| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Archer: Difference between revisions
(→Trimmed from the main page: new section) |
(→Suggested Changes: new section) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[Image:Archer_Mk2_3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|"Wait, you're just going to leave him with a grenade stuck up his ass?" "Yes Lana, I'm on a rampage. And also kidding, it's a smoke grenade." Or not.]] | [[Image:Archer_Mk2_3.jpg|thumb|none|600px|"Wait, you're just going to leave him with a grenade stuck up his ass?" "Yes Lana, I'm on a rampage. And also kidding, it's a smoke grenade." Or not.]] | ||
== Suggested Changes == | |||
'''1.''' The animators didn't totally mess the M16s up. In a couple of frames, Archer's is correct, while Lana's is wrong, and vise versa. | |||
In the first link below, you will see both guns in the same frame. Archer's is fine while Lana's is backwards... in the same frame. | |||
The second link just shows Lana's messed up. | |||
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/xyti0PcvfBee1R-Jkjo1ydsIn1J1U-QsyNul8IgRqiFwQzYnwR5LpPBzgvclmWYrJVbIPle8XGREtyk2tdv9EERk52Tqdg | |||
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/1BCt4y54atGvFPH0MQIoErxbBfvJO_EJ-W1kaOLGw1QlAfkBfD66COZ2L7Jks9OBttb7p7hJNJPtemqe59Ly6Gmdt63IVA | |||
'''2.''' Walther PP or PPK? | |||
At the end of 'Lo Scandalo', the following conversation occurs. | |||
Lana: "Walther PP chambered for .32 ACP, what's the magazine capacity?" | |||
Archer: "Uhh, 8" | |||
Lana: "8 rounds, plus 1 in the chamber, for a total of 9" | |||
Archer is correct, a Walther PP (chambered in 32) holds 8 in the mag, and Lana correctly adds 1 for the chamber. | |||
A Walther PPK, however, only holds 6+1 when chambered for .32 ACP. So, the gun Malory uses in 'Lo Scandalo' is actually a Walther PP, not a PPK. | |||
Few things though, this is the first time Malory has used anything other than her Smith & Wesson Model 629, so it's highly uncharacteristic of her. But, the Walther PP is crucial to plot becuase of the number of shots fired. | |||
Additionally, this is NOT Archer's gun. His gun has still not been named. But, I don't think it is much of a leap to say the 'Walther-looking' gun Malory uses is the same Archer uses... | |||
Also, her's is silenced. A link to a picture is below. | |||
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/u9JGY83zpVYui1lHk4TAUyXx3GFr16HswDKH5LmkBQ8PFB1cpuGeikKWccN1YOQwPMo-nDE8rerTUr0y3ikTQ3z8NxkezA | |||
'''3.''' The first picture used for the "Tokarev TT-33" showing Jakov holding the gun to the scientist's head, is clearly not a TT-33. Just look at the hammer, the beaver tail, and the protruding barrel. | |||
I know the caption says that they hadn't 'reworked' the guns yet, but this is too much of a stretch to be considered a TT-33. I think it is just a generic black gun. | |||
Revision as of 07:55, 26 February 2012
Sweet. Took long enough. BeardedHoplite 17:07, 23 April 2011 (CDT)
- Not to nitpick, but are we sure this should be categorized as "anime"? It's distinctly American in pretty much every facet (art style, humor, plots, etc.)--PistolJunkie 17:19, 23 April 2011 (CDT)
- I would agree, but I was specifically told to do so by the mods as to avoid deletion. --Funkychinaman 17:23, 23 April 2011 (CDT)
- One other thing; the P220s: The way the grip is stepped at the top, I think those are meant to be 92F/FSs.--PistolJunkie 19:32, 23 April 2011 (CDT)
- Since there's been no response, I'm going to presume that no one takes issues with those being Berettas.--PistolJunkie 17:25, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
- Yeah, sorry, I just can't tell. I just hope the Archer wiki keeps up. 95% of their weapon pages are based on this page. --Funkychinaman 17:33, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
- Jeez, they just copied this page wholesale, didn't they? Anyways, I left them a message that it had been corrected.--PistolJunkie 19:31, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
- Yeah, sorry, I just can't tell. I just hope the Archer wiki keeps up. 95% of their weapon pages are based on this page. --Funkychinaman 17:33, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
- Since there's been no response, I'm going to presume that no one takes issues with those being Berettas.--PistolJunkie 17:25, 28 April 2011 (CDT)
I know they dont count as firearms, but in Skorpio, kreiger is seen making Molotov Cocktail to burn down the isis mainframe. I saw that Molotov Cocktail were listed on Burn Notice, so i figured they should be listed here as well. -- Simmons 8492
- There has been plenty of debate as to molotovs, and I always thought that the consensus was no, since they fall under improvised weaponry. --Funkychinaman 08:26, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
The page states several times that "Training Day" was the pilot when "Molehunt" is actually the pilot episode. --cool-breeze 18:52, 20 September 2011 (CDT)
- Yes, I realize that now. I think I watched the eps out of order. --Funkychinaman 18:57, 20 September 2011 (CDT)
- Ah right. I was just wondering if they were screened on FX out of order or something because I've got the DVDs and "Molehunt" is the first episode on the set. --cool-breeze 07:13, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
- You know how FX airs the previous week's episode right after the current episode? I think that's how I watched the first two, and I just got it in my head that Training Day was the pilot. All I have to do it remind myself that the stupid "lost" pilot was based on Mole Hunt. --Funkychinaman 08:24, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
- Haha! Yeah. Just think that Crenshaw is in the pilot but none others after :P --cool-breeze 12:01, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
- You know how FX airs the previous week's episode right after the current episode? I think that's how I watched the first two, and I just got it in my head that Training Day was the pilot. All I have to do it remind myself that the stupid "lost" pilot was based on Mole Hunt. --Funkychinaman 08:24, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
- Ah right. I was just wondering if they were screened on FX out of order or something because I've got the DVDs and "Molehunt" is the first episode on the set. --cool-breeze 07:13, 21 September 2011 (CDT)
Trimmed from the main page
Suggested Changes
1. The animators didn't totally mess the M16s up. In a couple of frames, Archer's is correct, while Lana's is wrong, and vise versa.
In the first link below, you will see both guns in the same frame. Archer's is fine while Lana's is backwards... in the same frame.
The second link just shows Lana's messed up.
2. Walther PP or PPK?
At the end of 'Lo Scandalo', the following conversation occurs.
Lana: "Walther PP chambered for .32 ACP, what's the magazine capacity?"
Archer: "Uhh, 8"
Lana: "8 rounds, plus 1 in the chamber, for a total of 9"
Archer is correct, a Walther PP (chambered in 32) holds 8 in the mag, and Lana correctly adds 1 for the chamber.
A Walther PPK, however, only holds 6+1 when chambered for .32 ACP. So, the gun Malory uses in 'Lo Scandalo' is actually a Walther PP, not a PPK.
Few things though, this is the first time Malory has used anything other than her Smith & Wesson Model 629, so it's highly uncharacteristic of her. But, the Walther PP is crucial to plot becuase of the number of shots fired.
Additionally, this is NOT Archer's gun. His gun has still not been named. But, I don't think it is much of a leap to say the 'Walther-looking' gun Malory uses is the same Archer uses...
Also, her's is silenced. A link to a picture is below.
3. The first picture used for the "Tokarev TT-33" showing Jakov holding the gun to the scientist's head, is clearly not a TT-33. Just look at the hammer, the beaver tail, and the protruding barrel.
I know the caption says that they hadn't 'reworked' the guns yet, but this is too much of a stretch to be considered a TT-33. I think it is just a generic black gun.