Talk:Deep Cover

I don't think that's a Beretta 92FS Inox, but rather a PT92AFS. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

Yes, it's my mistake. So sad. Thanks. Greg-Z (talk) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

Time for my little bits.. ;) I do believe the compact pistol is a Taurus PT92CS, the markings appear to match closer to the Taurus than the Beretta. Un-ID'd snub-nose 1 appears to have a six-round cylinder, so it can't be a Model 36 - That one might be a re-use of the Detective Special already mentioned on the page. The S&W 659 appears to have a longer slide/barrel and slightly large bore making me it's a .45 variant - I'd have to say it's an early Smith & Wesson 4506 since it looks to have the wraparound grips (which the earlier 645 doesn't have). StanTheMan (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2015 (EDT)

Thanks, I completely forgot that 4506 had a stepped trigger guard. What concerns the revolver, you think that the faceted barrel is a cover over a real barrel, right? Greg-Z (talk) 02:44, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

Oh sure, but again, it's a six-shot, so it's not a .38 J-frame. It could be a .22 J-frame, but I doubt it (It's not a Model 34 for example, those have adjustable sights). Again, I'm still leaning to the DS being re-used. I'll add that the contour of the top-strap and front sight ramp matches with the Colt. The other revolver is too far away to really ID, outside of a blued snub-nose. StanTheMan (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2015 (EDT)

Thanks, I'll add it to the page. Greg-Z (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2015 (EDT)