User talk:MoviePropMaster2008 (Archive): Difference between revisions
User talk:MoviePropMaster2008 (Archive): Difference between revisions - Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
User talk:MoviePropMaster2008 (Archive): Difference between revisions
When I click on the MP5A2, the picture looks like a smaller JPG blown up to a larger size with not a lot of detail. When I click to make it a larger image, the weapon looks the same, but has a much darker appearance and a lot more detail. I see NO logo on either picture. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] 13:32, 26 August 2011 (CDT)
When I click on the MP5A2, the picture looks like a smaller JPG blown up to a larger size with not a lot of detail. When I click to make it a larger image, the weapon looks the same, but has a much darker appearance and a lot more detail. I see NO logo on either picture. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] 13:32, 26 August 2011 (CDT)
This is what I see when I first click the MP5 pic:
[[File:Btest 01.jpg|thumb|none|700px]]
This is what I see when I then click it to full res:
[[File:Btest 02.jpg|thumb|none|700px]]
Now when I use it in a page and change the res to 401px, I see the new uploaded pic with the IMFDB logo. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] 17:36, 26 August 2011 (CDT)
Revision as of 22:36, 26 August 2011
Most of my uploaded firearms pics were photographed by me and thus offered for use by IMFDB with my permission.
BTW: Please IDENTIFY yourself when you leave a message. I shouldn't have to sleuth your identity through the Wiki/History page to figure out who asked what. ;) Thanks.
I am copying this announcement from my User Page. So if you want a photo of a specific gun, don't ask me. I photograph what I can, when I can. Any new requests will be deleted and not answered. Thanks. MPM2008
NEW RULE
I appreciate input and questions from new members. But new members SHOULD list their age and what country they are from. It really helps me formulate an appropriate response. I don't want to sound like a jerk when I assume that you're an adult and you're an American, when and if you are not. Thanks for your cooperation
Please...
...specify on discussion page where dou you think spoilers unavoidable in Le Samouraï? I tried not to post any unavoidable spoilers as hard as possible. Thanks. --Kloga 17:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
US Navy Mark 12 MOD X Special Purpose Rifle
Hi I was referred by MT2008 that you may have access to a MK 12 SPR or a similar weapon. If you have access to an image to add to the Mk 12 SPR section of the M16 page that would be appreciated. The current image has a watermark and is a graphic from somewhere and probably copyrighted so It would be cool if that image could be replaced. thanks, -User:AdAstra2009
Well thanks for looking into it, I appreciate it -User:AdAstra2009
Check with Mike he has them in inventory. -Steve 06:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
J.C. Higgins
If Sears Robuck was the company that sold the various models (despite who made them) and just changed the name of the model to reflect the changing times then I say go with Sears & Robuck. The way I see it it's no different then all the 38 caliber K frame revolvers S&W used to make. Despite all the different model numbers S&W still comes first when naming them. So why not Sears? You probably know this, but Ted Williams was one of the first big name ball players to get an endorsement deal. Sears even had fitness equipment with his name on it. When I was in 6th grade (1979-1980) I had (still have parts of it now) a weight set with his name on it. Funny. Wonder how much hunting and shooting Ted actually did? Anyway I say yes. It will reduce the confusion and clutter if we group all those different shotguns under Sears & Robuck.--Jcordell 15:01, 21 July 2011 (CDT)
YES!
Thank you SO much! Those look great, and actually, they look very close to the ones that have appeared in quite a few movies. We can start replacing the two-tone SIG pics that we have on our other pages with these immediately! Again, I greatly appreciate you doing this for me. How will I ever repay you?
Out of curiosity, since you told me that they usually don't fit, how did you make them work together? -MT2008
Re: MP5A5
Huh, that's interesting. I always figured Stembridge would have mostly -90 series guns that looked just like those "MP5s" that appear in so many productions they've rented to. Any idea why those HK94s were never converted further to make them look like more realistic MP5s? As my Air Force One page shows, Stembridge basically left those guns as-is well into the 1990s.
Thanks for the MP5A5 picture...I was actually close to replacing it myself (albeit with something from a Google image search). And yes, I'm sure more people than me appreciate them! At least, I hope so. You're pretty much the most important person we've got when it comes to gun images. I mean, how many sites out there get to have pictures of the same prop weapons used in many films?
Thanks for the new pictures
You've uploaded a lot of good pictures recently...I especially like the S&W 4506 and the SIG P220 Sport (is that the one from Cinema Weaponry that's appeared in several movies?) I thought of taking a picture of my own personal 4506 for a while, but gave up because I knew I couldn't take one as good as what you could do. -MT2008
Thanks for the pics, they are great- Beeteles
One other thing...
I know I keep asking for stuff from you lately, but this time it's talk only.
I just finished working on the Air Force One page for this site. That movie features some type of short-barreled AK which looks just like the one from True Lies. Here's a picture:
The next time you talk to Harry Lu, would you mind asking him what these guns are and who owns them (Stembridge?) Thanks! -MT2008
Re:
The new pictures are really cool, as usual. I especially love the M16A1 with A2 handguards picture, because there are a lot of Hollywood movies featuring guns with that config, and it's great that we now have a picture to prove to our visitors how you sneaky armorers have deceived so many of us common folk action movie fans with those fake M16A2s! Haha, just kidding. Anyway, how did you get your hands on a Diemaco? Remember Al Vrkljan, the Canadian armorer who helped me out on The Incredible Hulk (2008)? He told me that Diemaco/Colt Canada wouldn't sell any of their guns to his company or any civilian companies, so where did it come from?
Also, you brought up an interesting point on the American Gun (2006) page...as an armorer who works in the film industry, how do you feel about the anti-gun attitudes that seem so prevalent in Hollywood? Does it ever frustrate you and make you not want to rent your guns out to people who are so overtly anti-RKBA? I've always wondered how armorers feel about the people they work with.
Appreciate the effort on the Type 84 and two-tone P226 pics. Whenever you get a chance!
Oh, yes, and one other request...
I have another request, this one a bit more unusual. I recently did a page for 2 Fast 2 Furious, which features a two-tone SIG P226 of West German manufacture that has a stainless frame and a regular black slide and barrel. It looks like the armorer just combined two existing guns to make it (since the two-tone P226s usually have black frame and stainless slide), and I'd love to have a picture of something identical for my page. So if you ever get out those two P226s that you photographed for IMFDB back in June, do you mind combining this:
...and then taking a picture of it for me? Also, if you put the slide and barrel from the stainless P226 on the frame of the black P226, you'd have a gun identical to the one from Face/Off which we could use for that page.
Now THAT is news to me. I'm really surprised...finishes really make the fit of the parts THAT difficult? Wow. I don't think the gun above is a factory job because the two-tone P226s that SIG has sold are always black frame and stainless slide, not the other way around. Do you by chance know who supplied the weapons for 2 Fast 2 Furious?
That's cool if you can get a picture of a Chinese Tokarev. Later. -MT2008
Re:Re:Sahara
As far as the source goes, I believe Crowntower Limited supplied the weapons that were used in Sahara. I say that based on a couple of deductions: Sascha Robey was one of the armorers who worked on Casino Royale as well as Sahara, Crowntower is listed in the credits of Casino Royale (but not Sahara) as the weapons supplier, and finally, if you look at our Casino Royale page, the AKs in that film top look identical to the one in Sahara that we were talking about. Perhaps this Sascha Robey rented the same guns for two films.
It's kinda strange, though...I wouldn't have figured British armorers would use civilian AK variants that were essentially geared towards the U.S. firearms market.
RE:
First of all, cheers for the update on the Type 84 picture. There's no hurry; I understand if it takes a while to get the appropriate mags (since obviously, a Type 84 doesn't look very different from a Type 56 without them).
Second, while I don't speak for everyone on here, I can say that I personally do not have any problem with you replacing pictures of guns on this site (even those that I uploaded) with any that you took. Nor do I see why anyone else would. The only reason I can imagine anyone getting offended would be if they went to the same effort you do to get the guns and photograph them on their own. But pretty much everyone else on here just uploads pictures they copied from other gun sites, in some cases airsoft web sites (like that picture we used to have of the SP89, which was just an airsoft MP5K fitted with an SP89 handguard from DenTrinity; terrible!). And it doesn't take much time or effort to copy and upload someone else's work.
Additionally, your gun photos are obviously of superior quality to anything else on here, and they're of guns that have actually appeared in movies (possibly the same movies as the pages they're on), so as far as I am concerned, there really isn't any reason why we can't replace any existing photos of guns with the ones you've taken. In fact, I would encourage you to not be so timid in the future when it comes to replacing photos. If you want an example of what I mean by this, take a look at the Armalite AR-18 page. Your AR-18 picture is way better than any of those on the page, so I don't see any reason why you can't just remove some of the others (maybe keep ONE of the other photos of the gun with the scope, and even that could be replaced if you took an equivalent picture).
One thing I will point out, though: I have sometimes used pictures on my pages that are from the web site of Rick Washburn's company Weapons Specialists, Inc. (http://www.weaponspecialists.com/index.php). They provided the guns for I Am Legend, so the page for that movie now features pictures of the guns used in the film that I copied and uploaded from them (including the tan-framed Mark 23). In cases like that, I'd prefer those particular photos stay up (you'll know them because I always provide links and info mentioning where they're from) because they feature the actual movie guns, and they're decent quality. Besides that, I don't have any problem with you replacing any and all photos of guns on this site with yours.
Chinese Type 56
First of all, I GREATLY appreciate the photo you took of one of the Goldeneye AKs for me. I didn't know you had access to any British armories?
However, I have one question: Do you think it's really appropriate to classify the Chinese Type 56 rifles with stamped receivers as "AK-47" and "AKS-47" clones, as opposed to AKM/AKMS derivatives? I realize that the Type 56s with stamped receivers lack just about all of the other features of the AKMs (including the muzzle break, ribbed receiver cover, rate reducer, grip rails, narrower front sight, etc.), but I've usually heard them described as AKM copies simply to distinguish them from the earlier milled-receiver versions. I know this is an over-simplification of sorts because the Type 56s aren't really orthodox AK-47s or AKMs (they're more like a weird hybrid version), but I figured it would be more appropriate.
Well, I would say I know the differences between the two. I must point out that I own a Chinese AK (mine was imported by Golden State Arms and simply has 'AK47S 7.62x39mm - Made in China' stamped on the receiver). I was simply curious whether the presence of a stamped receiver on the Type 56 made it worthy of being designated an AKM variant or not.
Personally, I think the best bet might be to literally just create a new sub-entry for the Type 56 under the AK-47 page and then we can focus on finding any and all movies that feature the Type 56 and putting them under there. This would reflect best the fact that the Type 56 is sort of a weird hybrid AK-47/AKM with distinctly Chinese characteristics (such as the hooded front sight), which most other AK derivatives (like the Maadis) don't have.
Haha, no offense taken, just wanted you to know I'm not a complete newbie when it comes to AKs, though obviously you completely blow me out of the water. Anyway, I would definitely appreciate the Type 84 pic whenever you get a chance. Not sure if there's anything else I need at the moment...but I would strongly encourage you to just take pictures of whatever you can get your hands on. As I've said, it's really great that we have you because this site is full of pictures that are copied from sites like world.guns.ru or (in some cases) AIRSOFT websites (i.e. the SP89 picture that we used to have before I replaced it).
BTW, these are some incredible pics you've gotten us lately, moreso than usual. How on earth did you get that Romanian AIMS from "44 Minutes"? Do you know Thell Reed, too? Also, I'm going to do a LITTLE bit of additional work on the Type 56 entry, and I think I'm also gonna ditch the AKS-47 one for now (simply because there don't seem to be any movies I'm aware of that have actual milled-receiver Russian AKS-47s or close copies) and move all the Type 56-1 entires down. If you disagree, you can revert (or partially modify) the edits and I won't mind. Also, good work on the RPG-7 article getting the Type 69 mentioned (it's something I wanted to do myself - mostly because "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" also has a Type 69).
Re: Editing Dogs of War
Thanks for the info. I've seen those guns in a whole bunch of movies and I always wondered what they were, who made them, and why. I think they've also appeared in a couple episodes of The A-Team and a Chuck Norris movie or two.
I have some great screenshots of the fake Uzis which I took for my Raw Deal page (I've been meaning to work on it for ages, but so far, I just never have managed to get around to it). Here they are:
Sorry for the mixup. Feel free to replace the image with a better one if you have one handy. It's good to have a professional armourer on the site to help out, you've been doing some good work so far. Orca1 9904 10:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Orca1_9904
Sure, you can re-post the CZ99 pic. It isn't "mine"; I took it from world.guns.ru, which is where many of the photographs of guns on this site come from (as you can imagine, that's why I'm happy to have someone like you who is willing to give us original photos, especially when they're of actual movie guns)
Hey
Hey MoviePropMaster, I'm Alienqueen11, and I seen the images you have uploaded, and they're great. I also want to know if you can do me a favor, if you can upload a picture of a Remington 870 with Ghost Ring Sights and a High Capacity Tube like the one in the screenshot below for the Dawn of the Dead (2004) page, I would greatly appreciate it, and great work so far.
Thanks for complitementing my knowledge on guns, I also reverted a version of one of your MP5 pictures because someone copied over it with an airsoft image, I really wish some people would checked the thing while they're uploading an image to make sure the name isn't already used to avoid mistakes like this. And once again, thanks for your contributions and keep up the good work. Alienqueen11.
Heartbreak Ridge M16's
I just saw Heartbreak Ridge on TV this afternoon, and all the M16's I saw on-screen were the A1 variant, complete with bolt-forward assist buttons at the rear of the upper recievers. Even saw one fitted with an M203 grenade launcher used by one of the Recon Marines under Gunnery Sergeant Highway's command.
Orca1 9904 08:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Orca1_9904
- He might want to look at my page and see they weren't all M16A1s.
Question
Gunmaster45: Hi, I was just wondering how is it you take a picture of a gun and get a perfectly white clear background? What method is used to get that effect? My other question is that on the Hollow Point page I made recently, did I get the AK varient right? I figured I'd ask you as you seem to be the AK pro on the site. Thanks.
(My list of pages is on my profile if you feel like checking any of my other work as well.)
M14 rifle
I've noticed that the M14 and M21 rifle pictures on this site aren't really that great, is there any chance you could take some good shots? The pictures now are blurry, or black and white.
37mm Launcher
Thanks for fixing up that page, I was told by MT2008 it was a Colt Launcher, I guess it was a Cobray. Finding the pictures of them was probably the hardest thing on the page. Do you think we should keep the M203 to launcher comparison picture or is it irrelevant? -GM
I built the colt launcher page based on what MT said, but your input greatly helped it. It's a shame taking professional pictures is so complex. The best I have is photoshop and an erase brush. I have a Norinco Type 54 pistol and I wanted to put pictures of it on the site soon. I'm not bad with editing, it should come out okay. I just need to find the time to do it. The M14 rifle pics came out great, let me know if you get your hands on an M21. I'll have plenty of films to be corrected in the future, my to do list touches the sky. One or two every friday or saturday. Stay cool. -GM
Bren 10 "Peregrine Falcon"
Here's a tricky task, do you think you could find a Bren 10 "Peregrine Falcon"? Aparently it is what John Practice uses in Last Action Hero according to user input, and I can't find a good picture of it. Until I do find a good picture, I'll have to keep my horrible AR-24 picture I had on their before. If it isn't a Bren 10 PF, I'd assume you of all people would shoot me straight.
Error creating thumbnail: File missingThis is the picture of him with the Bren 10 "Peregrine Falcon". His is a tutone model, but I'm not that picky. If both can be had, it would make a nice page in the Bren 10 gun section.
M1911/M1911A1
I apoligize for asking one more thing of you, but the M1911 and M1911A1 pistols are infamous works of art in the firearms world, commonly used in films. We got a repro M1911 picture (modernized), a Springfield M1911A1 (when Colt M1911A1 is the genuine picture desired), another M1911A1 with pachmyr grips (better than springfield, but see how it sticks out on Platoon? It's too modern) So is their any chance you could find a genuine (or prefered, an authentic reproduction) of a Colt M1911 and Colt M1911A1 to snap some shots of, that would be awesome. I trust you know them apart, your a pro. Thanks. Good luck. -GM
Re:Last Action Hero
I saw Last Action Hero when I was young and loved it. Now, it is still one of my favorites. I like how it makes fun of action movies, by showing how Arnold can fire a billion rounds from a Desert Eagle and cars just explode for no reason. I'll fix those problems you mentioned. Your saying they are more likely civilian TEC-9s instead of TEC-DC9's? What physical traits help determine this, just the sling? And they were firing full-auto so they were probably converted.
Hi!
Still no replacement grip for the M70?
Shame, it looks strange with that grip - I'm used to seeing them on M76s and M72s... which reminds me: about that mystery long barreled AK - I know that Crvena Zastava makes under-folder RPKs, namely the M72A (7.62 - based on M70), and the M90A (5.56 - based on an assault rifle of the same designation). The under-folder RPKs (those with an "A") have removable bipods (the standard, solid-stock ones have fixed), so w/ the folding stocks and w/o bipods they would look like those mystery AKs, no? Also, one more improtant fact: unlike the Yugo AKs (which have 3 holes), the Yugo RPKs have TWO holes in the forward grip (like the original AKs). http://pookieweb.dyndns.org:61129/Yugo/pics/m72a.jpg
I hope this was hepful, keep up the good work!
Request
I'm sorry to ask, but if you get the chance, can you upload a Beretta M92FS? I know the ones on the site are already good enough, but I want to see how great one by you would be. I know you're already busy, so don't do it if you're too busy, and if you can't upload it, it's okay. Anyway, welcome back, the new pictures for the M16 and M14 are great. Alienqueen11
RE:870
I think you're right about the Mossberg sights on the 870, they seem to match those on the Mossberg more then anything.
Here the picture I had on the page when I thought his shotgun was a Mossberg 500:
Hope this helps, and thanks for the favor, I appreciate it. Alienqueen11
Done
Don't worry, he won't be able to edit again, if it happens again, I'll be sure to make so only registered users can edit the Commando page. Alienqueen11
Karabiner 98k sniper rifle
I recently noticed while working on the Saving Private Ryan page that we have no sniper rifle varient Kar98k rifle pic. I've noticed you Enemy at the Gates page is in need of this picture as well too. I apoligize for adding yet another gun to your to-do list but just let me know if you find one. -GM45
Re: FINALLY
Excellent! I already have a use for the 870 folder, too - just put it on the RoboCop page (which features an identical weapon). And thanks for the UMP-45 and the Gen 2 Glock-17 as well! There are so many movies that feature Gen 2 Glocks, yet all we have is that stock picture of a Gen 3. When I get back to my place later today, I'm going to start using your Glock in every movie page that features such a gun.
Also...that AR15A2 you photographed; can we consider it an M16A2? Is it converted to auto or burst? We really need a good M16A2 picture, because the one that appears throughout the site is yet another crappy airsoft picture.
RE:
Hmmm, I'll have to see. There's lots of loose women and great beer over here in Texas that I might be able to offer you, but the gold's gonna be hard to come by! Haha.
Thanks yet AGAIN for the improved two-tone P226 picture. Weirdly enough, I completely failed to notice that the one in Face/Off had a silver hammer until you pointed it out. But it's great that you have a better eye for detail than I do, and moreso that you corrected it. And, of course, thank you for answering my questions about movie guns to the best of your ability. I think your idea for a 12-gauge pump page is perfectly useful, though I must point out that if it can't be categorized, it's gonna be hard for other users to find it. In order to make sure people see it, please add links to it on pages for the shotguns it distinguishes from each other. That would be the best way to make sure your word gets out.
Hope you don't mind, but I've already shown your SIG pics on SIGforum.com to draw attention to our site. I'd show your H&K pictures on HKPRO forum (where I also post), too, if their forum wasn't down every other minute. I dunno if you post on any other gun-related boards, but if you do, show off your pics and point folks to IMFDB. The more attention, the better. We've already got 55,000 views from the Heat page (which features your P220 and M16A1 pictures, among others), so spread the word and more people will discover the beauty of IMFDB with its original movie gun pictures, taken by an actual movie armorer!
Oh, yeah, and I will respond to the topic of vandals on Bunni's talk page shortly. -MT2008
Re:Dibbs
Feel free, one less thing for me to do. I only ask that you keep the bow and knife on the page so it fits the other two. I'll eventually add them to Rambo (2008) so that one fits as well. If anything I'll likely just add some shots like I tend to do. Thanks for asking me and not just doing it. Can't wait to see it. -GM45
Almost forgot, MT2008 may have asked already but we really need a Poly Tech Legend AK pic.
Nope, I forgot, too! Yeah, it wouldn't be a bad idea. I've been looking for one on Google image search, but no go on any good ones. Also, speaking of AKs (and here I go again making your request list longer), a new AKM pic would be nice. Not to sound unappreciative, but I tend to shy away from the one you took just because the red stock looks out-of-place and ugly, plus the magazine is the plastic type rather than the ribbed type. If you can get a picture of one of the Maadi AKMs with the right stock, plus a metal ribbed-style mag (which is more the "classic" style, if you will)...great. If not, no worries. -MT2008
Re:Casino Royale
Oh, yeah, and one other thing: I never thanked you for getting that Australian Automatic Arms carbine picture for The Matrix page. So...thanks! -MT2008
DotD 870
I don't mean to bug you, but did you have any luck with the Dawn of the Dead Remington 870, and did the message I sent you about about the sights help at all, please let me know. Also excellent work lately, The new Mossberg 500 and Remington 870 pictures are great, and so are the many other pictures you uploaded lately, I really like the two tone Sig P226s you got for MT2008, those are one of kind. Good luck, and keep up the good work.--Alienqueen11 03:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Kelly's Heroes
I was aware they were using FN BAR type D 8mm guns instead of american .30-06 BARs but I didn't know they were using the wrong mag pouches. Thanks for the info. -GM45
Re:M1911 pistols
The 1911 pictures are absolute perfection. The M1911 from 1913 looks great. I have one from 1913 too and yours puts mine to shame. Thanks very much. -GM45
And thanks for the P38, too! Feel free to just delete the one that's been on the P38 already, and insert your image into any and all movie pages featuring P38s. I've been replacing old gun images on many pages with your new gun images (i.e. the Glock you uploaded earlier in the week). -MT2008
Re: Beretta M92FS
It looks excellent, I don't mind an American made Beretta, an Italian made one isn't too different, is it? If you come across an Italian one in the future, you can upload that, but you don't have to, like I said, I like the new one as it is. Thank you soo much for the favor, you never disappoint.--Alienqueen11 23:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the USP!
I was thinking of asking you for a USP pic, but figured I should hold off on it, just to prevent you from getting bogged down.
As you can tell, we're embarking on a campaign to replace any and all older images of guns taken from other sites, with the pictures you've uploaded. I'm also curious...what would you think of a page dedicated to explaining the importance of your gun images to new users of the site, and featuring examples of your work? It would be linked from the main page. -MT2008
Should cartoons be allowed?
I want to know if it is either no one cares about the fact that cartoons like Family Guy, The Simpsons, American Dad, and recently South Park had been allowed to this site. I have don't think these pages should exist because do you think about the rare guns that appears on those shows and wonder what they are? Cause I sure don't. I'm too busy laughing my ass off to how funny these series are, not wondering if the shotgun Homer used in the Zombie episode was a Winchester Model 1887 or that it never appeared in any other episode following. I don't care and I dont think anyone else should care. We're getting cartoon fanboys that thinks just because Family Guy has an episode where Stewie has a closet full of look alike guns, means we should write a page about them. Those guns are not the point of the show and the artist that drew them obviously didn't take much consideration for them or mention. I think Family Guy, The Simpsons, American Dad, and South Park be removed at once. None of them deserve to be on this site. And whoever puts them here doesn't respect this site enough.
That's a little harsh. I added some of the info on those pages, thank you. I was eventually going to do the South Park movie, because it does in fact have some pretty obvious guns in it. Personally I think they shouldn't be removed but if they are to stay, someone should take the time to screencap them and show us what they are talking about. -GM45
Reign of Fire
I just finished screencapping Reign of Fire and before I upload them on the page, I wanted to see if you knew what this gun is. Based on what I see I'm assuming it is a .577 Nitro Tyrannosaurus Rex rifle built personally by the Mauser company's greatest gunsmiths based on the Mauser rifle type extractor/bolt release and the Mauser style firing pin striker seen on the gun. At first I thought it was a Model 70 or a Mauser sporterized and then they show what big ass rounds he loads in it so now I just don't know. I figured of all, you'd likely know best. Also, if it is a T-rex rifle, I'd likely need a picture of it because as usual, the internet sucks for finding gun pics. I know this gun is rare but so is the .600 Nitro double barreled rifle, but that is seen in The Lost World: Jurassic Park despite that. I'm not expecting a picture from you because I know how rare and expensive it is but I figured if it ever came up I could count on you.
What I meant is that I want to make sure people on this site see how thorough you are, and how accurately you match guns to requests. Remember that AR15 Sporter that you visually modified to look like an XM177 from The Dogs of War? Or the two SIG P226s you made to look the ones in Face/Off and Bad Boys II? Those are the kinds of gun pics that I want to show off to new folks. What I would do is just make a page that briefly explains your contributions, and then shows guns you've photographed and how close they are to those in the movies. This is an unformed idea, I admit, but basically, I want people browsing this sight to understand (1.) That your images are exclusive to IMFDB, and (2.) That they're basically close representations of what those users have seen in movies. I know I'm not being terribly articulate, but do you understand what I mean?
And don't worry about replacing previous pics with your pics. The rest of us will continue to do that for you, as we've been doing. So far, we've pretty much replaced all of the old M16s, M4s, Berettas, Glocks, Kar98s, MP40s, etc. with your guns. I think I'm gonna start putting your USP pic on our pages, too (except those that feature the larger .45 variant of the USP, like Collateral).-MT2008
AK-47 recognition page
Now that you've made a Shotgun page, why not make an AK page to tell a Norinco from a Maadi from a genuine, from a poly tech, etc.
Also, maybe an M16 page for slab sides, A1s, A2s, etc.
It would probably help the users out a lot. I'm sure the shotgun page did. Personally, I have trouble telling a Norinco Type 56 aside from its hooded sight. Perhaps a couple of close ups of sight placement, recievers and all that will make me a more efficient I.Der. -GM45
Dawn of the Dead
Hey, MPM2008, I uploaded some more shots of Ving Rhames' shotgun in Dawn of the Dead (2004) if you want to take a look, it's in the Custom Remington 870 section of the page. Thanks in advance.--Alienqueen11 03:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Hey, MPM2008, do you want me to put protections on your images so no one can revert them if they've been upload over with images from the internet in the past, or upload over them? I'm asking this because some user keeps uploading a crappy picture from the internet over your H&K USP40 image. And if you want, I could ask Bunni to make you a mod or I can take the protections off them whenever you want to edit them or upload a new version of them. Let me know what you want to do.--Alienqueen11 20:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Update: I protected all your images, and I also asked Bunni to make you an adminstrator so you can upload new versions of or revert them if want. If you not made an admin right away, just tell me what image you want to access, and I'll unlock it for you. I'm sorry I had to do this, but I wanted to prevent idiots like the guy who kept uploading over your H&K USP40 from changing your pictures, and I promise, if I ever get the ability to block users back, I will undo the protections. See you soon and good luck.--Alienqueen11 03:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Made you a mod, enjoy. WikiSysop 22:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Response
Thanks, I will always make sure your images stay the way they are. And I didn't understand that user either, I told him politely a bunch of times to stop, but he wouldn't listen. What really intrigues me most is how somebody could prefer a crappy image they probably found on Google Images over an excellent well photographed image such as yours. As for being a mod, congratulations, but I most warn you that the block function is not working at this time, but Bunni is trying his best to fix it, but you will be able to delete any pages or images you don't want, and you will also be able to protect pages. And if we ever get the ability to block back, that one user is going to be the first on my list.--Alienqueen11 02:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
As for the 870, take as much time as you need to, I'm sure it'll be worth the wait when it's uploaded. I will also have more requests in the future, but I won't bother you with them right now. And I also I have a question, I read your new project pictures thing on your user page, and when you say 870 riot configurations, do mean Remington 870s similar in appearence to the one seen in Walking Tall? Thanks, and good luck, I can't wait to see any future images you upload.--Alienqueen11 02:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Update- MPM2008, you are now able to block vandals.
Re:Special page
Well, that's fine. But now that you're a mod and your images can be protected, I don't think there's much to worry about. I also think it would just be cool if new users understood right off the bat that IMFDB has essentially its own movie armorer. -MT2008
Other Request
Hey, MPM2008, whenever you get the chance, is there a possiblity you can get me a Beretta 92FS Inox or Stainless model of the Beretta 92FS? Thanks in advance. Also, good work with your recent images, I really like the new Walther P99, I was going to ask for one, but you thought about it before I did. Keep up the great work.--Alienqueen11 21:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Sin City Yellow Bastard's custom 92FS
YB's Beretta 92FS in Sin City is a unique blend of a factory black and an Inox model, similair to SIG-Sauer used in 2 fast 2 furious. Since AQ11 just asked for an Inox, if you get your hands on one, do yuo think you could mix the two together. This is the gun in the movie.
Thanks. Take your time on the Ultimax, it isn't a big deal right now. Wiki just made me an Admin. so I'm feeling pretty damn special right now. I'm going to get the Punisher (2004) on today, than I'm finally back on track with my original list. -GM45
"Non Guns"
I just made a page for the "Non Guns", and I'm curious to know what you think of it. I don't know a whole lot about them besides what I've read online, whereas I imagine you've probably got some experience with them, since I've heard many armorers rent them for scenes where blanks are unsafe. Any thoughts? Would say the summary I've done at the top of the page is a pretty good description of what they do?
Haha, trust me, I hear you on the "fugly" part. I cringe every time I spot a Non Gun in a movie or TV show, because they're soooooo fake-looking and too many idiot directors don't even think to film them at angles/lighting conditions where it won't be so obvious what they are. But, like you've said, our goal here is to be educational and informative, and no matter how crappy Non Guns might look, they are still important to the topic of guns in cinema, and that's what we're here for. :) The images are from Weapons Specialists' web site, which apparently subrents them; ISS has their own pictures, but I prefer Weapons Specialists' because theirs don't have the measuring tape above the gun.
Sorry to hear you've been sick, but don't worry...you never have to apologize for anything. I really like the idea of your "Hello IMFDB!" card and think it would be great for our site. I will, of course, not demand it or anything, but it would be awesome if we had something like that. I agree with the idea of using the IMFDB logo, though if I can think of anything else, I'll tell you. As usual, thanks for all the work you've been doing (for us AND Hollywood), and thanks for the kind words on my Non Guns page. -MT2008
2nd-Gen Glock 23
Hey, I was wondering if you could possibly provide an image of a 2nd-Generation Glock 23 for the article on The Fugitive, since the image for that weapon on the page is of a 3rd-Generation model with accessory rails on the frame as opposed to the smooth-framed 2nd-Generation model seen in the screenshots? I already edited the Glock 22 section similarly for that article and the sequel U.S. Marshals, and was wondering if you could help me out with that one image so I don't have to chase down an image on Google. Thanks in advance. Orca1 9904 08:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Orca1_9904
I asked for Second-Generation Glocks, those are 3rd generation (note the accessory rails at the front of the frame). Seeing as someone identified the compact Glock model in the film in question as a Glock 19 it's something of a moot point now. However, a 2nd-Generation Glock 19 image would be appreciated as there's none available here yet and there's several pages here that could benefit from an image of that weapon. Orca1 9904 07:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Orca1_9904
Get Well Soon
Hey MPM2008, I heard you were sick so I wanted to stop by and say get well soon.--Alienqueen11 20:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
My man!
Awesome! The AKM and Type 84 look great; they're just what we needed. It's weird that I haven't been able to find a good picture of a standard fixed-stock Type 84 anywhere; yours might just be one of the best pics of this gun on the entire 'net right now. Question...is the AKM a Maadi, or is some other make? I would like to edit the entry on the AK-47 page to say if it is or not.
I will start phasing out the old pictures and replacing them, although it seems you guys have a head start on me. And thanks for the other new pictures as well - love that new PSG-1, the Uzi Carbine, and of course the "plain" 870 police (which, like you said, was something we REALLY needed). I'm also glad to see you're better, too. Take care. -MT2008 15:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
(BTW...dunno if you've noticed, but I only discovered this recently; if you hit the " ~ " key four times, it signs your posts automatically so that you don't have to type out your username. I've been using Wikis for several years now and I only just figured that out. Alienqueen discovered this long before I did, but just a heads-up.)
Great work
Thanks for the police 870, it looks excellent. we really needed a standard since so many of the 870s on the site look like that. I'll be sure to replace all the 870s that need to be replaced with that. And also, I'm glad to hear you got better.--Alienqueen11 18:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Pics
Hi,
First of all, thanks yet again for the new pics! The SR9s are nice, but...I had no idea that some SR9s in movies are actually converted from HK91s? If that's the case, then by all means, you should still go ahead and put down those pics under the SR9 section of the G3 page. But does this also mean that the SR9(T) from The Replacement Killers is one of these guns? Again, this is just a huge revelation for me. I still see no reason to put them under the HK91 entry, simply because if they're meant to be SR9s, just as the converted HK94s are meant to be MP5s, then I think it's appropriate to label them as such.
And, thanks for the Type 56 that looks like the Goldeneye ones. If you want to shoot it again with the regular non-blued bolt carrier, that's fine by me. However, I should also point out that the ones in Goldeneye also have red bakelite magazines, so you might wanna give it one of those, too. Then, you'll have something identical to the Goldeneye "AKS-74s". But I will still use the picture you have in the meantime. -MT2008 00:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm. Yeah, I guess I figured when I noticed the trigger, but I wasn't sure if the gun from The Replacement Killers was genuine or not. Was this sort of thing done because real SR9s were too expensive? I figured since the SR9 used to be a readily available civilian "assault rifle", armorers would use it.
However, if your guns are a fairly accurate representation of the SR9s that have appeared in movies, then it's better that you've given us images of these particular guns. I agree with you that our goal should be to have the most accurate representations of movie guns possible, and since you're an armorer, we can anticipate that yours represent what movies use.-MT2008 04:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
only 125 TCs were imported into the entire USA and only 100 T models
Wow, it was really that few? OK, that explains everything. I had no idea they were so rare to begin with. Even HKPRO, which has import data for most of the -90 series guns, didn't have that info. Thanks for those numbers.
Like I've said, I think this means it's good that we have the pics you've taken because they are a very accurate representation of the SR9s actually used in movies. I would recommend you do one of those "Movie Armorer's Notes" in the SR9 section of the G3 page, just like you did for the Colt Commando section on the M16 page, explaining what you've told me. Hope it doesn't bother you that we're unmasking all of the various tricks that you armorers have been using over the years to convince moviegoers they're seeing one gun when it's actually another! -MT2008 02:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Re: SR9
I think part of the problem is that there just aren't enough people who take Wikis in general seriously. As far as HK aficionados go, one of my pet peeves is that way too many of them I meet are way too arrogant towards non-HK owners for not being able to appreciate the "Teutonic superiority" (as Larry Correia put it) of HK weapons. Sorry to say that I dunno if you can please some of them no matter what you do. :)
Personally, I accept that there's some stuff that even Hollywood's people have to do in order to make our movie experience satisfactory. Like when we were talking about the Jarhead Abrams tanks...it's a necessary evil for Hollywood vehicle wranglers to dress up an English Centurion to look like an M1A1 simply because unless you're Spielberg, it's very hard to get the DoD to lend you a real one for a show. And likewise, in 1984, it was not possible to get real Soviet AKMs, RPG-7s, and DShKs, so the Stembridge armorers had to find the next best thing. But I also enjoy uncovering these tricks simply because I'm an enthusiast of firearms and military equipment in general, so I always like seeing how Hollywood's people think on the fly in adverse circumstances. There's an art to it, no? -MT2008 02:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction on the Four Brothers' HK33, it was labeled as a HK41 long before I started editing the page, I just took the screenshot. And also, thanks for the new images, I'm putting up the new M16A2 on pages right now.--Alienqueen11 19:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
No problem, every image you upload is great. I also have a question, how do you get the pictures so perfect? Because your gun images are probably some of the best, if not the best gun images I ever seen on the internet. And yea, your new camera really does make a difference, the new versions of the images look great. Anyway, good job on your recent images, and can't wait to see your future M16s.--Alienqueen11 20:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I see, you put alot of effort into your images and that's exactly what makes them great. I agree that alot of gun sites have bad images, some gun books don't have the best pictures either. One problem with some sites is that they also don't use the best examples, like they'll have a picture of gun but it'll have a whole bunch of modifications on it when the unmodified one is what's really needed, and I agree which should replace as many as the old images as possible. And I think visitors do notice your images because if you look at your Remington 870 Riot Model's file page, it has almost 200 views anad it's only been there since Sunday. And good work on the new M4, if you noticed, Hieloco (the user who kept trying to replace your images with "Net" Images) uploaded a version of the ColtM4 file with similar attachments, but yours beats his by by a long shot. And also is that the same M4 you mentioned on MT2008's talk page that the actor dropped? Just wondering.--Alienqueen11 21:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
re:M16A2
First of all, thanks so much for the new M16A2! The AR15 A2 picture was nice, too, but I just thought it'd be better to have the real deal, and it's nice that we have it now. AlienQueen's already been getting to work on replacing the old M16A2 with the new one, and I'll help out, too. The Luger is another image we needed - and the fact that it's from Hogan's Heroes is especially cool! As far as the HK91 goes, I didn't notice the shadow, but the new one is fine by me. There's only one that troubles - I think the newer Taurus 85 image is a bit fuzzier compared to the old one.
As far as future stuff goes, I have another recommendation. You know how we have an AR15 section under the M16 rifle page? I'd like to get some more un-modified, basic civvie AR15 variants on there, especially Colt Sporters, because I've seen them used in quite a few movies and TV shows that stand in for mil-spec M16s. We've already got an SP1 with an A2 hand guard that you took for the Heat page, but I think we should also have SP1s without the forward assist (both A1 and A2 forearms) and a carbine with a 16" barrel. What do you think? (Sadly, I have added more guns to your to-do list...inevitable.)
And yes, we definitely have some of the best gun pics on the 'Net thanks to you. I must admit I'm still smitten with the fact that Norinco Type 84 pics are basically non-existent in just about any gun image site around (even World Guns, which is usually pretty reliable)...except here. -MT2008 00:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Actually, one other thing occurred to me, something we need more than the Colt Sporter ARs...do you think you could get some pics of Thompson Submachine Guns? All of our Tommy images are jacked from elsewhere on the Net. It's about time they were replaced. Of course, I know we've already given you a ridiculous number of requests, so I won't bug you too much. Thanks. -MT2008 00:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Sergio Leone Trilogy
I finished the Leone Trilogy yesterday and I was wondering if you could I.D. the machine gun used in A Fistful of Dollars, someone said it was a fake but wasn't very specific. I figured if it was some type of fake movie gun, you'd know best.
Also, excellent Single Action Army picture, that's a beautiful gun. Care to tell me a little about the one you uploaded? Thanks. -GM
Good job on the Luger P08, it looks great. I don't think the finishes are a big deal, to tell you the truth, I don't even notice it. And it's cool that it was used in Hogan's Heroes, because not only is it a special gun, but someone's destined to make a Hogan's Heroes page eventually, and it will be of a great use when someone does. Keep up the great work.--Alienqueen11 01:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Speaking of LMS, his two .45s uniquely have diamond grips and I was wondering if you could take a special picture of A1s with diamond grips. I made a rough draft picture of what I had in mind.
Haha...whoops, you're right. I keep forgetting, but...when you upload a new version of an existing image, IMFDB doesn't instantly replace it. Instead, the old image goes fuzzy for a period of time (which seems to vary from hours to days; no clue why) before the new image replaces it. I saw your Taurus Mod 85 pic when it was in this fuzzy "transitional" phase and the thought slipped my mind that this happens. The filter from my brain to my mouth (or rather, my keyboard) doesn't work sometimes, I guess.
As far as the G3 page goes, it is unfortunate. One thing I find annoying about Wikis is that there's apparently no way to confine an image to a particular section of a page when you use the "align" code, so when we follow page conventions and force an image to shift left, right, or center, it totally fucks up the formatting if the images are bigger than the text (which is going to be common for guns that don't have very many movie appearances listed). The only thing you can do is just add lots of space in between each section manually so that the images fit into the section.
But I do agree with you on one thing...why do we need a regular sporter SR9 with the thumbhole stock? Have you seen a movie with one? Do you or any of your fellow armorers have any in stock? Better yet, is there any movie or TV show that would NEED some heavily neutered civilian version of a G3? I kinda doubt it, so I would say it doesn't make sense to include the image. -MT2008 06:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, I ditched the other two SR9 pics. Til we get movies with them (and I know I haven't heard of any yet), no point in having them on there.
Nice that you found those long-barreled AK folders. I'm pretty sure that Vollmer had at least one at sale (years ago, back when their sales site was still online), but they are quite rare in this country indeed. As far as the pics from World Guns go...it's a mix, just like here. Some of them are pics that the site's editors took themselves, others are jacked from other sites, and some are scanned from books or gun rags. I've usually just used them because (before us), they were one of the most comprehensive gun sites on the net. But I definitely think that because of you, IMFDB now has not only good movie gun images, but some of the best gun images, PERIOD.
Good luck on your current projects, and don't let those idiot Obama-supporting actors fuck up any more of your guns. -MT2008 00:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
The special page
Remember how a while ago I asked you if I could try making a page that explained to new IMFDB users just how significant it was that we have a movie armorer who photographs his company's guns for us? Well, I finally got around to trying it out. Here it is:
The title is kinda cheesy, I admit, but it was the best I could think of. The other issue is that I'm not always sure my facts are straight, so if you want to correct anything, go right ahead. And I realize this might be kind of a lame idea - but I just feel it's important for everyone to understand how important your work is to this site. What do you think? -MT2008 01:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, trust, I fully understand what you mean about wanting to remain anonymous. Even if you weren't a pro-RKBAer working in an industry that is hostile to gun ownership (and non-liberals in general), it would still be perfectly reasonable to want to remain anonymous. When you're a professional of any sort, working in any industry, you don't want to do post something on a web site under your own name that could get you in trouble. As far as the page goes, however, I don't think it should be too big a deal for your anonymity as long as you avoid giving us your name. It's mostly just a way for us to brag that we have someone who can provide us with such great pictures, and to make sure that our new users understand the significance of those pictures. :-) But if you really are uncomfortable with it, that's fine, too...I can ditch it. It took all of 15 minutes to make.
BTW, I dunno if you're OK telling me this or not (if not I understand), but are you a member of the American Entertainment Armorers' Association? I remember Dan Shea announcing its creation on a forum I used to visit, a couple years ago now. I understand that it was created specifically to address the threat from Cali's gun laws upon your businesses? -MT2008 01:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
More SAAs
Your Colt Peacemakers are great, my western pages greatly need them. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Be sure to check out Hellboy II: The Golden Army, I just finished it. -GM
Image use on WIkipedia?
Hi, I am an editor on the English Wikipedia. I came across this great site as it completes the media appearances lacking in our firearms pages. You've got some fantastic images of some obscure equipment in the idea configuration - that is, clear background and side profile shots. These would really help us illustrate some of our pages that are lacking in media content. Would you be kind enough to allow us to use these images on Wikipedia? We could upload them under an attribution license and provide a link to this Wiki in return. Kind regards, Koalorka from the WP:Firearms teams. 99.232.219.131 12:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Any chance of obtaining a response? I can be reached at koalora at rogers.com. 99.232.219.131 12:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
If you are hesitant or have any further questions regarding licensing, feel free to ask. Wikipedia is by principle an entirely non-profit organization as you are probably aware and we could not compensate you financially for the images. I do recognize that there was some considerable effort involved in collecting some of these rare specimens (still salivating over the CETME Ameli) and then setting up a studio with professional lighting, hardware etc. What we can offer to do is attribute you properly and generate additional traffic and awareness for this site and any other organization you specify (even the armory/studio that owns the firearms). If you agreed to have your images uploaded to our server, every one of them would be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license that requires the copyright holder to be properly credited every time the image is displayed, in either modified or unmodified form. The license does not impair or restrict your moral rights. Here is the license description. We can do a "test" image so to speak, upload an individual image to see if that satifies your expectations.
In other words, don't make me beg.. :D At least the Ameli, pretty please.
Regards.
To Koaloarka, I appreciate your kind words and gracious offer. As you can probably tell, I've been thinking about the offer. I'm obviously not jumping at the opportunity or else I would have communicated much earlier than now. I must assess what I've been trying to do for the last six months. Since I joined IMFDB I've been working extraordinarily hard to provide the site with exclusive gun images that are available nowhere else. Everyone here knows the hard work, time and $$ spent on trying to get the best quality images of the weapons available anywhere (on the net). And obviously I do it for the benefit of IMFDB. I'm torn by the upside of increased awareness to the site, but I am also not eagerly anticipating the inevitable diluting of the 'exclusivity' of IMFDB's images when they start showing up everywhere on the web.
Some background to my thinking - I would not have done the images for a simple firearms site. I probably would not have worked so hard for six months to get these types of images for a gun wiki. IMFDB's unique focus is that it mixes weapons and CINEMA, especially movie trivia and factoids which are not part of the 'regular gun owner's lexicon. That is the field I'm in, and I welcomed the idea of a place where I can contribute my experience and information (mostly 'lost' on the 'regular firearms crowd'). Many of my images are hybrid guns (M16a2s with A1 features or vice versa), or some of custom guns made for the movies (Custom Type 84s or AMD-65s), or weird combinations of uppers and lowers (like the M16 variants, or the 2 toned handguns,etc). which are not factory standards nor are they historically accurate. I remember once, when a firearms historian and enthusiast looked at some of my handguns (SIG P226s and USPs) and was wondering what was wrong with my barrels. He didn't fathom nor appreciate the fact that these were REAL movie guns. He was just disdainful that they were 'ruined' because of the customization needed for blank firing in movies. Anyway, I was toying with the possibility of a limit release of images with a specific watermark or copyright. I was thinking of using similar but not identical images (but still identifying IMFDB.org as the source of the image) with a translucent copyright logo, but that would take some time. But I have not decided yet and I hope you understand my reluctance at this time. I've only been doing this for six months and I don't think I'm ready right now to 'give away' the work I've done when I'm not complete updating the gun images for IMFDB. Perhaps when I've stopped or retired from getting gun pics for IMFDB ....
Now there are some sites who already have MY permission to use some MY images, but each one of those entities provided weapons to be photographed, so they helped me personally with the photography itself. (some FFLs, a few collector friends, other armorers, etc.) So you might see a recognizable shot somewhere else, but they will be watermarked and copyrighted as license granted to that entity.
Anyway I'm still thinking about it. Give me a little time. I am also conferring with other Administrators of IMFDB and I welcome their input. Ultimately, I will have to make some sort of decision (as the original photographer and copyright holder) as to where I wish to release the rights. Hope that helps.
I agree with what you say about how many people in the gun-owning community aren't going to appreciate what these guns are if they see them on any random gun site. Like, who the hell is going to understand that in Hollywood, HK91s are converted to look like SR9s, or AR15 SP1 carbines converted to look like XM177s? However, one thing I think you should consider is that some of the guns you've photographed are hard to find pictures of, and your pictures represent not only good "movie gun" images, but good gun images, period. The Type 84 pics you've taken are a very good example, because like I said earlier, good pics of the Type 84 seem extraordinarily hard to come by. The new FG42 image is also one that I think can be considered particularly special.
I would say that at the very least, you should consider it on a case-by-case basis; whether the gun image you have stands as both an important gun image as well as an important "movie gun" image. But ultimately, these are your images, so the decision is yours. Take my opinion only for what it's worth. -MT2008 03:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
I was not asking for a blanket-release of your work into the public domain or any such thing, just a few individual photographs of authentic and obscure and unmodified firearms, i.e. the CETME Ameli, FG42. Cheers. 99.232.226.200 18:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I KNEW that. But work on Wikipedia WILL be jacked and seen all over the web. And the more removed the image is from the original source (here) the harder it is to force people to remove pirated images on their own sites. I fully intend to slam pirates who steal my images (which is my right), but it's harder when they can say "Oh I got it from Wikipedia, who are you? What authority do YOU have to tell me not to use a stolen pic?" It might be helpful to make a list of what you are interested in. I am considering creating an alternate image of the same gun with watermarks and attributions for 3rd parties (though it's not something I was planning to do at this time). Let me know your list and we can discuss it. thanks MoviePropMaster2008 18:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The attribution license is for that purpose specifically, if you are not properly attributed when the image is displayed, that person has violated your rights to the image and is liable for prosecution under international or US copyright laws. Keep in mind that those willing to pirate your images will do so whether or not you agree with it, this will happen at a higher frequency once your sites gains in popularity; by letting Wikipedia use your images, your images will proliferate the net with the proper license, exposing your work and Imfdb.org to the mainstream. Right now, we can do just one image to determine if you'd be satisfied with the end result; how about the Ameli? The CETME Ameli page does not receive too many hits due to the scarcity of the gun. Kind regards. 99.232.226.200 19:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Any progress here? You asked for a list, we would just like the AMELI at this time. Regards. 99.232.219.131 17:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Smiths
Thanks so much for the Smiths, but especially the Model 29! All the ones on the page before now were 629s, and I figured we needed an original blued M29. In fact, it seems almost like blasphemy that this is exactly what Dirty Harry used and we haven't had the right gun until tonight. -MT2008 06:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, yeah, forgot about that other S&W 29, hehe. But still, an MPM2008 photo of a Smith is always preferable to some random image from Google. And to answer your question - yes, you should feel free to replace old pictures jacked from Google with yours. There's no reason why anyone should complain, because...
(A.) Your pictures are always vastly superior to the old ones
(B.) It takes no effort to copy an image off the web, whereas taking your own pics is a time-consuming process (especially the way you do it)
(C.) You're an administrator now, so you have the final word anyway.
As far as the other Wiki guy's offer goes, I agree that you should only do it if you can mark the images as your own first, or if they give you proper credit (and link to this site, guaranteeing us more hits :). Come to think of it, it might not be a bad idea to do that with ALL of your gun images from now on, just to make sure that we mark them definitively as ours. But although I like being able to think of your gun images as exclusively IMFDB's, not so sure I like the idea of clamping down on other users. I mean, let's face it, we'd look like hypocrites because many of the images on IMFDB are still jacked from other sites (though this will change eventually, of course). World Guns would probably throw a fit if they saw this site. -MT2008 01:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, I suppose you're right...if World Guns did ask us to remove all of the images we've used without permission, I would immediately comply with their request. However, you gotta admit that it's still going to be kind of flattering if people decide that IMFDB is a great source of gun images (not just "movie gun" images) and want to use our pics.
BTW, have you talked to any of the other armorers about IMFDB? -MT2008 04:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Predator
I never knew they tend to used A1 muzzle breaks but it does make sense, A1 star flashes look cool (I'm still in awe over the shot when the muzzle flash is out 2ft in each direction)
I hope you don't mind that I edited your pictures together, I just used what I had. I'll just leave them on the page like that until you take some SP1 pics. Thanks. More to come on the Predator page. -GM
Same film different subject. Do you know who mounted the Shotgun under Billy's Rifle. It looks like a Ciener Ultimate only it uses a Mossberg 500 and it's several years before Jane's says such systems came out. Rockwolf66 08:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Hollow Point
Thanks for the Type 84S specific to the Hollow Point page. I really apprieciate it. Was the gun actually used in the movie or do you mean it is made to look the same? -GM
The Mask
I have it on my list, so I'll get it done eventually. -GM
Alienqueen11 here, sorry if I got in the way when you were uploading gun images when I was uploading those Resident Evil screenshots. --Alienqueen11 00:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the new guns
I really like those new SIGs you uploaded (just ditched the old P220R image and replaced it with yours on all pages), as well as the Type 84 folder and the Madsen M50 (the movie City of God features those, so we gotta get that image on that page whenever someone screencaps it).
Also, can you by chance tell me what kind of shotgun this is (from my page for The Crow):
Who makes that bullpup stock? I think it's a Muzzelite, but I dunno, and a Google search seems to turn up negative for info or images on this gun. I know I've seen it in at least a couple of action movies from the 1990s. -MT2008 03:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Ah, OK, thanks for clarifying the type of gun used to kill Lee. I figured it was the 629 that killed him because I have heard from various articles that the gun was definitely a .44 Magnum, and the character of Funboy uses the 629 throughout the movie. Any idea why they switched to another gun for that one scene? Seems like it would have been identifiable as a continuity error had the scene been finished and Lee had not been killed.
And don't worry; I do fully appreciate (have heard it many times) that the entire reason that the accident happened was because the production sent the armorer home in order to save money. And I have heard it was the fault of some clueless property assistant(s) who were responsible for the fuck-up that got Lee killed.
Also, I appreciate the ID on Grange's shotgun. -MT2008 02:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Re:Dibbs
I didn't think of it that way but I completely understand what you mean. I'll change the word. Dibbs is kind of declaring it is mine, simply saying that a movie is on my to-do list changes it sort of. The only movies I would really want to declare "dibbs" on are the ones I ordered on DVD, even when I own them on VHS already, just so I can screencap them. I'll remove my dibbs messages and just let people know I plan to do it, and if no one else plans to do it, I would like to. "Dibbs" was simply a poor choice of words. It's not like I'm locking the page from someone else to work on though. When Orca1 9904 asked to do Tears of the Sun, I let him. (AQ11 even cut off the widescreen bars now). When you asked to do Rambo III, I let you. (P.S. Let me know if you need me to finish that.) I agree tho, it was a dumb idea.
P.S. I screencapped Iron Man, sorry. -GM
One more request
Hey MPM2008, when I asked for the Beretta 92FS Inox, I happened to notice GM45 asked for a reversed Two Tone Beretta 92FS for use on the Sin City. If you happen to get ahold of them, I would like to know if you can combine them the factory style way as well and photograph it if you can, because a Beretta like that would be useful for pages such as Hostage (2005). Here's a screenshot of the gun in the movie:
Thanks in advance.--Alienqueen11 01:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
That's an awesome shot as always, aAnd you're right that has to be the best shot of the gun on the entire internet. I like it the way it is, and excellent work on your most recent images too, I really like the M16A4. Also, are you still considering the Wikipedia user's offer?--Alienqueen11 01:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
AK-104
It looks great. The magazine is no big deal. Even with that magazine, you still have the only well-taken AK-104 on the net. Don't worry about fixing it right away, it looks awesome even with the wrong mag. One thing though. You never know when one day a movie could have an AK-104 with a waffle mag so don't just cover over it if you take a new pic. You replaced the MAC-10 with the after market mag with the newer image, but you never know when one could be seen using one. Just a pointer. I'm almost done with Hot Fuzz, then I'm gonna do Tropic Thunder, Crank, Shawshank Redemption, and The Dirty Dozen. Should have them all done by the end of the month. (With deer season, my job to fix guns has been pulling me away. Plus, I hunt myself on occasion.) Keep up the good work. -GM
If I use the word "sexy" to describe a gun picture, what does that say about me? LOL.
I like it. And I agree with Alienqueen; I wouldn't worry too much about the mag. However, I must say that I'm a little more excited about some of the other pics you uploaded while I was at work today...thanks so much for re-doing that Type 56-1 picture for the Goldeneye page with the AK-74 muzzle break and plastic mag, and I also really appreciate you getting the Benelli M1 Super 90 (oddly enough, we don't have a page for that gun, for whatever reason). And the new XM177 pic is something we REALLY needed; time to ditch that old XM177 picture we've been using to represent "Colt Commandos" in movies (I think it's actually a Tokyo Marui airsoft replica, anyway).
But...for now, I must do more GRE studying and personal statements for grad school apps. Sadly, I'm getting way too busy to make regular contributions these days, but real life keeps calling. -MT2008 02:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't worry too much about the stock, because if you notice every image you upload always finds a use. There's no telling if a movie will come up with an AK 104 in the same configuration, plus if it's a movie gun, the movie it was used in will have to come up eventually. But if you want to upload a new one, that's entirely up to you.--Alienqueen11 02:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
So finishes can cause that much trouble when combining parts? Makes you wonder how they do it because I see soo many Berettas in wierd configurations in movies, I remember seeing a Beretta 92FS Inox with a black barrel in Kiss of The Dragon. And also, how rare is it to see a two tone Beretta 92FS? Because even if you search it on Google, there aren't many images of one.
And about the FG421, that is one wierd looking gun, is it German made? Because it resembles the MG42's from Saving Private Ryan a little bit, but I must say the grip dosen't look too comfortable with the way it's positioned. But another great image none the less.--Alienqueen11 04:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
FG-42
Nice piece. It must be rare, I don't ever see them in my typical order books like Southern Ohio Guns or any other vintage firearms catalogs. Like AQ said, I think the grip is positioned ackwardly and seems uncomfortable. Like all the other cool German guns, I can't own it sadly. I don't see why they would make it a paratrooper gun, way too big. Nice pic. Glad you didn't ignore it in the back. -GM
No Problem
You're welcome. Despite not being such a great movie, it was quite interesting gun-wise :))
Taps and Mr. & Mrs. Smith
I don't own Tapps and have never seen it but I own the Extended Cut of Mr. & Mrs. Smith, which includes a scene with a Mini-gun and cool other things. It is on my list and once my to-do list pile is reduced, I'll get on it. Right now I'm working on Tropic Thunder and The Shawshank Redemption. -GM
The FG42
Damn, that thing is beautiful! Reminds me why one can never fail to give the Nazis points for ingenuity when it came to weapons. I seriously want one, along with a Sturmgewehr. Good news though! Have you heard about this? http://www.ssd-weapon.com/engl_web/produkte_en/fg42_en/fg42_en.htm Apparently, they've got civvie reproductions of these guns now! Dunno if/when they'll get imported/manufactured in the States. -MT2008 03:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Your choice, I guess. Are they being imported to the states yet, though? The site doesn't list a U.S. distributor, and I haven't seen any for sale yet. But yeah, it would be cool to have a picture of a nice new FG42, plus you can get the 2nd version which you told Alienqueen you didn't have.
BTW, speaking of rare German weapons, do you have access to a Sturmgewehr (either -42 or -44)? There aren't too many movies with them that I'm aware of (besides Escape to Athena), but they do appear in lots of WWII-themed games. -MT2008 01:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Remington 870
Closest thing I can find is this bird gun in The Unit.
I read your story on Brandon Lee, that's tragic. I sometimes make dummy bullets and I always fire the primers before I reload the bullet. Your supposed to use super glue to make sure the round stays in the brass. Then you go to a wire wheel and polish the brass and get rid of any super glue that seeped out. I wonder why they never made "dud" primers that could look live but not go "bang" when the hammer falls on them. I first made dummy rounds with 8mm rounds for my Kar98k, but I didn't super-glue them in, and eventually they all fell into the shells and got stuck. It sucked. I'm sick with something bad and Tropic Thunder is gonna have to wait because I feel like crap. Have a good day. -GM
Re:Morita
Thanks, I'm feeling a little better. I was filling out some of the fictional firearms pages and I figured of all of them, you'd like the Morita page since I remembered you said you owned one. I deleted my page because yours came out better than mine. You know more about the movie any way, I have yet to see it fully and last time I saw it was too long ago to remember. -GM
Nice SMLE pic! And I forgot to mention, the Colt Navy is beautiful. -GM
Bankok Dangerous
You made the page look much better now. Your shots are far clearer than mine. Thanks. -GM
Tropic Thunder
A Sporter II pic would be much apprieciated. To test the whole blank safety distance, I tested various blank calibers to a piece of paper and found 10 yards to be the dead zone. Since I'm trying to make a movie with a few friends of mine (maybe something to show a film school), I'm going to use some blanks and want to know my limits. Obviously, since I'm the only one with true experiance and weapons intelligence, I'll be handling the blanks, post-production edits on my computer will fill the rest. I'll try my best to make them look like they know what their doing with guns, but they are pretty dumb. If you have any movie making tips, please let me know.
P.S. I plan to make it a DVD and might even screencap it as a section on my profile. -GM
Re:590
Go for it, fine by me. Your pics are always better than what we find on google. -GM
The new Cobray M11 picture
The new Cobray M11/9 picture looks really cool! Thanks so much for that! Also, do you think it's appropriate to classify the M11/9 under the MAC-10 page? I have been thinking about giving that guns its own page for a while now. What do you think? -MT2008 17:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
First of all, I completely missed the MAC-11. I've just been getting busier and busier (currently at work - on a Saturday! - indexing prior art PDF files now), and you upload so many images that I've missed a few here and there. I did like the SG550, though, and the the AMD-65 pics were also something nice (it's cool that you found the same style BFA as the Israelis). But that Type 56 is just...ugh, who the hell treats a nice gun that way? (in Africa or Afghanistan, sure, but not here in the states!) It's odd because I had no clue that the Type 56 was imported to the U.S. back when Uncommon Valor was filmed (82-83). I remember hearing it wasn't until 1984 that they reached these shores.
As far as the Cobray page goes, I know what you mean about the mistake, but then again, we have the Taurus PT92 page separate from the Beretta 92 page even though the PT92 is commonly mistaken for the 92F. The best thing to do would put a note at the top of the page suggesting people look at the Cobray page just in case.
Appreciate the effort on the Thompson pics...like I said, we REALLY need some good ones. I hate the fact that someone put an Auto-Ordnance semi-auto Thompson clone with a long barrel to represent an "M1921". Also, from now on, whenever you upload pictures, please do the same thing you did with the Cobray; just upload them as a new version over the old ones. The way, we don't have to go back and replace the old image with your new image on every single page that has the old one. And like I said before, nobody should mind if you get rid of the old images, because yours are always better and you're an admin anyway. -MT2008 21:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, it makes sense, what you're saying. Were the Type 56s from Deer Hunter also the same as the ones from Uncommon Valor? I mean, let's face it...you don't see that many Chinese AKs (or AK-type firearms, period) in American movies before about the mid-80s. -MT2008 22:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
That Type 56
Holy shit, who handled that gun to make it that FUBAR?! One of my main jobs in my dad's shop is to clean up guns, so I understand how horrible that is. Mail it to me, I'll clean it up. -GM
Woah, that thing looks like it's 70 years old with every thing it been through. What did they do to it? I'll give it credit for one thing, that's a very good example of how durable and rugged an AK type assault rifle can be, especially with that kind of treatment.--Alienqueen11 02:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Couple of questions regarding Walther pistols
1) Has the current-generation P99 been converted or modified into a movie blank-firing gun that you know of? I ask because I see on the back cover of one of Wesley Snipes' DTV movies that he's holding one that appears to be a new-model P99, but it also looks like they took an UMAREX airsoft model and painted the tip black. Insight?
2) Word on a couple of forums is that the Walther PPS makes an appearance in Quantum of Solace, wielded by Olga Kurylenko. If possible, could you confirm? --Clutch 02:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, but I will keep it in mind when I ask around. MPM2008
Request
Revolver here
Just curious, could you get a good picture of the M4s used by the Air force in Iron Man? The ones with the ISM-V Scopes?
Possibly other pictures from the movie? Like the G36Ks and G36Cs?
I'll add it to the gigantic list of things to do. best regards. MPM2008
.577 Rifle
That would be awesome. Do you think you could one pic before he mounts a scope and one when he does? You'd have the best picture of such a rifle on the internet. Gunmaster45 00:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Another Request
I was wondering, would it be possible for you to get your hands on a stainless steel Jericho 941? There's at least a couple pages here such as The Kill Point and Transporter 2 that could benefit from it. I'm also still waiting for a 1st-gen Glock 19 (or whichever version of the 19 it is that doesn't have rails on the frame). Thanks in advance. Orca1 9904 21:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)Orca1_9904
I didn't know it was an order, rather than a request (re the Glock) and I don't have a 2nd gen of my own or I would have posted it already. I have to track down someone with one and take the time to do the photoshoot, a real hassle BTW. MoviePropMaster2008 23:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
About Png
Hi, for some strange reason VLC does not catches screenshots in jpg, only in png. In the future I will convert them in jpg before uploading. Fimvit
Re: Goldeneye
That's fine. In all honesty, it's a bad habit that I'm afraid I have, and I seem to be influencing other forum members to do it even though it does ruin the "encyclopedic" format of the pages, as you've said. I'll try to remember in the future; bad habits die hard for me. -MT2008 23:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Re:
I know, I had already changed the settings. Regardless, it takes the snapshots in png. Can't figure out why...
Kind regards Fimvit
Crank
Hahahahahahaha, Blu-ray. I can't afford half a Blu-ray player. I'm still using DVDs, I guess this one just looks a little better. I've noticed some people use png files now, but they take too long to load and if you click on the image, it's just as clear as a jpg, so that's what I use. Thanks. Sorry I'm taking so long with it, I keep getting sidetracked. Go check out AQ11's profile talk and see my list of movies in my pile. Ugh. It's gonna be a long month. -GM
Thanks
Thanks so much for the new images (i.e. the USAS-12), and thanks for getting the Benelli shotgun page in order. It really needed an overall badly, and it's crazy that we never even had an entry anywhere for the M1 series before now. Also, nice work on Ultraviolet; I've had that DVD in my collection for a while, but, like a lot of movies, simply never got around to capping it. No matter; yours are better than mine would have been.
Hope you've had a great Thanksgiving! -MT2008 04:48, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree, the Molotov cocktail doesn't need a page. This is the Internet Movie Firearms Database, not the Internet Movie Weapons Database. Also, dunno if you saw, but some anonymous user tried to delete your user page, and has thus been nuked. -MT2008 22:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh, yeah, almost forgot...I'm not really sure how to see page views besides going to "Special Pages" (under Toolbox on the left side) and there's a "Popular pages" section, but that's not quite what you need... -MT2008 18:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Re: Molotovs
I understand what you mean fully but many pages link to the Molotov page and it's one of those mistakes that kind of has to be there now. I'm making The Whole Nine Yards as we speak and that had a molotov. I don't think it is a weapon deserving a spot but too many pages already have it and it's just easier if it is there. Gunmaster45 22:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Question about the SIGs from Double Team
First of all, nice job so far on the Double Team page, even though it's not yet complete.
What type of laser controls are those on the grip of the SIGs? I ask because I've seen the same setup on a SIG P228 that Denzel Washington uses in the movie Virtuosity, and I was wondering who makes it. Or was it something done just for both movies? -MT2008 00:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The Thompsons
YES! They're awesome. Thanks so much...we really needed some good pics of Thompson SMGs. -MT2008 18:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Response (Sorry for being late)
Thanks for wishing me a Happy Thanksgiving, I hope you had a great one as well. As for improvised weapons, I agree with you, Propane tanks even though they were made to be bombs shouldn't be listed as weapons. But I agree the molotov should stay since it's already a page for it and it's on quite a few pages. Also good work on Starship Troopers, the page looks great, and the Thompson pictures are great as well. Keep up the good work.--Alienqueen11 03:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Thompson
Sounds good to me, we need some Thompsons. - Gunmaster45 21:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Please, in the future, never hesitate to replace the old pics with yours. Yours are always better, plus when you just upload over the old ones, we don't have to replace the gun pics on each movie/TV/video game page individually. -MT2008 23:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Good Job
Good job on replacing all the Thompsons, the new pictures look great. Also, are you still going to upload an M16A3? And also did some of the M16 type guns you uploaded come from Iraq? I mean like the M16A4, and the M4A1 with the scope and RIS Foregrip.--Alienqueen11 02:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Care to take a look at my RE:E movie page?
Since no one did this page since the DVD release, I decided to do so. I need some check ups cause I always have a hard time telling Taurus from Beretta. Also see if you can ID the Cobray M11 for me if it is one. The previous guy posted up and even I thought it was an MP7 until I looked closer. Excalibur01
Someone has to draw the line. This guy Don whatever. He just posted a NEW flash animation on this site. What the hell? I've see the pics or trash that resembles pictures of guns and he thinks those are what they are? Is he high or some punk kid that thinks it's so cool that it deserves to be on this site. Sift Head and that other flash animation thing, Taegukgi. Those are pardon my language, pieces of shit that are NOT worthy of this place that some of us hold with respect. Yeah, they seem entertaining, but if we decide to let something this slide, then whose to stop from putting other flash animations that have "drawings" of guns on them because "Oh they have guns, so therefore they should be on this site". I want to remove it, but I like a majority vote instead of me acting pissed of. I'm asking everyone else their thoughts. Excalibur01 02:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
My airsoft
So what do you think of my airsoft? I know a lot of people have a bad idea about what airsoft is, so what do you think? I'm a guy who likes to show off sometimes, that's one reason why I ask since I've updated pictures on my page, but more to ask what others think, particularly people who are more into firearms. Excalibur01 02:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Just the same, I know you can tell my ONE Glock is real over the others listed that aren't. I don't go to the range as often as I want. Bullets are expensive and so is renting time on the range closest to me. I only play with Airsoft because it's the only time where I get to shoot people and not feel the slightest remorse whatsoever. I'm killing them in a manner of speaking. I have ran into the types of guys that only knows Airsoft brand names. I on the other hand am really interested in the real life counter parts that inspires Airsoft, this is where I found out so much info on real guns...but I still have trouble telling Berettas from Taurus and between shotguns sometimes. Excalibur01 10:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
FN FAL
Could take a picture of an FN-FAL?Oliveira 00:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Re:Predator
Thanks, it wasn't on my list but I saw the page was incomplete so I made time for it. Sorry I edited your pictures, but it looks better than an empty spot for now.
Also, excellent job with the Uzi pic, it looks great. I too never liked that Uzi pic before. I just finished screencapping Unforgiven so be sure to check that out. - Gunmaster45
Winchester 1866 "Yellow Boy"
Do you think you could check your armory for a Winchester 1866 "Yellow Boy" rifle? Also, a lot of the ones in films are used as Henry rifles by removing the forend, the advantage being the lack of a spring follower pinching the shooter's hand. So if you do find a Yellow Boy, could you remove the forend and snap a shot of that as well? Thanks. - Gunmaster45
H&K USP and H&K MK 23
Could you replace the pictures of the H&K USP .45 and the H&K MK23 with better images. Thanks.
Type 84 Target/Match
So you finally got to take pictures of them. Nice! -MT2008 01:19, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
And thanks for the new .308 Valmet. Those appear in lots of movies, so I can use it on my Hard Target and The Negotiator pages.
The HK94/MP5 conversion
Thank you so much for this! I wanted it as much as GM did. Where did you find it? And you've actually confirmed already that it's one of the Air Force One MP5s? -MT2008 03:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Nah, of course that doesn't ruin it. If it's a movie gun, and it's the same type of conversion seen in those action movies from the 1980s and 90s, it's fine by me. It's the same type, and that's more than enough for us. As far as Jedi Mind Powers, yeah, I guess I got something like that. Actually, I've just been glued to Facebook extending Christmas wishes to people most of today, and I check IMFDB pretty regularly. Also was working on 24: Redemption earlier today.
As far as your watermarking idea goes, I encourage it. However, there may be some way to actually disable right clicking on just your images so people can't save them to their HDs and re-post them later. Or, there may be a way of embedding copyrights into them. Not sure. But we'll figure out something. Asking Bunni about this would be the way to go, I think.
Hope you've had a great Christmas. Over here on the East Coast, I've only got 1 hr. left before it ends, but you're in Cali, so I guess you still get a few hours left to enjoy today. And thanks for all the wonderful Christmas presents you've given IMFDB (again, I appreciate the HK94, the M78, and the long-barreled Type 84s). -MT2008 04:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
The HK94 is great, I felt really bad chopping your pictures. Now I can get rid of them. And I read about your water marking idea. You should put one of your own personal insignias and maybe an imfdb logo. I hope you had a happy holiday. I got lots of movies to screencap including The Great Escape. I'm going to buy Romeo + Juliet and a few other gun movies with the money I got as well. I'm stilling working on Starsky and Hutch right now though. Great work with Stripes btw, I loved that movie. - Gunmaster45
Terminator 2 page
What do you think of the T2 page? Did I over do it on the "fun facts"? As far as the guns go, did I get my info right? Colt Commandos are kind of hard to ID for me. Hope you have a happy new year. - Gunmaster45
re: the images
First, thanks again for the new images. It's nice to have a USP45 (especially since Collateral is one of the more popular pages on here, and Tom Cruise used one in that movie). The FNC is another nice one to have. Did you ever find out if the Heat FNCs were chopped-down Sporters with auto sears and M16A1 flash hiders installed, as you suspected?
As far as copyrights go...yes, it was inevitable. I know people have been talking about IMFDB and its images on quite a few gun forums, but I had no clue anybody would have the audacity to take your images and claim them as their own! How has your electronic tagging worked? Any particular software you used? The last time you and I discussed watermarking, I did a quick search for software that might be used. I found this: http://www.filetransit.com/view.php?id=10611 . But if you have a better one, that works, too. I do think you should start getting the images tagged ASAP, because I don't think people should be stealing your stuff. I still do worry somewhat about the "hypocrite" accusations, though, but as long as you keep getting new images up, especially for well-known guns (like ARs, H&Ks, AKs, Glocks, 1911s, etc.), those cries will have little validity.
Anyway, sorry to add to your growing list, but I have another request. I recently did a major re-vamp on the Accuracy International Arctic Warfare series page, which used to be called just the "L96A1" page. All of the gun images I have on there now are jacked from Remtek's Accuracy International site, which I hated doing, but had no other choice. If you get a chance to photograph any of the AW rifles in your company's inventory, I'd be most grateful. I'm especially interested in the basic AW and the AWP (because my Jericho page has the latter), but anything else you have in stock would be great. Thanks so much for all your hard work. -MT2008 18:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The USP-45 looks great. As MT said, it will work well on the Collateral page (especially because I'm going to be adding shots to it later) and the FNC is excellent. Bravo. - Gunmaster45
Check IMDB for gun-heavy movies (you won't find specific IMDB forum topics in a Google search). It's very common now to see somebody ask a question about a gun in a movie and some other forum user will point them to us. Last one I recall looking at was "Hitman" where somebody mentioned us. I have also seen people make topics about us on everywhere from the AR-15.com to the 1911 forum to the Firing Line.
As far as reactions go, sorta mixed. Some people draw attention to our mistakes (and let's face it - we had a LOT, especially before you came in), others say we're neat. However, there don't seem to be a whole lot of folks so far who understand the fact that our images are exclusive to us - which is another reason why your watermarking is such a good idea. -MT2008 06:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey MPM2008, I just wanted to say thanks for all your recent pictures, I really like the USP 45, and the Mossberg 590 Mariner. Thanks to you, Imfdb now has genuine pictues of all three calibers the USP is available in. Keep up the excellent work.--Alienqueen11 04:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Screencaps
I was trying not to do too many shots in Commando since I didn't want to muck up your page but I didn't know your limit was 4. I add so many shots usually because they illustrate different users and different scenes. I don't try to spoil the story but I try to run a path with my images. I was trying to respect your format more than how many screencaps (you'll see I kept the calibers after each description like you do and kept the size image under 600px. I'll admit that LMS had too many shots but don't hold that on me every time I go a little over on my screencapping. Hope you had a happy new year. - Gunmaster45
That is one Sweet AK! Is that the actual gun used in the movie? Happy New Year By the way.--Alienqueen11 07:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Re:Finally Got It!
It looks awesome! Where did you find? Is it one of Cinema Weaponry's guns, as I suspected? Also, that gun appeared again this past summer in Pineapple Express, so I added it to that page. But nice job. And Happy New Year! Thanks for the wonderful gifts you have given us! -MT2008 15:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Rambo
I noticed you are adding some new shots to Rambo. Do you think you could grab some shots of his knife and bow, since all the othe Rambo pages have them. If you can't, I'll do it eventually. If you can, note that he has two knives. His mini machete that Stallone actually made for the movie and the knife from Rambo II. - Gunmaster45
The Auto 9
You had access to the Auto 9? Wow, I had no idea they had any of them intact after all these years. Of course, Sin City features one, but theirs was actually a modified 92FS, not a 93R. How did you get your hands on this thing? Whatever...nice job, and thanks for the awesome pic. -MT2008 15:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
RE: Finally Answering your questions
I understand now, thanks for the reply. So you can basically make it look like any kind of M16 if you have the right parts, anyway I can't wait to see your C7. Also, are you uploading more Mossbergs? Because if you want, I can edit the Mossberg 500 with the Heatshield out of the Comparision picture and upload it if want me to:
But if you prefer to upload your own image, it's okay.--Alienqueen11 22:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
About the Mossbergs, So you do want me to edit it out? Anyway, A simple Mossberg 500 with a High Capacity magazine tube to replace this image would be nice:
Also, if you can get an image of a Mossberg 500 with a pistol grip like the one in Training Day it would be apprecited. Thanks.--Alienqueen11 22:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Mossberg 500
Hey MPM2008, I cropped and edited the comparison image, and uploaded the Mossberg 500 with the heatshield as a seperate image. I just want to want to know if it's okay before I add it to the page. I wrote that it belongs to you in the image description. What do you think?
Thanks, I tried to make it looked as much like one of yours as possible. I'll put on the page now. Feel free to edit or overwrite it whenever you like.--Alienqueen11 22:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The PT92C
Thanks for this! I just put it on the Hard Boiled page. I'm guessing it might even be the same one seen in Gates of Hell. -MT2008 04:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: 24 Redemption
Yep, I understand. I was just giving a reason to everyone why I was. I realize you wouldn't make that mistake. I think the page used to have the USPc simply because it appears on the DVD cover, before I screencapped it and generally gave it a huge overhaul. -MT2008 03:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the new FALs!
They look great! We can always use more. Only question is...do you by chance have a picture of a 50.61 like the gun from Heat? (or rather, something that looks like one)
The new Mossberg Bullpup also looks good. While I liked the one with the extended magazine tube, I like this new one better, simply because the standard models without the extended tube seem to be the ones which appear in movies most often. -MT2008 22:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Excellent, that 50.61 is perfect. Thanks again! -MT2008 03:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Trapdoor Springfield
Thanks for uploading pics of the Trapdoor Springfield rifles, they complete a few of my pages better. I added your pictures to those pages as well.
I've been working on The Dirty Dozen, have you seen it? I have the guns down but I've only seen the movie twice and don't know all 12 guy's names. If you have, can you help me out with that? - Gunmaster45
RE: Above
I am sorry in advance for the language I am about to use but this douche Gunmaster45 completely erased the "Dirty Dozen" page I had ALREADY created. Not a single piece of the page I had created still exists. Admin or not where does this asshole get off destroying a page I worked on???
Help with Transformers 1911 pistol ID?
Hey, I was wondering if you could take a look at the M1911 being used by Captain William Lennox (Josh Duhamel) in my screenshots of Transformers and see if you could ID it? It appears to be a mostly standard M1911 pistol but has a Kimber-style hammer and slight beavertail to the grip safety. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Orca1 9904 08:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Just took another look at the M1911 page and it almost looks like the Colt XSE, only the weapon in the film lacked the second set of cocking serrations at the front of the slide. What do you think? Orca1 9904 05:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Re:KIN93
Not really. He has been warned before this, so being a bit frustrated is understandable. And yes, I agree that being released in theaters does not justify using bootlegs, and will certainly still be noticed by any studio police on the prowl. After all, if a movie hasn't been released on DVD yet, there's no way to get screenshots other than bootlegging. And that's why it's unacceptable. -MT2008 01:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
About the images on the Predator 2 page
Could i replace them?Oliveira 20:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Screencaps
I've been trying to cut back on the amount but I have my specific way I make my pages. I don't just tell what guns are used. I tell you what guns are used, who uses them, goofs, and fun facts. It makes the page a little larger but I like to think of it as being thorough, more like an article then just a "page". Since we have pages for actors, guns, and films/TV, it is good to show you the info. Sometimes I just can't pass up good shots. If you notice on my Last Man Standing page, the shot is either good, or is telling information. I understand that some of my pages are cluttered, but I've been doing my best to keep them organized. My limit now is usually ten or less images, but I sometimes have to makd exceptions. You are free to remove screencaps I add if you find them to be to many on one of your pages. You are free to do whatever you want to your own pages, if I add something you find it not needed, you have the right to remove it. I took some of the Mini 14 shots off your Commando page for that reason. - Gunmaster45
I was looking at the Rambo (2008) page and saw some of the changes you made. As always, I was a little sad to see those images you removed go but it is your page and your right. While I understand the removal of the shot of the soldier sent airborne by the .50 caliber (I just thought it was worth noting how dumb "movie logic" can get, but it doesn't have a gun in it, so it is not needed), but why did you remove the shot of Diaz with his FN FAL Carbine? I thought it was a pretty clear shot.
I just added some shots to Flashpoint and soon I'm going to do Get Smart and a revamp on the Matrix series (the three films and that awful Animatrix) since I bought the four pack DVD - Gunmaster45
Thanks!
Thanks for your comments about my pictures from The Sting; it's always been one of my favorite movies (despite its use of suppressed revolvers!) Feel free to make the screencaps any size you feel appropriate, I appreciate your comments and interest! - Speakeasy804
A little help
I just started my Police Story 3: Supercop page, but I need some help IDing some of the guns. Can you give me a hand? Excalibur01 14:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Question About Bond Actor Category
I was wondering, in the "James Bond Actor" category page, should we limit it to actors who've played James Bond himself, or should we allow 'supporting' actors such as Bond girls (ie, Halle Berry & Honor Blackman) and villians (such as Robert Carlyle & Gert Fröbe)? I'm proposing this to several admins and would like to get some feedback on this before making a decision. Orca1 9904 22:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Screencap limit?
Hey, I was just looking at some of my own pages and seeing that I tend to really really overdo it with screencaps (which makes some pages take way too long to load). I was just wondering if you know what a good suggested amount might be for the same gun? Thanks - Speakeasy804
That sounds like a very good amount for each. I'll try and go through some of my pages (especially Dillinger (1973) and Bonnie and Clyde) and reduce some of the redundancy. I'll keep it in mind from now on. Thanks for getting back to me so soon! - Speakeasy804
Hi!
Sorry I haven't been on IMFDB in a few days. To answer your question: It's not so much that life is kicking me in the ass, it's mostly that I'm in Washington, DC right now without my laptop. Even though I didn't vote for Obama, I came here for his inauguration, mostly because my Mom is a big fan, and because my boss got us the tickets, and well...you know, I do try to do nice things for Mom, even if I don't like the guy she helped elect President. Plus, I got several days off from work, which is always nice.
I should be back tomorrow, and I'll catch up on everything I've missed for the past few days. -MT2008 01:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Request
I really like how you edit those jacked pics and make them look so much better. So, I figured I'd ask...if you get time, do you want to edit this pic of a Gen 1 Glock 19 that we've been using on several pages?
If you get around to it, cool, but I realize it might be a while. It could use some removal of white space and shadows, and any other touch-ups you can do. Thanks! -MT2008 00:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Ah, alright, well, that's fine then. Just figured I'd ask because I thought I remembered you telling Orca that you didn't have a Gen 1 Glock 19 in stock at the time, and I wasn't sure if that had changed recently. And yes, DC was a whole lotta fun...until I had to go to the party where all the people from my firm were celebrating the inauguration. Try being the only Libertarian in a room full of mindless liberal douchebags and it's quite awkward. I loved how they were all clapping and cheering even when Obama was saying things that weren't really all that profound or moving. I don't think it matters how good or bad Obama turns out to be as President...this Stalin-esque cult of personality around the man is something I will never get used to. -MT2008 01:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
It looks WAY better. Only thing is, next time, please just upload a new version over the old one. Thanks for doing this. -MT2008 19:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
By the way, is there really a difference between the T3 AKMS pistol and the ones from Rambo and Pineapple Express? I keep comparing photos and I still can't see the difference in barrel length. The only thing I see is that the Rambo one may or may not have a smooth receiver cover (like the standard Type 56) instead of the AKM-style ribbed. And the True Lies gun is a different one entirely. -MT2008 21:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Rambo (2008
Just to give you a heads up I changed the info on Rambo M2 Brownings. I talked to Kevin @ ISS about them and he told me they were M2. He was with the show in Thailand working on the 50's. As for the designation AN/M2 was used by the military to discribe the Browning Aircraft gun both 50cal and 30cal unitl 1944 it was changed in September 44 to M2 Aircraft. Thanks. - Phoenixent
Thanks
Thanks for the new 870, It looks amazing. Even the color of the stock and pump match the gun in the movie, excellent work. So are you working on the ghost ring version right now or still looking for the accessories? Either way, I'm sure it'll be worth the wait. Thanks again, and keep up the great work.--Alienqueen11 22:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
M1-C Garand
Beautiful M1-C, thanks for uploading it. - Gunmaster45
Browning M2
That is definately useable! It's great! I was going to ask that you replace the M2 pic but figured you had enough to do already. You might want to take a picture of it on a pintle mount though because that is the most commonly seen .50 in films. - Gunmaster45
I like your picture! If you can do the pintle mount, great, but right now, I'm just happy we have a picture of an M2 at all that we can call our own. -MT2008 20:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Browning M2
Thanks for the M1 Garand info, that picture helped me alot, I now understand how the scope and gun work. As for the M2, That is definitely a usable picture, it's excellent! .50 cals are huge, and I would say that type of format is perfect for them. If you want my photo wishlist again, it is these besides the ghost ring 870:
Beretta 92FS Inox
Two Tone Beretta 92FS (If you're able to combine the parts)
Heckler & Koch Mark 23 ("SOCOM")
And if it's possible, can you obtain a U.S Military issue Beretta M9, I know it's very much the same as a Beretta 92FS, but I heard there were some slight differences, and it would go great with the M9A1 you uploaded before. But if you can't get ahold of it, it's okay. The 870 and the Beretta 92FS Inox are the main things I want. Thanks.--Alienqueen11 19:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Nevermind the M9 actually, MT2008 is right. We don't need it.--Alienqueen11 20:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
MP5A4 with Surefire custom
If you don't mind, I uploaded a picture of an MP5A4 with the Surefire forearm, which is built from two of your images. - Kenny99 18:04, 3 May 2011 (CDT)
Looks like my Jedi Mind Powers are at work again. Creepy, eh?
Alex Reid uses several types of weapons in Ultimate Force. She uses a SIG-Sauer P226 in at least a couple of episodes. In the episode where the SAS goes against the IRA, she uses an MP5KA1 to shoot at the terrorists during the ambush, and later briefly has a Glock 17 (the same one you see being pointed at her) before the bad guy takes it away. In the season 1 finale, she is given a PPK, but never gets to fire it herself. In another episode where the SAS goes after a Christian cult, she has an MP5SD3. In the season 2 finale where Red Troop goes to South Ossetia, she uses an FN Minimi. Here are some pics from the Ultimate Force page:
Only problem is, these don't really show her face that clearly, so you can't tell who she is. I'll see about getting others... -MT2008 20:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I think I got one. Give me a sec to cap it. Season 1, and the episode was "Just a Target" Excalibur01 06:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Also, just remembering, in season 1, forgot which episode, she is seen with a full length double barrel shotgun, but never fires it. Excalibur01 06:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I requested several images from you a while back, but there appears to be an editor on Wikipedia going by the name Josh Woolstenhulme who appears to be uploading some of your gun photos and claiming to be the author. Here are his uploads: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Josh_Woolstenhulme
I'm not a Wikipedia member at present (I usually post anonymously), but it seems this user is already setting himself up to get your images removed. Note on the AKM image, it now says this:
This image or media does not have information on its copyright status. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be deleted after Friday, 6 February 2009. Please remove this template if a copyright license tag has been added.
But you should keep working with Koalorka to make sure your stuff isn't being taken, because I'm afraid I dunno what to do besides leave requests on a moderator's talk page. -MT2008 19:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that was me that put up the warning tags. All violating images have now been removed and the pirate warned. Thanks again for the Ameli, you can find the article here. 99.232.226.200 16:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Was the extra holding that M60 an extra or someone well known? By the way, I could never do your job. The idea of so many idiots handling and breaking my guns would drive me to insanity. - Gunmaster45
Good Luck
I would like to wish you good luck on your most recent business trip, and I hope you have a good time or try to, and thanks for notifying us about it. Also, sorry to put more requests on your list, but can you look around for these as well?:
Browning Automatic Rifle or B.A.R
Mossberg 500 with High Capacity Magazine tube
Mossberg 590 with Ghost ring sights (I think this is what the Remington 870 on the Hostage page really is, and I seen them in movies such as The Last Castle)
M1 and M1A1 Thompson
Thanks, and I wish you the best of luck on your trip.--Alienqueen11 02:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
I have a question. I know auto pistols need to be milled and threaded to fire blanks but do revolvers need to be modified to fire reliably? I once had some acorn crimped .45 LC blanks which I put through a SAA. The primers backed out from a lack of recoil and the gun locked up. I tried putting it though a Colt M1917 and it hardly fired unless I angled it right. I've seen in movies how some of the firing pins are removed from the hammers (like the S&W 36 from Running Scared). If they do need to be modified, could you tell me how exactly? Thanks.
P.S. If we have any more things to add to your list, can we just add them directly or should w ask you first in discussion? - Gunmaster45
I also forgot to ask, what movie was the M60 used on? - Gunmaster45
Push
Have you seen the trailers for the new movie Push coming out soon? I'd screencap the hi-def trailer but my computer is too slow to do it right. If you're free, could you give it a look? I'd rather you made a page with HD trailer shots than some anonymous user making an empty page. - Gunmaster45
RE: Got a gift for you! ;) More coming
You are awesome! These guns are great! I'll be sure to add them to the page. I'm going to have to go back and snap a shot of Ace with an SAA (they didn't show him too clear but I think I can find one). I can't wait to see what else is coming. Thanks! - Gunmaster45
I'm glad to see you've gotten more famous guns, they look great. It's quite impressive how many guns you're uploading that are well known as used guns by the actors. Did you meet with some important people lately? Keep up the good work, the pics look great. - Gunmaster45
All I can say is...Oh, my, God. You have outdone yourself this time. This is one of the best updates you've given us yet. I don't even know how to begin thanking you. I can't even express how giddy with excitement I am that we have these pictures. -MT2008 01:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Yep, I saw those too! Really awesome. More than awesome, actually. And the new Desert Eagles and the Mark 23 are also VERY highly appreciated, too. -MT2008
Desert Eagle
The Desert Eagles are great! We really needed a black model and you gave us all three! Thanks much. - Gunmaster45
H&K Mk 23 SOCOM
Outstanding work with the SOCOM pistols! How did you come across a REAL knight's arament suppressor? You've really outdone yourself this time! Keep up the good work. - Gunmaster45
Photos
Nice photos you got the other day from our friend. I did not mean to rub you the wrong way last week. We could work better together and put this behind us. - Phoenixent
Babylon .A.D/ SPAS 15
I don't think the gun under the M4 is a SPAS 15. The gun pictured has a full lengh forend and the reciver doesn't match. I have seached every where and can't figure out what the gun pictured is. But thanks for help. Gunner313
Welcome back
Welcome back from your trip, hope you enjoyed it, and thanks for the new goodies. I put your newest Smith & Wesson handgun pictures on most of the pages except the ones that had no screencaps or if I couldn't tell which kind of model it was, and I also put the movies guns you got on the S.W.A.T., Untouchables, and Pulp Fiction pages. Best regards.--Alienqueen11 21:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
RE: Thanks
Sorry about taking the honors away from you, those are amazing pictures though especially those guns from The Quick and The Dead. If you would like help replacing the pictures, let me know.--Alienqueen11 06:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the new pictures, how many armorers did you meet with? Also the Berettas from Die Hard and Lethal Weapon are nice, so they took it out of the case for you? It looks well worn.
Also, about formatting, I noticed one or two users put at the bottom of sections a few times to space out their pages, I previewed it on pages a few times, it seems to work, but you have do it a few times in a row. Not sure how effective it is, but I figured it's worth noting.--Alienqueen11 08:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Two requests
Star Ultrastar, And a S&W 5906 w/ Adjustable sights
Nice job on the Beretta 92 section, by the way
~ Revolver
Weapon Photos
Nice photos you just posted. I hope you do well getting your next gig. This SAG BS will put a damper on things. I will have some non-industry related work coming into my shop so it should not hurt that bad. If you need anything PM me on the forum and I will see what I can do. Thanks - Phoenixent
Re: Update
You have really outdone yourself this time, all these new images are amazing. It's cool that you had help from the armorer of True Romance, and that you got to photograph the Beretta from the Die Hard and Lethal weapon films, it makes me wonder why so many why so many actors and directors are so anti gun, especially when they worked around guns so much. Anyway, no one should mind if you replace their pictures, yours are superior to anything else on the site, and I have seen the XXX guns, and those are cool, thanks for finding out what the mystery M1911 on XXX 2 was. It's also cool that IMFDB now has it's own pictures of these unique guns. It was nice of those guys to help you, that was by far the most guns I have ever seen you upload. One thing is for certain, if people don't come here to see what guns were used in which movie, it'll most likely be to see your pictures.
No problem about the formatting, a user named Vinniebar used it when this site first started, hopefully it'll be the answer to our formatting problems. Anyway you did good with those Berettas, they came out great with what you had there, do the they still work good? Anyway I have to get to bed now. You can keep uploading gun pictures if you want, but you can take a break if you want, you derserve one. Thanks again.
P.S, sorry if it took me long to respond, I'm not the fastest typer.--Alienqueen11 09:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
The new stuff
Your updates just keep getting more and more incredible. Having actual movie guns was cool enough, but having specific guns from movies handled by stars is just beyond cool. The new Berettas and the Tokarevs are especially appreciated. I just don't even know how to thank you anymore, and words just ain't gonna cut it.
BUT...I must ask you a really quick question. You say that this Beretta was used in Die Hard:
...because this one actually DOES have an extended slide release and mag release. Also, LMO has a picture of this gun on their page for Die Hard (which isn't as good as yours) and it looks identical to this.
Furthermore, I doubt this gun (the one right above) was in Die Hard 2 or Die Hard with a Vengeance because I don't think either of the Berettas in that movie had the extended slide release. On the Die Hard with a Vengeance, I posted a picture of one of the Berettas which I took from LMO's site.
Anyway, point is, are you sure you didn't reverse the images? Thanks. -MT2008 18:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Also, I could have sworn the Beretta Gibson used in the first Lethal Weapon had a gold Beretta logo on the grips. Did they replace it with the blacked-out one later on? Orca1 9904 18:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, crap...you know, I barely even grasped the scale of what you uploaded because you did so many. The Auto Ord 1911 from "Pulp Fiction", the S&W 629 and the 1911 from "XXX 2", the P7 from "True Romance"...excuse me while I go pee myself with excitement. -MT2008 18:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
And not only do we have a Jericho 941 that's stainless, but it's the same gun used in Live Free or Die Hard? (faints) -MT2008 19:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
The Berettas
First of all, Cinema Weaponry has a display case for some of their famous movie guns? That's really awesome...do you other pictures of it? What else is in it?
Anyway, like I said, I'm pretty sure you just reversed the two Beretta images. THIS one is from Die Hard:
Again, if you look at the picture of Willis with the 92F from "Die Hard", it looks identical. Also, wasn't there more than one of them? I've always understood that you guys are in the habit of having at least one or two back-up weapons for each "hero gun" use? Did Mike Papac configure multiple Berettas in the same way as the one used by Bruce Willis in the first "Die Hard"? -MT2008 20:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
OK, I'm looking at your picture of the display case. If you want my opinion, it looks like the 92F in the center of the picture (next to the "Enemy of the State" 1911) actually was used in "Die Hard 2" and "Demolition Man". You can see that it hasn't been modified for Bruce Willis (no left-hand mag release, probably because Sylvester Stallone used it later, and he's no lefty). However, the next Beretta over is definitely the one from the first "Die Hard" - it does have the left-handed, extended mag release. However, you probably just can't see the label for the gun because it's out of the picture.
Do you think that might explain things? We should ask Steve about this, as I'm sure he knows well. -MT2008 20:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
But I forget...didn't Syd Stembridge basically take all of his remaining assets to Cinema Weaponry? I've been under the impression that Stembridge and CW essentially merged with each other after Stembridge closed down in '99. So aren't the guns that Syd kept now in Mike's hands?
And yes, I imagine Mike must have a lot of cool stuff to photograph. One other thing you should ask about...remember the H&K G11 from Demolition Man? If you can at least get the story on where that gun came from, that would be awesome. I've always wondered...did they build it themselves?
ALOT of them in films are still those HK94 conversions, but now we can't tell visually if they are or not.
True, but that just means they're identical to almost every single other transferable MP5 within the chain of commerce, which were also converted from HK94s. I forgot...was it La France that did most of the conversions of HK94s for Stembridge, Ellis, etc.? Anyway, it's good that you got the picture of the one that you have. Those things may be obvious conversions, but they're still an important part of movie gun history! -MT2008 21:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I figured Syd was still in business even though he doesn't seem to get many armorer credits these days - if you watch A Man Apart, for instance, it says, "Weapons provided by Stembridge & Cinema Weaponry" in the credits. But I've been confused about what weapons he retained, what LMO sold, what CW received or what came under their umbrella, etc. Thanks for clearing that up.
So as far as the G11 goes, are you saying that the one in Demolition Man was actually a real G11 and not something that was built specially for the film? I figured it was built around something else, sort of like the way that "XXX 2" features G36Ks mocked up to look like XM8s (and I think Steve may have had a hand in that film as well). As far as getting a picture, don't worry, I won't pressure you. I realize how hard it must be. I was just curious to know if the gun in the movie was the real deal or not, because I couldn't imagine HK would ever trust some moronic actor with one of their rare prototype weapons (no offense to Wesley Snipes). -MT2008 02:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Confusion + Overseas visit
I think I'm about to make you a whole lot more confused...
Mike recalls that he didn't install the extended mag release button and slide release until the second movie
If that's what Mike recalls, then it doesn't seem to match the evidence. Here is a screencap from the firstDie Hard showing the Beretta:
So again, this is the first movie that this image came from. If you look closely, you can see that McClane's (Willis') Beretta does have the extended slide release. Again, compare to the picture you took:
So Mike's memory must be failing him on this, with all due respect. It looks like he did put on the extended slide release (and mag release) for the first movie. I don't know about the Lethal Weapon movies (I don't have those on DVD), but the 92F from Die Hard 1 is a gun that has an extended slide release.
Also, did Mike do any work on Die Hard With a Vengeance? I've always been under the impression that because that movie was filmed in New York, Weapons Specialists, Inc. provided the guns for that film. Rick Washburn is credited on IMDB as the armorer on Die Hard With a Vengeance (though it looks like Dave Fencl also did some work on the film). -MT2008 20:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
re:
I MAY have an opportunity to go overseas (France) and I will try to photograph some of Christophe Maratier's guns (Leon/Ronin/LaFemme Nikita/District B13/Taken/etc) I would like to also go picture taking in Britain at Bapty's or Sascha Robey's collection, but who knows? I don't have a connection/introduction yet with those guys. And with all the retarded gun restrictions going on over there......
That is pretty wild! Unfortunately, Bapty auctioned off a whole bunch of the James Bond movie guns (including several of the original Walthers, plus the OICW replica from Die Another Day), back in 2006, before the recent ban on "realistic imitation replicas" took place (they were all deactivated prior to the auction). Still, it would be really cool to see some of the stuff they still have. You would probably be able to get them to let you in, though. Dan Shea went to Bapty's back in 2003 (I think) and they let him photograph a lot of their guns (which appear on LMO's site), so if you told them who you were, you could probably get in. Have fun! -MT2008 20:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, but WHO is the better photographer? ;)
Well, obviously...hehe. :-) The coolest thing is how you got a lot of the same guns as his site, but yours are 100x the quality. Speaking of which, have you ever considered professional gun photography for a living? Or do you already do it? Your pictures are the kind of thing that gun rags and books would kill for.
I was thinking of doing an actual table top book with the pics (including a bunch of other angles that I did not upload)
What about a book showing off specific "hero guns" from movies? Have any of you (the armorers) talked about that in the past? Of course, I guess the great thing about IMFDB is that you guys are free to use it for precisely this purpose, except that anyone can access it for free.
Either that or I'll say "MT2008 says you're full of SHIT!" heheheh. Those were done 23 years ago and we're all doing this from recollection.
Ugh, I dunno if I could stomach the idea of correcting Mike on his own work, being as I'm not an armorer. But I do realize that it's unreasonable to expect him to know all this stuff from memory. I have trouble remembering details about specific guns I shot as recently as 5 years ago. 23 years is a long time to keep details in your head, for any human being.
As far as the (nearly) blank pages go...screw 'em. I've deleted several already. Also, one user made a page for The War Briefing. I'm not sure it fits with the scope of the site. What do you think? -MT2008 05:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
re:Asshat
It's just some dude who's upset because I gave him a temporary suspension for fucking up the Live Free or Die Hard page with inaccurate info when he didn't even have the courtesy to ask before editing. Maybe I over-reacted a little, being that I did most of the screencapping and other work on that page, but the sheer audacity of his rudeness just pissed me off so much that I figured he deserved a time-out.
Don't worry, I wasn't fooled for even a second when I saw the "Warning" on my talk page (you can see my responses to him here). And yes, I could actually report him for impersonating an FBI agent and they might complain. But, this loser is too pathetic to even bother. Besides, I have the flu right now, so I don't feel like it anyway. -MT2008 20:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Arachnid
OK, it's really interesting you made a page for this movie...I watched it on Sci-Fi not too long ago, but couldn't remember the title! And even though I'm an Ultimate Force fan, I completely failed to recognize Alex Reid in the movie. Weird...
As far as the guns in the movie, I may be wrong, but I remember the AR-15 carbine (the long-barreled one) being a Colt Sporter-1. Or at least, I think the upper was from a Sporter-1, because that looks to me like a 16" barrel. I can't remember - was the gun ever fired on auto? I remember the Model 733 was, but I remember the other AR only being fired on semi. In which case, I suspect it's most likely a factory civilian Sporter-1.
Also, I think Chris Potter's MAC (the one which magically becomes an Uzi) is an RPB clone or something else that's smaller. Unless Chris Potter is a huge guy with huge hands (and he doesn't seem that way in any of the other stuff I've seen him in where he handles guns), the receiver on the MAC looks a bit too small for it to be an original MAC-10. -MT2008 20:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
No worries! I would have been really upset myself. My first week here, I remember editing a page while another user made a minor edit simultaneously, and I was really pissed off too because I lost all my edits which I hadn't backed up, which was nearly an hour of work down the drain. Nowadays, I'm in the habit of copying anything I write into a Word file before submitting in case that happens.
Anyway, back to the movie...I'm not sure if Chris Potter has such huge hands or not. Not too long ago, I was watching episodes of Kung Fu: The Legend Continues on YouTube, which he starred in. His sidearm in that show was a Beretta 92FS Inox (which had a habit of turning into a Taurus PT92 in some scenes), and it didn't seem any bigger in his hands than mine, and I don't have big hands (just long fingers). I haven't compared a MAC-10 to an Uzi in size, so I dunno what the difference is.
Oh, yeah, and I love how he fires his MAC/Uzi sideways, "gangsta style". He used to do that with his Beretta in "Kung Fu" as well! -MT2008 00:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Browning A5
Do you by any chance have any Browning A5 shotguns in your armory, as well as a Remington Model 11 copy, since I've noticed a few pages featuring them (like Speakeasy804's Thunderball page).
And you never got back to me on my qeustion about blank converting revolvers. It's a little further up your discussion page. - Gunmaster45
The Rundown
I've had The Rundown screencapped for some time now (hadn't had time to upload) but would you mind if I replaced some of your shots with mine (they are larger resolution), but if you don't want me to, I could always delete my caps, but it took me a while to save them. I've had it on my list for some time now, it would really make me happy if I could upload mine. Get back to me on this. - Gunmaster45
I realized this, so I only replaced one shot of the Remington 870 because it shows just a little bit more. You're shots are still on the page. - Gunmaster45
Thanks, I felt (I guess the word is self-conceous) since I knew I was uploading more screencaps than you would have, but as you see, I add comments on the crazy movie logic and other fun facts to fill out stuff (I always have a plan when I save screencaps, so I know when I plan to label these facts early, hence I sometimes have a heavy screencap load). I try to always catch EVERY gun in a movie, so I never use scene skip and rarely fast forward. When I do fast forward, I have a strange sixth sense that allows me to see guns that are only seen briefly on even normal speed. Anyway, I'll be uploading a movie called Legends of the Fall tommorow, I'm working on it now. I think it is a perfect gun movie because it covers the early 1900s, so we see old west guns, WWI guns, and prohibition gangster guns. It's great. Incredible film too, I recommend it. - Gunmaster45
Revolvers again
Copied from above:
I have a question. I know auto pistols need to be milled and threaded to fire blanks but do revolvers need to be modified to fire reliably? I once had some acorn crimped .45 LC blanks which I put through a SAA. The primers backed out from a lack of recoil and the gun locked up. I tried putting it though a Colt M1917 and it hardly fired unless I angled it right. I've seen in movies how some of the firing pins are removed from the hammers (like the S&W 36 from Running Scared). If they do need to be modified, could you tell me how exactly? Thanks. - Gunmaster45
Thanks for clearing up the SKS, that was the only model I was aware of (not an SKS pro, only know what I've seen or held at shows) - Gunmaster45
I guess I just had crappy blanks. I can't remember the brand but they were written in french or italian or something. They were acorn blanks, not those longer movie blanks. Plenty loud though. - Gunmaster45
Shoot 'Em Up
I usually use my desktop computer for screencapping and it keeps the master images at a relatively simple size so I don't need to resize them. But I screencapped Shoot 'Em Up on my sister's HP Pavilian DV-6000 laptop because my screencapper on the desktop didn't except SEU's format. Her computer is HIGH-DEF and the images were gigantic, even after I resized them. I thought they were small enough after resizing but they were still pretty big. They certainly look nice though. You can tell based on the number of screencaps that I wasn't up to re-resizing all the images because they were a tad over sized. Next time I use her laptop to screencap (get ready for a much better documentation of the Matrix films), I'll be sure to resize them correctly. - Gunmaster45
Smith and Wesson 1006
Hey, MPM, could you get me a pic of a Smith and Wesson 1006? That'd be awesome, thanks.
from ProtoAuthor.
Also, from me again, how about making an UziMac10, like in Dogs of War?
Those guns don't exist any more. Once regular Uzis became more prevalent (including the influx of semi automatic Uzi Model A and Model B carbines that were then converted into full auto guns in the 1980s) the MAC 10s were converted back to MAC-10s. And good riddance in my book. ;) MoviePropMaster2008 05:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Dang. Well, how about the 1006?
M1911 Question
I was wondering, would it be possible to take the hammer and grip safety from a Colt XSE and put them on a standard M1911A1? I was thinking this might be what was done to create Josh Duhamel's 1911 in Transformers. Any input you have on this would be greatly appreciated. Orca1 9904 04:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, a user converted all the 500px images I used on Badlands to 300px, but I was wondering if that was too small? I would change it back to my original 500px (or at least 400px) but I don't want to rub anyone the wrong way by undoing what was done (if they had good reason). Also, good call on the 03A3 rifle used, I had completely misidentified it! - Speakeasy804
Thanks for clearing that up, I appreciate it. I didn't want to cause any trouble but since you'd seen the page for sure I figured you'd know best how to handle it. - Speakeasy804
Colt 1903 Pocket Hammer
Hi MPM. The Colt 1903 Pocket Hammer is a completely different weapon compared to the Colt 1903 Pocket Hammerless. The Colt 1903 Pocket Hammer is a shorter version of the Colt 1902 Military and is chambered in 38 ACP. You don't see them that much any more since the 1911 came out. We did send one out on Public Enemies but do not know if Harry used it. -Phoenixent
No problem but someone at Colt was not think when they named their models. I can see the salesman trying to explain it and the customer rolling their eyes and saying what are you talking about. They had some neat weapons in those early movies. - Phoenixent
Ever used one of these?
While I was screencapping 3:10 to Yuma (2007) (I'll be uploading it very soon), I saw in the special features that they use this special gun that fires balls of dust or spark so you don't have to set up squibs anywhere to imitate bullet impact. It looked pretty cool and I was wondering if you were familiar with these. - Gunmaster45
Mythbusters had something remotely similar on an episode a while back. I say remotely, because while they created the same mini-bombs (for lack of a better term), they hand-launched them at their door instead of shooting them. --Clutch 07:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Watermarked Image
Since people have been using your images without permission, I made one of your pics with a water mark. What do you think? If you like, I'll be more than happy to add it to all your images so no one steals them.
All I did was Hardlight the logo to remove the back color and faded it so it was just the logo alone. It's really easy. Get back to me. - Gunmaster45
For now do you mind if I just warn of spoilers at the top of the page? Later I'll decide what I can get rid of (if I do). If that guy on the Rambo page is a jerk, by all means remove his images, I personally don't know him so I couldn't have known that.
Don't forget to tell me what you think of the watermark. If it is too big, I can make it smaller. Whatever you want. - Gunmaster45
Re: Saturday Shoot --- more pics coming --- just a heads up
Thanks for the heads up, and good luck with the shoot. It sounds cool that you're going to photograph more great guns, I can't wait to see the McMillan TAC-50 and M249 , and anything else you have, you never dissapoint. If you get more western guns, that will be great, those guns look amazing and GM45 will be thrilled. It's cool that Imfdb will have pictures that no one else has or will have. Anyway, good luck with your shoot, don't work too hard. Also, can you try to get more cool Beretta handguns like the ones you uploaded last time? sorry if I'm bugging you with Berettas alot, I'm just really anxious to see you upload a Beretta 92FS Inox, it's one of the pictures I want most, that's all. Once again, good luck. Also did you tell any other armorers about Imfdb?--Alienqueen11 05:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, sorry I didn't respond earlier, but I have a burning request and I'm hoping you get this message before you go to CW again.
You know those weird AKMSU clones (in 7.62x39mm) that have AKS-74U-style folding stocks? They've appeared in a zillion movies, and I know they must be the same guns being reused a lot. I think they're just full-size AK variants (Type 56s or Maadis, maybe) that have been converted with Krinkov parts kits. I have no idea whose inventory they're in, but I've seen them in a lot of movies that Mike Papac and other CW armorers worked on, which leads me to guess that CW must have at least a couple of them in inventory (unless they sub-rented from a different armory).
They've also appeared in movies like Three Kings, Crank, The Kingdom, etc. If you were to take a picture of one of these guns, I think it would probably become our standard AKMSU photo, because probably 90% of the AKMSU-type guns I've seen in movies seem to be these same guns. If you can get one on short notice, great. If not, no worries. But have fun! -MT2008 04:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Titles starting with "the"
Personally I've always hated the format of putting "The" at the end, despite it being considered "prop format" and personally I like the titles the way they are. If it is absolutely necessary to make this change, go ahead, but I don't like it. I think titles look fine the way the are "MoviePropMaster2008, User:".
And for the people who make fun of us in chatrooms, FUCK EM! People make diggs at us all the time, but the ten or so admins. on the site work hard and productive and are constantly combating 1000s of anonymous users daily, which is more than most can say. We do what we do right and anyone who mocks our work is a dumbass. - Gunmaster45
Getting tired of pictures? Every time you upload more guns, I feel like I'm getting presents, because I love seeing awesome new pictures of guns, especially movie guns. I almost peed myself with excitement when you uploaded all those screen-used weapons (like the P220 from "Live Free or Die Hard") on your last update.
The titles thing may be able to be fixed as well, without actually doing any redirects. There may be a way to sort titles so that the word "The" is ignored. I know that on my iPod, bands that have the word "The" before them are grouped by the next word in their names on my "Artists" list. It can't be that hard to find a command which sorts them differently. I'll see if I can find it.
And I share GM's sentiments on the people's who talk shit about us. They're just lames. Who cares what they think? If they were better than us, they'd actually make their own sites that are as thorough and informative as ours. Besides, I think IMFDB has already been influential in a lot of ways. I already see people on other gun boards distinguish now between a basic "AK-47" and a Norinco Type 56 look-a-like, which seems to be a trend we helped start, now that we've told people what to look for. For every negative comment I read about IMFDB, I see 10x as many people who love our site. Besides, how else do you explain the ridiculous number of views we've had in the last year? (nearly 3x as many in 2008 as 2007, the first year of operations) The numbers don't lie. -MT2008 20:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Nah, dude, I don't disagree with you that it's annoying, what I'm saying is that there may be a way to fix it besides doing re-directs (which is going to take ages if you want to do it). You may be able to fix the page code so that the listing ignores the word "The" if it comes at the beginning of a title. That way, a movie like "The Dark Knight" would be grouped under "D" even if it was listed as "The Dark Knight" instead of "Dark Knight, The". -MT2008 20:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
re: AK issues
No, I don't hate you...actually, I've had the same thought myself for a while. The AK-47 page is getting too long and now includes variants it wasn't really meant to include. However, my idea for the solution is a bit different - that is, I'm not so sure we need to give the guns their own pages based on country of origin.
Broadly speaking, I think the AK-47 page should be limited to AK variants that are 7.62x39mm. You and I both know that the 7.62x39mm AKs which appear in movies and TV shows are the same types that used to be imported to the U.S. in the 1980s as civilian sporters. What that means is that the list is actually pretty limited - you've got the Egyptian Maadis, the Chinese Type 56s, the Hungarian SA-85Ms, and the Yugo M70s, and that's pretty much it. Of course, we've also seen the Romanian AIMS in a couple of movies (like "44 Minutes"), so maybe that one, too. So we can still classify the 7.62x39mm AKs by country, but on the SAME page instead of separate pages. You've told me yourself that armorers mostly stick to the old 1980s-vintage AKs and don't ever buy any of the newer guns (like the crappy Romaks and the Century Arms POSs), so doesn't that make our job pretty simple? We don't necessarily have to look for the more obscure derivatives that will only (at best) show up in movies filmed in countries where those guns were manufactured.
Besides grouping the 7.62x39mm AKs by their country of origin, I propose we also do the following:
-Put the Norinco Type 84 on the AK-74 page instead: The logic being, the Type 84 often stands in for the AK-74 in American and Canadian movies/TV shows ("Stargate: SG1" being a good example), so why not put it on a page with the gun it's meant to imitate?
-Move ALL AK-100 variants to their own page Even though they're basically modest updates of the classic AK-47 design, they're still different enough by name that I think they need their own page.
-Keep any AK derivatives that are significantly different on their pages What this means is that something like the AEK-971 should not be on the AK-47 page. And likewise, the Galil and Valmet (which already have their own pages) need to be kept there.
-Refuse to allow any foreign-made derivatives that don't appear in at least a few movies
How do you think that sounds? Maybe my defensive reflex is a bit strong on this, but I do really want to keep weapons that are basically identifiable as AK-47s and AKMs on one page. -MT2008 21:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Question:
Hey, MPM, how do movie effects people do RPG fire? Is it all CG, do they launch a dummy tip and edit it out, or what?
Re: Titles
I knew somebody would start changing the titles like that eventually, a few users complained about it, and a website even noted to look for titles beginning with The in the T section. The redirects you did worked out great, I think the movies with The in their titles will be easier to find that way, good work.--Alienqueen11 02:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I agree, that makes things much easier! Should we also do the same with titles beginning with "A" or "An"? - Speakeasy804
Mr & Mrs Smith
I just finished The Boondock Saints and am in a pause between movies, were you planning to do this one or can I (I noticed you added shots)? It's been at the bottom of my pile for a while and it wouldn't hurt to start digging from the bottom now. If you have stuff saved, you can of course do it, but if not let me know if I can. Thanks. Great gun pics you've uploaded, we've needed a G36 for a while and the StG 44 is excellent. Superb work. - Gunmaster45
I did the Matrix on my sister's laptop, which puts out some really big pics. I sent them to my desktop and uploaded them on the site but didn't have time to resize them. They look fuzzy? I thought they looked great. I'll be doing the other Matrix movies on the laptop too, but I'll try to resize those shots first. I'm super pissed right now because I screencapped Mr. & Mrs. Smith and 50 of the screencaps didn't save. So now I have to go back and grab the shots, many of which are from gun heavy scenes. So I had planned to upload the caps by tommorow but my crappy as computer has other plans. BTW, I only use my sister's laptop when the DVD doesn't have the right format and won't play on my screencapper (a rarity, but it happens), so I don't use it too often. It's her computer so I obviously can't bogart it for my own means alone. - Gunmaster45
Your images look a lot better, but didn't you buy this special machine that screencaps VHS and DVDs? I'd assume that would put out better images than any simple DVD player like mine. If I had put more time into it, I could have brightened the pictures to look better (I do that more commonly when adding caps to one of your pages, because my caps look like crap next to yours if I don't edit them). Compared to my regular desktop images, you can see why I would find the laptop ones more appealing. You'll see when I upload Mr. & Mrs. Smith that I brightened the pics. My personal favorite screencap from the Matrix is the Desert Eagle cycling blanks, it just looks cool. - Gunmaster45
BTW, how come your images are so small? Usually when I upload images, they are just a little bigger than the sample picture with a full resolution preview. Yours have no higher resolution. Do you resize them to this point to save space or does your screencapper just produce small pics? - Gunmaster45
Re:Admins
I had figured he had had quite a probabtion period, but the one with power makes the decisions, not me. It was just a suggestion. - Gunmaster45
re: Congratulations!
Thanks! It's an honor to be a part of such a talented group. And I certainly understand, no need taking a risk when it's not necessary! While we're on the subject of controlling some of the stuff anonymous users add, I recall seeing a section about spoilers on the forums. I noticed today that someone had changed some of the words on my page for Godfather Part III, The to include some spoilers about the action happening (such as main characters getting killed, etc.) I realize this user was probably trying to help others specifically note when the gun was used, but that's what the screencaps are for. Would it be rude to rollback some of this user's suggestions to the previous format (which was more vague about deaths and killings in the film) or were they correct in adding this information? - Speakeasy804
re: Spoilers
Absolutely, that helped a ton! There are also a few in the Scarface page which, in my opinion, needs some revamping (especially since its one of our most popular pages). I'm thinking of capping it sometime soon when I have about four hours to spare, so hopefully it'll look very cleaned up relatively soon. - Speakeasy804
Mr. & Mrs. Smith pistols
I had them IDed as a Browning Buckmark Camper with a suppressor and a Ruger Mk III with a suppressor. Your caps are a tad clearer than mine, and now I'm even more sure I was right. (I'll likely use your caps instead of mine since they show the guns better)
As for the big room full of pistols, that is awesome. I can just image that when you open the door, blinding light shines through and a choir sings. I could spends hours upon hours in there.
BTW, the Beretta 93R pic looks great.
I'm almost done working on M&MS, it's a big movie and has been taking me a long time to finish. I've also brightened my caps so they look nice. - Gunmaster45
Yeah, I love when you post the pictures of vaults/armories and such. Thanks for sharing those with us. Also, the new gun pics lately (the G36, Sturmgewehr, Beretta 93R, etc.) are much appreciated! Sorry I haven't been around as much lately; I have kind of a lot going on right now. -MT2008 02:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
RE: You might get a kick out of this
Wow, all I can say is Handgun Heaven! That collection truly is amazing, it has everything from Flintlocks to Semi-Automatics, I enjoy it when you take pictures of vaults and museum cases, they're really cool. Btw, the G36 rifles, the Beretta 93R, and the other photos you uploaded this past week are amazing, thank you for uploading.--Alienqueen11 03:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I been to every gun selling site and read every youtube video and could not ever find a
CornerShot on auction. Probably because CNN said this weapon system will onfortunately not be sold to civilians. Were these weapons systems real or replicas if they were real how could armorer's get them when they originated from IRAQ?Btracy1993 22:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
gun room picture
They have an incredibly impressive collection there! That seems like one of those places that once you enter, you'd never want to leave! - Speakeasy804
SP89 used in The Rock
Hi, I would like to know more about the H&K SP89 used in The Rock (1996).
Was it actually, based on a H&K SP-89? or just a H&K MP5k plus a SP89 type front grip?
Also,i would like to know What's the trigger set of it? 0-1? S-E-F? or with Navy type?
That was my bad, I could have sworn he said "Kids." Thanks for clearing that up and going through the effort of screencapping it with subtitles. I'm working on the Glocks now, then I won't have much more to add. - Gunmaster45
Reply
I'd probably stick my hand in the cubby with the MP5K-PDWs or the one with the sawed off/pistol grip shotguns below it to the left.
As for the "Colt 25", it is indeed a Colt 1908 Pocket chambered in .25 ACP, but most newcomers (and the person who made the page) know the cheap airsoft gun's name, which is the "Colt 25". - Gunmaster45
I was reading the Dawn of the Dead page, and I agree that the M16 they used looks more real than an Armscor. I own an Armscor M1600, it hits almost dead-on at 80yards but the pistol grip cracked so I don't use it much anymore. It hardly looks like an M16 at all. - Gunmaster45
How do I get my own room like that? -MT2008 01:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Imagine if you will.......
Wow, how big is Cinema Armory? I would look in the one that the green Beretta looking handgun in it. What is that green handgun anyway? That is a very cool picture btw.--Alienqueen11 01:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Sigma SW9F
Thanks so much for that one! It's cool that we now have a standard black Sigma as well as the grey one. -MT2008 02:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Colt Mustang
I don't know. I had originally changed the Mustang because it had its own page and added it to the 1911. Basically it is still a Compact 1911 variant in .380 ACP (even refered to as Colt Government Model .380 by some and derived from such), but then again they make the Imbel M973 in 9mm and the Imbel MD1 in .38 Super Auto and both of them are fit for the 1911 page and based on the 1911 model. So my vote is no. - Gunmaster45
Re: Chamelot Delvigne Model 1873
The Chamelot Delvigne Model 1873 was issued in the white only they were never blued by the French. Strange to us that someone would issue a bare metal weapon any finishing or caliber mods were done by gunsmith here in the states. We had ten of them at Ellis and they were beautiful in the white. - Phoenixent
Re: Die Hard 2 "MP5s"
I don't think we can call the MP5A3s in Die Hard 2 "fake" MP5A3s because if you look closely, they don't seem to be partial conversions. On Stewart's MP5, you can see that it has a barrel with three attachment lugs, and the lower receiver has a pushpin (for swapping out different types) and a flipper magazine release. The partially-converted HK94s wouldn't have any of that stuff.
The MP5 handled by McClane (the one with the scope) may or may not be an HK94 partial conversion; I will have to check my DVD to be sure. But for now, I'm just going to call them MP5A3s because unless the gun is a partial HK94 conversion, we shouldn't call it a "fake" MP5 (even though we both know that 99% of transferable MP5s in the U.S. were actually converted from HK94s). -MT2008 18:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I don't disagree with you that we should separate the HK94s from the MP5 if they are partial conversions. I've been trying to do that more and more often myself (see my Air Force One page, for instance). But the only thing I'm saying is, the Die Hard 2 MP5s are not partial conversions. Therefore, we can't really call them "fake". I think your eye just slipped. The ones in the movie are the full conversions which are visually indistinguishable from standard MP5A3s. -MT2008 19:04, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Just checked my DVD. The scoped MP5A3 used by McClane is also a full conversion (it has an SEF lower and barrel lugs, which are visible when he pulls it out of the snow, takes out the mag, and realizes it's loaded with blanks). But it's all good, since we're on the same page now, as you said. ;)
I do appreciate the new pics! The AKMS and SL8 are quite nice, but the main one I was happy about was the S&W Sigma SW9F you gave me for my American Dragons page. Even though the Sigma doesn't appear in too many movies, it's really great we have one those now! Thanks again for all your hard work! As far as new users making too many gun pages...screw 'em. I mentioned my stance on this in that topic on the forum. Check it out.
Oh, yeah, and did you see that we were able to use your Daewoo DP51/K5 picture on the page for the game Combat Arms? -MT2008 19:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Smith & Wesson Model 60 Hammerless
I was wondering, did you ever upload a picture of a Smith & Wesson Model 60 with a shaved hammer? I could have sworn we had a pic of such a gun here but when I went looking for it for the CSI: NY page I couldn't find one. Any help you could provide on this would be greatly appreciated. Orca1 9904 21:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: The Beast of War Screenshots
I love the new screenshots, way better than the crappy Youtube stills I had up. Thanks a lot for screencapping this page for me. One note though; the tank used in the film is actually a Ti-67; a T55 that was modified by the Israeli's , most notably having the main gun upgraded from the original 100mm D-10T to a western-built 105mm L7 gun (the same kind used in the American M60 Patton and the earliest version of the M1 Abrams). Thanks again for the new screencaps, looking forward to seeing the rest of them. Orca1 9904 06:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much
Thank you so much for the 870, it looks amazing! I'm wondering the same thing, maybe he wanted to mock the 870 up to look like a Mossberg 590 with Ghost ring sights. But we got to admit, it sure does look badass, thanks again for the shotgun. if you need anything, just ask.--Alienqueen11 19:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Thanks for the Beast updates
I saw this film several times on TV a few years back, but I haven't been able to catch more than Youtube clips (where the previous low-res screenshots came from) lately. Some of the info came from those clips, while the rest came from memory and research on IMDB and Wikipedia. As for the screenshot captions, I don't mind at all, makes my job easier. I remember the film also has a firearm-related Rudyard Kipling quote at the beginning. Orca1 9904 23:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Dawn of the Dead Shotgun
If anyone deserves thanks it's you, but you're welcome. Also, since we're talking about shotguns, do you think you could get an old wood stock set on a Mossberg 590 for the Dead Presidents page? ~Yournamhere (I forgot my name, silly me.)
Re: Dawn of the Dead Shotgun
Thanks again, it looks even more menacing now, a true zombie killer. One question, did you have to do something specific to the shotgun to get the sights on? such as drilling holes?. Anyway, thanks again for the shotgun, it was well worth the wait.--Alienqueen11 05:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Omega Man pictures
Hey great work on the OM page. I don't have the ability to capture stills from a DVD with my PC (I don't think I do) so way to go. Jcordell
Yep I'm a fan of Omega Man.
I'm forty-one and I remember going to a drive in with my parents back in the summer of 73 and watching Omega Man. It was the second feature, but dad says that I stayed awake for the entire movie. Pretty impressive for a five year old.
I own a copy of I Am Legend, but I prefer OM. Own both actually.
The only guns I own from the movie are a 1911A1 and a 1903A3.Whoops sorry I do own an M-1 carbine as well. I own several S&W revolvers , but unfortunately they never make an appearance in the movie. And I belong to a couple Omega Man websites. For those who like the movie.
I don't own any selective fire weapons. Out of my price range right now.
It belonged to the Quigley Down Under page, but I had replaced all the images later on since QDU was my first page I screencapped and had all widescreen shots. I didn't know that if you saved over an image, it eventually stopped getting stretched, and I wasn't an Admin. yet so I couldn't delete them myself. I deleted that image and any other from that movie that pop up in random images. - Gunmaster45
Mauser Rifle Series
I was wondering since you added the Mauser 98 to the page if you think the Gew 98 should be on the same page instead of a separate page? I was thinking that it should be for everything else except the popular Gew98 ans K98k rifles. - Phoenixent
You rock on the Mauser photos they are beautiful. At Ellis we had 1891, 1895, 1898. Model 1935 and VZ's I just have to find my repair records before I list them. Thanks Steve
re:
I'm in the habit of making LOTS of new redirects, meaning that I do new pages for gun variants that we have grouped on particular pages, and then I redirect to the group page. The advantage is that it makes it simpler to insert gun page links when I'm doing a movie/TV page. Like, who wants to write [[Heckler & Koch USP#Heckler & Koch USP Tactical|Heckler & Koch USP Tactical]] when you can just write [[Heckler & Koch USP Tactical]] and be done with it? -MT2008 21:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Heckler & Koch MP7A1 and Heckler & Koch 416
HI MoviePropMaster, I'm Gerry.I want to know if you can do me a favor, if you can upload pictures of a Heckler & Koch MP7A1 and the Keckler & Koch 416 I would greatly appreciate it, and great work so far.
XM16E1 Photo
Hey MPM, I hope that it did not upset you on the XM16E1 photo it was a configuration that most people have never seen or own. It was just one that was missing and the mod was a flash hider, chrome carrier to go with We Were Soldiers. If I did sorry. - Phoenixent
Your Break
You deserve a break, you've done a lot of hard work for us. I hope you find taking pics fun again, just remember, you alone have taken more movie gun pics than any other on the net. It was my fault for starting the whole Frankengun thing, but I think the best way to fix it is to not allow it from now on, and credit you for any of the ones in current use. I can imagine it must be frustrating to have people messing with your work. It annoys me how people like Kin93 almost MASS-PRODUCE your images in this manner, and I don't see your name anywhere on "his" pics. At least Steve told you he used your M16A1 and M16 pics. Kin93 never even contacted you. Anyway, hope your hiatus ends soon, we all love your gun pics and apoligize for those who don't appreciate them. - Gunmaster45
On the one hand, I think you definitely deserve a break. IMFDB doesn't pay the bills, after all, and anything you do for us should be done because you enjoy it, not because you feel obligated to do it.
On the other hand, I don't think you should take it too personally if IMFDB users make "franken gun" pictures. Yes, they should give you credit (as Kin93 failed to do), but it doesn't mean they don't appreciate your work. Whenever someone does that to you again, you should warn them that you don't like them butchering your work, but please don't treat all of IMFDB as if we're like this. Besides your gun pictures (which are awesome), you're one of the most valuable people on this site. Even if you never post another gun picture again, your presence would be greatly missed. -MT2008 18:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Break
Sorry to hear about your most recent problem, and I agree, they should atleast give you credit when they edit your pictures, that's what I would do. And believe me, there are a quite a few users on here who apprecite your work. You are one of the most important users on this site because you have helped bring this site very far, and if there is anyone who deserves a break, it is definitely you. Hopefully you'll be able to find taking gun pictures fun again, and come back, but until then, enjoy your break. You will be missed.--Alienqueen11 04:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Edit MPM2008, When you come back, I think you should see this:[1]
RE: THANKS! for the note of support
I'm glad to see your back and I'm sorry you had a tough time. We all missed you though, the site felt a little less complete without you. Sorry to hear that guy took credit for your work, I'm sure he'll get his soon enough >:)
BTW, check out the Dirty Harry movies, I've been working on them lately (I finished The Enforcer most recently) and am trying to get Sudden Impact done by tommorow. Anyway, welcome back! - Gunmaster45
Re: THANKS! for the note of support
Glad to have you back, and sorry to hear about the tough time you had during your break. Sorry to hear about the shotgun too, hopefully the credit found it's way to who it really belongs to. And I find those Franken Gun picture amusing too, everytime I see one, I wonder to myself how they do that, but figured it was photoshoping, did you see this one?:
About the Wiki page I showed you, Cutaway uploaded your picture of the Mark 23 with the supressor on it on that site, but I also contacted MT2008 about it as well, and Cutaway agreed to take it off the page, don't be hard on Cutaway though, I don't think he knew that you didn't want your pictures on other sites.--Alienqueen11 00:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Glad you're back!
I'm relieved you came back. The past couple weeks just have not been the same with you gone. I totally understand what you said, though.
In your absence, we've still been enforcing rules regarding your pictures. Alienqueen and I took care of the pictures that Cutaway posted on the Gunpedia Wiki (he complied with my request to remove them). -MT2008 01:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome back!
Hey MPM, Glad that you are back hope things went well. I have been putting in some long hours down south also. Good to see your back at it. If there is anything we can do to help let us know. Thanks - Phoenixent
Re: AMT Pistols page
I haven't been talking to Rockwolf actually, I just figured I'd make the page because we needed it. It's understandable that no one wanted them, they are ugly and fire mostly unique cartridges. They are like 1911s on steroids. Anyway, I had Auto Mags on the mind because of the Sudden Impact page I'm soon to upload. BTW, how the hell do you write Auto Mag? Is it Auto Mag, AutoMag, or Automag? I figured it was the first since that's what's written on the gun in your pic (which looks great). That's a 180, right?
I'm proud of my Auto Mag III picture, since it was originally a gun on a rug, but I took the rug out. - Gunmaster45
Thank you, sir. Though I think did get maybe a little carried away with pics of the Glock 19 (seven total, one of which shows just the magazine). Usually, when I do that, it's because a movie has made me enamored with the particular gun that gets more screencaps than the rest. Watching "Executive Decision" has given me the worst urge to go out and blow $$$$$ I need for tuition on a Gen 1 Glock 19.
When I see the 'crazy terrorist' with the Norinco Type 56-1 I always expect him to scream "I Blow You! Mother Bitches!!!!!" hahahahahaha.
Haha, I should have recognized him! It was indeed Shaun Toub [2] who played both the crazy(er) terrorist with the AK folder in "Executive Decision", as well as the store clerk in "Bad Boys". -MT2008
OK, wow, it happens that you post on my Talk Page at the same time I'm writing a response on yours! Haha. Thanks for the new "44 Minutes" M16 pic. Again, whenever you get around to it...Best, MT2008
Request
Excuse me, but I have a request. Could you combine your Remington 870 Folding stock, Ithaca 37, and MP40 images to make the cool looking Ithaca 37 from The Professionals? You just take the a pistol grip of the Remington, add it on to the Ithaca 37, and then put MP40 stock on it. I would really appreciate it. - Swordfish941
Excellent work with the page, that was always my favorite Indy film (Indiana Jones, I mean). - Gunmaster45
I'm glad to here you're doing all the Indiana Jones films, I was so sick of how crappy they were. And I agree, your screencaps look very clear. I have to brighten and sharpen my images just so they can even come close to yours. I just finished brightening and resaving all the Sudden Impact caps so I'll upload them tommorow if all things go well. I should probably go to sleep, it's 3:35am. But tommorow's Saturday and it's spring break from school so who cares? - Gunmaster45
Re:Redacted
I can image that movie offended you (and other veterans), it made all soldiers look like pyschopathic rapists. But I cannot say I would want it removed. Why? Because then we are just as one-sided as the admins. on Wikipedia who delete all the negative crap about President Obama (remember how much we criticized that?). While the movie is offensive (as is Bowling for Columbine), they still have guns so who are we to say they are unfit to be documented on here. (but understand I still am for what you said, the movie was very offensive).
I'm a good example of why Redacted should stay on the site (about 4 years ago). I watched the film but didn't know all the guns that well, and thought "I wonder what they are using. What AK is that?" Even though I didn't like the movie these questions still arose. I doubt I'm the only person in the world who's done this, so those who hated the movie but still wanted to know what guns were used are at a loss.
Edit: I understand you aren't picking on me, you have every right to hate the movie, as does every veteran. I just think that how you feel about a movie doesn't mean it should be removed from the site. Hopefully you understand what I mean and not think I'm being on sided or anything. I totally agree with you about the film. - Gunmaster45
imfdb is now controversial?
When did this happen? I haven't seen or heard anything.And if the site is now controversial who is upset about us? Jcordell
V.I.P.
Great job with V.I.P. so far. I haven't seen that show in a million years. I finally got the Dirty Harry movies done! Now I have a ton of other Eastwood films I'm going to do. - Gunmaster45
I'm not positive on what it is but it might be a Beretta 21A Bobcat threaded for suppressor, similair to this one:
Beretta 21A Bobcat threaded for a suppressor - .22 LR.
Fictional Firearm article moves
I like the changes you made to the fictional firearm titles, but gramatically speaking, the apostrophe should be before the 's'. It would only be placed after if it is a plural word ending in 's'. For example, the possessive of oceans would be oceans'. If it is singular it always ends in "'s" even if the word ends in 's' such as Jesus's. Hope that helps, if you care. -UW
fuck I should have known that. I was tired and it was late. I will change it later. Thx. MPM
re: Browning BDA
Nah, unfortunately, I totally forgot about the BDA when I did the page. Gunmaster was the one who recognized it based on your picture. For some reason, I kept thinking it was a Beretta of some kind and spent 20 minutes searching Beretta photos. My brain is kinda dead right now because I let myself get talked into running 8 miles this afternoon, on only 4 hrs. sleep.
I don't think it's a problem if you want to create pages for some new guns that may/may not be in movies. The only thing I find annoying is when people make pages for guns that couldn't appear in movies because they're only rare prototypes or variants that you know armorers wouldn't have (like the original SR9). Also, if you ever want to upload your MAG-7 shotgun picture, we can put it on the Romeo + Juliet page. -MT2008
Barb Wire
Hey,
It's awesome you're screencapping Barb Wire, but I thought I'd make some comments here (so we don't have edit conflicts) after looking at the screencaps with my eagle eyes ;)
(1.) The SIG-Sauer is a P228, not a P226. You can see in the first shot that the trigger guard is rounded, not squared like on the 226. Denzel Washington used an identical gun (maybe even the same one) in the movie "Virtuosity", with that same custom laser-control grip. LMO has a picture of it on their site under their "Movie Guns" section.
(2.) The gun you IDed as a Browning Hi-Power also seems to be the two-tone P228.
(3.) The Congressionals' M16s look to me like the MGC replica M16s, except with A2 handguards and A1 flash hiders. If you look closely, it seems they have the same style forward assist as the MGC M16s.
also you notice that there's a bunch more guys posting FULL frame screengrabs? versus widescreen? should I replace a full frame shot with a widescreen of the same shot (thus showing more of the picture?)..... MPM
I don't think it matters TOO much. I use widescreen myself when I can, but full frame is fine, too. As long as the guns are visible, that will do. :)
As far as replacing the Franken-guns, go for it. I've said before - nobody's entitled to complain when you replace images because yours are better (and they involve actual effort besides just going to Google or Photoshopping other pics). However, I'm starting to wonder how we can even begin to get every single variant. I mean, let's face it...there are SO many different Franken-M16s, H&Ks, etc. that you'd go insane trying to get every little variation. I wouldn't sweat it too much. -MT2008 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Image
About the picture, remember when the servers switched back in October? Well, two images you uploaded were lost. I wasn't sure if you noticed or not, so I took that image from the old server and uploaded here, and credited to you.--Alienqueen11 23:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
images
What with people overwriting images with the same images that are already on the site?
I was watching the red band trailer for Crank: High Voltage and I took some caps but the video quality was so crappy only one of the pics was even close to site-worthy. Since you seem pretty good at finding excellent quality HD trailers, I was wondering if you could take a look at it. That is if you aren't too busy. Thanks. - Gunmaster45
Enemy at the Gates
I watched Enemy at the Gates last night and saw some guns you missed, so I added the caps to the page, as well as a few minor add ons to the existing guns. It's your page of course so you decide what can stay or go. I tried to make every shot I took very important and took as few as possible. You may notice my images match yours pretty close, I finally figured out how to match your cap format. I need to brighten a little more though, they still look too dark. - Gunmaster45
Like I said, it is your page, you can remove any images I added if you don't like them. I only added one image to the Mosin Nagant section so Joseph Fiennes could have an image for his page if needed, and added two to the sniper version, because they were pretty good close ups. I also added three shots to the Kar98k sniper section, although the closeup in his room isn't the best so I suppose it could go. It's all up to you. - Gunmaster45
RE:
I definitely do not remember that one being in the third "Die Hard" movie. Our page doesn't have it, either. Hmmm...
As for the last post: "All you need for a movie is a girl and a gun." - Jean-Luc Godard (and yeah, he was a commie bastard, but he spoke wisdom on this point) -MT2008 22:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm replying to what you said in Matt's talk page. Now that I think of it, that could be th gun Pamela Anderson is holding. I'll check out Bionic Woman now. - Gunmaster45
Category:B&W
Hey MPM, I like your new sub-category for B&W films I came up with an idea for you. How about a category for Widescreen since it did not exist until after World War II somewhere about 1951 or 1952. Just a thought for you. - Phoenixent
Happy Easter to you too MPM. Don't let them get to you. - Steve
Bionic Woman
Nice job on the page! It needs gun photos and links, of course, but we'll get on that. Anyway, here are some quick observations...
(1.) The MP5s you IDed as MP5A4s seem to have collapsible stocks, which makes them MP5A5s.
(2.) The Serbian gangster's pistol, which you IDed as an S&W 5904, looks like a Browning BDA (the DA version of the Hi-Power, not the BDA-380).
(3.) John got the last two right...they are a CZ-75 (or some clone) and a two-tone Walther P99, respectively.
Take care. Hope you had a happy Easter! Also, when I get home (I'm at work now...ugh) I'll have to put in my "Die Hard III" DVD and see where that Seecamp 32 that's on LMO's site appeared. I really don't remember it, but I'll look for you. -MT2008 19:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
RE:
Ah, thanks for the new gun pictures! We really needed a two-tone Walther P99 because there are a LOT of movies that have them (The Bourne Supremacy, Underworld, A History of Violence, Far Cry, etc.) I thought about asking you for one a while ago, but decided I should let you prioritize other stuff. Also, while I don't have screencaps for it, there were Browning BDAs used by Tibetan separatists in an episode of Ultimate Force, so we can use that one on that page, too.
Also what is with the gigantic ... but blurry ... screenshots that I see other users uploading?
What do you mean? Can you show me examples? -MT2008 21:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Spawn AMT 380 Backup Pistol
Hey MPM, That AMT 380 Backup Pistol that's used in Spawn is just dirty or due to the lighting. AMT built the Backups in Stainless Steel only with the frame and top of the slide bead blasted. My aunt worked at AMT and I knew Harry Sanford since I was a kid until he passed away. - Steve
Hey MPM, No problem on the id for the Backup. AMT which was the last name for that company had several locations. As a kid I went to two different El Monte shops and my aunt worked at both Covina and Irwindale. I think my aunt has a couple of the earlier Backups I will see if I can get a photo of them. I filled in a few blank spots on unknown weapons on pages. It was fun doing that as making new pages can get a little tiring. - Steve
AMT
The AMT Backup is really nice! It's good we have a picture of one for my Spawn page. I was about to upload a Google image search result, but obviously, yours is waaayy better.
So, I checked "Die Hard III" (got through about an hour last night, another hour this afternoon) and I don't know where the hell that Seecamp .32 appears in the movie. Either my eagle eyes are failing me (possible), or LMO got their facts wrong. Or maybe it was rented for "Die Hard III" for a scene that wasn't filmed. But it appears nowhere in the finished film that I can tell. -MT2008 01:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Scarface talk page
Yeah, now that I read what it said you're probably right. I just assumed it was some anonymous user trying to cause trouble. Whether it was or not, you're right - the discussion there is invalid now so I got rid of it again. Thanks for prompting me to take a second look, you were definitely right. Oh and a quick sidenote, the Bionic Woman page is looking great! You certainly put a good deal of work into that it looks like. I didn't get to see it when it was on but it looks pretty good from the caps you got. Speakeasy804 03:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
High Standard 8111 page
Hey MPM,I placed your High Standard K120 Shotgun photo on this page although the page name is not correct. Jcordell listed it by the High Standard catalog number 8111 instead of the Model name High Standard FLITE KING. If you could fix this please. Thanks - Steve
Hey MPM, Thanks for the correction on the page. - Steve
Re: Thanks
I can certainly understand the burnout feeling, especially when working with TV shows with so many episodes. That would be great if they would get those pictures; IMFDB is certainly indebted to you for all the hard work you're doing to get us exclusive pictures like that! Speakeasy804 07:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
RE: Did you take this picture?
No, I just jacked it from google and touched it up with photoshop. Feel free to replace it whenever you want. - Gunmaster45
RE:
That would be REALLY cool if you got pictures of some of the sci-fi guns. There are a lot of pics of the Moritas floating around the 'Net, but most of them are (A.) shit quality, or (B.) the rubber stunt versions. We both know yours will inevitably be 100x better! Haha.
Also, I notice you were curious about these machine pistols from Timecop:
I don't know what this damn thing is called, but it appears in quite a few TV shows and movies. Excalibur got some GREAT pics of them appearing in Smallville:
They also appeared in at least one episode of the TV show Viper (which also had the Timecop Taurus PT99 in its pilot episode) and I think I remember seeing them in an episode of The X-Files as well. Some of the ones used in Smallville seem to be the same ones used in Battlestar Galactica, and we have a picture of a rubber stunt version:
Do you think your Canadian armorer acquaintances would have any idea what they might be? -MT2008 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
That "Cylon Gun" is a different one, look at the cocking handle on the side. It's similar, but different. Also, I can get some Moritas up, though they are Watermarked from the site I got them off. -protoAuthor
Re: Image overwrites
I agree with you about the overwrites, I think you should be only one who is allowed to decide whether your images are to be overwritten or not. It just annoys me when some random user overwrites one of your images when it's not theirs. BTW, Great job on you most recent gun pictures.--Alienqueen11 20:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Old Movies
Hey MPM, Thanks for the compliment on the old movies that I have been posting. Some of them are harder to get clean screencaps on as the master has not been restored. But that is something I a lot of in my own library so I will keep filling the empty spots. I also have westerns dating back than also those will come in due time. One more note for you as it is important to both of us SAG signed Friday and will announce Monday. - Steve
re: bourne
Thanks! Yeah, I figured that because of its age and its less action-oriented story it would have less guns but it surprised me! Trying to identify that rifle really bothered me, I looked through a bunch of H&K and SIG rifles but then when I saw the side shot of it (which is much too brief), I wondered the same thing about the Ruger. That was really the only trouble I had save for the two pistols I currently have labelled as "unidentified" and the CZ-82 I had labelled as a Makarov (but GM45 helped out a good bit with identifying that, as well as noting the Beretta as an original 92 model rather than the 92S I had it labelled as). All in all it wasn't a bad movie at all, if some parts were a little slow (probably to draw in a more diverse audience rather than the typical espionage/action crowd. Speakeasy804 18:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: New images
Nice! I'm so glad we have a two-tone Jericho now. It seems like every other action movie made these days features the lead bad guy using a gun in the exact same configuration. As far as getting a two-tone FS model, I think it's mostly the British armorers who use that model because as best I know, the 941FS was the only version ever sold in Europe. I think the two-tone 941FS pistols that you see in Hot Fuzz, Casino Royale, Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life, and Children of Men are all the exact same gun, because all of those shows were supplied by Crowntower, Ltd. (according to credits). It's likely that you're seeing the same pistol being reused in many films. Fortunately, there are plenty of American action movies which use the original model with the slide safety in two-tone (i.e. my page for Under Siege 2: Dark Territory).
I'm also happy to have a good Benelli M3, too! Thanks again for all of these. -MT2008 18:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Nice!
Awesome work on the new pictures, we needed a two tone Jericho 941. From the looks of it many of the movies on here use the early model Jerichos, the only page I've seen that had a Jericho without the safety on the slide is District B13. Anyway, Thanks for the new gun pictures, they're highly appreciated. By the way, is there a such thing as a reverse two tone Jericho 941? Just wondering.--Alienqueen11 21:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Excellent work, I kind of missed seeing your work. Screencaps improve the site but your images complete it :). If the '94 doesn't have a saddle ring or holes for one, it isn't a saddle ring. I'd say its a Trapper Carbine, is the barrel 16"?
Re:
Nice picture...I would say how about a Vertec section under the Beretta 92 page? -MT2008 03:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
if you watch 2:55:58 of a bridge to far you will see german soldiers with m1 garands , I think they must have had a shortage of k98k's in this film.
I remember you asked if I had Mr. & Mrs. Smith and Taps, and guess what? I bought Taps. I have it sitting in my screencapping box and will try to do it soon. I also grabbed Appaloosa, which I've been meaning to grab for a while. I'll be screencapping that now. :)
This is irrelevant, but I got to hand a Federal M201-Z gas gun today. I went to this man's house who was a former Correctional Officer, and he owns one. He said he owned a gas gun and I asked if it was a Federal M201-Z, which shocked him since most people don't know these guns off the top of their head. Needless to say I thought it was awesome. - Gunmaster45
Thank you for Troll Removal
Thank you for removing the troll who was among other things messing with the content of the M16 page. I've gone through and undid several other posts by this person as they contributed nothing to the pages modified. Rockwolf66
Re:Chuck guns
An armorer from ISS has been sending me photographs of stuff from their inventory that has appeared in movies and TV shows, including the guns from "Chuck". I'm also going to be posting photos of an M1903 Springfield from "Letters from Iwo Jima" and a nickel PPK from the "Austin Powers" movies that he sent me, too.
Also, did you check out some of the pics I posted on The Spirit page? I got great pics of Samuel L. Jackson's revolvers from that movie, and of the O/U shotguns he used, plus Eva Mendes' Beretta Jetfire. -MT2008 13:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
RE:WTF?
As much as I love the Resident Evil videogames and it's guns, I would have to say no to a Samurai Edge page. The Samurai Edge is basically a Beretta 92FS with modified parts, but is still visually the same looking gun, not too different to be worth noting on anything else beside the videogame pages, mockups such as the Aliens' Pluse Rifle are a different story. Plus, not only did he make the page, but it seems that the user copied and pasted the entire article off the Resident Evil Wiki up to the placement of the images, See here [5], and you'll notice everything is the same. I would say delete the page, but I would get word from MT2008, and GM45 before doing anything.--Alienqueen11 00:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Plagiarism is a huge no-no. So, it is now gone. I would maybe say OK to an entry on the Beretta 92 pistol series page, but certainly not if everything is copied word-for-word from another Wiki. If we see that, there's no reason not to shoot (delete) on sight. -MT2008 00:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
No problem MPM2008, I deleted the article.--Alienqueen11 02:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Re: 7.7mm Arisaka Type 02 Paratrooper Takedown rifle
Hey MPM, Same that people have to chisel others out of what they have. I know how that goes I just try not to think about it anymore. The 7.7mm Arisaka Type 02 Paratrooper Takedown rifle was at Ellis Mercantile as that was were the guns came from for Dirty Harry except for the Model 29. I looked at it and just shook my head at what they did to sporterize them. We also had the 7.7mm Arisaka Type 02 Paratrooper Takedown rifle that was used in the Manchurian Candidate. -Steve
Tutone Taurus PT92 AFS
Your images are always useful. I put it on the Shoot 'Em Up page, as that is the only page off the top of my head that I know has that gun in it. Excellent work as always. - Gunmaster45
Thanks, I didn't even notice that. Again, excellent image. - Gunmaster45
Remington 700P
MPM, as far as the PSS entry goes someone was converting all of the 700PSS entries to 700P entries. I put a bit of data on the 700 Police entry so that hopefully People will realize that not every black remington 700 is a P model. I myself own a 700P in .300 Winmag and someday I should try and get a good photo of is so that we can referance the barrel contures. Rockwolf66 23:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
I am changing all the 700P entrys back to PSS enties.Still as I'm not at home and I don't own a PSS I'm not going to make any judgements on if the rifles really are P models or PSS models. Rockwolf66 20:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Shotgun Blanks
Hi MPM, I was wondering if you could help me out with something. Me and my dad are building 12 Gauge shotgun blanks with a reloading press for a movie I'm making in June with some friends, and we were wondering, is there an alternative method of packing in the power than to keep the plastic wad in? Because that plastic wad can be lethal and while we know are safety, sometimes we have to fire blanks at people. Now, he figures something like a wad of cardboard could replace it, but we don't want to try anything unsafe without some more information.
Since a box of 20 blanks is $30 bucks, we figure shotgun blanks are way cheaper to make ourselves. I hope you know a method, or else I may have to pull out the heavy kevlar vests my dad has ;). Or we are going to have to use a LOT more camera tricks. - Gunmaster45
Taurus PT92
Hey MPM2008, thanks for the new Taurus PT92 pictures, they're amazing, especially the two tone ones, keep up the good work.--Alienqueen11 06:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I greatly appreciate those pics, too! The one with the wood grips looks identical to the PT92 that I used to own (although I replaced the wood grips with a set of Hogues not long after I got it). And the two-tone is awesome - did you make it with Darkman II in mind? -MT2008 02:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Reply
You're welcome, and yeah, I remember the days when we had those crappy images. I even used to be impressed by some of them, but then when you came along, you showed we otherwise, and now I can't stand looking at airsoft images on this site. No one can shoot gun pictures better then you. And awesome work on the Mossberg 590, Yournamehere asked for it, and there's a place for it on the Dead Presidents page, I'll be sure to put it there right now. Thanks once again, you have out did yourself once again.--Alienqueen11 03:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
No problem, and don't worry, I'm sure you're fine. We all get that way after alot of hard work. And by the way, is that Mossberg 590 something that should go on your page?--Alienqueen11 03:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Haha, Alienqueen beat me to the punch. But I agree...of course your images are so much better than airsoft images. Remember when our SP89 image used to be a picture of an airsoft MP5K with an SP89-style hand guard? I cringe at the memory now.
BTW, sorry I haven't been on so much recently, but between the move out of my apartment in TX and my crash-course in Arabic, I've been pretty busy. -MT2008 04:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Mossberg 590 from Dead Presidents
Thanks for finally uploading it with the wood furniture, now the page looks cooler. I also saw you uploaded a Model 36 Flat Latch so I'll change that if it hasn't already been altered. ~Yournamehere
Re: Inox
Yeah, two-tone P226s are pretty common in movies. The "reverse two-tone" from 2 Fast 2 Furious is rare (mostly because it wasn't available that way from the factory), but the normal two-tone (nickel slide, black frame, nickel controls) has been in plenty of movies. At the very least, I figured we needed one for the Face/Off and Bad Boys II pages, since the tutone P226 is very prominently featured in both of those movies.
As far as the Inox goes, whenever you can get around it, please do it. The fact that we don't have a good image of a 92FS Inox is kind of embarrassing, since the stock image used on our Beretta 92 series page has appeared on almost 75 movie/TV show pages now. The way I see it, the more a gun image appears on IMFDB, the more urgent it is that it needs to be replaced if it hasn't received the MPM2008 treatment yet.
And yes, I agree that the newer Inox Berettas are pretty ugly; the fact that the controls are now black was obviously done to lower production costs. The older ones look way better. Also, I don't think I've seen an Inox with black controls in a movie (besides Shaft, which featured those cheap 8mm blank replicas that also had black controls), and as I know we agree, it's best to use guns that look identical to the ones which our visitors have seen in their favorite action films. -MT2008 01:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
This shows the most-used images on IMFDB, and of course, they're all gun images. Anyway, you can see that most of them are gun images you uploaded, but a few in the Top 25 aren't. The Browning M2 image that was uploaded by Bunni when this site was started has been on 108 pages, the Inox image has been on 74, and the M60 has been on 70.
Anyway, I mention it because I think it's a good guide for stuff to prioritize. -MT2008 01:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
MP5K request
I apoligize for requesting an image (I'm not sure if I'm allowed to yet or not [?]) but I've noticed that more and more movies use SEF MPK5s with the foregrips removed to make them machine pistols (including Taken which I just finished screencapping) so I figured you'd be the man to find one. Thanks, and again sorry. - Gunmaster45
RE: Calico Weapons page
Great work, The page looks great. The Calico Rifles are probably the most futuristic guns I've seen, they look like something out of Star Wars. I'll be sure to keep a look out for any Calicos on movie pages, I listed Bad Boys on th page just now.--Alienqueen11 19:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, it's interesting you say that, Alienqueen, considering that the Calicos have been around for over 20 years now!
MPM: The page looks much, MUCH better now. I suck with Calicos myself (now that they're so much harder to find), and I get lost with the different variants. Also, have you ever noticed that Calico used to call their weapons the "Liberty I" and "Liberty II"? What is with the "Liberty" nomenclature, and which guns does it apply to?
Oh, yeah, and are you sure the Deep Rising Calicos are the M955A? Not saying you're wrong, just that I personally can't tell the barrel length with those fake rotating barrels on them. -MT2008 22:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks for the explanation about the "Liberty" thing. As far as Deep Rising goes, what you are saying makes sense.
I have one other question which you might be able to help me with...can you tell what kind of optics are used on the M1-L1s in Deep Rising? -MT2008 01:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey MPM, I have a request for you. When I was at Ellis Mercantile we had a pair of custom M-100's built by LaFrance Specialties for a show. Would it be okay to change your M-100 into that configuration? Or you can set it up yourself as there is a photo of it on World Guns.ru smg .Let me know when you can. Thanks. -Steve
Hey MPM, Ellis supplied LaFrance with M100 rifles and he made pistols out of them. They are different then the M110 pistols as they still have the rifle looks. I can mod you photo with you permission and then upload it under LaFrance Specialties M100 Calico Pistol. If it's not up to you standard on the photo when I upload it delete it.Let me know when you can. Thanks. -Steve
Hey MPM, The LaFrance Calicos were sold when the Ellis Gun Room was sold off. I have access to the rental records for them so I can find out what show they were built for. As for a photo World Guns.ru has a photo of one from LaFrance. -Steve
Hey MPM, I uploaded the image of the LaFrance built M100 Calico Pistol. I know that Ellis had two of these I will check with Syd to see if they had them also. The photo is not as good as yours but it will work for now unless you modify one of you photos to match. I don't think we will ever see these in the film industry again. -Steve
Small Request
Hey, MPM2008, I'm not sure if you're still calling a hiatus on requests at this time, but if you're not, I would like to know if you can upload another Remington 870 Police riot shotgun like the one here [6], but with synthetic furniture if you get the chance. Thanks, and sorry if I added to your list.--Alienqueen11 19:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Experimental Guns
I say get rid of any experimental or old gun pages, since they have no chance of appearing in anything anyway, Cutaway created way too many pages like that. But we should keep the ones you created since you're a movie armorer, and like you said, they're already blank adopted, so they have a chance at appearing in a movie eventually, plus they're nice pictures. So my opinion is to get rid of the experimental guns, and keep the pages you created even if they don't appear in anything because you never when you'll be called to a set or work on a movie that will need them.--Alienqueen11 20:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I've already deleted a whole bunch of Cutaway's gun pages that don't appear in movies. If you want to delete any more, I think it's fine. -MT2008 03:17, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Greetings!
Hello MPM2008, I'm a new user to this site, 500Magnum. I just would like to express how I think your pictures are the bomb! I have never seen such fine looking pictures in my lifetime. Keep up all that hard work!
- 500Magum
S&W 60
It's okay, it seems like a pretty easy mistake to make when a gun is improperly labeled by the factory. I'm actually somewhat relieved it actually IS a model 60, because now I don't have to find the image and change it to a Model 36 Satin nickel on all the captions where the image was used on a movie page. I'm glad you cleared that up. - Gunmaster45
Ich verstehe nicht
I figured this would be your kinda movie! It even has the hottie from Downfall toting automatic weapons (though she gets killed early on, sadly). It's a pretty good movie; one of the CT analysts I used to work with recommended it to me.
I'm going to start uploading my screencaps soon. Maybe you can help me with some of the guns I'm not sure about. -MT2008 01:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, MPM, a friend of mine on another forum is making a continuing thread about "Fantastic Firearms". With pictures. I was wondering if I could say he could use your pictures in his article, since they're so awesome. -protoAuthor
Also, could you get a good picture of a sawed-off Remington 870 with an Enforcer pistol grip?
RE:
First of all, I'm sorry I merged the Zastava M70 page without asking you. However, I didn't delete the page for that gun; I simply copied the text onto the AK-47 page and then re-directed the page to go to the Zastava M70 entry on the AK-47 page. If you type in "Zastava M70" in the search engine, it will take you to the new page.
If you want to change it back, that's cool, but I must ask you to consider whether your objections have merit. You seem to be worried that people won't be able to find the Zastava M70; if we do re-directs, then this doesn't happen. And remember that our previous discussion about where to put the M70 was before we knew how to do re-directs.
Also, if SB2296 actually deleted the PSL page without doing a re-direct, then he is not doing the same thing I do. I would never want users to be confused; but I think that with re-directs, this doesn't happen. -MT2008 15:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
The M70 may be built on an RPK receiver, but surely you can't deny that its role is that of an automatic rifle, not an LMG or squad automatic weapon (like the RPK)? Everything else about the gun is roughly AK-based (albeit with the many modifications specific to Serb needs, like the GL sight). That's how I see it - the AK-47 page is more-or-less intended for AK-type rifles, not light machine guns. And the M70 is, fundamentally, still a rifle, even if it's built on an LMG receiver. -MT2008 04:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
You raise a good point, and I actually considered moving the Galil and Valmet pages a while ago. Which raises another point - I wound up not doing it because the Valmet M78 and Galil look very different from the AK-47 or AKM, even though the receiver design is very similar. Whereas the M70 still does look like an AK, and is usually used to impersonate Russian AK variants in movies. On the other hand, I would maybe consider moving the Valmet M78 to the RPK page, since we both know that the M78 has most often been used in Hollywood to impersonate RPKs.
Again, I don't want to sound like I'm fighting you too much or anything, and I don't want us to get too upset about this. I only raise these points because I think it's worth asking ourselves how to be consistent in our classification scheme. These are, of course, issues that are inherent to guns that don't fit into a particular page or category so easily.
Also, before I forget...thanks so much for the new pictures you've uploaded recently! Where did you get those Howa Type 89s? It says on Wikipedia that the Type 89 was never exported out of Japan. It's also really nice that we have a good Blaser R93 picture. -MT2008 04:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
FPK / PSL Sniper Rifle Page
Hey MPM, I changed the FPK / PSL Sniper Rifle page back to it original format and added info explaining that the weapon is based on the stamped receiver RPK and not the Dragunov. Some think that it's a SVD but it's not it's more like a Yugo .308 AK. So all in good now. -Steve
RE: Why do people forget Category:Movie?
Yeah, I agree with you there. It just annoyed me because it's right in the description before they create page using the box, but like you said, it's probably better if they don't. One thing I hate the most is having a visitor find their favorite movie in the Categories, and clicking on it to find a blank or poorly made page, but hopefully that problem will be phased out with time. By the way, I got rid of and deleted those crappy movie templates that User: Dragon made, so you guys don't have to worry about seeing them anymore. Best Regards.--Alienqueen11 07:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Picture Request
i am really sorry to bother you with this but i would like you to take a picture of a AK-74 and AK-74M. I am really sorry MPM2008 but i love your pictures and we need a AK-74 and AK-74M Picture.Oliveira 11:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Bren Ten "Peregrine Falcon". I can get you a picture.
Hey, MPM, I've got a book with a picture of the Bren Ten, I could scan that for you if you'd like. It is old and black and white, though.-protoAuthor
Done, put it on the "Last Action Hero" page. It also appears that tutone is standard, because that picture is from a gun digest.-protoAuthor
PT99
We can use these images to the page of the PT99? - Charly Driver
No problem, I think those linked headings were there for ages before you started editing. Anyway, awesome work on the page, it looks hundreds of times better now. Is the Podbyrin picture you uploaded the actual gun from the movie? It looks great.--Alienqueen11 21:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Podbyrin
Yeah, I just noticed the trigger guard after I sent the message, but no, don't remove it, despite the trigger guard, it's perfect. Plus it's nice to have another unique gun on this site, and it may be the only high resolution picture of the Podbyrin on the net. Thanks again for the new picture, and by the way, thanks alot for the Two Tone M1911A1 you uploaded a few days, it's one of my favorite images on the site.--Alienqueen11 00:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Nice Podbyrin Pic!
Sweet! I like that picture. I haven't seen Red Heat, but I've been dying to see the Podbyrin 9.2mm. Good work MPM2008! -500Magnum
It looks better! But please don't butcher a 92SB (which are kind of rare nowadays) to achieve the same effect in real life! -MT2008 00:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
I can't even tell it is photoshopped. You may have noticed my comment on the Podbyrin page noting the wrong trigger guard. Maybe I'm wrong, but wouldn't a Walther P38 trigger guard be better suited, since the gun is a "P38 on steroids"? - Gunmaster45
Sorry MPM2008, I cut and pasted your sig block by mistake as a quick means of leaving my signature. I sometimes have the habit of pasting and modding words to get things done quicker, anyway i have corrected the mistake on the talk page - User:Cutaway 03:21AM (UTC)
If it is any consolation, I had planned to reupload all of the images resized, sharpened, and brightened. Now that school will be over at the end of next week, I'll have more free time to get it done (as well as the other Matrix films). - Gunmaster45
It's no big deal or anything (and I did think it was cool you grabbed the same frame), I just thought I'd let you know incase you had planned to replace my screencaps or something. My sisters laptop stretches images for some reason, I can fix that too but it is a tad harder... - Gunmaster45
I didn't do it to be immature, I did it because your images make mine look like crap in comparison and I figured it stood out too much. Even with all the image editing I did I couldn't get the color contrast correct. Sorry... - Gunmaster45
It's alright, I understand your frustration and I've definately run into petty people on the net before. Keep an eye out for Matrix Reloaded, it's my next project. :) - Gunmaster45
Czech BRNO VZ24 Mauser
Hey MPM, The Czech BRNO VZ24 Mauser Rifles built before the war were similar to the M24 Yugo or 1935 Peruvian with straight bolt handle, long handguard and different rear sight. It was during the war that the Germans changed them to K98K standard. We had them both in Ellis Mercantile pre-war VZ24 and wartime production. I think that if it is a VZ24 wartime production it should be in the K98k page as they were K98k but the pre war rifles should be on the Mauser Rifle page. - Steve
Small Request
MPM, I know you're not taking requests right now, but I have a small one compared to my last request (The Proffessionals Ithaca 37; I'm sorry about adding it to your to-do list). Could you possibly create a Cobray M11/9 with a MAC-11 style stock (the parts are interchangable, right)? We could use it for our S.W.A.T. and Hard Boiled pages. Thanks and have a great summer. - Swordfish941
CZ75 WITHOUT Ring Hammer
Hey, MPM, protoAuthor here. Do you have an early-edition CZ75? One without the ring hammer, but with the...damn, forget the term, but the 1911-looking hammer. Just wondering if you could get a picture of one up here, for articles like Gunsmith Cats. No biggie if you don't, I can probably find a good picture on JC Devine some day-protoAuthor
Seven Days
Yes, I am an absent-minded moron. I admit it. I even checked the page history and then forgot who I was planning to address. :)
Anyway, watching the AVIs of Seven Days has made me realize what a ridiculous number of franken-M16s there are in the biz. This show has some of the same XM177 mock-ups seen in The Rock and other movies/TV shows - the ones that have M16A2 receivers but chopped barrels with the fake XM177-style compensators. I've seen some episodes that also feature M16 SP1s with A2 hand guards and A1 flash hiders (just like in The X-Files). Any chance you'd be willing to do some more franken-M16 pictures, or let me Photoshop a few? (of course, I won't do it without your permission)
Here's a couple from Season 1 episodes:
Thanks again. Hope work hasn't been too bad for you. I just watched a TV show where an actor threw down his M16A1 (a real one, not one of the rubber stunt versions) and thought of what you told us in that forum topic. Haha. -MT2008 02:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Honoring Actors who have passed away
Read your suggestion about the addon for the pages of deceased actors/ actresses, and I think it'd be a good idea. I also have a couple other additions for that list, namely Alexander Godunov and Heath Ledger. Orca1 9904 04:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I think it's a great idea. I could find some good screenshots of Carradine from the Kill Bill movies if you want, so we don't grab a google image or something. (edit: I checked the page, your image is just fine). It's a shame about Carradine, not the most honorable way to go :( - Gunmaster45
Hey MPM, I think it's a GREAT idea to honor the actors that have passed away. I think that it would raise the level of IMFDB another notch considering that people from the industry are now checking out this site more often. What ever you do on this I will use on a lot of my pages since it's mostly B&W and those actors are gone for the most part. - Steve
Glad you liked the Heston photo with his DOB and DOD. That was my contribution. I think you're onto something.--Jcordell 06:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Godunov?
According to his Wikipedia article, he passed away in May 1995 due to a combination of alcohol abuse and Hepatitis complications. Orca1 9904 04:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Honoring Actors who have passed away
That's a very good idea, I say go for it. I would be great to honor some of the greatest actors seen in movies. Roy Scheider is a good one too, I was going to put something on the Jaws page for him, but I wasn't sure how it would work.--Alienqueen11 21:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Over reacting
Ok, I might agree the Team America one deleting might have been over doing it. I was just pissed off that no one cares about South Park, The Simpsons, and American Dad, not to mention Family Guy. I see HUGE discussions on what kind of weapons they are using when clearly most of them were fictional guns drew up because the guy drawing doesnt know a thing about guns or wasnt told to be more detail with them, the rest of the shows look like doodles, why make the guns look like guns. Excalibur01 07:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
VG guns
Well some games can be forgiven to be a little bit lack of detail, but quite a few games do go out, record the sound of the real gun shots and use those in the final production, the bigger problem most gamers has with VG guns is more on their accuracy and power compared to the real thing. VG developers sometimes significantly just make guns that would be powerful and accurate as hell weak as fuck for the sake of game balance. And going with Modern Warfare 2, some of the guns are just stupid for what real world special forces would use. I mean the Bushmaster ACR? I can see how it has military uses, but I don't even think it was even considered for military use. Russian Ultranationalist using AUGs and FAMAS? Spas 12s? Oh yeah and the one big thing a Kriss Super V. That thing last I heard wasn't even in full production yet and they somehow have Russian terrorists get ahold of one? At least with COD4, they were semi consistent with what primary guns people use, the SAS and Marines using M4 weapons, the enemy using AKs, but the random USPs, Berettas and the one mission where you as the SAS trooper holding and M24 sniper rifle was just piss poor. Excalibur01 07:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
RE: VG guns
I agree with you MPM, but only because most of those experimental and rare guns are pieces of shit. For exemple, look at how many games have the XM8! The XM8 sucks ass and video game developers love them. The same thing happens with the XM29. It's a piece of shit and video game developers love them because it looks futuristic and cool. It also happens wtih the SPAS-12. It's really fucking weird to see a discontinued, really expensive shotgun being used by police or Military soldiers in video games.-Oliveira 18:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who first got into modern military/LE weaponry by doing weapons skins for Half-Life mods in my teens, I can say that most game dev teams really have no common sense when it comes to weapons. The SPAS-12 is actually a very good example. I remember on my first mod (which never got finished), there was a lot of disagreement amongst the members of my team over what type of shotgun we were going to have. Most members wanted the SPAS-12 because they all thought it looked cooler, while I wanted a pistol-grip Mossberg with heat shield (I had just been to a gun show where I had the chance to hold one, and being 17, I thought it was the coolest gun ever). Ultimately, the SPAS-12 won out when we voted on our forum. Of course, this was an unprofessional mod being designed by high school and college students, but most of the professional teams in the business aren't that much different - the designers are all geeks who have zero real-life experience with firearms. Whenever they choose which guns are going to appear in the game, the team members almost always pick what they've seen in other video games or their favorite movies. -MT2008 19:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
RE: SPAS 12
Yes, the SPAS-12 apears in movies all the time, however, i was talking about how it's weird to see SPAS-12s being used by Militarys and terrorist/criminals because they are discountinued(I probably spelled that wrong) and expensive. The SPAS-12 does needs a place in IMFDB. So does the XM8 even though the only XM8s that appear in movies and television are Mock-ups like the ones in XXX 2.-Oliveira 20:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Understood
Yeah, I should've responded on Oliveira's page. I got carried away again... -MT2008 21:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thank you for editing
Thank you for your editing of things specifically the star trek page which looks great now. You're Awsome!!!!!!
Re: Our own movie
OK, so the idea of IMFDB doing its own action movie (with an actual budget, storyline, and production staff) is a total fantasy, but here's something a little more grounded in reality: What would you think of a short home-made video where we show off some blank-adapted firearms, provide narration describing how they work, maybe even do a brief firing demo where we fire a few rounds through a pistol at someone's range? IMFDB already has a YouTube account (under Bunni's name) - we would just post it there. Nothing too fancy - just a video that would explain to people that, contrary to popular belief, the guns they see in movies are real. I'm still amazed at how many people seem to think they're "fake" (just talked to another gun owner on another message board who initially didn't believe me).
Also, that reminds me...what are rental fees at the armories nowadays? Does it cost significantly more to rent adapt a blank-adapted pistol as it costs me to rent an unmodified pistol from my local range? Of course, I'm guessing blanks themselves are the bigger expense (since the armories all do their own loads). -MT2008 23:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Oh, yeah, and by this, I mean that the blank-adapted firearms in the video would be rented/borrowed from one of the major rental armories. If that's even possible... -MT2008 00:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't see why the action movie is a fantasy. I could get someone to write us a script, and if we all pooled our resources... We have people who can be actors on this site (myself included), I'm sure. We just need money. How many members do we have?-protoAuthor
ProtoAuthor, I have been on some film sets (mostly when I was younger and several major shows were filmed in my home town), and I know enough about the industry to know that that's not a realistic goal.
MPM, wow, I had no idea blank costs had risen THAT high, even though my sources have always told me they are more expensive than live rounds. And sorry to hear about the SAG losses, though I remember hearing about it earlier (you're actually one of a couple people I know working in showbiz who have told me the same story about how it affects them).
That being said, the best I can say is that I'd rent one of the guns that hasn't "paid for itself" in rentals yet (i.e. one of your Springfield XDs or FNPs), so it would be a step forward to a return on the investment. But I do understand the issue with blanks, that and the fact that I appreciate how hard it is given your schedule. -MT2008 20:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
rule of thumb is usually 10% of full replacement costs for one week.
So, in other words, an $800 pistol would rent for $80 a week? Does it adjust as a gun loses Blue Book value? (i.e. do Gen 2 Glocks rent for lower prices than Gen 3 Glocks)? Also, I'm guessing daily rentals or student rates aren't SOP? -MT2008 00:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
SAG Strike
Ok, i know some things about the SAG strike but i didn't knew it was that bad! Can you tell me how the SAG strike affected movie armourers?-Oliveira 02:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
new user issue
My guess would be an issue with his browser. To troubleshoot I'd suggest first creating a new account using the same computer, if the problem persists I would change to a different browser (ie. Firefox) and if it still persists try a different computer. I bet simply changing browsers will take care of it though. bunni 02:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Much as I hate to be down on a page obvious work has gone into...
It's a scrolling shooter where the player controls a spaceship. I can see how two of the pictured weapons could be based on real-life weaponry, but you could say the same of Halo [sniper rifle as NTW-20, assault rifle as FN F2000] and I don't think that's around anymore. Dongs 08:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Holland & Holland Page
Thanks for the compliment. Boy I wish one of those H&H rifles pictured were mine. But I'm just a mere mortal who has only held an H&H Double (owned by a wealthy local businessman). And I count myself lucky for that experience. The photos are from the Nitro Express Forums site. http://nitroexpress.com/
But thanks again. I figured it was time that we had a page for those great (and expensive) doubles. --Jcordell 14:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, and Little help please
First thanks for your revamp of the Calico weapons, great photos. Second I was wondering if you could help ID this gun from the Australian show Sea Patrol:
Nothing I find seems right, it looks like a Smith and Wesson but the pattern on the handle seems off. Revolvers aren't my strong suit.
Thanks, and keep up the great photographing.
Sci Fi Gunner 22:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Memorial Photos
I'm flexible. If that is what folks want done or want to do I won't throw a hissy fit if they replace the photos I added. I've heard from different contributors regarding the memorial photos. Some people like what I've been doing - gives it a Hollywood feeling. But you an a couple others have suggested using screencaps with the actors in their iconic roles. That's the nice thing about imfdb. we can all contribute. For me it's just fun. Good hearing from you. Glad to know that folks are not against the memorial photo idea. Just have different opinions on how to format them. Or is it present? Well you know what I mean. --Jcordell 18:47, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Test Template Page
Hey MPM, Nice test page showing the difference between old and new. Adding a new column is easy just have to figure out what to name the column and how wide to max it out. I am working on the AK and M1911 right now to test but I can see right now to add a note section. Let me know what you think. -Steve
Hey MPM, Added the notes column check it out. -Steve
The Daewoo K3
Hey, MPM, I just made a page for the Daewoo K3. I just figured out last night (with Steve's help) that some "M249s" in movies are visually-modified K3s (like the one used by Kevin Costner in 3000 Miles to Graceland). Can you tell me more about the obstacles to buying M249s which led armorers to use the K3? I figured I should get input from both of you on this so that the summary is accurate as possible. Thanks. -MT2008 16:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Steve says they were apparently cheaper at one time. One thing I've noticed is that the K3s seem to appear mostly in action movies filmed in Canada. If you happen to run into one of the K3s made to look M249-ish, please do tell. -MT2008 01:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I hate puppets
It's not that I hate puppets. It's that I hate taking it seriously. I mean come on. We're talking about what kind of guns they armed little string puppets. Where did they come to the conclusion that I hate puppets? Excalibur01 01:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, well I got tired of looking at the cartoons, screen caps or not. Excalibur01 04:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Rock Island Armory Commander
Hey MPM, You would not happen to have a photo of a Rock Island Armory Commander. Ben Stiller uses one in Starsky & Hutch (2004). -Steve
Hey MPM, Good to see that you are busy working I know several that are just looking for some work. The RIA Commander in the photo has Colt Series 70 checkered grips on it. No hurry on the photo as I will put a filler in it place for now. Thanks. -Steve
Template
Hey MPM2008, I just want to say amazing work on the new template. That is a good example of how a template should look, I can actually see that successfully showing up on more page in the future. It looks millions of times better then the crappy ones Dragon made months ago. Good work.--Alienqueen11 01:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks but PhoenixEnt designed the original template. I am just playing around with it to try to see what format seems best, and boy is it hard. I sure hope we all agree on something :) MPM2008
I Concur, this will help keep the information neat and organized. This will especially be good to have on certain pages. -500Magnum
The only issue I can potentially see is if no character is seen using something; for example, a remote weapon who's controller isn't identified, a weapon found on the ground but not picked up, or whatever. Dongs 06:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey MPM, Thanks for the compliment on the template layout. You really brought it out to the for front. I just brought to IMFDB some items we used on another wiki. I do believe that all the Admins will come to the same page on how the final layout will look. It will look great when we all get on board the same train. Thanks Again. -Phoenixent
I think we should use more, although it'll take alot of work getting used to. I agree to anything that will help the site look neater, plus I would like to see that template on more pages.--Alienqueen11 22:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Re:
slaps forehead* OK, I admit it, I really am going senile at 23. Either that or the fact that I had my Arabic final yesterday and have been sleep-deprived for the better part of the week. Sorry, but don't take it personally. Oh, and nice job. ;) -MT2008 00:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Standardize Template Layout
Hi, As we are moving forward with the new layout on the Guns and Actors pages. We need to finalize a standard layout for the Template. We have been changing gun pages over and they do look better but everyone has their own style. Dates for instance some are on the right side some on the left, some have the most current movie at the top and some have the oldest. Then we have other issues like the headers are different from one poster to another. We need to fix these issues now before we have a ton of double work to do. Please give you feedback on pages completed like the M1911 pistol series and the Steyr AUG so we can have a standard on these pages. Thanks - Phoenixent
I prefer Chronological order as well, since it neatly documents each year the guns appeared each year without needing a character to use it.--Alienqueen11 04:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I figured there was already a consensus that we do things by chronological order? I definitely agree with the idea, 100%. Also, in situations where we have multiple movies featuring the same gun in one year, then we go to alphabetical order within those years only. For example, if we have listed ten films, all released in 1996, that feature the Beretta 92F, those ten films should be alphabetical order. There might even be a way to change the columns so that we won't have to write "1996" for all ten films, though I have no idea how right now. -MT2008 04:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Updated Template
Thanks to everyone for the response. I have changed the first entry in the 1911 page to a blend of both mine, MPM and MT2008 which looks very nice right now. As to the other suggestions on lines for each entry I have posted samples at Talk:Test Template Page. The third sample looks the best as in not quite as busy as the others. The colors can be changed to a lighter gray or blue if that need to be changed to make it a little more eye appealing. It looks like we are getting close to a standard on this pretty quick. As for added actors using the same weapon I have always included them on the listing instead of trying to place multiple actors on one entry that way it has less clutter. Thanks on your input on this. - Phoenixent
Zombieland Mare's Leg pistol
I understand my comment on the Mare's Leg gun disrupted the flow of the page, so I figured I'd tell you a little bit about it. I'd assume it is a C.B. Custom model. They've been selling the "Mare's Leg" in typical pistol calibers (.38spl, .45LC, .357Mag) and consider it a pistol so civilians can buy it without paying a tax for a cut down rifle. Since the gun looks so new and shiny, this could be assumed. Also, they sell the gun with a non-loop lever. LSI (Legacy Sports International) has also been reproducing Mare's Leg guns since 2008, so perhaps this film bought one brand new from the company to show it off (but since the movie was filmed at this time it would be BRAND new). - Gunmaster45
The Hills Have Eyes
Sorry about that, I couldn't figure out why it was doing that, so I just deleted the redirect page, if you can make a better redirect, go ahead. I'm not too good at doing redirects myself.--Alienqueen11 17:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem, I was going to try getting rid of the Category: Movie tab at first, but everytime I hit the Edit tab, it would bring me to the page it redirected to, so I just decided to get rid of it, thanks for creating a better redirect by the way. --Alienqueen11 22:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Alien resurrection
I added a note to Alien: Resurrection about a page I found on the props, you might want to take a look and see if it's legit since it implies most or all the sci-fi firearms are just props made from machined aluminium. Tim 01:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey MPM
Anyone ever tell you that you have a lot of pictures? haha. - RedJedRevolver
BTW the HKP7M13 picture, the factory nick and the blued, are they the same gun? I'm just wondering, same serial no., and if they are, how'd you accomplish that?-RedJedRevolver
Ahahah I completely agree, I posted a picture of my Gold Cup on the forum, but I put duck tape over the SN. So are they the same gun? I saw that they had nicks in the same place as well. And thanks, I just pay attention
Desert Eagle
Agreed, moved back. -MT2008 23:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Navy SEALs
Hey MPM, would it be okay if I uploaded a few screencaps for Navy SEALs? When I say a few, I mean a FEW. I just wanted to add some guns you missed.
Terrorists fire a DShK (or M2 mock up) at a helicopter during the film's start
FN FAL seen in soldier's hands in news footage.
Sheen uses a Browning Hi-Power to shoot a terrorist when he finds the conversation "boring".
Stinger missile launcher, which is kind of pivotal to the whole story.
One of the SEALs is seen holding a 92FS in one scene (during the night raid), it had a squared trigger guard.
I promise I won't fill up the page with huge amounts of screencaps, in fact I think each gun should only hail one or two caps each, total. I don't think I'll need to add any extra caps to the existing guns either, unless I come across something really, REALLY good. :) - Gunmaster45
After screencapping it, I noticed all types of AK variants are seen, not just AK-47s and AKMS's. The Hi-Power was a CZ-75. The new footage had an FN FAL, and M16A1 with jungle taped magazines, and a DShK. The gun at the beggining is the same type of mocked up M2HB from Rambo III, except it is a dual mount. And a terrorist APC is seen fitted with dual M1919 .30 calibers. There are some other guns too but that was just some of the stuff I caught. I took a few more extra screencaps for the existing guns than I thought I would, so I'll put those in the discussion and let you okay them. Sound good? - Gunmaster45
Shit. Damn my impatience! Well I only added some extras to the existing guns on the page and filled out the AKs in better detail. I'll leave everything else to you, and hey, if you miss anything once your done I still have all my screencaps saved and ready to use. Sorry to tread on your toes. - Gunmaster45
BTW, I fixed up the page format a bit (it wasn't quite IMFDB standard). I was wondering, what is this gun Ramos is holding?:
File:NS-FNFNCPara-1.jpgRamos with (???). My best guess is an FN FNC Para or someting around that series of firearms.
After updating DefTech1315.jpg I noticed the RoboCop 3 page used a duplicate image of the original (found here). They were both the same image before and now the DefTech1315.jpg is just a larger/cleaner version, and the one here isn't used. Sci Fi Gunner 16:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
DONE :)
RE:Sorry guys
Good luck with the productions. I started to film my own movie last tuesday and a little today, so I guess summer's movie making time. Hope you get back soon. - Gunmaster45
Great to hear from you again! I was wondering what happened (I only just noticed the update on your user page, haha). Hope all goes well and you (and the guns) all come out of it OK. I'm sure you'll have stories to tell, too! -MT2008 04:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Armorer page idea
Hey, I haven't checked the forums in awhile so I don't know if anyone's had this idea before, but I was wondering if we should set up a way of making pages for movie armorers or at least one page with the armorers and links to the movies they've done. I'm not sure how it would be set up, but I just wanted to consult with anyone else to see if this would be a good idea. I figured these guys do a ton of work and it'd be great to see who all's worked on what, etc. Again, if anyone's had this idea before just ignore this but I was just thinking it might be neat to honor these guys. Let me know what you think! Also I hope you're having a good time with the productions you're working on now! - Speakeasy804 05:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Your Photos
You know, I was just looking at those photos you took on your user page, and I must say that these are very well done. Bravo! -Gunman69 02:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Indies
So do you ever find that the Indies are lees knowledgable about firearms from the A list movies or is there no difference. --Jcordell 02:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
There are ignorant idiots everywhere. Doesn't matter what the budget is. MPM2008
Smith & Wesson Model 5943
I read your comment regarding the 5943. I don't know if I came off as rude, condescending, or arrogant, but I assure you I did not intend offense nor did I mean to slight you in any way. I am merely a gun enthusiast whose knowledge is evergrowing, much like the rest of the people on this site.
The Smith & Wesson number system dictates that a "5943" is a full size, double action only, alloy framed gun, and there are numerous examples of this. However, the gun pictured to represent the 5943 has the 3.5 inch barrel of many of the 69 Series guns. You know without a doubt that it's a 5943, which, since I can't confirm with you due to your real life projects, I can only assume you can confirm by the marking number stamped on the frame. After looking some more online, I've found two possible answers to this phenomena. One, someone could have merged a 6946 slide assembly with a 5943 frame, but I don't know if you got the gun secondhand or not, so this isn't likely. The other answer is the 5943 SSV (short slide variant) which is exactly like the one you have pictured. I'll attach a link to an example. It has a blued slide, but I did find an example with a stainless slide, but the picture was removed before I could save it.
Again, sorry if I offended you, I'm just trying to figure something out and learn.
Nice pic of the Bisley Colt! I didn't know Cimmeron made a copy of that version, but I guess I haven't looked at their site in a while. Any way, excellent work. How's the work in the indie movies going? - Gunmaster45
Help with Militaria
I see you are a collector of Military equipment. I want to be a collector too. Could you tell me where to find a good website that sells militaria? I am looking for a soviet SSh68 helmet. The one the Soviet Army used during the war in afghanistan. I'm also looking for a Vietnam War era american M1 Helmet with the Nam Leaf pattern. Could you tell me where i can find those?-Oliveira 14:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Nope. I got all my stuff years ago in person and NOT on the internet. I bought all my M1 helmets with the nam leaf pattern cover at the Great Western gun show in 1993. MPM
Template Layout
Hi Everyone, Now that I am back let's talk about the page layout template. On the forum we had one item brought up about the chronological order being reversed. Also another item was brought up about putting lies or boxing in the information. As admin it is up to us to police the site and make a decision that is agreed upon by the majority of admins and then implemented. Let's all go back to the Talk:Test Template Page and nail these last issues down. As we talk about it pages have been created and might need to be corrected so there is a standard look to all the gun and actor pages. Thanks for you input and help on the. - Phoenixent
Re: Primeval
I just saw a chopped and converted HK94 (masquerading as an MP5) on the BBC show "Primevel" tonight. WTF? Why on earth would the British Armorers have such a thing?
Hmmmm, that is odd. I imagine that there were at least some HK94s imported to the U.K. before the 1987 Hungerford Massacre (and the subsequent ban on semi-auto rifles and shotguns), so it's possible that a few were acquired by the British armories and only partially converted to MP5 specs. But it's definitely the kind of thing I wouldn't expect to see anywhere except in American movies and TV shows. -MT2008 03:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Re:Remington M1903A3 in Public Enemies
I think this is a factual error mistake or someone confused the rifles to be M1903's.Maybe it's an earlier version of the M1903. - Kenny99 02:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
This pistol has a single-stack frame, so it can't be a 6906. It's most likely a 3913 (the regular 3913, not the Ladysmith). -MT2008 02:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
WTF? you in the habit of reading Gunmaster45's talk page?
Yep, I'm just creepy like that. No, seriously, I was about to leave a message on his page when I decided to PM him on the forum instead.
As for the S&W, I'm not 100% sure it's a 3913. But remember that because Rachel Weisz is a woman, she's probably got small hands, so guns which look compact in the hands of a guy are probably going to look much bigger in her hands. Her IMDB profile says she's 5'7".
Thanks for the new pictures. It's nice to have our own P18.9, and the old-school MGC XM177 look-a-like. I've actually handled one of the newer MGC XM177s (which has a more realistic-looking forward assist button). -MT2008 02:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Whoa, you have been quite busy this weekend! Nice, very nice! But still curious...any chance of an MGC M16 configured like the ones from Barb Wire and Outbreak? -MT2008 03:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't think the Barb Wire guns are a factory MGC config; I think they were built using real M16 parts. As you noted yourself on the page, they have real M16 mags that clearly don't fit in the wells.
Anyway, as far as the Photoshopped guns go, I noticed that somebody keeps re-adding many of the M16s (like that inaccurate XM177E1) to the M16 page even though I have removed them myself on various occasions. Not sure who keeps doing it, but I would not discourage you from removing them. I'm getting to the point where I'm a bit fed up with Anonymous users myself (I've undone their incorrect edits a whole bunch of times now). But I hope it doesn't make you completely hate us. -MT2008 03:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I was just coming on here to suggest 3913 as well (not the Lady Smith though). I believe this is the gun in Painkiller Jane (2007) as well. Let me know when you plan to finish Navy SEALs, I'm looking forward to seeing it. - Gunmaster45
I think they're Bulgarian Arsenal ARs in 5.56mm not Norinco guns.
Hmmm, you might be right (the dark wood is certainly not consistent with Chinese AKs), but I'm pretty sure they have the full-circle front sight hoods, which would mean they're Norincos. I'll have to check again to be sure. Also, the armorers who worked on Underworld: Evolution are the same guys who do Stargate: SG1, and that show very often uses the Type 84 to equip the Russian SG teams (as an AK-74 substitute). So it would make lots of sense if the same guns were used here. -MT2008 00:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
You might be right (and we both know I've screwed this up before), but just take a look at this one other shot:
My eyes could still be playing tricks on me, but those do looked like the circular front sight. Also, I noticed that in Stargate: Continum, Cameron Mitchell used a Type 84 with the same color wood:
Again, the same armorers worked on both shows. It would make plenty of sense if the same AKs were sent out on both. -MT2008 03:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Images
Hey MPM2008, I just want to say excellent work on the images you have uploaded this past weekend, I like the Pre war M1911A1 alot. Keep up the good work, I hope work has gotten atleast a little easier for you.--Alienqueen11 01:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Can you believe this guy?
Yournamehere thinks he can come to my page and change the format I prefer because he doesn't like it. How is my format not orderly. It's pissing me off. I mean look at my Black Lagoon Page. How is it better now than before when I had sections for which guns is which. Excalibur01 23:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
You should ban this guy.
67.183.66.44 is making nonsense edits to loads of gun articles, adding links to films he seems to just be making up as he goes along, adding images that are misformatted...He needs a good solid kick up the rear, I think, since he's just making things worse now. Vangelis 05:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
RE: Jericho
Nah, I'm not sure who those guys are (or if they're all the same person). I haven't touched my Jericho page in months now, even though it could use some more work.
Also, sorry I didn't get back to you about user 67.183.66.44, even though I see you banned him. I have been pretty busy and I keep forgetting to do things for this site that I've been meaning to do. -MT2008 20:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Léon
Don't commend me, give the honors to AdAstra2009. He's the one who did the completed page first and IDed the obscure weapons such as the assault rifles. I'm just adding better screencaps and fixing formating issues (no captions, lack of descriptions, etc.), although there are a few guns I will still upload that I don't think he found. - Gunmaster45
I second that; I think John is correct. -MT2008 21:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Pulse Rifle inspiring the Morita
Yes it did, the same guy made both of them. The dude took what he learned from the pulse rifle, and applied it to the morita.-protoAuthor
Nice new pics! + "Stealth"
Thanks for the new MP7 pictures! Are those yours? The Rossi Overland is also great, because now we can ditch the picture that was jacked from LMO (I think you can probably just upload over the old one, and nobody will mind).
Also, I still think that the MP7 that you documented in Stealth is actually a prototype PDW and not a production model, for the reasons I mentioned on the page (and which I guess we should move to discussion). -MT2008
Actually, ignore what I said, I forgot that the existing Rossi Overland was the same one from The Untouchable, and keeping it for that page only is a good idea. But I think we should use yours for all other pages that have the Rossi. -MT2008
Nah, I ain't psychic, just happened to be online at the same time. It happens. LOL. As I said later, changed my mind...the LMO one can stay on the The Untouchables page only, but every other page that uses it should have the image replaced by yours. Also, I think there's already a sawed-off 870 besides that one from the Waco Police Dept. on here somewhere...we should just ditch it and use the other one.
Nice MP7. H&K may think we suck and they hate us, but having our own MP7 pictures is really great, especially since it appears in so many movies as of late. -MT2008
Assault on Precinct 13
Oh yeah that movie is seventies all the way. My dad was a cop back in the seventies (1970 - 1994) and what that movie portrays was a very real concern of cops. The idea of a police precinct being besieged in an inner-city neighborhood seemed very real. Plus all the firearms are old school. Revolvers, pump action shotguns,even that unrealistic "silencer"on the C96. None of the bells and whistles that the remake had.Plus the bad guys was a street gang not some type of massive armyof "bad" cops.I like the fact that the original isn't so PC. All in all it's a better movie imho. Just has an edge that the remake lacks. Alot of the 1970 cop films had a bite to them. --Jcordell 21:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Flight of the Intruder Edits
Sorry about stepping on your toes in regard to Flight of the Intruder, I didn't mean to mess you up while you were working on the page. Orca1 9904 06:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Don't use PNG files for screenshots
Okay. Now I have to convert all the screenshots after I take them, no a big problem. How do I remove the pics I already posted?
BTW, I didn't realize just how much work it takes to make a page till now, you guys are really amazing. --Zurak 47 23:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
As you noted, this is the same gun used on Stargate: Atlantis. The show's armorer, Rob Fournier, specifically said in an interview that it's a Desert Eagle .44 Magnum, and he also mentioned that the gun was originally built for Timecop even though it's been re-used on the Stargate shows several times now. You can check that interview out here:
Just thought you might be interested. Have a good weekend. -MT2008 00:45, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Maruzen Pump action TEC 9 in Planet Terror
Thanks for spotting that. The M3 Grease gun was already written on the page before I worked on it and I followed it right in. I didn't pay close enough attention to caps I took of it either to see there is a big damn difference. I was in too much of a hurry trying to get them all loaded. Thanks again. --Predator20 05:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
When I get older I would like to be a film armorer but have no idea how, could you help me? Drjuki 19:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Category:Behind the Scenes Image
Good idea! We do have a lot of photos that need this classification (mostly on John's pages). Do we apply it to images of stuff like armorers showing off the guns, actors training with weapons, etc., as well as Trivia-related stuff? -MT2008 02:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: B&W Actor Pages
Thanks for the heads-up on that; I modified some of the pages I had made recently which mostly include B&W actors and a few actors from Hill Street Blues who have passed on. Would you be able to check one of the pages, such as George Raft's, just to make sure I did it correctly? Speakeasy804 06:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Also, unrelated, but would you be able to very briefly check this cap and identify the revolver. I had originally thought it was a heavy-barreled S&W Model 10 but Gunman69 identified it as a Model 15. He may be correct but I'd just like a confirmation. Thanks!
Looks a lot better! Feel free to replace the old one. Also, I've meaning to re-upload most of the images my contact at ISS sent me - not the Public Enemies guns, since those are the ones that got me into trouble, but I will put back the guns from Chuck, Letters from Iwo Jima, The Unit, etc. When I do, would you like to do clean-up work on those?
Also, what do you think of the gun pictures on Weapons Specialists, Ltd.'s web site? I just uploaded their Seecamp LWS-32 (so that I could use it for my Strapped page):
I think they're not quite as good as yours, but still pretty sweet. They have a lot of cool stuff on their site. -MT2008 04:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Hi Standard group pic
Oops, sorry! Thanks for letting me know, I just put the previous picture back up! Speakeasy804 20:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
The Cell
I doubt those SIGs are P220s. When in doubt, you should probably assume P226, because the 226 is by far the most common SIG pistol used in movies.
Also, the gun you IDed as a Glock 17 in Jeepers Creepers also appears to be a SIG P226. -MT2008 02:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Mera Gaon Mera Desh moved to .......
You have moved Mera Gaon Mera Desh to My Village, My Country aka "Mera Gaon Mera Desh" as per IMFDB's standard that if a foreign has an English international title, that title takes precedence. But as far as I know, this film does not have any english title. Even in the IMDB it is listed as simply: Mera Gaon Mera Desh. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0232081/ My village, my country is a direct translation of the hindi phrase, mera gaon mera desh, however the movie is known by its original hindi name. Therefore It would be kind enough if you inform me the reason behind this redirection that has taken place. Thankyou. ritwikbmca 08:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Also I would like to know that how this foreign films are defined in IMFDB. As this is an international detabase, US made films are also foreign to us. Had this been Hollywood movie firearms data base, then films made outside US could have been called foreign. But this is certainly not the case. Therefore, I think it is not fair to precede an english translation before a non-english title. I would be happy to here from you regarding this matter. Thankyou. ritwikbmca 08:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, now I can get the point that why you have changed the title. But I have checked on the IMDB that Khosla ka Ghosla has a UK subtitle, Khosla's Nest, and Rang De Basanti has an english international title, Paint It Yellow. Are these has to be changed as well? Yes, I can remember that I was told this before, but the reason I have raised this question again is that the word foreign and international appears contradictory to me. Why cant we take it as a fully global site instead of an American site? The server may be somewhere in the America but why are you restricting the site as an American only.ritwikbmca 02:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nid de guepes
It might be me bringing my wikipedia notions over, but oh well.
Didn't know we could just upload covers grabbed from other sites.
It's not like I have 'ownership' of the page, anyone can add whatever relevant, that's the whole point of a wiki.. Right? :/ --Joffeloff 18:42, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Request
I have a request for you. Could you take the 2nd Generation Glock 22 picture and spruce it up (cut the bars, fix the lighting, etc) like you did with the 2nd Generation Glock 19? Here's a picture of it:
Thanks! I miss this show and wish it would come to DVD, too. I do have quite a few more pics of other guns used in Seven Days, including a S&W 640 Centenniel which Parker used briefly in an episode, Norinco Type 84 AKs, an NSV heavy machine gun, a custom shorty AK variant, the shotgun used to kill Olga in 1x04 "Come Again", the Dragunovs, etc. I will also document the Non-Guns used in the Pilot, which, as you pointed out, were due to the restrictions of filming in the District. There are also a LOT of appearances of airsoft guns in this show (many of them pretty obvious, even on the low-resolution AVIs I have) for the non-firing scenes.
Also, Nick Searcy, who played Ramsey on the show, is from this state (North Carolina). I can't remember if he still has family here or what, but I know he's been back at least a few times in the past 5 years. -MT2008 14:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Question!
I've noticed your name a lot on the site and I decided it was best to ask you. I've noticed several weapons on Law and Order Criminal Intent but I have no photos and only have the weapon in my mind. Also, is it fine to copy paste things for games? Like Resistance 2, which have descriptions about weapons in it. -GunEnthusiast
Re: The M60
Nice! Finally, you have blessed us with our own M60 picture! I personally like the bipod down a little more, but the bipod up is fine, too. It might even be more appropriate, because they're commonly wielded that way in movies. Whatever you choose, please make sure to upload over the existing one...it would be a nightmare to replace the M60 image by hand on over 100 pages! Hehe.
Also, I did a little more work on Seven Days. -MT2008 03:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Apology
Look, I'm sorry that I pissed you off about uploading that Remington 870 with a Pachmayr grip pic. Fist of all, I got it off this JC Devine site where they auction guns and I thought I can just save a few pics and upload them to help the site. Second of all, it matches the one used on The Kill Point. You can delete if you want to and upload your version. - Swordfish941
The AK Krinkov
Nice picture! It's really great we have our own picture of one of those AKMSU/Krinkov-type guns, because that style weapon has appeared in a HUGE number of Hollywood movies and TV shows (if you check the "Links" section under the image, I just added your picture to almost 25 more pages which feature the same gun). Plus, up until now, that Zastava M92 which we've been using is just not a very good representation of the kind of AKMSU seen in the movies. Thanks for the image. -MT2008 13:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
I haven't checked on the various armories to see what exact version was used in what film, but I guess I will get around to it.
Steve mentioned to me that CW had quite a few of the Krinkov side-folders that look like yours. ISS has some, too, but I believe CW owns the majority of the ones that have been seen in Hollywood movies. Probably 95% of the AK Krinkovs that have been in American action movies are of the same type as the one you photographed - AKMs with the parts kit added and the side-folding AKS-74U-style buttstock. The movies that your picture now links to represent only a partial listing, I reckon.
As for the unknown pistols in The Hunted, here is what I can tell:
(1.) The suppressed pistol in the SF guy's holster looks to be a SIG P226 with a 20-round magazine. You can see the grip panels pretty clearly, and they're definitely SIG-style.
(2.) The pistol used by the Serb soldier looks to me like a CZ 75, though I'm again not 100% sure. But the CZ 75 is the most common Wonder Nine used by Eastern European military personnel in Hollywood, even in movies depicting military forces that never actually used the CZ 75 in real life.
Hope that helps a bit. -MT2008 23:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC
Hi, actually I dont have all those DVDs with me right now. I am trying my best to get those DVDs, so that I can finish all my articles as soon as possible. By the way, when I was creating the movie template one thing came into my mind, that, may be points like release dates, directer, producers are of less relevant for IMFDB. These data are easily available on IMDB and Wikipedia. So I have changed the format a bit. Could you please have a look at Template:Infobox Movie once again and tell me if this will be of any help. In that page I have changed only the box which has KAMINEY in it, the other two remains the same. Also could you please suggest me some more IMFDB related points that I can incorporate in the infobox movie, television and videogames. Thanks (this is a Festival season in India, so greetings from me as well)ritwikbmca 15:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC
Warehouse 13
I'm watching the Pilot episode now. The SIG pistols used by the USSS agents are a mix of P228s and P229s, not P226s. Lattimer's SIG is a 229 when he first loads it up (you can see the cocking serrations pretty clearly), but later at the museum, due to a continuity error, it becomes a 228. It becomes a 229 again in his apartment when he meets Mrs. Frederick, and then it's a 228 when he first arrives at Warehouse 13 and draws on Artie. -MT2008 15:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nice! Those are really great. Of course, I see you already made the P225 picture the new standard version, but no reason anyone should complain; it looks way better. And the 8mm Bruni is much-appreciated; I think those have appeared in some other movies, too, besides Ultimate Force. Also, the nickel Taurus PT92 w/ pearl grips used in Shooter was also used by Lex Luthor a few times in Smallville (literally, the exact same gun; both had the same armorers). You should add it to the Smallville page as well.
I will watch some more episodes of Warehouse 13 when I get the chance, but the Pilot definitely has P228s and 229s only. -MT2008 14:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Sorry I've been a bit busy lately; I've been helping with some research in my department. Thanks for those new pics of M16s and Berettas. I've seen AR15 SP1s with A2 hand guards in quite a few movies, so it's great we have a picture of that. Also, you should add the picture of the Taurus PT92 with the pearl grips to Smallville. -MT2008 13:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Beretta 92FS Inox
Can you get a picture of a Beretta 92FS Inox with wooden grips? Several movies like Push have these kinds of Berettas.(Crysis) -98.234.121.159 14:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Love the new picture
Seriously, I vocally cheer a little bit every time I see you've uploaded a new gun picture. Thanks for all your hard work, man.-protoAuthor 21:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
sarcastic captions
I agree that some of the sarcastic remarks have gotten carried away in some instances. On The Stand page I remarked that Ossie Davis didn't use a good grip when holding the S&W Model 29. But I just mentioned it and let it go. Some of our members have trouble letting it go. But I like to write humerous captions as well. Read my captions on Ghost and the Darkness, Crossfire Trail and The Yakuza. I don't have any trouble with humor. But there is a difference. So ,to wrap things up, I think you're onto something. I never really considered that folks in the industry would be checking us out. I don't know why I didn't think about that. I would like to think that they would use us as a teaching tool, but if they are turned off by smart ass remarks then we're "shooting" ourselves in our foot and the same mistakes will continue to be made. --Jcordell 15:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Captions
I try to use the best shot without the actors looking bad. (I usually end up with multiple caps for each scene.) I guess the best thing to do is point out good handling, and that is all. I think the worst as far as comments go is Payback. While Mel has handled weapons before he may not care for them all that much and doesn't ever practice. Just because the Porter character has a USMC tattoo doesn't mean, Mel is going to go get USMC training. (He has better shit to do.) Most of those comments are written by GM45 correct? Who is a MOD, so some users may be following by example. -Predator20
Remington 870/Captions
Awesome work, it looks perfect. I put it on a few pages that I know use 870s with black furniture, so you can go in and start editing when you're ready. There could be more pages that use them, but I'm not sure. As for the caption thing, I agree, it's one thing pointing out stances and actors having their fingers on the trigger for trivial purposes, but calling them names and making fun of them shouldn't be allowed, because like you said, they never get the chance to practice proper shooting techniques, plus these are movies, and no one should take these things too seriously if they see them.--Alienqueen11 19:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
RE: Thanks for your actions
No problem, your photos are part of what makes Imfdb great. If you're wondering about all the unploading, switching servers apparantly caused a bug that made us unable to revert images and pages like we usually would, so we had to click on your revision of the images, save the file, and then re-upload them over the images Hiel0c0 screwed with. But anyway, everything seems to be back to normal now or atleast close thanks to bunni, and his network administrators. I'm doing good fine by the way, thanks.--Alienqueen11 21:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
RE: Planet Terror
Thanks. There is still some work to be done on the page. I always try to check recent changes, to see what new goodies you're adding to site. I saw that Python and immediately thought of Planet Terror. There is probably a few others using the blued versions that need to be changed to the stainless. -Predator20 14:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
A real life spook
Check it out I think we have a real life spook on the site! :o [[8]] bunni 05:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
New guns
Beautiful! Did you make another trip to CW (I take it this explains the T3 SL6 and the "Fair Game" Beretta Inox?)
It's wonderful that we have a Beretta 92FS Inox now - that's been one of our site's biggest omissions for a while now. Also, do you know if that particular Beretta was used in any movies/shows besides "Fair Game"? I only ask because if it's Mike's gun, there might be a possibility it could have been used in The Last Boy Scout and Hostage.
Thanks again for the new pictures. Again, they're beautiful. -MT2008 12:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Oh, wow! No, I missed those classic screen beauties. Must have been an update you did while I was away (I come and go nowadays). Nice! Also, you mean to say you have a lot more where these came from?
Don't worry, I haven't died just yet. But I do sometimes expect my research and papers and everything is going to kill me, I must admit. It does seem a lot quieter without John around - he used to be the one who tackled all the big new films when they got released to DVD. -MT2008 17:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
My Man
Thanks so much for the Beretta 92FS Inox, it looks great! Not only have you gave us a new Beretta Inox, but also a two tone Beretta, and the screen used Sage Control SL-6 from Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, you are great! By the way, how did you get the grenade launcher? Did you make another visit to Cinema Armory?--Alienqueen11 18:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the response and info
Thank you for the apologue and responding back to me. When I first started contributing to pages I had though that I couldn’t use other member's photos. That's why I probably uploaded so many photos to pages that already had them. I've never received a message asking me to stop uploading images that were already represented, but that person could have posted it on the firearm page I posted on. If I have gotten a message to my discussion page (only messages I’ve gotten have only come from AdAstra2009, and didn’t concern photos) I would have stopped sooner. But I will check around to see what photos I’ve posted than present nothing and deleted them. As of now the only time I upload an image is when I can’t find one on this site, or trying to find something similar that isn’t posted. I wish I would have read MT2008 message but I honestly don’t know where he posted it. Not trying to blame him for anything, but know that I do know I will delete those photos. --Mauser 07:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Foxy Brown/The Getaway
First off, EXCELLENT work getting the shotgun used in The Getaway! Having stuff like that is just part of what makes this site great! I'll try and watch for the shots you mean before the weekend, most likely tomorrow afternoon/evening or Friday afternoon. The shotgun was most prominently used in two or three big scenes but I'll watch the last half to try and catch it; that would be very impressive to match the numbers.
Also, thanks for the compliments on the Entourage page; a good number of those came from a "Behind the Scenes" feature in the fourth season DVD that showed good close ups of the weapons used to film the movie-within-a-show.
Finally, I'm glad you were able to help identify FB's pistol. Something bothered me about labeling it as a Baby Browning but since it had a similar look I figured it was a safe enough bet. Thanks for getting the correct identification though! Do you know if those were used in any other films or shows?
Good to hear from you and great work lately with the photos! Speakeasy804 09:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry if you've been waiting on that Getaway shotgun cap. I've watched those scenes a few times over and maybe it's me (so used to seeing the movie itself) but I'm not able to find the exact part you mean with a closeup of the side. Do you happen to know which part that's from? Also, GREAT job getting those exclusives from The Book of Eli, Dirty Harry, The Usual Suspects, Pulp Fiction, and the others. Your contributions are invaluable and really help imfdb to be a one-of-a-kind site! - Speakeasy804 05:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Screen used gun uploads
Yeah, I have noticed a lot of those lately. Most recently, I saw those guns from Dirty Harry, which made me happy. But the Miami Vice S&W 645 beats that out, at least for me :). Thank you so much! If you could get those other Miami Vice guns like you said, that would be awesome. :) -Gunman69 04:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Live Free or Die Hard
I didn't call it the actual gun used because I wasn't sure that it was. I guess it makes sense because it's the EXACT same configuration :). And no, I don't think it would be too confusing if you said it was from Iron Man (2008) and Live Free or Die Hard. It's just like that Beretta 92F that was used in Die Hard and Lethal Weapon. So yeah, you should say that it's from both movies :). -Gunman69 15:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: MAG-7
As best I know, Romeo + Juliet is the only major Hollywood movie that's ever featured the MAG-7. I'm sure it's appeared in movies filmed in South Africa, but I haven't seen any of those films.
You've really got a lot of cool stuff from the boys at Cinema Weaponry. Please, do tell me, how was your trip down there? This is a really awesome update you've put together for us. Also, have you seen Steve recently? -MT2008 15:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the Street Sweeper and the Gen 2 Glock 19. But do you mind deleting the Glock and re-uploading over the old picture of the Glock 19 2nd Gen that we've been using on dozens of pages? -MT2008 19:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Actually I wouldn't reupload it over the current image, I think it would be better to have the image named Glock 192ndGen rather then Vviewpoint or whatever, I can go on Pages and replace the images.--Alienqueen11 20:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Forum Moderator
Just made you a moderator on the forum - have fun wrangling the noobs! bunni 04:06, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Re:Thanks for your help
No problem, I don't like the idea of gun pictures having names like that, like you said it's just too wierd and confusing. As for the recent waves of screen used gun, excellent work! It's an honor to know that IMFDB is the only site on the web to have this pictures, and what's even more impressive is that alot of the guns you uploaded are 20-30 years old atleast and they're still in great shape, plus you got guns from movies that aren't even out yet, I wouldn't be suprised if other prop sites are jealous of IMFDB. Thanks so much for your updates, I can't wait to see what you upload next time.--Alienqueen11 04:40, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Where should I put this?
Hmm, I'm not really too good with identifying AKs myself, but I'll try to help as much as I can. Congo could possibly use one, and it looks like Hard Boiled and Rambo: First Blood Part II use them, but I'm not sure, you would be probably have an easier time identifying them then I do, and yes I would suggest a new section for it, or atleast put under with the original AK-47s. As for the question about getting sick of your updates, definitely not, I could never get tired of seeing your pictures, they're too awesome. P.S, can you do me a favor? If you get the chance, can you get an Ithaca 37 with a high capacity magazine tube for The Terminator page? because the current image representing Reese's shotgun is terrible, and dosen't fit well at all, even if you get one that isn't screen used or has a full stock, it would be a better representation then that. Thanks again, let me know if you need anymore help.--Alienqueen11 05:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
rules page
That's the power of the wiki structure! We'll both have at it and see what comes out. bunni 04:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
M1911 history page
You've done a great job so far with the IMFDB Info - The History of M16s in Film and Television. It's a great way to add more information about one of our most popular pages. I was thinking: we should do a page like that for the 1911s. I'm always seeing confusion about 1) what 1911s were used in a movie and 2) how to identify different 1911 variants. I think this would definitely help clear up confusion about 1911s, as well as attract more people to our site who are interested in this weapon (the wikipedia article on 1911s is, in my opinion, substandard). Granted I'm only suggesting that this be done for Colt models, and not the different firearm company variants (S&W, Springfield Armory, Kimber, etc.) because not only would it be very long, but the real point is to inform about the history of the original Colt variants. Anyways, this is only a suggestion. I know how busy you are, so don't think I'm trying to pressure you, but I think it'd be a great idea :). -Gunman69 03:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
insulting actors/films
I think we should include your notes on not insulting actors to the rules and standards page. Personally I feel this should be in the principles section under "Be nice." and let everyone behave like adults, but if we're going to enforce it maybe it should be a new rule. Thoughts? bunni 00:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
:Let's do both - it deserves to be a clear cut rule as well as being expounded upon in the other sections.bunni 02:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Your photo has been edited.
One of your 1911A1 photos has been edited to look like the Dillinger machine pistol used in Public Enemies. Also I think that image was edited over an image I had already posted under the Dillinger machine pistol in Public Enemies. The image I had up was an actual firearm, while this edit is just cut and pasted together. The "new" image that replaced mine still even has most of my original write up I did in the thumb. I know that you do not tolerate your photos being messed with, as I can now kind of relate since my image has been messed with so I figured Id let you know. --Mauser 00:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
No problem.
That would be awesome if you could build the machine pistol. I understand what you mean by the younger members too. I was going to write him the message but when I saw his user page I thought that would not be the best/nicest thing to do. Anyway thanks for the response lol. --Mauser 01:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Bauer .25 Automatic
Excellent find! I'd say you're right; there's almost a 95% chance that's the FB Bauer and I've seen Wonderboys (but don't own it) and I remember Tobey Maguire using a small nickel pistol like that, with Michael Douglas's character mentioning he thought it was a "cap gun". From the shots I grabbed from FB though, I'd say we can be almost positively sure it's the same pistol. Thanks and great work! - Speakeasy804 10:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Gun image rule
I had a quick questoin regarding the rule that multiple images of the same gun should not be uploaded to this site. I agree that two images which are virtually identicle are unnecessary, however, would two images of the same weapon but with different finishes or barrel lengths be considered redundant as well? Granted they are identical from a technical standpoint, however having images with different finishes could help contributors post an image on an article which is a closer visual approximation to the weapon used in the film. So to reiterate, would uploading images of the same weapon with black, stainless, and two-tone finishes violate the principle posted on the rule page?
-Anonymous
4006 Reliability Question
Hey, MPM, I was just wondering how reliable the Smith and Wesson 4006 was with blanks. I'm currently writing a script, and I've armed the main character with one. I'm seriously planning to make this script a movie someday (in the far future, but hey...), so I'm asking for your input. -protoAuthor 18:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
The History of the M16 page
When are you going to update the history of the M16 page? Because I would like to help.--Oliveira 14:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Re post
I posted this question above but I fear it may have been lost among the other so I will restate it here. I apologize in advance if it sounds like I am pestering you:
I had a quick questoin regarding the rule that multiple images of the same gun should not be uploaded to this site. I agree that two images which are virtually identicle are unnecessary, however, would two images of the same weapon but with different finishes or barrel lengths be considered redundant as well? Granted they are identical from a technical standpoint, however having images with different finishes could help contributors post an image on an article which is a closer visual approximation to the weapon used in the film. So to reiterate, would uploading images of the same weapon with black, stainless, and two-tone finishes violate the principle posted on the rule page?
Pursuant to the Standards page...how many caps are considered too many? The reason I ask is that I have been capping for the "Sons of Anarchy" page and have a fair amount at the moment. I know you should not do too many caps per weapons so I was wondering what is acceptable? 2, 3, per weapon? Any advice or commentary would be appreciated. --Charon68 02:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks...it narrows it down a great deal. As it stands I have something like 60 caps for the series but, again, they are for the same weapons (AKs) and the like. --Charon68 11:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
I know what you mean. For SOA there are some "unique" weapons but then, as I look, there's a Glock, there's another, there's another...yadda yadda. --Charon68 02:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm looking for some props
My name's Joe and I read your username and thought you might be able to help me with finding some prop revolvers or pistols. My brother is a film maker and we are looking for some 70's era revolvers ( S&W model 10 and 27) and a Colt 1911 for his film. My e-mail adress is humanzie3@aol.com, if you can help me out please shoot me an E-mail. November 2, 2009 (UTC)
Re: The Hurt Locker
I'll confess that the captures were from a screener. You can delete them- I was a bit too eager to get some decent shots after watching the movie at the theatre. --Markit 00:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Forum login
Is the error that login attempts are being used up, but not by you?
I have a problem similiar to your's sometimes. For some reason I can't log onto the site at night or at some random point during the day. I hope you succeed where I have failed and figure out what is wrong-S&Wshooter 22:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Someone is trying to brute force attack the login passwords and is using up all of your attempts. I hope you have strong passwords that aren't in the dictionary or forms of dictionary words. If not they should be changed to something strong and random ASAP. I will go through the server logs and try and track down the offending IP address. bunni 00:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
I have a list of ip addresses trying to access your account - and it's a long list. Do you access from many different computers? Does your ip address change often? bunni 04:37, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Too many screencaps
Whoops! Sorry about that. I wasn't counting how many I uploaded, but I guess that was too much. How does it look now? -Gunman69 03:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Reservoir Dogs
Thanks! I was wondering: do you think the screenshots look low quality? Because I used an ordinary DVD, but Oliveira thinks they look low quality. I don't really they do, but I figured I should get a second opinion. -Gunman69 00:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Also, that'd be great if you got the hero guns from the movie, especially the nickel 1st gen Colt Detective Special. I know there are a lot of pages that feature this gun but we only have pictures of the blued 1st gen. -Gunman69 00:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
H&K G3 page
Can you protect the page from anonymous users, I reverted the edit of the vandal who for the umpteenth time decided to remove the Specifications section.--SB2296 13:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Clue revolver
Hey, I have some grabs from the 1985 movie Clue but I have no idea what this revolver is. Since there's no cylinder release (this picture is of the right side but the left side looks exactly the same), I'm baffled.
Thanks in advance for taking a look. - Speakeasy804 20:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks MPM. Would you recommend me (or anyone) making a page for H&R revolvers? It seems like there've been a few in some movie pages lately and I don't know enough about them to discern whether to bulk the similar ones together or make a page for each model? - Speakeasy804 22:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I think you're right! Sorry I only sent the side shot before, I didn't want to clutter up your talk page with pictures especially if I hadn't made the article yet :-/ Also, I just checked and saw that the Model 922 is a nine-shot .22 revolver. If I had sent a shot from the front, we would have seen the six-shot cylinder so that's my fault as well! Thanks for helping out though! A user (not sure who) has been adding H&R revolver pictures which has been great to help identify some H&Rs in other films, so hopefully he'll see this change as well. - Speakeasy804 02:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I can't believe it
How the hell did you get an M1941 Johnson rifle? I though they were extremely hard to find.
Also, did you take that S&W Model 39 picture yourself?--Oliveira 21:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Sorry about that, I was just very frustrated with all the recent vandalism on that page especially when it's hinted that's it's the same person doing it over and over again. I'll cut down on it next time.--Alienqueen11 03:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Smith & Wesson hammers
I posed this question to gun master a while back and he was unable to help me. I was hopeing you could provide some insight:
I don't know whether or not you have the answer to this question but I thought I'd ask anyway. I was doing some reading recently and learned Colt's Positive Lock safety, separating the hammer from the firing pin to prevent accidental discharge, was developed fairly early in the twentieth century and applied to Colt revolvers, however, many Smith & Wesson revolvers continued to use the simple spiked hammer design for decades. I was currious if you knew when, if ever, S&W adopted a safer mechanism for their revolvers and if you had any details about the design.
After more thought I figured that Smtih & Wesson had to have some safety mechanism on their guns differentiating them from models like the Colt Single Actoin Army, but I haven't been able to find any details on them. -Anonymous
Italian Job Trivia Section
The reason I moved the trivia section of The Italian Job is because it was not directly firearm-related. I was following the precedence set by the trivia section of Transformers; having the non-gun trivia about the titular robots moved to the discussion section. Orca1 9904 00:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
High Standard shotgun
Why did you put an place holder picture of an High standard shotgun? I thought you already had took a picture of that shotgun for us. Here:
MPM, you da man! :) These look awesome. I would've never expected to see Tony Montana's M16 here! Or the Skull's shotgun or the M16's from Predator! Great work. Thanks so much for these lovely images! :) -Gunman69 03:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
-Edit: oh, and yes, I think the black tape looks better. That makes it the EXACT configuration, making it all the more genuine :)
Once again, I'm blown away! IMFDB is very indebted to you; Thanks for all your work MPM! - Speakeasy804 03:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
MPM, you get the all the best stuff. Fucking cool.--Predator20 03:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Ah, sorry! I just got a bit over-excited about the exclusive pictures ;) You're absolutely right though, gotta give the prop houses their due! - Speakeasy804!
Really great stuff MPM, Tony Montana's M16 in particular. --AdAstra2009 06:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I echo everyone above. Beautiful! Which armory owns this gun now? Also, can I show this off on The Firing Line as publicity for us? -MT2008 16:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Truly awesome MPM. I continue to be amazed by your contributions. You have elevated the imfdb to a new standard and are truly making it a definitive historical source. ps. love the tape, I was using gaffer tape to close off some bathrooms on set yesterday, good to know I can use it mount accessories to my firearms. bunni 01:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Putting this image on the page is not professional and it has questionable value. MoviePropMaster2008 06:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't putting down the actor, that's the character in the film that's a bad shot. In the film White (Rourke) is told by his superiors that Herbert needs more training.(hence not enough trigger time) But White says there isn't enough time and throws Herbert undercover. --Predator20 05:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. that is interesting information. Hmmm, the description should specifically mention the plot point being given to the audience regarding Herbert's unsuitability to go undercover and thus ends in his death. But then I still wonder how relevant it is considering we're trying to cut down the number of extraneous screencaps. Thanks for the explanation! MoviePropMaster2008 05:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I would have replied to it sooner but I hadn't checked that page in a while. It was one of the first pages I did. You can delete the pic if you want, there is a few other pics I think that can be deleted also. I'll give you a list. Also thanks for putting out that memo about commenting on actors weapon skills. The site is a whole lot better.--Predator20 05:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Also how is it going on getting more Miami Vice guns?--Predator20 05:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: You won't believe this
Awesome work MPM2008! You have done a very amazing job bringing us the actual screen used M16A1 and shotgun from Scarface, Scarface fans will definitely be proud and excited. As for the black tape, I think you've done a great job making the gun the way it was in the movie, I mean what better way to see the image then the way it appeared in the movie. Keep up the great work, I can't wait to see what you upload next time. Your edits make Imfdb proud.--Alienqueen11 06:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Additional stock gun pics
I was thinking since not all of the gun pics you take can be put in their main page. (that goes for other people's stock gun pics too) Couldn't they be put in their talk page and a note be made to check it for additional gun pics? These two below are not in the 870 page but are used in several movies. It would help with clutter of pics in some gun pages and maybe keep users from uploading pics you've already taken but don't know about since they aren't in the gun page. --Predator20 17:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
I could be wrong, but I could've swore that you uploaded an image like this below with the same furniture but without the extended magazine tube. I looked for it on your page but couldn't find it so I may be wrong. --Predator20 22:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I have a question: Have you taken any pictures of Colt Canada C7s/Model 715s that are on your hard drive? The reason I ask is because I've recently done pages for several TV shows filmed in Vancouver (including The Sentinel and Millennium), and those shows have many of these rifles. I've also noticed that many of them seem to have the "Stowaway" pistol grip that used to come standard on Olympic Arms AR-15s, so I think the "C7s" used by the Canadian armorers are actually late-80s/early-90s Olympic Arms rifles converted to select-fire. -MT2008 15:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good if you have a C7 upper. Better yet, if you slap it on an Olympic Arms full-auto lower with the Stowaway pistol grip (if you have any of those), you'll have something that looks just like the guns that the Canadian armorers use. I'm not sure why they like the OAs, either, but they sure do seem to use a lot of them.
Thanks also for that shorty M16 picture; I had no idea that anyone besides Olympic Arms manufactured guns with that style barrel. If the K23 series didn't exist in 1996, then yeah, I guess the gun in The Sentinel can't be one of those. Only difference, the one in The Sentinel has a different hand guard than yours (it doesn't have those horizontal cuts). Otherwise, they're the same, so I'll use the picture. -MT2008 18:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
The Unit Page
Yes, I'm trying to clean up the page with a little more detailed descriptions and screencaps from the actual DVD's. Keep posting those screen used gun pics! --Ben41 08:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
S&W Model 19 with the 2.5 inch barrel. It had the full lug protecting the ejector rod and the Baughman front ramp sight as well as adjustable rear sights and it appears to have the engraved lettering on the frame typical of S&W revolvers. None of the .38 special K frame snubbies (Model 15 and Model 10) made by S&W have a full lug protecting the ejector rod.
S&W Model 27 with the 3.5" barrel. Danny Aiello is a big guy so the N frame Model 27 might appear to be smaller in his hand, but the frame is bigger than the medium sized K frame Model 19 and the barrel has more length. But it ends right after the front of the ejector rod lug unlike the 4" barrel Model 28. But the big giveaway is the amount of light you can see between the front of the cylinder and the frame. The Model 27 is a .357 magnum and has a shorter cylinder than the Model 57 (41 magnum) or the Model 29 (44 magnum). On both those models the cylinder fills the frame. Also the cylinder fills the frame on the Model 19. That one feature alone makes me certain it's a Model 27. Also compare it to the snubbie held by Aiello in the screencap below.
Back to the S&W Model 19 with the 2.5 inch barrel for the above stated reasons.
Hope this helped. --Jcordell 03:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Smith & wesson hammer repost
I asked this question a few weeks ago and I guess it got lost among all your other messages
I posed this question to Gunmaster a while back and he was unable to help me. I was hopeing you could provide some insight:
I don't know whether or not you have the answer to this question but I thought I'd ask anyway. I was doing some reading recently and learned Colt's Positive Lock safety, separating the hammer from the firing pin to prevent accidental discharge, was developed fairly early in the twentieth century and applied to Colt revolvers, however, many Smith & Wesson revolvers continued to use the simple spiked hammer design for decades. I was currious if you knew when, if ever, S&W adopted a safer mechanism for their revolvers and if you had any details about the design.
After more thought I figured that Smtih & Wesson had to have some safety mechanism on their guns differentiating them from models like the Colt Single Actoin Army, but I haven't been able to find any details on them. -Anonymous
Pirates of the Caribbean
I think it's pretty crazy that someone keeps putting up these pages, but doesn't work on them, so I thought I would work on the pages so you wouldn't have to keep deleting them. Unless you don't want me to. --Ben41 01:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. You can delete the Pirates posters I uploaded. --Ben41 04:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I actually have a picture of a Trapdoor Springfield converted to a pistol for this movie (from ISS's inventory) that I would love to upload, but can't without the page. Do you think it might justify the page's inclusion? -MT2008 17:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Rush Hour 3
Nice job on Rush Hour 3; it's great that you've finished up that page. I do have a few corrections, though...
I think this is actually the Non Gun Glock. The trigger guard has that weird distorted look that the Non Gun Glocks have. But the barrel is definitely too short for a G17.
This is actually a P226, not a -220. If you look closely in the second screencap, you can see the double-stack bulges on the frame. -MT2008 20:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay
Do you think those are inexpensive airsoft P226s being used by the Air Marshalls? I just looked at my own 226, and the markings on the slide don't look like that. -MT2008 00:27, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem
the anonymous poster has been very busy. He/she needs to educate themselves on the correct terminology. --Jcordell 10:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Quotes
So far, nobody seems to have noticed that I changed Template:Quote. I wonder what that means? ;) -MT2008 05:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
RE BTW you do great work
Thank you, It's great to know that my work is appreciated :) --AdAstra2009 22:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous users
Can you block these two anonymous users-94.142.129.98 (for adding gibberish to the Generation Kill talk page) and 216.45.58.187 (for vandalising the DEA page).--SB2296 14:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Boondock Saints II Desert Eagle
When I talked to Al Vrkljan about the guns used on The Boondock Saints II, he told me that the Desert Eagles that his company built for the movie were chambered in .357 Magnum. Of course, you are correct that fluted barrel Mark XIX = .44 Magnum, but is it possible they may have re-chambered the Eagles just for this show?
Also, sorry I haven't been around a lot the past few days - I'm on vacation right now and haven't had as much time to patrol the site. But I did temporarily ban that one Anonymous user who kept making annoying mass edits (you know, like when he inserted "Category:Pistol" onto all the revolver pages, which I have since un-done) for a week to be on the safe side. -MT2008 00:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Both the .357 and .44 Mark XIXs have fluted barrels. --Predator20 00:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Delete list
Unnecessary images from my pages.--Predator20 17:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem, I got rid of those images when the owner wanted them gone. As for the Imfdb being pirates, I don't think so. If we don't have our own exclusive image of a gun, we have to due with something else, plus there are websites out there alot worse then we are.--Alienqueen11 21:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Need help on Incredible Hulk
I don't have access to the site's forum so I need your help here.
I noticed you recently made a page for bolt action sporting rifles similar to the pages for double barrel and pump-action shotguns. I was wondering whether or not a similar page for single barrel shotguns would be a good idea. I know they are not as common in film as the other weapons these types of pages were made for, but I think they are weapons where many people (certainly myself) have trouble distinguishing specific models. If you could give me your thoughts and feedback it would be greatly appreciated. -Anonymous
A request
I know you said no more request, but figured I would ask anyway. There is a particular Smith & Wesson Model 629 with a Magna ported 2.5 barrel that's been used in a few films. Seems like it would be the same one. --Predator20 20:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for informing me about the needs for game screenshots. I'm no fan of jpeg artifacts in images, so I just set the "quality meter" in Adobe Photoshop to maximum in the jpeg conversion screen (my screenshot program only saves in bmp format). After your reminder though, I tried setting the meter to 3/4ths and it seems to be alright.
Maybe it's time for the "upload file" page to contain the rules and standards for images themselves, then. Right now it doesn't say anything about "preferred resolutions" or "recommended filesizes." If that page contained more information on those rules for the wiki, I'm sure it would eliminate a lot of confusion and inappropriate files.
As for the GRAW2 page, maybe you can remove the overly-large screenshots for the MR-C rifle--I can post smaller ones from the PC version. Unfortunately, the PC version's all I have, so until someone uploads screenshots for the console versions too, that page will likely stay incomplete for some time. Mazryonh 15:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
RD protection change
Sorry, YNH asked me to change it back because he saw the movie again and said there was a gun that wasn't on the page. I forgot to change it back afterward Excalibur01 16:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Tremors: Wall of Guns
Can you help me find more guns on Burt's wall of guns? I can't identify some because of the picture quality. - Kenny99 05:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Last Samurai screencaps
The screencaps are from the DVD. Let me know what movies, I probably have them.--Ben41 10:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Beat Me to the Draw
I was just investigating the anonymous user who blanked the Smith & Wesson semi-auto pages, only to find you'd already nailed him. Good kill, over. Orca1 9904 19:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
S&W 4500
I never deleted anything from any article. All I did was copy and paste the information from the 4505, 4556, and 4516 articles onto the 4506 article and then changed that article's name. I deliberatly left the other articles unchanged so that if my change was rejected all that was necessary was to change the 4506 page back. Gunman69 recommended after the change that I contact an administrator to check the changes and decide what to do with the old ones so I informed MT2008 (who I believe is an Administrator) of what I did. I never logged in anonymously (well more Anonymously than usual) and wipped out the pages. -Anonymous
Sorry I didn't get back to you guys sooner yesterday, but I had a very busy day. I see that the S&W 4500 page has been created and all the variants grouped. Are we good? -MT2008 15:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hunter
Hey MPM, I've been working a lot on the page for Hunter in the last month and am about two episodes shy of completing the first season. I'll be picking up the next two as soon as I can. Since there are at least 51 different firearms used during the first season (and undoubtedly more as the series continues), would you recommend splitting the page up by season like Miami Vice? Also, as long as we're on the TV show subject, do we have a preferred format? I tend to try and keep the firearms in order of appearance, although this seems more practical for films rather than TV shows. Thanks ahead of time for your input! (P.S. I know some of the entries on the page are a little screencap-happy, but I wanted to try and get a wide pool to chose from, then delete whatever is deemed unnecessary or superfluous at the end of the season) - Speakeasy804 15:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for that response! I agree, the 4:3 really makes excess screencapping look even worse, but luckily with the first season complete and the decision to split up the seasons, I can streamline to a 4-7 limit. I'm going to delete some of the YouTube placeholders I had for guns used in later seasons (1-3 are the only ones that have been released on DVD so far) and cross my fingers that the rest will be released soon. I'll also start looking through the weaponry used and if it balances out in terms of handguns, rifles, etc., I'll split them up and leave the main weapons (Hunter's compensated P9S, for example) towards the top and sort the rest alphabetically. Again, thanks very much for your input and hopefully your latest four-day job went well! - Speakeasy804 09:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Server Speed
How's it feeling now? bunni 01:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
The Way of the Gun
I added a few screencaps to the page. I know you don't like people adding an excessive amount of screencaps to a page, especially one you worked on. If you think it's one pic too many let me know. I try not be pic happy. --Predator20 17:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Seecamp
Nice! Thanks for that! -MT2008 16:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Hmmmm, good question. I hate to ban somebody permanently who isn't making malicious edits (vandalizing, spamming, etc.) But I really don't understand why this guy seems to be so incapable of talking to us, especially after he's been asked so many times. Failing to acknowledge our requests is just obnoxious. I don't know if he's autistic or what, but either way, he certainly doesn't seem to get the message. For now, I say ban him temporarily, but let's tell him that if he continues to do what he's been doing, then the next time, the ban will be permanent. He's had enough warnings, enough times. -MT2008 19:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the appreciation and comments... Sorry for the hyperlinks, it's been a long time since I've read the rules. I'll propably read them again in a few days :) And for the spoilers on Already Dead; I tried to keep them as minimal as possible, but for instance the only good view of The Detective's Colt Defender is when he is holding it on his lap when he's dead.
PS. I will also change the hyperlinks from my other pages (Smokin' Aces 2) too, to be in line with the rules... But not yet, since our winter break just started ;) But I'll get to it as soon as I can. Once again, thank you. --Warejaws 21:45, March 5 2010 (UTC)
The Olympic Arms AR-15
Thanks for the OA rifle! We do need one. But you don't by chance happen to have a C7/Colt 715 upper you can slap onto that lower, do you?
Also, one other thing...I just watched "The Education of Jamie Sommers", and from what I can tell, the M16 that the guy picks up and fires is not the same one seen on the floor. I think they use an Olympic K4B (with the distinctive "Stowaway" grip) when the rifle is lying on the floor, but when he raises the rifle to fire, it's an M16A1. In other words, yet another continuity error. The Olympic ARs used by the BC armorers always seem to be the C7 look-a-likes. -MT2008 06:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
One other thing, while I'm at it, a few more things for the Bionic Woman page...
The Beretta 93R used by the motorcycle assassin is actually a 92FS converted to auto and fitted with a 93R grip (the firing weapon, not just the rubber one). I'm guessing it's probably the same one that was used in Harsh Realm, and I've also seen that gun in Wrongfully Accused and Seven Days.
The M249 used by the guards in the Pilot is almost surely going to be a Daewoo K3. The BC armorers don't seem to have any real M249s, for reasons I don't understand, so they always use the K3s as stand-ins.
Hope that helps. -MT2008 15:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Batman movies categorization
I'm not sure what you mean by changing the categories for Batman, because I don't think I touched that part. Could you elaborate? --Ben41 08:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Predators (2010)
Thanks for updating, i couldn't find that pic with the minigun when i wrote the page and ive just found it and was about to amend that section. In the script its definately described as a 4 barrelled GShG so i guess they are just pretending the minigun is the russian gun.--The Mercenary 18:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Dirty Harry
Any preference regarding the M29 vs. M57 debate going on between me and and another poster on that page. He thinks it should be shown as the Model 57, but I think it should be listed as the M29 with notice given to the possibility that that a M57 was the actual model and served as a body double so to speak. Do you even care? I'm out of it, but you are the webmaster. More or less. --Jcordell 23:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
That would be great. Perhaps Milius will be able to confirm that he had originally intended the M29 to have a four inch barrel and if the production really did obtain two working M29's from the factory. I was involved in an investigation several years ago and actually spoke over the phone with Roy Jinks. I was tracing the background of a S&&W Model 23 that was in our evidence locker, but I think this time it would be an abuse of my authority to call him (he's now semi-retired and working out of his house)to see if that actually happened. --Jcordell 19:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
About PNGs
Sorry about the PNGs! I know how to convert them, but it looks like you already have. Thanks. I will convert them from now on.
--Linkinpark9812 04:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Dirty Harry Model 29 description wording
It looks to me like someone either copied IMDb or they copied us. Plagiarism?
Imdb
:Dirty Harry's gun is supposedly a Smith & Wesson Model 29 revolver, chambered for a .44 Magnum cartridge. In the film, the gun is shown as being capable of sending assailants flying through the air, even when shot from a distance, however, in reality the gun does not produce such dramatic results. Additionally, the .44 Magnum round is not considered to be a practical caliber for urban police force use due to recoil (which makes target re-acquisition difficult) and over-penetration issues, which greatly increases the likelihood of the bullet going through its target and injuring bystanders. The actual gun used on set by Clint Eastwood was reportedly not a Smith & Wesson Model 29. According to a story circulated by a member of the studio's prop department, Smith & Wesson did not have a Model 29 in stock at the time, and so a Smith & Wesson Model 57 chambered for a .41 Magnum cartridge was used. The Model 29 and Model 57 are identical except for minute differences in bore size, chamber dimensions, and exterior markings, none of which are visible in the film. Fans however, have claimed that in a close up at the end of the film, the gun carried by Eastwood is in fact a genuine Model 29 chambered for a .44 Magnum. The close-up clearly shows the markings "44 MAGNU," with the final "M" blocked from view.
Ours
:Dirty Harry's gun is a Smith & Wesson Model 29 revolver, chambered for a .44 Magnum cartridge. In the film, the gun is shown as being capable of sending assailants flying through the air, even when shot from a distance, however, in reality the gun does not produce such dramatic results. Additionally, the .44 Magnum round is not considered to be a practical caliber for urban police force use due to recoil (which makes target re-acquisition difficult) and over-penetration issues, which greatly increases the likelihood of the bullet going through its target and injuring bystanders. The actual gun used on set by Clint Eastwood was reportedly not a Smith & Wesson Model 29. According to a story circulated by a member of the studio's prop department, Smith & Wesson did not have a Model 29 in stock at the time, and so a Smith & Wesson Model 57 chambered for a .41 Magnum cartridge was used. The Model 29 and Model 57 are identical except for minute differences in bore size, chamber dimensions, and exterior markings, none of which are visible in the film. At the end of the film there is a close up of the gun that clearly reads 44 Magnum on the barrel. So the Model 57 may have been used until Model 29's were found.
I added "At the end of the film there is a close up of the gun that clearly reads 44 Magnum on the barrel. So the Model 57 may have been used until Model 29's were found."
This pic clearly shows 44 magnum on the barrel. --Predator20 15:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't think all that sending guys flying and over penetration stuff is necessary.
Inspector "Dirty" Harry Callahan's sidearm throughout the film is a Smith & Wesson Model 29 with a 6.5" barrel. John Milius who did uncredited rewrites for Dirty Harry notes on the Magnum Force commentary track. That he had written Callahan to have a Model 29 with a 4" barrel, like he had himself. But only the 6.5" barrel models could be found. There are several sources claiming that when filming began no Model 29's could be found, so the Model 57 chambered in .41 Magnum was used instead. At the end of the film there is a close up of the gun that clearly reads 44 Magnum on the barrel. So the Model 57 may have been used as a stand in until Model 29's were found.
Let me know what you think. --Predator20 17:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
I'll add some info about over penetration and it's mainly a hunting caliber, etc. --Predator20 21:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
M2 Carbine
I read your post in the Forum about M2 Carbines. I can’t log into the forum for whatever reason so I am responding here. I made The Eagle Has Landed page recently and in the movie they us either M1 or M2 carbine. Now in the film the actors are seen firing them on semi auto and full auto. There is never a real good close-up. Could you take a look at the page and see you can tell if they are M1, M2s or both? I have read that it was pretty easy to convert M1s to fully automatic which would probably explain if they are not M2s, because in the film they clearly are firing on full auto. Any help would be appreciated.--Mauser 03:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: Thanks for the confirmation. Its funny how British armories would have more M2 Carbines than the US armories. --Mauser 17:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
MPM,
What about Apocalypse Now? GM45, I think was the one that changed them to M2. It was filmed in the Philippines so I have no clue about their weapons access. --Predator20 21:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks about the page. There's still a few more shots for me to upload. But if you know which ones were left off, let me know.
--Ben41 01:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Howa Type 89 help
Mate, I need to edit something as I updated an article regarding a name change from Library War to Toshokan Senso. Thanks. Ominae 08:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Got your "request". Took care of it. I'll wait for the article unlock. Thanks. Ominae 08:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Mistake
Apologies over the Library War article. I overlooked it. Will fix all reverts to it once article is unlocked. I'm also waiting for the availability of the Howa Type 89 article so that I can work on it also. Thanks. Ominae 17:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: Happy Now
Excellent, thank you, sir! Yes, I am quite happy.
Well, OK, not quite (and I apologize in advance if I sound demanding). There is one thing I've mentioned: All of the "C7s"/"Model 715s" we have documented on IFMDB are actually Olympic Arms K4Bs. Those are what the British Columbia armorers use, because as we've noticed, they seem to love Oly. The M16 that appears on your page for Bionic Woman is also a K4B (the M16A1 only appears due to a continuity error when the guy fires it). So what I kinda hoped was that you take the upper receiver from this...
So that you would have (effectively) a pre-1994 OlyArms K4B rifle. Of course, I do realize that I can't demand anything, and how hard it is to take the pics. But if you were to do that, you would have an accurate representation of the "Model 715" rifles that appear in Vancouver productions (which account for almost all of the "C7"/"Model 715" appearances that we have ever documented on IMFDB).
BTW, thanks also for the M1 Paratrooper model. Something else we've needed for a while. -MT2008 16:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: There's no pleasing you
I know, I know...it must be my "aspergian" tendency or whatever to be so obsessive. ;) Seriously, it's not a huge deal if we just use the Model 715 you photographed, since, pistol grip aside, it's the same gun as the Oly K4B.
So are all the Canadian shows have the Oly grip on them? Are you sure?
Obviously, I can't be 100% sure. But I can tell you that the Model 715s that appear in Millennium, Viper, Harsh Realm, M.A.N.T.I.S., and now Bionic Woman all definitely have the Oly "Stowaway" pistol grip, so they must be full-auto conversions of Oly K4Bs. All of those shows were filmed in British Columbia, so my gut feeling is that if you see a show that was filmed in British Columbia and it has C7-type AR-15s, the rifles in question are probably from the same batch of K4Bs owned by whatever armory exists in Vancouver. It seems like a safe bet, right? -MT2008 19:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: Stargate/Seven Days
There are a lot of TV shows filmed in British Columbia (especially Vancouver), but I'm pretty sure there's only one major armory in the province that supplies to all of them. There aren't that many shows where the pistol grips on the Model 715s are visible, but it still strikes me as highly likely that they're all K4Bs if they all come from the same armory.
(1.) I wasn't able to see the pistol grips on the episode of Stargate: SG1 that had the Model 715s (the one that Excalibur screencapped), but again, if it's the same armory that supplied Viper and Millennium, then the guns are presumably the same ones: K4Bs.
(2.) I don't remember if I've ever seen any Model 715s on Seven Days, though I can check again. The firing M16s I can recall seeing on that show were all M16A1s with A2 handguards (the non-firing scenes all used Airsoft M16A2s).
As for the Photoshopped pictures, yes, let's keep deleting them. I'm trying to recall if I've seen anymore. The only one we still have that I recall is the XM16E1 picture that Steve Karnes made (it's still on the M16 page). -MT2008 20:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: C7 stuff
I'll replace the C7/Model 715 picture on all the other pages later tonight.
As for the receiver, what you've told me is interesting because it seems to explain why we probably see the Oly K4Bs in all of these Vancouver productions. You're saying that Colt wouldn't even sell its lowers to armorers? Presumably, this would apply to the Canadians, too. Maybe the armory in Vancouver wanted to buy C7-style rifles in case they ever had to work on a movie depicting the Canadian forces (since, in the early-90s, the C7 is what the CF still used). But since Al has told me that Diemaco wouldn't sell them any of its rifles, and since Colt wouldn't have either, OlyArms would have made the most sense for them, because the pre-94 K4B looks like the C7 and because Oly's plant is just across the border (a few hours away).
I'm speculating, of course, but it would explain a lot, no? -MT2008 20:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: Colt cowards
Yeah, I remember what cowards Colt were, long before the AWB was ever passed. I'm old enough to remember those badly neutered "Match Target" rifles being the only Colt rifles available at FFLs. I just didn't think they were such pussies that they treated armorers the same way. If they did, then I think it would go a long way towards explaining the use of Oly K4B rifles by the Vancouver armorers - they couldn't have bought C7s from Diemaco, but they also wouldn't have been able to get Model 715s or AR-15 A2s from Colt (without going through red tape, presumably), so going to OlyArms was probably the easiest way for them to get a C7-style gun. -MT2008 22:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: 715 photo
Nah, I don't think it matters too much, since it's only the right side of the gun that's visible (not the left). It still looks extremely close to a 715, which is what matters most for our purposes.
I have also been planning to buy a 20" upper and A2 buttstock for my DPMS Panther carbine that I bought this past January. I already have a Stowaway pistol grip on the gun (which I bought direct from Oly). I was planning to buy an A2-style barreled upper, but do you think I should get a Model 715-style upper instead? I don't care too much about having the A1-style rear sight, after all (I can't imagine I'll ever be shooting at distances where I'd need to just for elevation, and I'm not that good, anyway). If I get a 715 barreled upper and slap it on my DPMS lower with the Oly grip, I will have a rifle that looks (from the right side) identical to an Oly K4B, so I can photograph it and you can edit it for IMFDB use. What do you think? -MT2008 23:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
RE:
Cool. Yeah, I guess it does look a bit closer to the real thing, but you gotta admit: Few people will notice. Just look at all the mistakes on World Guns or Security Arms (or any other site with gun photos).
Also, I did the Harsh Realm page ages ago. Contrary to what I said on the page, the Model 715s which appear on that show are definitely OlyArms K4Bs. In the opening scene of the Pilot episode, Max Martini has his rifle slung over his back in one scene, and it's possible to see that it has a Stowaway grip. Plus, Harsh Realm was done in Vancouver, and like I've said, the armorers there definitely use K4Bs to simulate C7s/Model 715s. -MT2008 23:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
RE:
Really sorry for that, will make sure it does not happen again.--SB2296 10:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
removed comment
"The SP89 was obviously a lazy choice by the film's armorer, because the book clearly specifies a full-auto MP5K."
That was not written by me. About all I did on that page was the images. I'm not one to write comments like that. --Predator20 01:31, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Well, I am guilty of not deleting it when I worked on the page. It's been awhile since I work on that page, I just happened to check it out when comparing the holsters worn by Tommy Lee Jones in "No Country" and "In the Electric Mist". --Predator20 03:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Archer
I recently took alot of screencaps from the show Archer and when I went to create the page noticed that a page for that show had already been created and deleted with the message that western animation was not allowed on IMFDB. Below are a few of the screencaps I took from the show:
File:Archerkalash.JPGNote the area above the magazine indicating that this was specifically intended to be an AK-47File:Cubanuzi.JPGThis weapon is clearly a full sized Uzi
I refrained from taking images of any weapons that appeared in the show that were amorphous drawings that beared no resemblance to real weapons, however to ban western animation that clearly represents actual weapons seems to reflect more on personal prejudice rather than quality standards as there are Video Game and a few Anime articles on this site that feature guns with far less clear basis on real weapons than many of those featured on this show. -Anonymous
RE: P228
Personally, I'm fine with your P228 picture for now. We can certainly replace it with a jacked image from Google if you really don't like it. But if so, the proper way to do so is to upload over the old one, whereas Mr. Joker is trying to add the image to just one page. And he's ignoring my attempts to talk about it. -MT2008 21:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Reply: Archer
I only brought the matter to you because it appeared that you were the one who had previously deleted the Archer article. I too have never been a fan of having video games and Anime on this site (truth be told I'm not that fond of either media in general). The only articles I have created so far have all been live action films and television shows, however, watching the show Archer I noticed that the guns were rendered far better than in most western animation and thought it might be interesting to make a page for the series. I apologize if it seemed I was singling you out for complaints and would like to know if there is another admin I should clear the idea with first before I go through the trouble of building the page. -Anonymous
Another request
In the Frankengun thread on the forums, you said you'll take request but we can't hound you about when we're getting them. So another request.
We need a Colt Python snub nose with nickel finish. We have two images of blued finish models that are jacked from the web. But nickel is more priority since we don't have one. Thanks. --Predator20 23:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Here is a photo I found on the Internet. Only one I was able to locate, but if nothing else it can fill in until something better comes along. --Jcordell 21:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I used my copy of the DVD. IDK if it means anything, but i used Windows Snipping tool to take the shots. All of my movies that I've upload have been on legally purchased DVDs. -The Winchester
Re: Atlantis: The Lost Empire
I replaced the images with widescreen images and I even increased the picture size to 600px. Hope this helps. - Kenny99 04:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey
Hey MPM2008, I would like to say welcome back from the Pacific, I hope you really enjoyed your time there. I also have a question, is this M60 you uploaded back in September from your armory?
If so, why didn't you put your copyright on it? It's no big deal, I'm just asking since it's a great picture, and I want to know if it's yours. Thanks.--Alienqueen11 22:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Re:M60
Yeah, sorry I haven't been around lately, been caught up in school work, but I'm back to help now. I think I might have stopped those those spammers using the the Index.php to hi for good. I deleted the Index.php and protected it, so far it seems to work. Also, there is this new user named SuperModerator claiming to be a mod. Should be say something to him?--Alienqueen11 03:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Damn, somebody was impersonating a mod? My bad for not seeing it. Also, how was the show? -MT2008 03:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Okay then, thanks for getting rid of him. He was likely one of those people pretending be a moderator in order to insult other users and keep them from talking back to him. Thanks again for showing what a real mod can do.--Alienqueen11 03:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I've slipped and acted like a jerk myself alot while banning people, lol. But yes, We can't afford having fake mods making us look bad, I think spammers and Vandals are already enough to deal with.--Alienqueen11 04:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm trying to keep up with everything. Even though I basically work in front of a computer for 10 hrs a day (which means I tend to come on here when I'm feeling distracted), I still miss out sometimes on annoying anonymous users. My tendency is to notice if they edit a page that I worked on, but not always other stuff.
Also, thanks for the new M733 photo. Also, that's cool that you get to go to Rome. What do you mean by advisory capacity? Just curious. -MT2008 14:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Question about Colt Model 733 Carbine
I noticed that you just edited the Colt Model 733 section of the M16 rifle series page to remove the comment about genuine Colt Model 733's having A2-style upper recievers. I take it then that this statement was false and real Model 733's actually have an A1-style upper? Just want to verify this for future reference. Orca1 9904 08:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Massive Amount of Guns
Am watching a National Geographic special on Guns in America and was considering creating a page for it. Thing is the number if weapons visible in the thing is so overwhelming I have no idea how long the page would be. Any suggestions? Age: 41 Country: Canada --Charon68 13:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. In actuality the thing seemed to strive for some semblance of balance but, as with most documentaries of this sort, did seem a little anti-gun. What I found funny about it was some of the interview subjects which included two purported trauma specialists (MDs) who were capping rounds at a range and both seemed almost giddy in the process and a self avowed pacifist who owns, among other things, a custom MAC-11, an M-16 model of some sort and several others (all Class 3) which he keeps as "investments for his grandchildren". --Charon68 15:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Situation Critical
Thanks for the information you gave. BTW can you help me recognize the exact variant of the G3A4, it may be a G3KA4 or a HK91. My age is 15 and I do not live in North America (cannot specify my exact region).--SB2296 06:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks and that is the North Hollywood Shootout episode. Are there any other such airsoft weapons in the page?--SB2296 06:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation page
I have created some disambiguation pages,eg, M3 and Delta Force to improve page navigation in IMFDB. Considering the latter I used to hate when I typed to search the video game Delta Force when the site redirected me to the movie page Delta Force with the same name. So I am currently in the process of making disambiguation pages for pages with similar titles to make navigating pages easy. Ben41 asked me recieve the sysop's consent before undertaking this project.--SB2296 14:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: the member on probation
Thanks, and yeah, I'm going to keep an eye on him. It's one thing getting to a heated argument with other users, but openly insulting other users over spelling, and a lack of knowledge is just plain trolling. Oliviera may have went too far with the swearing sometimes, but atleast he contributes to the site, but if this user is only here for discussion, he might as well be nice about it. I agree with your warning too, it should make him think twice before snapping at other users. Thanks again.--Alienqueen11 22:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
RE: StrikerDelta
Welcome back, hope you're enjoying your trip so far. As for StrikerDelta, he came back under the IP address 173.62.63.63 a few days ago, see his contributions
[9] here, and deleted the content on a whole bunch of pages, and I banned him for that too, so that should get rid of him for good. As for the address you mentioned, I'm not certain that's him, but I'll definitely keep a watch on him, if he goes too far with deleting stuff, I'll let him know. Any way, other then that, Good luck with your work, let me know if you need anything.--Alienqueen11 21:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey, MPM
ProtoAuthor here, I've forgotten my login, and the email won't come to me. But I see we now have a Silent Hill 3 page. I've been contributing as of last night, but I want to upload official images from the press releases. I'd scan my guide, but I don't have it with me, and it won't look as good. So, I hope my email comes soon.
Blank adaptions
I posted this question on the Star Model B page but figured it would be better to ask you directly as you're the leading authority on this site. Around what time did armorers resolve the issue of converting larger calibre guns to cycle blanks so that it was no longer necessary to do things like use a Star Model B as a 1911 or make fake 1911s with revolvers inside as was done in The FBI Story? -Anonymous 00:32, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
User talk:99.12.124.133
I hate to report this, but this user keeps creating pages with only a minimal amount of information and I'm not sure what to do. I hate to have to go and fix every page this user makes. --Ben41 22:38, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
RE: We Were Soldiers
Holy crap, you got screen-used gun pics from We Were Soldiers? Beautiful! -MT2008 01:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
We Were Soldiers and screencapping
Thanks, I'll make sure in the future to have some screencaps ready before I start the pages. As for the We Were Soldiers page, I saw that you're deleting some screencaps and have replaced some. I had some HD caps ready for the M60 section and the M1 section, but if you want to do the rest, that's fine with me. --Ben41 00:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
PNG's to be deleted
What's the best way to let you know that you can delete some of the PNG's I've replaced with JPG's? What I've tried to do is use the same filename for the JPG as was used for the PNG. If you look at The Incredible Hulk page, I've replaced the PNG's with JPG versions, so you can delete the PNG files. I've done the same thing for the Indiana Jones and the Infernal Machine. --Ben41 01:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
RE: We Were Soldiers AK
Hey, MPM, I have a question...did anyone at CW tell you if the We Were Soldiers AKs have been used on any other shows? Also, I'm wondering if we should use that AK to replace many of the jacked Internet AK images that we've already got.
BTW, I finally learned why Canadian movies and TV shows have so many Olympic Arms AR rifles. -MT2008 15:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
RE:
Yeah, I hate those jacked images, too. I especially hate that people keep using the picture of a Type I AK-47, which is something that has almost surely never appeared in a single movie (not in the West, anyway). Even the Type IIs are pretty rare (although at least one appeared in Blood Diamond). But I figure that since the We Were Soldiers AK is about the closest we have (for now) to a Russian AK that's all our own, we could use it as a placeholder until we find a "general" image. Kind of like the way that we use the nickel Baby Eagle from Live Free or Die Hard as our standard version.
As for OlyArms and the Canucks, I got the following info from an anonymous source:
The big armory in British Columbia is run by a guy named Tom Felcan. His company has changed names a lot (Felcan International, Felcan Enterprises, or just Tom Felcan), but it's the same guy in charge. Any movie or TV show filmed in British Columbia gets its weapons from Tom Felcan - The X-Files, all of the Stargate shows, Seven Days, Battlestar Galactica, etc.
In the early-90s, Felcan made a bulk purchase from OlyArms. The records are all gone (due to the fire at the OA plant from 10 years ago), but my source remembers Felcan approaching them to purchase a very large quantity of K4B rifles and K3B carbines, both complete guns and upper receiver kits, around '91-'92. These were all semi-auto civvie rifles, but a few years later, Oly sold Felcan a smaller number of LEO flattop K3B and K23B "stubby" carbines (again, as either complete rifles or upper receivers-only).
In short, that's why you see so many Oly guns in productions from that neck of the woods. Speaking of which, I'm doing some more work on the page you started for Jeremiah, and that show has a ton of AR rifles made by OA. -MT2008 19:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
The Sopranos PJK-9HP
Thanks for identifying the PJK-9HP used by Tony Sirico on an episode of The Sopranos. I knew it was a FEG (thanks to the help of another contributor), but was unable to find exactly which model. With the fantastic new photo you uploaded, that page (one of my favorite of my own articles) is now even better. Again, just a small thing but I wanted to thank you for that contribution! Hope all's been well. - Speakeasy804 07:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Delete list
Got a better view of the rifle used in this episode. --Predator20 21:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey MPM2008, I remember you saying something about you not wanting any "Frankengun" pictures made from your images. Well, I found this on the Thompson Submachinegun page:
It's been on the site for quite awhile, what do you want done with it?--Alienqueen11 19:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Re: Hybrid
I took the Hybrid picture off the Thompson page, but left it on the movie page for now. As for the sniper rifle, beautiful image! Feel free to overwrite any of the gun pictures I uploaded whenever you please. Keep up the good work.--Alienqueen11 04:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Excellent work. Thanks for the screen used guns from We Were Soldiers too. Long Mountain Outfitters must be getting jealous.--Alienqueen11 04:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Virus
Nice job on Virus. Here's something you might want to point out on your page:
Now compare to these images from Seven Days (1.11 - "HAARP Attack"):
Coincidence? I think not. ;) I remember this weapon also appeared in an episode of JAG; I believe it was originally Mike Gibbons' gun. -MT2008 15:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Interesting email I recieved
I recieved an interesting email today in regards to deleting a duplicate image of an RKG-3 anti-tank grenade, filename 'RKG-3 GRENADE REPLICA.jpg' and I thought I should share it to see what you and the other senior admins think of it. Below is the bulk of the message in its entirety:
"Hello,
Thank you for the image update on IMFDB, we didn’t load those images originally due to copyright issues and chose to use an image from our company website instead. Any questions you have regarding ordnance or weapons feel free to send an email. Thank you and any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know.
If I'm interpreting this correctly, it sounds like someone uploaded a copyrighted image without permission and the owners of the image emailed me to thank me for removing it. What do you think? Orca1 9904 18:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Inert ordnance
I was contacted by him on AIM not long ago; he's the person who uploaded the picture I removed. Apparently he uploaded it not realizing we already had a picture of that weapon. He's a pretty cool guy; served as an EOD in the Army prior to retiring. He's here under User:MPJOrdTech. Good to have yet another expert to add to our stable of professionals. Orca1 9904 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Enfield Mk II revolver
I sure don't have any (non) jacked images. Wish I did. However Nyles might be a good resource. Not only is he an old gun collector with connections, but he's Canadian and the Mk II was issued to the Mounties so there might be several up north that can be photographed. Who was the armoer for Silverado ? That movie was filmed in 84 in New Mexico and John Cleese used one. Could that be a possible connection? Or did you already think of that? Anyway that's all I have for ideas. --Jcordell 13:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hudson AK-47 replica
Thanks for the info, but are you sure those are the .22 AK clones? I saw one of those up-close once, and the one I saw had a less-curved magazine (almost shaped like a Norinco Type 84 mag). I can't remember what brand it was, but I think the receiver said that it was imported by Mitchell Arms. Also, haven't the Hudson AK-47s' manufacturing specs been changed a whole bunch of times? The ones that they made in the 1980s look quite different from the ones they make today (I've seen pictures of those, too). -MT2008 14:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Film Template page
I think with the poster line at the top, it makes the table of contents go all the way below the poster. With the way it's put on The American (which is one of the pages I started), I prefer having the top of the poster aligned with the table of contents. But that's just my preference. --Ben41 06:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Pictures Question
I was wondering, are you still closed to gun picture requests? I was asking because I was wondering if it would be possible to get a picture of an M16A4 with an M203 grenade launcher, as there are several articles (namely Legion and Project Reality, to name a couple) that could benefit from such an image. I hope to hear from you soon on this, and wish you well. Orca1 9904 06:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Zastava pictures
Can you block this guy and delete the unnecessary Zastava pictures that he uploaded.
[10]
--SB2296 08:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
RE: Limited Time offer
Hey, MPM! First off, I'm on a pretty busy trip to the capital city right now (my first as a lobbyist), but thanks for making this offer. Right now, I'm pretty tired, so I can't really think of what I'd love to see on the site. But off the top of my head - can you see if anyone has a Daewoo K3, especially a Paratrooper model? I think Mike Gibbons used to have a few of them, but not sure. Also, since Predators is out in theaters now (saw it recently, BTW), do you know who has the screen-used guns from that movie? I'm sure I'll think of lots more later, but those will do for now, LOL. -MT2008 01:46, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh, and one other thing: Do you know anybody who has a Knight's Armament Revolver Rifle? I've been searching in vain to find a good picture of one of those. They're pretty rare. -MT2008 13:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
RE:
Hmmm, I'm stumped. I can tell you that in some of the screencaps, it's a SIG Non-Gun. But a few of the images show a gun that looks like a Taurus PT945, yet the cocking serrations are too tall, so I don't think that's what it is. I'm really not sure, gonna have to look some more. -MT2008 02:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
RE: M3 carbine Pic
I thought before that Kin93 was replacing your pic without permission since that all of your firearm images are taken from a real armory until you told me that yours was a fixed image of someone's image :) - Kenny99 21:16, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Invasion USA
I don't know if you're still working on this one, I added a few screenshots to Invasion U.S.A. (1985). --Ben41 08:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
In reply to "You're gone I hear"
Hi, hope you are doing well. Probably you have gone through SB2296's talk page.
Yes you are right, this American site does not has to somehow change to suit my view of the world. Well you can have your American site. Neither I wanted this site to comply with my worldview, nor to start an argument with you. I just had a doubt. As far as I can recall, I have never claimed that IMFDB's I stands for INTERNATIONAL. May be you are right that the DEMAND made it INTERNATIONAL. But again, people from other part of the world could easily misinterpret this as nothing was mentioned regarding its STRICTLY American nature. It is quite difficult for a non-American to understand that Internet Movie Firearms Data Baseis restricted to America.
You are talking about WORLDVIEW.
What world view can describe the obscureness of the film New York? see: 22:39, 1 November 2009 AdAstra2009's comment here: [[11]]. Irrespective of the fact that the page has clear screen caps and well researched, it is obscure. I can understand that wallpaper was removed as it was not in a typical desktop res but whats wrong with the film? 'high and mighty Americans' (your words, not mine) perhaps can answer this.
And last but not the least, You get revenue because people voluntarily contribute. Even my SUCKED UP pages give you revenue, no matter how small, but they still do so. If you think those pages are realy sucked up, please delete them (including all the foreign pages which does not meet quality standards). But please dont think in your mind that why foreign pages are left halfway finished.
I'm thinking we should recreate that page and protect it, so only admins can touch it. I had delete it twice this morning in a short period of time.
I watched the preview for The Walking Dead a few days ago. Looks pretty good, reminds me of cross between 28 Days Later (waking up in a hospital) and The Crazies (sheriff). --Predator20 15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
re:Russian Spammer
Yeah I kind of figured it was spammer. If they're in a foreign language they usually are. Another thing I noticed, once a spammer hits a talk page, they'll keep on that same page until the protection level is changed. This one talk page got spammed three times before I wised up. --Predator20 17:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Front paging
I was wondering who of the Admins is responsible for the front page featuring of articles. People put so much work into the SG-1 Article over the past few months, I personally thing that it is quite presentable by now. If the one responsible needs any help with picking caps for the FP, feel free to ask me :P --Milkovich 07:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey MPM2008, I'm not sure if you knew this but I have spotted a bunch of your images being used on the Zombie Wiki here: [12]. I not sure if you gave them permission to use the images, but the way the images are viewed won't allow me to see who uploaded them. Just wanted to make sure you knew about it.--Alienqueen11 01:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I checked it out and they give just give credit for the pictures to IMFDB just in general. I'm not sure if You're okay with just that, but I just thought I would check it out. - Kilgore 19:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
To find the person who uploaded it, put Image: after the name of the image and then you'll find out. - Kenny99 02:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Zombie
Pkay so you think the Zombie sub-cateogry should be movie and television only? Am I understanding you correctly? I have no problem with that and I can change it. --Jcordell 15:27, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I understand and agree with you. I'm changing it. By the way have you see the commericals for the new AMC series starting on Halloween The Walking Dead? Produced by Frank Darabont and Gale Ann Hurd? Something tells me you have. I'll be watching it. At least for the first few episodes. Me and zombie movies go back 30 + years.My guilty pleasure. --Jcordell 16:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Picture Notes
I was wondering if I could get your opinion on something I have been doing about notes in the frames of gun pictures. Because a lot of the weapon pictures we have uploaded to the sight have information already in the bottom of the frame, when I have needed to make a comment about the specific weapon featured in the show in comparison to the pictured weapon, I have made my comments bold and italicized to differentiate them from the information normally in the frame. Below is an example I did on the Bones article:
In the episode "Mummy in the Maze," the murderer dressed as a clown uses a sawn-off double barrel shotgun in his shootout with Booth.
Error creating thumbnail: File missingThe weapon in the episode was sawn down to the semi-pistol grip portion of the stock with the barrels left relatively long, similar to this weapon - 12 gauge.
The bold text is used to compare the weapon in the show to the one in the picture, something I also did on the Love Kills page. I was curious if you thought this might be something I should try to popularize or if maybe I should refrain from putting article-specific notes in the frames of gun images at all. -Anonymous
Beretta AR
Can I know why the Beretta AR 70/90 has been removed? What I wrong? --Charly Driver 09:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I updated the right section. However now would be more correct to call the page "Beretta AR-70 Series" rather than "Beretta AR-70/223.--Charly Driver 09:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
What fuck have I done? I tell you what I did. Yesterday I created the new section "Beretta AR 70/90", which disappeared after a few hours I do not know why. I asked why is disappered and you rightly told me that it was not necessary to open two pages of the same weapon. So this morning I updated the existing "Beretta AR-70/223" section. Now you tell me very rudely that I've done a mess, can I know where I wrong?--Charly Driver 21:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
It Appears that Charly Driver deleted the "gun" category tag, by mistake or by ignorance of it's purpose I assume. I've fixed it. --AdAstra2009 21:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
La Femme Nikita
I was going to change it, but it looks like you already did. --Ben41 03:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Re:The perpetrator
I left a message on the page's discussion, but no one seems to have responded. As for MattyDienhoff, I say warn about your copyright policies. I wouldn't be too hard on him since he appears to be a young user and more then likely didn't know about your copyright.--Alienqueen11 04:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
User 173.62.63.157
Thanks to you, man. Long as he's gone either way. I just don't tend to leave messages about problem members on every admin's page (hell, I don't even know 'em all), but well, whatever I guess. Thanks again Mastah. StanTheMan 00:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
RE Section Headers
Sorry about that, I'll keep it in mind in the future. --AdAstra2009 06:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Total Recall
Better check out the addition from the supposed inventor. --Jcordell 18:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Also I sent a message to Bunni and I've locked the page so only admin can make changes. Just being careful right now. --Jcordell 18:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I know people that have dealt with John Goncz in the industry. He uses a lot of cursing and threats but generally he is regard as being highly eccentric. His weapon as long since past it's prime but he believes it made a fortune on the film industry. You should talk to Syd some more about him and move from there. --phoenixent 22:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Excellent. I started to think that myself, but I knew you would be more familiar with this situation. --Jcordell 01:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Zombie Wiki
Hey MPM2008, I have talked to the head of the Zombie Wiki, Philodox a few days ago about the issue with your images on his wiki, and he responded saying that he respects you and IMFDB. I also gave him a list of the images, and also Matty Dienoff isn't who uploaded your images there, there's also a user named Angel 956 also uplaoded a few onto the site. Right now, I'm just waiting to see if the images get deleted. If you want to talk to Philodox yourself, here's a link to his profile [13], and here's his response to me, if you want to see what he had to say [14].
--Alienqueen11 02:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
No problem, I knew you said you had an electronic tag somewhere on your images, and that's what I told Philodox. As for watermarking, I really don't like the idea of having a big IMFDB symbol on the side of the image, as I too believe this ruins the image. But one idea I do like is to have the site's name or your name on one of the corners of the image, like you put on this Cetme Ameli you shot for that user from wikipedia:
Error creating thumbnail: File missingNotice on the bottom left corner you put Courtesy of www.imfdb.org. I wouldn't mind something like that as it doesn't disturb the image so much and it won't be too noticeable, but users will still see it and know who it belongs to as long as the lettering is darker then this image.
Anyway that's my opinion. Let me know what you decide.--Alienqueen11 04:12, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Specifications template
I have just now created a proper template for the specifications section (example here). Although it is amateurish it is the best one I could do, please suggest ways in improving it.--SB2296 16:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
RE: Your Expertise
While I thank you for suggesting that I become the black powder flintlock expert, I am not quite sure that I am up to the task. Though I have some experience and interest in flintlocks, I couldn't tell you specifics on them, such as the style of Pennsylvania Rifle (Allentown, Dickert, Lancaster, or York for example), nor could I tell you specifics such as what model of certain flintlocks, like was it a second or third model Brown Bess. Yet, if you want to shoot me a question on flintlocks or black powder, I will try my best to help out where I can. Right now I am just comfortable commenting on pages, as I am a new user.
--Markethunter 18:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Ultraviolet - My Mistake
- I didn't mean to cause a problem. I admittedly wasn't sure how much 'blades' and whatnot were actually allowed or not on a page - I know you fellas have had some trouble defining limits on the knives/blades/etc before. Anyway again, I apologize for that. I appreciate you giving me a better idea of what's acceptable for pages so I'll keep it in mind. Glad to hear my help isn't causing any other problems thus far. Thanks again. StanTheMan 01:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Axeman and Lost Images
On the Lost page, the user Axeman keeps reverting the screencaps back to originals he put up. Axeman's images weren't cropped and were too dark. I put up a comparison of his images next to mine on the Lost Discussion page. I think mine would be preferable, but I want to get some other opinions. --Ben41 22:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Screencaping tool
What screencaping tool, DVD player, or software you used? I'm asking this because your pictures are quite sharper than Ben41's saturated images. - Kenny99 03:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm referring to movies like Body of Lies, Kick Ass, and Sucker Punch. Ben41's images are quite similar to mine as both have adjusted contrast, brightness and a large amount of saturation. Sometimes, Ben41's images may be as sharp as yours probably because he uses the Blu-Ray version. Also, since that you are using an Apple software, is there a Microsoft Windows program similar to the Mac program you mentioned about on my talk page? - Kenny99 21:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Copyright issue
Greetings
Some great image work for sure. Is it possible to use three of your pictures (namely - those of Mossberg 500, FN FAL and Tommy Gun M1A1) for my gun articles written for my website?
Strictly non-commercial use intended, of course.
PS- Although I'm in general oppose the very concept of "copyright" and Russian Civil Code grants some fair use rights for personal non-commercial use - I find that polite to ask the author first.
Best regards, Mikhail. --RussianTrooper 11:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
PS- As for my conceptions about copyright- they are simple. If it is non-commercial use, it should be OK and free. For commercial use- royalties are to be paid to the authors.
PPS- Some of my notes about weapons in Fallout series of games were copied and presented as herself-written by the person who did the copypaste. The problem was - she didn't know a thing about firearms - like putting my description of a bolt-action hunting rifle to a semi-auto rifle, or more hilarious- putting the description of a double-barrelled shotgun to "suit" a single-cartridge home-made rifle. I just LOL'd at this.
Best regards, Mikhail --RussianTrooper 17:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Permissions
So may I use the images of yours I mentioned above on my website?
Entirely non-commercial use intended with no modifications to the photos of course.
Best regards, Mikhail --RussianTrooper 19:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
AK-101s and photos
Thanks))
Well, you are a sysop and it is in your discrestion to revert my edits if you find them unsuitable. Just in my point of view AK-101 is essentially an AK-74 chambered for 5,56mm. That's the reason.
About the photos - well I only uploaded that of better quality or just more correct ones- for example old AK-101 photo depicted a commercial semi-auto AK-74 clone, 5,45x39mm (more curved mag than AK-101).--RussianTrooper 20:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
> he reason is that most movies made in the U.S. and Canada during the 1980s used Chinese guns (and the random Egyptian or Yugoslavian guns) but the only variants we saw for decades was either 7.62x39mm or 5.56x45mm.
Well, this was also general case during 1980s here in Russia as well )) Most films used AKM and AKMS rifles, and AK-74s were not widely displayed in movies. Nowadays, however the AKS-74 and AKS-74U are the main Kalashnikov-type weapons used in Russian movies, they are supplied by MVD's Forces of Interior arsenals.
PS- However, it is interesting, why the 007-Golden Eye movie sticked to Chinese Type-56 modified to look like AKS-74s rather than having real AKS-74 supplied by MVD. (Remembering they DID leased an actual TANK from MVD Interior Forces).
PPS- By the way - are Soviet and Russian movies and TV-series OK to get an article here?--RussianTrooper 23:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks again for the pics --RussianTrooper 00:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Colt Category
Yeah that discussion was before my time. Not a problem. I'll delete it. I see your logic. --Jcordell 02:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Well I have my moments of course. But the many years I spent in the Army and the past ten years as a cop have taught me most of the time to choose my words carefully and keep a grip on my temper. Though there are some folks here in my city (where I both live and work) who hate my guts. I've invited them to come by and see me at my house since they're so quick to tell me where I live. But for some reason they never take me up on my offer. Very strange.
Well anyway not a problem. --Jcordell 02:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Solo Voyage, movie bans and etc
Well - honestly saying, here in Russia back at Soviet times there was Goskino's (State Dept. of Movie Industry) instructions to generally refrain from depicting an all-out conflict between Russia and America. That was the general policy - therefore Soviet analog to your Red Dawn just do not exist. So, all American military get depicted as an OpFor in Soviet movies are portraid as renegade, and not of "main-line" US Armed Forces. ;)
As for banning movies -nowadays it is IMHO of no use - both in Russia and in USA. There is an entire industry of 'pirated' (counterfeit) copies of movies - banning DVD release doesn't mean the movie won't be available on Pirate-bay and other sites.
And about AK variants- isn't private possession of fully auto rifles banned? Here in Russia it is legally forbidden unconditionally to privately own full-auto capable weapons (full-auto weapons ownership restricted to Russian Army and official law enforcment bodies, however, law does not forbid to own military-style assault rifles after they are modified by licensed gunsmith to permanently restrict them to semi-auto.). --RussianTrooper 10:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment
As much as I would like to claim the Barrett as mine the pic was taken last summer at a gun show in Michigan. Rather fascinating bunch out there!!! --Charon68 15:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
RE:lame page makers
I wouldn't doubt it. I wouldn't have given him or her a temporary ban, but Jcordell had already deleted Fred the movie prior to me deleting it a second time. I had to temporary ban another user because he keep making a season 1 page for Starsky and Hutch, even after Ben and I already told him not to. Maybe they'll get the message. How's work going?--Predator20 17:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
RE: Removed Guns
I seriously apologize for that, as well as any other wrongful edits I may have made (which I sincerely hope was not that many). Only in the Glock and 1911 pages did I actually do any serious removal editing and again, it was done solely because certain sections seemed extraneous at the time, had no listings, and before I myself gave serious consideration to the 'reference/completeness' point. Again, I'm very sorry about that, and any problems that have arisen because of it. I have found out I indeed removed the Glock 20, in addition to numerous other ones. I have since gone back through the edit logs and restored the Glock 20 section, as well as all other entries I removed, I hope that will be alright. I will certainly cease any serious editing of the sort and especially removal of entries from here on out making sure it is alright, if at all. I could probably take time and restore some other things I've edited, though I think outside of possibly the 1911 page (And most of the entries' thumbnails I reposted on the talk page, and several of them I think were posted by random users and have no listings or links to anything on the site), there shouldn't be any issues. In any event, in the interest of NOT doing any more serious editing, I'll just leave things where they're at unless another problem arises. Of course, please let me know right away if there are any further problems from my past edits and I will help out however I can. Again, I sincerely apologize to you, and the others. StanTheMan 17:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- No problem sir. Frantic, no, but stern I definitely thought so. But that kinda comes with your title I suppose. Besides, I understand perfectly fine - Regardless of how crazy you may seem personally (I'm joking.. I hope :b), you still do an awful lot for the site here and spend a whole lot of your time and effort doing it so I get where you're coming from, and I definitely understand wasted effort, I'm sorry that even happened. As I said, glad I could rectify things to some extent, and I've since given up doing any edits of the sort. I appreciate your understanding. That said, keep up all the good work - I'm especially liking the M16 history page, quite a good read there. StanTheMan 04:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nah, I'll trudge through he logs myself. It's my doing and I think I might be good at it anyway. :b Though at least this time it was easy, as the post I made in the talk page about removing the guns was still posted and had the date. Anyway, the magic ones are - Dan Wesson Panther, Konigsberg M/1914, Taurus PT1911, and Para-Ord P15 and P16. Considering how many 1911s that are posted now, that doesn't really sound too impressive.. Bah. Anyway, I kept the thumbnails for the Konigsberg, Taurus and Dan Wesson ones in the Talk page under 'Other Variants', but I can restore all the entries if you really want. I also removed a section for the LAR Grizzly a bit after all that, since it had it's own page already. That's all from me I believe, if there other missing ones, I didn't do it. Hope it helps. StanTheMan 17:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Zombie Wiki
MPM2008, I'm pleased to tell that Philodox deleted the images on the Zombie Wiki. By the way, nice to see you uploading gun images again, they're great.--Alienqueen11 21:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Gunfight at the O.K. Corral
Thanks for the compliment. I was surprised it wasn't done as well and I had forgotten that DeForest Kelley was in it. --Ben41 05:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Documentaries
I've been reading on various pages around the site that documentaries are no longer going to be allowed. I'm sure this was explained on some discussion page but I didn't hear why this new rule was inacted. I'm not contesting it, I was just wondering if you could tell me the reason behind it.
PS: I just read your rule about people listing their country of origin before you respond to their questions so here goes: I was born to two US Army Helicopter pilot parents on an American military base in Germany, however I have lived in the good old USA since I was six months old-Anonymous
RE:Site title business
Well, I was just making a joke but damn, I didn't even think about that. Guess I'm just another one of those narrow-ass arrogant ignorant and racist Amerikans.. Oh well. Seriously, I always figured 'Internet' was the first part of the title as so many other other sites/pages start out with 'Internet' also - I thought it was kinda common knowledge. Perhaps not. I don't get that second post you showed me, it seemed like an angry rant that went off on a tangent in spots, especially in that last part. Nevermind the fact he contradicts himself with his own statements, he was honestly bitching about the site getting paid of his work? Bah, so what, every wiki does, as well as Google, YouTube, etc etc. Again, that's pretty standard knowledge I thought. As for using American protocol and English language only articles and all that, it's not bigoted, it's practical - The man who owns/runs the RoboCop Archive is Swedish, yet his site is all English. Honestly, that dude just seems to be flipping his anti-American shit. It seems to him that y'all are acting racist for classifying pages as incomplete if they're for foreign films/etc (Never mind the numerous incomplete pages that aren't for foreign media, and/or if they're classified because they're actually incomplete) Bah, the dude has rubbed me the wrong way as you can tell. In the end though, the only answer I got for him is that noone's forcing him to stay, and if he doesn't like the site he can certainly leave. Pretty simple. As for the title, well, I can see now where it's 'for-dummies' inclusion really comes from, though I doubt it'll alleviate remarks like that entirely. Still, good to know, even if it may have gotten me a bit worked up. Anyway, thanks for the bit of light on the issue. StanTheMan 23:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
RE: Nickel 1911
That is one beautiful gun! And as you can tell by the enormous number of pages on which I placed the image, we needed a nickel 1911 with pearl grips for a while (everybody keeps using the Auto Ordnance from Pulp Fiction as a substitute, which I'd rather they didn't do). As far as other grips, I dunno...maybe ivory grips? I've seen that config in at least one movie page. But it's your call. -MT2008 20:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Wood grips would also be good, the gun in Sucker Punch (2011) is bright nickel with wood grips. While rarely seen on nickel movie guns, black grips like one in No Country for Old Men.--Predator20 22:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, another beautiful addition, along with the newer S&W Model 28. As for other variants, maybe one with the Ivory grips, but I'm not sure. I think there is a satin nickel gun pic with black grips already though. Bah, I don't know. I'll leave that to you guys. StanTheMan 17:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
ASP 9
Error creating thumbnail: File missingASP 9 (Highly customized pistol using a stock Smith & Wesson Model 39 as the starting point) - 9x19mm. This is the screen used firearm from the film Cobra
Do you have an idea where this gun was used in the film? Did Stallone use it? I thought he used the 9mm Gold Cup as his pistol throughout the film. --Predator20 22:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Syd Stembridge provided the guns for the film and he swears that it was a screen used gun, perhaps in Sly's waistband, but I've questioned this on multiple occasions, and I usually don't argue with the armorers who were there :) MoviePropMaster2008
hmmm... I'll have to watch the film again, Sly most always had the Gold Cup in his waistband. Maybe it was used in a deleted scene?--Predator20 01:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
What should I do?
http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/FrankPoncherello I already to this user not to build a Season 1 page for Starsky and Hutch, I even temporarily banned him for two weeks. But yet he builds it again for a third time. What should I do? He doesn't seem to listen. --Predator20 01:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Lol, I was just about to tell you. I kind feel bad about the comment I made on his page, but then again, maybe not. Anyway, this will be his third strike, I say boot him for good. It's clear he doesn't care and/or doesn't listen. But, I don't know, I just can't even stand stuff like that. Of course I guess I'm one to talk... StanTheMan 01:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I was going to send you a message like this I'm not going give him a temporary ban, but if he builds it again. Then he's gone for good. I figure if I was to temporary ban him again and he may just build the page again because of the ban. But had an editing conflict with Stan. So I checked recent changes and the page was up again. He's gone for good.--Predator20 01:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Yeah he already made the page, that's why I made the comment about doing it again. Just stupid.. Wait... did I screw up again? :b StanTheMan 01:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
New picture Ass-kissing
Well, I'm not doing much to shorten your already absurdly large talk page am I? Heh, anyway, figured I'd give you some more thanks for the new images - The Remington 700P(SPS) is very sleek. The two-tone SIG P229 is very nice, too. But especially the Smith Model 15. That is very nice, glad to have one with the target grips. I'm gonna add it immediately to the original Halloween page, as it's pretty much the exact representation of the Smith that Donald Pleasence carried there. Thanks again, very nice. I wonder what we'll see next! :D StanTheMan 21:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Stevens 67
Shouldn't the page be titled Stevens Model 67? Great image too.--Predator20 17:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
I would keep the image, maybe re-upload it as a Savage/Springfield? I would still use it as a place holder for the Stevens. What's the deal with Savage/Springfield vs Savage/Stevens? I'm not an expert on those guns. But I do like knowing the difference between pump shotguns. --Predator20 17:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Behold A Pale Horse
thanks for the fix to the page's format. I'me currently using my parent's computer. Took the kids over for the weekend and their computer is driving me nuts. The only reason why i even decided to build a page is that I'm bored out of my mind. Hard to believe that I grew up here. --Jcordell 13:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Oh Jeez you have access to the Savage 99 that Ken Foree uses in DOTD 78? Oh boy I'm looking forward to that one. Don't forget to put it on the DOTD 78 page. I once read on another firearms forum where somebody half-seriously said that Savage should make a Ken Foree/Dawn of Dead Commemorative Savage 99. --Jcordell 18:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Stray Dog Weapons
I know that The Red Spectacles used only fake blowback stand-ins, but could you take a look at Stray Dog to see if that is the case there as well? At first I anticipated that they would be, but if that MG42 is a fake, it's a pretty damn good one.--PistolJunkie 18:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Protection level for your images
I had to revert one of your images after another user decided to upload over it because it needed to have a scope. Should we go through your images and change the protection level for adims only? It's not the first time it's happened, I'd rather it be the last. It would be a serious amount of images to go through, but I think it would be worth it to do. --Predator20 01:35, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Error creating thumbnail: File missingYugoslavian SKS M59/66 rifle with blade bayonet and grenade launcher attached to barrel, the variant most seen during the Balkan Wars - 7.62x39mm. The Yugoslavian M59 is nearly identical to the Russian SKS, it is the M59/66 which has the grenade launcher attachment at the end of the barrel.
No prob. Yeah it's easy to revert, but we shouldn't have to. It's doubtful anyone would have have better pic than yours. :) But on any new uploads, I would go ahead and protect them. Also this Mossberg below, is it the screen used gun or just made up to look like it? --Predator20 02:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, remember me? :) It's me, Warejaws. Remember when I promised to screencap the I, Robot page from the BLU-Ray? Well... I done it. Sorry it took so long, I've been trying to keep up with my studies, and at work we have to move our shop/hardware store to another location. But yeah, the page is done, and I really hope you like it. I might have gone a little crazy with the amount of screencaps, so if you feel like something needs to go, it'll go.
Ps. Do you have actually have a Valmet M76 in your armory? The reason that I'm asking is that the standard issue assault rifle for the Finnish Army is the Rk 62, which is basically the same thing as the Valmet M76. And nowadays you rarely see the M76 is movies, even as a stand in for an AK variant.
I saw the picture on your user page and got curious; Is the M76 obsolete from (modern) movies? --Warejaws 21:54, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Taurus Model 80
Excellent. It dawned on me a few days ago that there was a strong possibility that all those revolvers that almost look like S&W, but not quite could be (in some cases) the Taurus Model 80. So I made the page. --Jcordell 01:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Photos from manufacturer's web-site?
Would it be okay to upload photos from manufacturer's website? Good quality, but there is one minor detail - technically this could be considered "copyright violation", buy really it is unlikely they would ever complain such thing if the copyright notice is given upon re-post (as many websites are reposting and according to Russian copyright legislation this could be considered fair use, technically). But the deal is in IMFDB policy to such things - if it is allowed - then I'll upload the pics.
Thanks for reading that
Best regards)) --RussianTrooper 15:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Should this be the ultimate reference for a lot of the firearms? --Ben41 05:58, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Way of War
I think this film was only released direct to DVD in the U.S., so I was going from the name on the DVD cover. --Ben41 01:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
M1911A1 disclaimer
I'm thinking about adding this to the M1911A1 section. LMK what you think. I'm not really satisfied with the wording.
Note many in the list below could actually be Colt Mark IV Series 70/80 Government Models, Springfield Armory, or another manufacturer. Instead of a former military issued M1911A1, unless its a war film. Since the markings of the gun aren't always clear, M1911A1 is a catch-all term. Being most 1911 manufacturers pistols are based off the M1911A1 platform.
--Predator20 22:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
RE Militia
Thank you, I actually took several screenshots you can use to demonstrate that. He also stole from Delta Force 2 and Rambo 2.
No, please you do the writing. I'm not very good at writing commentary and you probably have more insight into it then I do. :) --AdAstra2009 06:32, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
question
Hey, MPM, quick question: Did you post the most recent entry on my talk page (at the bottom)? It was posted anonymously, but I wondered if it came from you. Thanks. -MT2008 16:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, just busy. Anyway, I didn't want the blurbs to sound like we're crediting them for the photos, only the behind-the-scenes information. And yes, I admit some of it isn't that substantive, but it was sort of a quid pro quo for exclusive stuff that they did provide (like the pics of the Beretta 81). Sometimes, getting the language right is a bit tricky. -MT2008 14:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Re: In Cold Blood
Thank you very much! I had those pictures ready for about a week before uploading and kept trying to figure out exactly which they were. 870 didn't seem right to me but for some reason I didn't want to definitely go with a less common model in case someone wouldn't have been able to identify it correctly instead. I'll make the changes where I see them and if I have any more foul-ups, I greatly appreciate the help. - Speakeasy804 16:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
No need to apologize, unfortunately the film doesn't offer too many shots of the very weapons that alter its plot! Thanks for keeping the pics coming; very nice touch with the watermark! Also, it's great having all those shotguns in a comparable view like that - I never even seemed to realize all the differences until seeing them lined up like that. - Speakeasy804 16:50, 12 May 2011 (CDT)
Hi its Banukis517 again. Hey can you change the picture for the Remington 870 in the movie "Manhunter" A Michael Mann movie. This picture of the MOSSBERG 500 is more accurate to what the serial killer used>http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:Mossber500CPistolGrip.jpg
I'll respond to Banukis517 on his talk, but Jim Zubiena who trained William Peterson for Manhunter, said that they used his own personal 870 for the film. --Predator20 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you happen to have both of them in your inventory, so that you could take comparison pics? I sometimes see Smith & Wesson 3000s misidentified as 870s. While they are very close, there's a few giveaways. 9 times out of 10 it is an 870 being used in most films. But on some occasions it's a Smith & Wesson. I think some comparison pics would help a lot. Thanks.--Predator20 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Restrict image uploads
Was finally able to take care of this, only jpg and jpeg are allowed to be uploaded now. bunni 21:01, 14 March 2011 (CDT)
Advertising
I think User:SPACEart may be trying to use IMFDB to advertise his own business. I'm not sure what the policy on this sort of thing is, but I at least thought it should be brought to an admin's attention.--PistolJunkie 02:56, 21 March 2011 (CDT)
Colt Model 733
Was the Model 733 ever available with an A2 rear sight? On the Black Hawk Down page a few actors are listed as using the M733, the one used by Jason Isaacs is definitely a shorty but it has an A2 rear sight, same with the suppressed one used by Nikolaj Coster-Waldau. The one used by Nikolaj I don't think it even has a short barrel. Probably a 14.5" or 16" upper with a fake can slipped over the barrel. --Predator20 09:32, 25 March 2011 (CDT)
Hi. I am terribly sorry, I didn't know that. I have re-uploaded them with smaller size (now around 250-350 KB each). Is there any way to delete the old big images from the server? (If you cannot delete those older versions only, just please delete all the images and I upload them again.) Thanks, and I am sorry, again. bozitojugg3rn4ut 12:28, 5 April 2011 (CDT)
Deleting redirects
The redirects I deleted were broken redirects that were leading to pages that don't exist anymore. They were listed in the "Broken Redirects" page in the "Special pages" section. --Ben41 03:39, 7 April 2011 (CDT)
Just to explain the RPG thing (still can't post on the forum)
Burt has apparently decided that he should remove all uses of the term "RPG" to refer to anything but the RPG-X series of weapons made by Russia, since apparently the term is "incorrect" if it's used to mean anything but it's original Russian meaning; this includes removing references to projectiles as RPGs, something the US military (and English-speaking militaries in general) would disagree with him on. Obviously, he's wrong; I've quoted a BAE Systems press release ("The LROD system provides lightweight, low-cost RPG protection that is easily adapted to virtually any armored vehicle") and the Historical Dictionary of the US Army regarding the fact that it's a term used by professionals and authoritive sources. He's claiming I'm just saying "everyone" uses it, but I'm saying experts on the subject use it; people who's job it is to deal with these weapons, speaking officially and formally, call them RPGs (his reply is that he's a higher authority than defence contractors and the army on this site, which is...interesting, certainly). I'm also not saying we need to change everything: just that "Type 69 RPG" is no more incorrect a way to refer to the weapon than "Type 69 rocket launcher" or simply "Type 69." All three are valid in captions and on weapon lists, so there's no need to change anything from the way it is. Evil Tim 01:36, 16 April 2011 (CDT)
Everybody hates chris
I restored and bumped up the protection level so no one else can mess with it. --Ben41 01:42, 20 April 2011 (CDT)
The reason why I thought about restoring and protecting that particular page because anyone can recreate that page just by typing in those words, much like someone making a page for "Simpsons Movie, The" and "the simpsons movie". But if you want to keep deleted, that's okay with me. --Ben41 01:52, 20 April 2011 (CDT)
MP5-thing
Hi! I have recently uploaded a pic of the MP5SD5 which I made in Photoshop CS3 by using Your images of the A4 and SD6. I hope you don't mind it, If you do just tell me and I won't do things like that anymore. PS: I needed the SD5 for the The Sum Of All Fears (VG) page. This is the image:
During the making-of for La Linea - The Line a member of the film crew shows blanks loaded with BBs. I was wondering: Do these have a specific name? Are they used frequently on movie sets? I was hoping to make a trivia note out of it. Also: Could you take a look at the section for the carbine Liotta uses in the same movie? My own knowledge of firearms is too limited to make a proper identification. I'd appreciate any help you can offer. --Milkovich Error creating thumbnail: File missing 03:40, 26 April 2011 (CDT)
During the making-of a crew member is seen cycling multiple such rounds through one of the carbines. He does this in rather tight quarters.
In Motion, you can actually see the BBs bouncing off the wall. From what you said it's a good guess that that is a pretty hazardous thing to do (especially since he isn't wearing safety goggles). Could it be that they simply wanted to make sure that the weapon is cycling correctly? It sounds logical to use a less expensive kind of ammunition before putting hundreds of movie blanks through it just to have it jam on you. --Milkovich Error creating thumbnail: File missing 01:31, 27 April 2011 (CDT)
Not a good thing
I stumbled across this and thought you might want to know to was here. I figured this would be something you'd rather not have on the site.--PistolJunkie 23:26, 17 August 2011 (CDT)
Because your talk page is so long and my wireless signal is too weak, which means that my connection times out before your talk page can load; I have to edit the lowest section that loads before I loose my connection. Have you considered archiving older edits it so that it's not so long?--PistolJunkie 01:54, 18 August 2011 (CDT)
Hey
Hey MPM2008, Sorry I haven't been on in ages, How's life? Hope it hasn't been too busy or stressful. I like the new images, you did a good job with that watermark on your most recent ones.--Alienqueen11 00:14, 27 April 2011 (CDT)
Your Weapon Images
I just want to say thank you for the Ginormous amount of images you provided for this site. :) - Mr. Wolf 00:21, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
Shotgun Tube Cap pic
All hail MPM. Thanks a bunch for that pic, it will definitely help on the 70s and older films. --Predator20 15:29, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
Re: Thanks for the hello!
Yeah, it is amazing how much this site can change so much during a long absence, like the new layout similar to other wikis. Is it me, or was the search bar at the top of the site, then back to it's original spot of the left side? And yes, there are so many names I never seen, I do like how new user accounts appear in the recent changes list as they are created, it makes it easier spotting possible vandals and spammers before they act, but it's always great to have experienced users working around the clock to make sure newbies make the right edits. You did a great job on the watermark, originally I was against the idea after I saw the example Gunmaster45 made, but you, like always, makes everything work perfectly. Even though there will always be piracy, I will always be able to tell a MPM2008 image from a stock image as no one can do a better job then you. Also, great job on the 12 gauge shotgun magazine tube image you uploaded earlier, are you going to upload the Remington Model 31 and Ithaca 37 in that picture? There's no rush or demand, I would just love to see what the whole pictures look like. Best Regards, and nice to hear from you.--Alienqueen11 21:14, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
Lee Enfield Mk II
Yeah that guy is interesting isn't he? I notice that he isn't a real regular poster. He did several posts (to include his drive-by on my page) on April 2 and before that the last postings were in December. Absolutely no response to my post on his page. Little flakey if you ask me. Thanks though. I appreciate it. I figure you know what you're talking about. --Jcordell 18:03, 29 April 2011 (CDT)
He's gone. He sent me a pretty nasty PM over on the forum. He's got nothing to contribute here. --Jcordell 13:16, 9 May 2011 (CDT)
Rough Riders
Nyles identifed the Mausers as being Chilean. The Mausers in the screencaps. I think I just went and changed the caption after he made the ID. Let me know what you find out. Thanks.--Jcordell 22:55, 29 April 2011 (CDT)
AK Image
Honestly I didn't even bother comparing the images. I just saw that someone else had already voiced doubt about its identity on the talk page instead of cramming natter into a page. Natter doesn't help any; it just makes a page look crummy and means that someone else has to go in and clean it up. I figured I'd go back and try and narrow down the exact model down when I had time (finding the page again wouldn't be an issue since it's in my recent edits now), but didn't see any reason to leave a poorly written "correction" sitting there in the mean time.--PistolJunkie 03:29, 1 May 2011 (CDT)
RE: Raven Arms MP25
Nope, I don't own an MP25 (I'd never buy something that inexpensive and un-tacticool). And if I did, I assure you I would never subject any of my guns to that kind of treatment. It's another one of Weapons Specialists, Ltd's guns that I took from their site - so it's beat up because it's been in lots of movies. Please do get us a picture of one of yours if you get a chance. Thanks! -MT2008 22:16, 3 May 2011 (CDT)
Question Regarding Documentaries
Hi,
I'm sort of new to the Internet Movie Firearms Database world, so forgive me if I seem a little naïve on some of the rules and regulations. The page that I created on the documentary series Secret Service Files was tagged for deletion. You made a note in my talk page about how there is currently a moratorium on crating new IMFDB pages for documentaries, and that the current ones on the website were "grandfathered in". It seems a little odd to me that IMFDB would make such a decision specifically on documentaries, whereas pages about movies, TV shows, anime, and even video games are allowed. The Rules, Standards, and Principles page describes IMFDB as "an information resource". In the interest of completeness, doesn't it seem that a database for firearms depicted within this type of media should include documentaries (just wondering)? I certainly would like to finish the page I started to create (provided, of course, it is acceptable to the IMFDB staff). You also mentioned something about "running it by the Mods first to see if it warrants a waiver from the ban." What is "the Mods" and how would I go about doing this?
I just noticed that several of my pages are open to anonymous users. You know where it says what the protection status is on the top? I have alot that say protect instead of unprotect. I don't know if the global protection will protect them as well. I'm just being anal and changing them.--Jcordell 20:56, 11 May 2011 (CDT)
Alien: Resurrection
I know you've said you'll re-write that page yourself at some point, but I added an "overview" section at the top to cover the fact that the evidence I found (that prop site on the talk page from ages ago) suggests that none of the guns in the movie are real. I figured that we ought to say so somewhere. Evil Tim 12:42, 20 May 2011 (CDT)
Hi. Just a quick question.
I was just wondering how hard it is to get into the movie armory business? Is it fairly exclusive or are there a lot of firms?--Westernman1987 20:23, 20 May 2011 (CDT)
There was a mention of the most blanks fired in the DVD commentary of Starship Troopers 2 (they were mentioning that they didn't want to do the same thing on the sequel). In addition, on this site [16], there's a quote from Rock Galotti that mentions that he used over 300,000 blanks on the film (this quote was taken from the Making of Starship Troopers book). Also, there was a discussion about this in the IMFDB forum [17]. --Ben41 04:59, 29 May 2011 (CDT)
I guess the stat probably meant a record for Galotti and not for the entire industry. I'll change the wording. With the advent of CGI, do don't think it will ever to that many blanks ever again? --Ben41 02:49, 30 May 2011 (CDT)
Hemingway & Gellhorn
That's a lot of guns! I probably won't list any more right now until more promos come out. --Ben41 13:02, 1 June 2011 (CDT)
re:responding on my talk page
No biggie, I figured you would chime in soon enough. I was really hoping to avoid a discussion with him about it, but I knew that was wishful thinking. I haven't looked at his previous edits, so no idea if he's a good contributor or not.--Predator20 14:21, 3 June 2011 (CDT)
Gangster's Paradise: Jerusalema - Assortment Of Weapons
I've completed most of the weapons for the Gangster's Paradise: Jerusalema [18] page, but I have one photo which is an assortment of weapons that I can't name. I'm a 29 year old, male action movie fan from England, United Kingdom.
You probably know more than most about guns here, so I'd appreciate any help. --2deal2 22:55, 8 June 2011 (BST)
Thank you so much for helping me! --2deal2 14:15, 9 June 2011 (BST)
AVP
Hi. There is one quick question that bothers me: What is up with the Aliens vs. Predator video game pages? Are they allowed or not? Just 'cuz I was thinking of creating a page for a 2010 AVP video game, but I do not want to screencap it if the page's gonna get "nuked" after. It must be noted that this game features perfectly modeled M41A pulse rifles, M56 Smart Guns just like the movie(s). And there is another game in development, which will be some sort of unofficial Aliens remake, you know without Predators and shit like that. So should I do this/these pages or is IMFDB better off without 'em? Thanks in advance! - bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:03, 9 June 2011 (CDT)
Took down non-actor page
Took the non-actor page and disabled the links. --Ben41 04:44, 11 June 2011 (CDT)
deadliest warrior season 2
i am curious about why season 2 of deadliest warrior isnt on here it had far more weapons than season 1?
--Beggarsclan 03:51, 11 June 2011
Thanks For New Pics
I just wanted to say thank you for providing new and improved versions of some of the weapon pictures on here, such as the Beretta M9 image. Your pictures are always top-notch and greatly appreciated. Orca1 9904 09:53, 15 June 2011 (CDT)
Thanks for the M9!
Hey MPM, I just saw your new M9 image you uploaded a couple days ago, and it looks awesome. Was it hard getting ahold of such an authentic military handgun? Love your work, and best regards.--Alienqueen11 17:21, 17 June 2011 (CDT)
Heh, sorry.
Didn't realise you were on, and I wanted to make sure you saw it. Anyway, I picked the info up from imcdb (internet movie car database), one of their comments on the fake tanks had someone mention the M8A1 and I looked at the photos and realised that it couldn't be an M48: as well as the return rollers, the M48 has a really odd out-in curve to the hull sides while our shot of the ZSU hull bottom on the Red Dawn pages shows the hull sides were straight. That's where someone mentioned the Sheridan, too; it was only when I thought to check the Red Dawn page on our site that I saw it could only possibly be an M8A1. Evil Tim 01:54, 29 June 2011 (CDT)
Addendum: after further looking around, it looks like ultimately the source of the correct info was Filmpanzer, though I don't know if that site got it from somewhere else again or he just ID'd them himself. It makes sense that they're use the M8A1, actually, since it would mean they only needed one set of spares for all their AFVs since they were all M41 derivatives (the M42 is, too). Still not sure why they'd get it wrong on the DVD, mind. Evil Tim 02:50, 29 June 2011 (CDT)
It's basically just a stretched M41 hull with a longer tread run, like those 6-roadwheel M113 updates some companies make; all the actual parts of the running gear and drive components are the same as far as I can tell, it's just a longer chassis (and if Wikipedia's stats are to be believed, an uprated engine, even though they say it's the same engine but give different horsepower figures for the M41 and M8 anyway. Ah, Wikipedia...). So yeah, they'd only need M41 bits for all the tanks in the movie since you don't tend to haul spare lower hulls around. :D Evil Tim 01:46, 30 June 2011 (CDT)
Short films
Hey, I do a bunch of short action films, which I usually release on YouTube, published under my studio's label. I've ID'ed the weapons on my own page, but I was wondering if they're eligible for they're very own page here on IMFDB? I know what the rules are for YouTube videos, but these are technically films, they just happen to be on YouTube - Anders MacTavish
Battle LA Helmet Cover
I think what he meant to say is that it appears that the helmet cover is turned inside out. Note how the seams are raised on the sides and that MARPAT pattern is not visible anymore on the helmet. I don't know about the flap though. It's possible that this was done to hide the fact that they used an Army helmet cover instead for this shot. --Ben41 01:31, 4 July 2011 (CDT)
Sorry Ben but what I meant is that the flap is suppose to be at the rear of the helmet not the front. I explain further below. --AdAstra2009 15:30, 9 July 2011 (CDT)
Dragon Wars: D-War
I rewrote one of your trivia sections here since I figured out how they got all those tanks: they didn't. Only the front pair are real, you can tell by the way none of the others are obscured by smoke from the lead tanks' engines (look in particular at the one turning into the top of the street on the right compared to the tree next to it). I think the rear two Humvees are fakes too since they don't have the tall whip antenna the two at the front do. Also (and one I can't edit) I found out the Tiger tanks in Saving Private Ryan are T-34/85s. Happy 4th of July to you, too. :D Evil Tim 02:04, 5 July 2011 (CDT)
Those would be the ones that use construction equipment rubber band tracks rather than real ones, like the fake tanks from XXX: State of the Union and Transformers? Yeah, I could see that, but unless the tanks were digitally cleaned up in post I can't see how they wouldn't be affected by the exhaust from the leads unless they aren't real. And it does strike me as interesting that every other shot we have of the tanks is blocked so that only the two Army Trucks Inc Chiefbrams are in it ;). Still, I'll check through and make sure I didn't say it for sure. Also, I think User:Grimbo is moviemaster1993: he's posting that he was innocent and we were mean and horrible and has made a particularly charming edit to the main page talk he then undid. Evil Tim 22:12, 5 July 2011 (CDT)
RE Battle LA
The thing that indicates that the cover is backwards is that the "big flap" is worn to the back of the helmet. It's purpose is for
"commo cables" not for NVGs as there is a vertical slit on the opposite side to accomodate the Rhino Mount Bracket (Yes I know I said for helmet band retention before-but thats what I used it for). Also while that flap looks large it actually only opens up about an inch, definitely not large enough to accomodate a "Notoros Mount". I also have no experience with Marine Gear and my experience all comes from the Army ACH/MICH but I imagine they are identical in function. Regardless I have never seen the cover with the flap worn anywhere but the back. --AdAstra2009 14:26, 6 July 2011 (CDT)
Commo cables? please explain that. I'm an old timer. I got out way back when the Fritz was the norm.... MoviePropMaster2008 21:56, 28 July 2011 (CDT)
Stealth
I've been making some additions to Stealth and since you originally built the page and added it: can you remember where you saw an M16A2 in the movie? I've been flicking through scenes likely to contain guns rather than watching it all the way through, granted, but I've only found some guy in the background of the briefing scene after the intro with some sort of AR-15, and his looks like it has an adjustable stock. The carrier scenes everyone seems to be sticking to their sidearms. For now I've removed the entry since I can't confirm it. Evil Tim 03:03, 9 July 2011 (CDT)
Image Rules
I recently uploaded an image of my personal CZ 85B (with licensing to IMFDB). We already have a stock image for it that is of higher quality, but it's a jacked image and does not show the right side of the gun (i.e. it does not show the biggest difference between the 75B and 85B). Should I replace the current stock image?--PistolJunkie 12:18, 10 July 2011 (CDT)
Drat
I've put up a couple like that (mostly for 2 XM8 variants we only had hideous GIFs of before), should I try to track down gun-only pictures for those? Are they no good as placeholders even if they're a better view of the weapon? Evil Tim 16:31, 11 July 2011 (CDT)
Ok, I'll work on that. The trouble with XM8s in particular is you can never tell if the damn things are Airsofts if you're just Googling (they usually are) and you can be fairly sure nobody would issue an Airsoft weapon on a real firing range (plus US army images have the advantage of being public domain). Still, if thems are the rules I'll have to go searching, I guess. Evil Tim 16:48, 11 July 2011 (CDT)
Ok, I think those are all real. Also, could you take a look at the talk page for Stealth? Found a couple of pistols we didn't have that I could use some help ID'ing if you're not busy. Evil Tim 17:11, 11 July 2011 (CDT)
Caliber notes in caps
Why do we need to have them and why can't we edit them out if we want too? - Mr. Wolf 18:51, 11 July 2011 (CDT)
Stealth
When I started working on it the weapons were in roughly chronological order, I was just sticking to pattern. If you want me to change it I'd be happy to, I've never liked chronological order anyway. Evil Tim 04:40, 12 July 2011 (CDT)
By the way, if you saw it in the history, that "durr it's Australia" wasn't aimed at you, it was aimed at me. I was kicking myself for not remembering Australia uses a variant AUG that might explain that weird-looking one I'd just found with the picatinny rail and 20-inch barrel that turned out to be an F88S. Evil Tim 07:04, 13 July 2011 (CDT)
Noob
I'm pretty sure the guy is moviemaster1993 again (wants a Halo article, is currently trolling the comments for the new Transformers movie because we don't have screenshots), and whoever he is he's just here to cause trouble; it seems he takes offence to having it pointed out that he was trying to dicatate what does and doesn't belong on the site when he had a grand total of five edits. I removed a comment he added that Ben41 told him off for ("What the fuck makes you so fucking special?") and he decided he should remove my comment that he was replying to. I reverted it a few times then gave up after telling him he was likely to get banned if he persisted: since then two other users (HashiriyaR32 and Rockwolf66) have reverted him too. Evil Tim 14:08, 13 July 2011 (CDT)
I have to agree with Tim here. I suspect it's 1993 again as well. The attitude (and language) is very similar. --Jcordell 14:37, 13 July 2011 (CDT)
Thanks for doing that. I was considering it also. --Jcordell 15:10, 13 July 2011 (CDT)
Na man I just saw that, that user was creating trouble so I thought it would be funny, just messing around to make this name--Jd0555 11:38, 14 July 2011 (CDT)jd0555
Sure you did. And you sign your name exactly the same incorrect way he did, because you're a totally different person. Evil Tim 11:42, 14 July 2011 (CDT)
Relax man it's all in good fun, Sorry I'm new to the site how are u supposed to sign your name? And come on if I was really that dude. Do you really think I would just change one number?
Nobody said 'that guy' was clever. In any case, the truth all always out. StanTheMan 12:00, 14 July 2011 (CDT)
So, now he's posted an article for Halo (with nothing on it). So, I'd say that's a fair proof that Jd0555 is Jd0554 again, as if it really needed proving. Evil Tim 09:09, 27 July 2011 (CDT)
Thinking of writing a "how to contribute" article
Since you suggested it and all. The way I was thinking of doing it was rather like a conventional article using screencaps to visually explain the various formatting rules we have and so on. Since that'd be too big for a forum post and have too many images, I'd probably start it out by posting it "floating on nothing" and then make a forum thread linking to it for comments and suggestions.
First question, though: what do you think would be a good example movie? I'm heroically resisting the temptation to use The Lord of the Rings ("Beholde as Legolas useth ye Glock"), and the ideal would be a movie with a title starting with "the" so I can explain the title rules regarding that. Any suggestions? Evil Tim 23:55, 15 July 2011 (CDT)
Type 56 in "Uncommon Valor"
You posted a picture of a beat up type 56 used in "Uncommon Valor"
You mean practically destroyed rusty Title II guns? Why would you want to know that? MoviePropMaster2008 15:51, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
I was going to post this image on the Uncommon Valor page, but you had said you were going to post a picture of one in better condition. Is that still the plan? --Ben41 20:28, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
I just wanted to know more about it, I have never seen or heard of a stamped T56 select fire Chinese export making it in the US, I have heard of conversions but not original export select fire's. - Aaron
It's called a GCA 68 amnesty Vietnam War Bringback that was papered to be a pre-86 transferable. And no, China was NOT exporting these guns commercially into the U.S. MoviePropMaster2008 03:15, 19 July 2011 (CDT)
RE: Gun image query
It was used on another page (Medal of Honor: Rising Sun) as a gun image, so I had first thought it was an actual gun image someone uploaded with it in their hand (Which I read somewhere wasn't allowed for gun images). I later found out it was a screenshot. That was all. StanTheMan 16:39, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
T3
I fixed the entry. I would like to do it, but the site is still taking a long time to register overwrites of images. --Ben41 21:25, 18 July 2011 (CDT)
Stealth again
I've removed the calibre notes as per the forum thread, but there's another note I'm wondering about removing. In the gun image caption for the Zastava M70AB2 you said you intended to re-photograph it with a new pistol grip, but that note's been there for three years. Understand that I am not trying to bug you into doing this if you don't want to, I just want to know if I should remove the note. Evil Tim 17:47, 20 July 2011 (CDT)
By the way, am I right about the M167 VADS (under M61 Vulcan) muzzle flashes being CG, or do blank-adapted M61s not eject spent casings? I've been wondering if I was right to say it with certainty when I don't know how the Hollywood versions operate; the M61 page implies they'd eject brass as normal, but I want to be totally sure. And I know I shouldn't have added the comment if I wasn't certain; I was certain, but doubts have creeped in since then. Evil Tim 01:18, 21 July 2011 (CDT)
J.C. Higgins
If Sears Robuck was the company that sold the various models (despite who made them) and just changed the name of the model to reflect the changing times then I say go with Sears & Robuck. The way I see it it's no different then all the 38 caliber K frame revolvers S&W used to make. Despite all the different model numbers S&W still comes first when naming them. So why not Sears? You probably know this, but Ted Williams was one of the first big name ball players to get an endorsement deal. Sears even had fitness equipment with his name on it. When I was in 6th grade (1979-1980) I had (still have parts of it now) a weight set with his name on it. Funny. Wonder how much hunting and shooting Ted actually did? Anyway I say yes. It will reduce the confusion and clutter if we group all those different shotguns under Sears & Robuck.--Jcordell 15:01, 21 July 2011 (CDT)
Sturmgewehr
I had a question about the STG44, the names STG44, MP43, and MP44 are all names that mean the same thing right? Or are they all different variants? MasterHunter96--MasterHunter96 18:51, 2 August 2011 (CDT)
RE MICH Cover
No problem MPM, always glad to help. I'll admit that I didn't know what the back flap was for at first, I just knew that it went in the back. :D
--AdAstra2009 08:51, 4 August 2011 (CDT)
M16A1 Lower
Hey, just curious, what lower is that on the pictures of the M16A1 variants you photographed?
Is it an A2, as it looks like it has the strengthening around the front push pin and buffer tube.
Also, on the following picture your description says it is an SP1 lower modded for full auto, but it has push pins rather than screw pins and a detent spring holder (partial magazine fence) rather than slab sides. Could it be that this is actually an XM16E1 type lower? (Although on second though that isn't it either, as it has the A2 strengthening around the front push pin.)
Any info you could give me on these would be great. --commando552 12:33, 4 August 2011 (CDT)
Beretta Cougar/ PX4 Storm
Hey, Jazz here, and I just had a quick question about the Beretta Cougar/ PX4 Storm. Are these pistols any harder to convert to blank fire due to the rotating barrel? Thanks. Oh, and I'm from the USA and I'm 14.----JazzBlackBelt-- 12:38, 7 August 2011 (CDT)
MP5A2
When I click on the MP5A2, the picture looks like a smaller JPG blown up to a larger size with not a lot of detail. When I click to make it a larger image, the weapon looks the same, but has a much darker appearance and a lot more detail. I see NO logo on either picture. --Ben41 13:32, 26 August 2011 (CDT)
This is what I see when I first click the MP5 pic:
![[3]](http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:Glock23.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:Walther-P99-Pistol.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Image:Remington870PoliceStd.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/9959/5943vssnx0.jpg){kind=link}
