| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Deep Cover: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think that's a Beretta 92FS Inox, but rather a PT92AFS. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | I don't think that's a Beretta 92FS Inox, but rather a PT92AFS. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Yes, it's my mistake. So sad. Thanks. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | :Yes, it's my mistake. So sad. Thanks. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
Time for my little bits.. ;) I do believe the compact pistol is a Taurus PT92CS, the markings appear to match closer to the Taurus than the Beretta. Un-ID'd snub-nose 1 appears to have a six-round cylinder, so it can't be a Model 36 - That one might be a re-use of the Detective Special already mentioned on the page. The S&W 659 appears to have a longer slide/barrel and slightly large bore making me it's a .45 variant - I'd have to say it's an early [[Smith & Wesson 4506]] since it looks to have the wraparound grips (which the earlier 645 doesn't have). [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 22:59, 30 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
:Thanks, I completely forgot that 4506 had a stepped trigger guard. What concerns the revolver, you think that the faceted barrel is a cover over a real barrel, right? [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 02:44, 31 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
:: Oh sure, but again, it's a six-shot, so it's not a .38 J-frame. It ''could'' be a .22 J-frame, but I doubt it (It's not a Model 34 for example, those have adjustable sights). Again, I'm still leaning to the DS being re-used. I'll add that the contour of the top-strap and front sight ramp matches with the Colt. The other revolver is too far away to really ID, outside of a blued snub-nose. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 13:19, 31 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
:::Thanks, I'll add it to the page. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:26, 31 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:44, 1 November 2015
I don't think that's a Beretta 92FS Inox, but rather a PT92AFS. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (EDT)
Time for my little bits.. ;) I do believe the compact pistol is a Taurus PT92CS, the markings appear to match closer to the Taurus than the Beretta. Un-ID'd snub-nose 1 appears to have a six-round cylinder, so it can't be a Model 36 - That one might be a re-use of the Detective Special already mentioned on the page. The S&W 659 appears to have a longer slide/barrel and slightly large bore making me it's a .45 variant - I'd have to say it's an early Smith & Wesson 4506 since it looks to have the wraparound grips (which the earlier 645 doesn't have). StanTheMan (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2015 (EDT)
- Thanks, I completely forgot that 4506 had a stepped trigger guard. What concerns the revolver, you think that the faceted barrel is a cover over a real barrel, right? Greg-Z (talk) 02:44, 31 October 2015 (EDT)
- Oh sure, but again, it's a six-shot, so it's not a .38 J-frame. It could be a .22 J-frame, but I doubt it (It's not a Model 34 for example, those have adjustable sights). Again, I'm still leaning to the DS being re-used. I'll add that the contour of the top-strap and front sight ramp matches with the Colt. The other revolver is too far away to really ID, outside of a blued snub-nose. StanTheMan (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2015 (EDT)