| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:I'm Not Ashamed: Difference between revisions
Clonehunter (talk | contribs) (→Archival section: new section) |
Clonehunter (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Archival section == | == Archival section == | ||
Whelp boys and girls, that's it. I'm only making a note here because I'm sort of torn on the last section of the article. I'm wondering if the archival footage from the film should be included, as it could be seen as sensitive. Yet, given the context of the film (regardless of how it was a pretty badly made film), I feel that it still proves useful in a contextual (and strictly educational) manner. Also, given that the film-makers apparently put some effort in making Chapman and Errigo look the part right down the guns and clothing, I'd hate to lose the photos of the actual crime scene guns. I'm simply wondering if there were any other thoughts, given the subject matter. --[[User:Clonehunter|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter|talk]]) 01:27, 29 March 2017 (EDT) | Whelp boys and girls, that's it. I'm only making a note here because I'm sort of torn on the last section of the article. I'm wondering if the archival footage from the film should be included, as it could be seen as sensitive. Yet, given the context of the film (regardless of how it was a pretty badly made film), I feel that it still proves useful in a contextual (and strictly educational) manner. Also, given that the film-makers apparently put some effort in making Chapman and Errigo look the part right down to the guns and clothing, I'd hate to lose the photos of the actual crime scene guns. I'm simply wondering if there were any other thoughts, given the subject matter. --[[User:Clonehunter|Clonehunter]] ([[User talk:Clonehunter|talk]]) 01:27, 29 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:27, 29 March 2017
Sawed Off
Could use a definitive confirmation on that sawed-off. They seem to have all of the other weapons correct, but I can't really tell about the Sawed-Off. --Clonehunter (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2016 (EDT)
- It's a Savage/Springfield 67F, given by the pump design and the cut out on the receiver for the operating rod. Give them some credit, they got all the weapons and such fairly accurate, let's just hope the rest of this stays in a similar fashion. -- PaperCake 00:17, 27 April 2016 (EST)
- Well, I was talking about the double-barreled shotgun labeled Sawed Off. But otherwise yah, it seems that they did their research on the equipment (Though the TEC is missing its strap). --Clonehunter (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2016 (EDT)
- Thought you meant the others. As for the sawed off, I'm certain it's just a generic sawed off shotgun. A Savage 311 is pretty similar to a number of other shotgun models so we really can't judge them for getting a different make. -- PaperCake 18:30, 27 April 2016 (EST)
- I'm feeling that this could be the case, but they could have also grabbed any old pump-shotgun that looked vaguely similar and didn't. Odds are, we won't be able to definitively tell until the film is released, and even then the film would have to have a clearer shot of it. Thanks anyways. --Clonehunter (talk) 01:50, 28 April 2016 (EDT)
Interesting...
I'm just kinda surprised that a movie focusing mostly on Rachel Scott accurately depicts the weapons used by the Columbine shooters. Don't see that kind of attention to detail every day. --PyramidHead (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2016 (EDT)
- Given what I've heard about this film so far, the attention to detail regarding the shooters may be the only "Hi Point" about the film. (Too soon?) Regardless, I just placed a hold on the film from my Library, so I'll finish this page then. I'm curious as to whether or not they depicted the duct-tape grip on the pump-action. --Clonehunter (talk) 02:39, 27 March 2017 (EDT)
- My friend, it's never too soon to make jokes. Ever. (Then again, maybe taking advice from me isn't the greatest idea). Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2017 (EDT)
Archival section
Whelp boys and girls, that's it. I'm only making a note here because I'm sort of torn on the last section of the article. I'm wondering if the archival footage from the film should be included, as it could be seen as sensitive. Yet, given the context of the film (regardless of how it was a pretty badly made film), I feel that it still proves useful in a contextual (and strictly educational) manner. Also, given that the film-makers apparently put some effort in making Chapman and Errigo look the part right down to the guns and clothing, I'd hate to lose the photos of the actual crime scene guns. I'm simply wondering if there were any other thoughts, given the subject matter. --Clonehunter (talk) 01:27, 29 March 2017 (EDT)