Talk:Star Wars: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 03:00, 2 June 2022

Splitting up

I'm not sure I understand why the different trilogies are all grouped as one page for multiple movies. I think we used to do this back in the early days of IMFDB, but it is a convention that has long since abandoned. Is there any reason we can't split all of those pages into separate movies? -MT2008 (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2016 (EST)

I concur with you. --Jcordell (talk) 12:22, 5 November 2017 (EST)

Eh, I've gotten used to these pages like this.. we've always had those scant few exceptions to how we normally do things here and there. There's also a sense of redundancy being eliminated here; The pages, if split, will have most of the same firearms listed on each of them. Remember it was one page for the entire saga before, I think the trilogy splits were a good compromise between both separating pieces/pages of media while keeping some listings/info condensed together. All-told it just seems to boil down to either keeping it for the sake of it or splitting for the sake of it. Personally, I don't see the harm in keeping it. That said, I'm not really against splitting up should it come to that - that is indeed long been the norm after all. Eh, I guess while I'd prefer to not change it, I'm good either way. StanTheMan (talk) 13:37, 5 November 2017 (EST)

We should split up the pages. The current format makes it difficult for readers to tell what weapons are found in each of the individual movies, and it's an unnecessary deviation from the format of the rest of the wiki. If nobody objects, I will do the splitting myself. --Wuzh (talk) 17:31, 1 December 2019 (EST)

I would argue against splitting up the prequel trilogy, as if that was done the only film that would really be eligible by our normal rules would be the first as it has one real gun and a couple of real ID'd air pistols. Unless there are other non-recorded weapons, the only thing close to real guns in the latter two prequels is the DC-15A which is sort of based on an MG34. It is more acceptable to have them listed as additional weapons on a larger page, but having a page just for them is pushing it. --commando552 (talk) 05:09, 2 December 2019 (EST)

I see. OK.--Wuzh (talk) 10:36, 2 December 2019 (EST)

Why not just move content on the latter two prequel films to the talk page, leave a note saying that these two films don't have real guns, and finally move The Phantom Menace to its own page? --Wuzh (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2020 (EDT)

Spaceart images

Star Wars: Stormtrooper E-11 Blaster - Ultimate Edition

BlasTech DH-17 blaster pistol

Which movie was this? It was NOT the first one (A new hope) (1977) because I've handled those original Prop guns and they were just cheap metal tubes and NOT built on a Sterling SMG. The Stormtrooper ones yes, but the Rebels on the blockade runner had very simple crappy prop pistols made out of machined aluminum. MoviePropMaster2008 00:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

This is true, you can see during the blockade runner sequence the trigger guards on the dh-17s are really thick indicating something that was molded or thrown together cheaply.--Variableorange 05:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars guns

Star wars fans and costumers have been for years trying to find out what all the guns in the star wars saga were made of: Parts of Star Wars ([1]) is a fan-created list of most of the guns - from the main props to blink-and-you'll-miss-them ones wielded by extras. --Variableorange 05:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Page Re-Organization Recommendation

Is there any particular reason we have all the films in this franchise all on one page? I believe it would make more sense to split them into several pages covering the individual films and have a category to serve as a central hub for them. Orca1 9904 15:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Some Star Wars films have only one real-based guns (the first episode, for example) and is a waste to make so all of them are grouped in one page. - Kenny99 16:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

That's exactly what I did, group them all in one page. Excalibur01 01:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I think this makes it look much less professional, however. --Jovantheun1337 19:17, 11 September 2011 (CDT)

Clone Blasters

Should the clone blasters really be on this page, since there was never actually a physical prop for any of them used in the films? The Wierd It 19:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Most viewers would not realize that, so it's probably best if there is a section for it, if only to point out that, unlike the rest of the gun on the page, that one doesn't actually exist.--PistolJunkie 21:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Droid blaster

Does anyone have any objection to the E-5 blaster used by the battle droids in the prequels being added?

The screen used practical props were made from castings of a an E-11 blaster replica, which itself was based on a Sterling. Granted, no guns were directly used to make this prop, but at least it is a physical prop unlike the clone rifles which are on this page.

Also, just as an unrelated bonus, here is a (hires) photo from a convention showing replicas of various Star Wars guns, where among others you can see the Episode VI Rebel rifles made from M-16 parts, and the Episode IV DH-17s notable by their thick trigger guards and generally cruder appearance. --commando552 00:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Isn't Jango & Boba Fett RPGs real weapons
+== Splitting up ==
+I'm not sure I understand why the different trilogies are all grouped as one page for multiple movies. I think we used to do this back in the early days of IMFDB, but it is a convention that has long since abandoned. Is there any reason we can't split all of those pages into separate movies? -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] ([[User talk:MT2008|talk]]) 19:35, 13 December 2016 (EST)
+:I concur with you. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] ([[User talk:Jcordell|talk]]) 12:22, 5 November 2017 (EST)
+:: Eh, I've gotten used to these pages like this.. we've always had those scant few exceptions to how we normally do things here and there. There's also a sense of redundancy being eliminated here; The pages, if split, will have most of the same firearms listed on each of them. Remember it was one page for the entire saga before, I think the trilogy splits were a good compromise between both separating pieces/pages of media while keeping some listings/info condensed together. All-told it just seems to boil down to either keeping it for the sake of it or splitting for the sake of it. Personally, I don't see the harm in keeping it. That said, I'm not really against splitting up should it come to that - that is indeed long been the norm after all. Eh, I guess while I'd prefer to not change it, I'm good either way. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 13:37, 5 November 2017 (EST)
+We should split up the pages. The current format makes it difficult for readers to tell what weapons are found in each of the individual movies, and it's an unnecessary deviation from the format of the rest of the wiki. If nobody objects, I will do the splitting myself. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 17:31, 1 December 2019 (EST)
+:I would argue against splitting up the prequel trilogy, as if that was done the only film that would really be eligible by our normal rules would be the first as it has one real gun and a couple of real ID'd air pistols. Unless there are other non-recorded weapons, the only thing close to real guns in the latter two prequels is the DC-15A which is sort of based on an MG34. It is more acceptable to have them listed as additional weapons on a larger page, but having a page just for them is pushing it.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 05:09, 2 December 2019 (EST)
+:: I see. OK.--[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 10:36, 2 December 2019 (EST)
+Why not just move content on the latter two prequel films to the talk page, leave a note saying that these two films don't have real guns, and finally move The Phantom Menace to its own page? --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 08:17, 5 July 2020 (EDT)
 ==Spaceart images==
@@ Line 108: / Line 119: @@
 *I believe Dengar is seen with an MG34 in promo shots, while in the actual film he has an MG42. Dengar's Promo 34 is seen in the hands of the droid bounty hunter 4LOM (Or maybe it's the other way around). There's a large number of other guns strewn throughout the films. This page could really use some reorganizing. --[[User:Clonehunter|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter|talk]]) 17:42, 30 July 2014 (EDT)
 *For that matter, isn't Greedo's gun missing?--[[User:Surv1v4l1st|Surv1v4l1st]] ([[User talk:Surv1v4l1st|talk]]) 00:04, 1 February 2015 (EST)
+*Luke's landspeeder gun is a Moroccan flintlock. Denix used to sell one almost exactly like it.[[User:Mzmadmike|Mzmadmike]] ([[User talk:Mzmadmike|talk]]) 22:20, 29 February 2016 (EST)
 == "Relby K23" blaster ==
 I just uploaded two screencaps of a weapon (The "Relby K23 blaster") that I noticed missing from the article. I'm afraid I was a bit hasty uploading the caps as I learned (too late) that this weapon is not based on an actual firearm but was taken from a "nemrod" speargun. Since I can't delete the photos I figure I'd post them here just in case.
-[[File:Relbyk23 (1).jpg|thumb|left|500px|]]
+[[File:Relbyk23 (1).jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]
-[[File:Relbyk23 (2).jpg|thumb|right|500px|]]
+[[File:Relbyk23 (2).jpg|thumb|none|500px|]]
+Cool, good to have everything possible I'd say. This might qualify to be on the page with the 'If it could be mistaken as a real firearm-mockup, etc' point, but if not, can definitely still go here on the discussion page I'm sure. That said, a minor technical note - 'none' should be set as the justification for all image thumbnails on talk pages. I went ahead and adjusted them accordingly here, just keep that in mind next time. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 14:48, 19 February 2015 (EST)
+:Oh...Did not realise that. I just put the two screencaps beside each other just to go easy on the eyes :). But, lesson learned! [[User:Dudster32|Dudester32]] ([[User talk:Dudster32|talk]]) 17:01, 19 February 2015 (EST)
+:: Well that might be fine at the resolution you're using, but they appeared diagonally for me because I only have a 1280 res on this system, and that's the point - Keep in mind we're dealing with various screen-size/resolution configurations here, so what looks fine to you may look odd to another. Keeping no alignment bypasses that potential issue entirely. It's no big deal, though, just a heads up. ;) [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 18:49, 19 February 2015 (EST)
+== Finn's blaster ==
+Is it just me, or does it look like Finn's blaster in the below promo image is based to some degree of a [[G36]]?
+[[File:John-Boyega-and-Chewbacca-in-Star-Wars-Image.jpg|thumb|400px|none|]]
+[[File:Hkg36c.jpg|thumb|400px|none|Heckler & Koch G36C - 5.56x45mm]]The parts that make me think this ar ethe shape of the magazine well and that diagonal line at the back of the handgaurd. It also looks like this might be a mirrored image as it has what looks like the ejection port (complete with sci-fi blue glow) and brass deflector on the left side. The sight on top also looks like it is based on the old Singlepoint OEG sights that were on the rebel blasters of the original trilogy, plus it has that shiny barrel which makes me think it might be intended to be a progression of the DH-17.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:36, 24 July 2015 (EDT)
+Here's some images from the new merchandise. I think it's pretty safe to say it's based on a G36 variant. You can even see the selector switch.
+[[File:3.75-inch_Finn_figure_box.jpg|thumb|300px|none|]]
+[[File:6-inch_Finn_figure.jpg|thumb|300px|none|]]
+[[File:6-inch_Finn_blaster_left.jpg|thumb|300px|none|]]
+[[File:6-inch_Finn_blaster_right.jpg|thumb|300px|none|]]
+[[File:12-inch_Finn_figure.jpg|thumb|300px|none|]]
+Not sure why the blaster is yellow sometimes.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 14:53, 6 September 2015 (EDT)
+== KPOS Glock carbines in "The Force Awakens" ==
+Apparently, in addition to slightly modified E-11 blasters, the Stormtroopers in "The Force Awakens" also get Mako KPOS Glock carbines painted white. I've seen them on 1:6 TFA Stormtrooper toys, but I can't recall if there are any movie photos to confirm it. Anyone? --[[User:Seriously Mike|Seriously Mike]] ([[User talk:Seriously Mike|talk]]) 10:33, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
+:These stormtrooper can be seen with some sort of sidearm in a holster or bracket moulded into their right thigh. They haven't been seen well in any of the trailers yet, but they can be seen in some promo images like [https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/87/75/1b/87751ba5d9fa0d3605befb342542735e.jpg this]. Looks a little small to me but it ''could'' be a modded KPOS.--[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:12, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
+::A new shot of the "Nerf" version you can buy pretty much confirms it is a Glock in a customised KPOS.
+[[Image:StarWarsGlock.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 19:03, 20 October 2015 (GMT)
+== Star Wars: Force Awakens Props ==
+Wired just released the images of the official props from The Force Awakens, including the guns http://www.wired.com/2015/11/star-wars-force-awakens-props/ --[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 15:52, 19 November 2015 (EST)
+:Wow, great resource, thanks! Captain Phasma's blaster has two stocks on it? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 16:06, 19 November 2015 (EST)
+::No prob! I think that's actually the frontal grip --[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 16:21, 19 November 2015 (EST)
+:::I thought so too, but then I realized it's the original folding stock on the Sterling. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 16:39, 19 November 2015 (EST)
+::::Finally, someone else notices that! I think that only the "grip" can fold out, and the rest of the "folding stock" is actually fused with the body. If that's the case, I wish they would have left the useless part of the stock off and gone with a more practical grip design. But maybe then it wouldn't look enough like the E-11.
+::::Also, in [http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/sw_prop_1a-1024x768.jpg this image], the cap on the end of the F-11D is upside down for some reason.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 20:29, 19 November 2015 (EST)
+::::I was checking out a few of the guns to see if I recognize any real-world weaponry in them, which is proving to be a challenge, and this one [http://i.imgur.com/Bwk7dJc.jpg here] I think was built around a shotgun and, judging by the slide/pump area (dunno the actual name, sorry), I'm thinking a Neostead.
+:::::Looks like just a fabricated prop to me. [[User:Mr. Wolf|Mr. Wolf]] ([[User talk:Mr. Wolf|talk]]) 05:05, 20 November 2015 (EST)
+::::::Looking at the "pump", maybe built off of some sort of water gun? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 07:45, 20 November 2015 (EST)
+::::::::I think that like a lot of these guns there are real parts used, such as the stock which is either from a Tantal or East German AK.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 05:46, 21 November 2015 (EST)
+:::::::::Looks like this along with one or two other weapons are actually based off of the [[Bergmann Model 1896]]. The grip shape, trigger area and magazine housing are all very distinctive.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 11:38, 11 January 2016 (EST)
+:::::::The second pistol-with-a-brick-for-a-muzzle looks like an M1911 with an extended beavertail lives in it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 09:40, 20 November 2015 (EST)
+:::::::Was looking at it while half-asleep before, it's a Desert Eagle:
+:::::::[[Image:SwPropDeagle.jpg|thumb|none|600px|"Trandoshan Tripler on a Shorosuub blaster:" note the Desert Eagle's long beavertail, slide release and textured grip.]]
+:::::::[[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 21:29, 20 November 2015 (EST)
+::::::::A few other things we get from these images. Firstly, we can see the double stack step on Poe's blaster confirming that it is based on a P226. There are also a couple of blasters which are based more on the original Sterling than the stormtrooper rifles which look a lot like the original DH-17 rebel blasters (one of which appears to be battle damaged and has a stock, different sights and a few other slight differences). There is another version of the G36 blaster fitted with a stock, and from stuff I have seen my guess is that these are the standard Resistance blaster rifle. Lastly, I think there is actually an M1911 in one of these guns, just not that one. If you look at the one with the bone handle and long square barrel, the only exposed parts of the base gun are the trigger, trigger guard and magazine release, and the me these look like they are from a 1911 variant with a "3 hole" trigger:[[File:SWTFA bone blaster.jpg|thumb|450px|none|Huttsplitter blaster]]  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 05:35, 21 November 2015 (EST)
+:::::::::Beavertail's visible right of the circular thing, too, it's one of the upturned ones. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 07:18, 21 November 2015 (EST)
+Pretty sure I saw a Barrett M82 in the bar/cantina/merc hideout. The really huge dude with a girl on his lap has it.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 23:46, 22 December 2015 (EST)
+::::::::::Mean this gun? --[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 23:53, 22 December 2015 (EST)
+[[File:Star-wars-force-awakens-tusk.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Barrel on the left]]
+::::::::::Yes.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 10:40, 23 December 2015 (EST)
+:::::::::::...And they even gave the guy a name and backstory apparently. Well, that's Star Wars for you.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 23:20, 24 December 2015 (EST)
+::::::::::::From what I caught, the rifle Grummgar is holding, it's a 'hunting rifle with a remote trigger interface and a sniper barrel flash suppressor' --[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 00:28, 14 January 2016 (EST)
+Some of the Guavian Death Gang enforcers are wielding pistols and rifles made off a Kalashnikov AK-101/102/105. Most of the changes add a bulkier dust-cover, some cosmetics to obscure the receiver, and the removal of the barrel and gas tube. The foregrips and trunion block rear sight are unmistakable, however. The Visual Dictionary entry refers them as "sawed-off" percussive cannons.
+[[File:Guavian_Death_Gang.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Seen to the right]]
+[[File:Guavian Death Gang Enforcers.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Two versions shown, pistol in upper right, rifle at bottom]]
+--[[User:Blitzen|Blitzen]] ([[User talk:Blitzen|talk]]) 20:49, 11 April 2016 (EDT)
+== Star Wars Battlefront ==
+Is it worth a new page for the Battlefront game? The in game weapons are incredibly accurate to the movie props, such as the Rebel's StG-44 based blaster.
+[[file:SWBFB A280c.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]
+:I'd be up for this as the weapons are based 1:1 on the movie props --[[User:RedRobinAlpha|RedRobinAlpha]] ([[User talk:RedRobinAlpha|talk]]) 18:46, 24 December 2015 (GMT)
+== Sten SMG(s) in Ep 7 ==
+The character at the bottom right carries what appears to be a Sten SMG with a second Sten mounted on top of it. I'm not versed in Episode 7 lore so I dont know what (Star Wars) name this weapon has. I also cannot identify the Sten variant. [[User:Dudster32|Dudester32]] ([[User talk:Dudster32|talk]]) 12:50, 16 April 2016 (EDT)
+[[File:StarWars7Sten.jpg|thumb|none|450px|]]
+[[Image:Sten.jpg|thumb|none|350px|Sten Mk II]]
+:Saw that too. Unfortunately, like most of the background weapons in ''The Force Awakens'', it doesn't have a name. We'd have to call it something like "Double Sten Blaster".--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 16:51, 20 April 2016 (EDT)
+::I suppose we could play it cool and wait until they release one of those authorized encyclopedia books on Episode VII. [[User:Dudster32|Dudester32]] ([[User talk:Dudster32|talk]]) 15:23, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
+:::The ''Visual Dictionary'' was released, but it didn't have anything on that gun.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 17:48, 22 April 2016 (EDT)
+== Rouge One Celebration Reel ==
+https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUb_zpdyDpU
+The Celebration Reel for Rogue One got released and it does show some new weapons (I didn't get around to screencapping them yet) and, I could be mistaken, but it looks like the DL-44 is back but with a removable magazine/clip now. --[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 12:06, 15 July 2016 (EDT)
+:If you're talking about the blaster that Cassian Andor (Diego Luna) is using, that's some AR-15-based blaster. You can see it in some of the [http://imgur.com/gallery/t3ID7 images] released a while ago.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 14:15, 15 July 2016 (EDT)
+::No, this one.--[[User:SeanWolf|SeanWolf]] ([[User talk:SeanWolf|talk]]) 22:42, 15 July 2016 (EDT)
+[[File:RougeOneUnknownPistol.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]]
+:::Yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Here's a picture that shows it's an AR-15:
+:::[[File:RogueOneUnknownPistol2.jpg|thumb|none|600px]]
+:::The top is completely smooth for some reason.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 00:42, 16 July 2016 (EDT)
+::::The little furry guy that Warwick Davis plays also uses a door mounted blaster that appears to be an only slightly modified M60. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 04:33, 16 July 2016 (EDT)
+:::::There's also a Luger, an MG 34, and lots of Sterling parts. I'll probably try to update the page after the second trailer comes out.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 05:16, 16 July 2016 (EDT)
+::::::The second trailer is not being released (at least not any time soon). They said it was just for the people in the room. There was nothing substantively new in terms of guns though from what I can remember. Just to correct something I said earlier, the guy with the M60 isn't Warwich Davis. I though it was because he is wearing a similar harness. During the creature panel (which Warwick was moderating) they brought out this character, who they called the "Space Monkey", and he was significantly taller than Warwick. They actually said the name of the actor that was inside, was something like Nick Killinger but I cant remember. "Space Monkey" is not his actual name, that is just what they called him in the creature shop and none of them could remember what his real name actually was, although some leaks from a book a while ago called him Bistan I believe.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 19:16, 16 July 2016 (EDT)
+:::::::Well, that sucks. Might as well update now then.--[[User:Quarax|Quarax]] ([[User talk:Quarax|talk]]) 21:54, 16 July 2016 (EDT)
+== Obi-Wan Kenobi ==
+Pardon me for asking, but when shall we make the page for the Obi-Wan Kenobi series?--[[User:Thomoy15|Thomoy15]] ([[User talk:Thomoy15|talk]]) 19:35, 1 June 2022 (EDT)
+:You are welcome [[Obi-Wan Kenobi]] [[User:Pustelga7|Pustelga7]] ([[User talk:Pustelga7|talk]]) 19:58, 1 June 2022 (EDT)
+::Good, good. --[[User:Thomoy15|Thomoy15]] ([[User talk:Thomoy15|talk]]) 23:00, 1 June 2022 (EDT)

Talk:Star Wars: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 03:00, 2 June 2022

Splitting up

Spaceart images

BlasTech DH-17 blaster pistol

Star Wars guns

Page Re-Organization Recommendation

Clone Blasters

Droid blaster

Trivia and such

Naming

Imperial officers and the DH-17 Blaster

BlasTech DH-17 Blaster Pistol reflex-sight!

Jango Fetts guns

Star Wars: Dark Forces II

Blanks

Missing Guns?

"Relby K23" blaster

Finn's blaster

KPOS Glock carbines in "The Force Awakens"

Star Wars: Force Awakens Props

Star Wars Battlefront

Sten SMG(s) in Ep 7

Rouge One Celebration Reel

Obi-Wan Kenobi

Navigation menu

Search