Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Tobruk (1967): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
BTW, I think the tank is an M48. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 18:17, 4 April 2015 (EDT) | BTW, I think the tank is an M48. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 18:17, 4 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, it's the original production M48, before they added that little mini-turret on top of the commander's hatch and redesigned the blackplate. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 22:44, 4 April 2015 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:44, 5 April 2015
I guess that submachine guns, identified as "Bergman SMG", looks more like Suomi KP/-31. The flamethrower seems to be a Flammenwerfer 35 or Flammenwerfer 41 rathen than M1 as it has one large and one small balloon while M1 has two large and one small. Greg-Z (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2015 (EDT)
- Look at the charging handle. It is in the wrong place compared to a KP31. Dudester32 (talk) 17:41, 4 April 2015 (EDT)
- Also look at the muzzle....
- It looks more like a PPD40 (minus the drum magazine).
Flamethrower: Flammenwefer 41 Dudester32 (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2015 (EDT)
- Note the german version does not have a back and front grip. Dudester32 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2015 (EDT)
- I'm fairly sure it's an M2, it's just the angle he's standing at that makes the second large tank look like it's not there in the top image; you can still see the side of the left tank below the middle one. In the one below you can see there's a full-size tank on the left, too. Evil Tim (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2015 (EDT)
BTW, I think the tank is an M48. --Funkychinaman (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2015 (EDT)