| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:XXX: Difference between revisions
AdAstra2009 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Extended Cut== | |||
There seems to be the full length version of the film with extended scenes on netflix as of right now if anyone cares to get that. This page kind of needs a revamp. --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] ([[User talk:AdAstra2009|talk]]) 19:38, 4 November 2015 (EST) | |||
==Interesting== | |||
Hmmm. IMFDB won't allow us to type in the actual CORRECT TITLE for this movie, which is "xXx". Because it won't allow a lower case letter to start a title. But the actual official title (per IMDB and the movie poster) is "xXx" (lower case x, Upper case X and then a lower case x). I hate it when software doesn't allow us the ability do to things 'out of the box'.... :( [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 02:52, 19 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
:Wikipedia's article is at "XXx," but they seem to have a template (DISPLAYTITLE) which makes the correct name display. Let me have a look... [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:58, 19 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
::Hm, seems complicated. I'd probably have to work out how a bunch of associated templates work to get it working over here. Still, I'll have a go next time I'm off work. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:03, 19 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
I think this might need Bunni's attention, actually. DISPLAYTITLE, according to the mediawiki documentation I've hunted down, shouldn't need a special template (and you can get rid of that page), it needs a server-side option called <nowiki>$wgAllowDisplayTitle</nowiki> to be set. If I'm reading Special:Version right we're also running slightly old version of Mediawiki software on the site. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 03:39, 19 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
== FNC, not HK-33 == | == FNC, not HK-33 == | ||
| Line 46: | Line 55: | ||
:also on the picture showing the load of two regular bullets and four special bullets, it says that the purple ones would be blood splatter darts....this is incorrect. the red ones are blood splatter darts while the purple ones are explosive bullets. it is evident by the fact, that XXX uses one explosive dart to blow up the electro-box in the fortress. | :also on the picture showing the load of two regular bullets and four special bullets, it says that the purple ones would be blood splatter darts....this is incorrect. the red ones are blood splatter darts while the purple ones are explosive bullets. it is evident by the fact, that XXX uses one explosive dart to blow up the electro-box in the fortress. | ||
:the fact that the special bullets look like buttons might be explained that the holes are vent-ports for some compressed gas that is used to propell the darts at less than lethal velocities (it looks quite similar to the gyrojet rounds used in the James Bond movie "you only live twice") [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:12, 12 May 2011 (CDT) | :the fact that the special bullets look like buttons might be explained that the holes are vent-ports for some compressed gas that is used to propell the darts at less than lethal velocities (it looks quite similar to the gyrojet rounds used in the James Bond movie "you only live twice") [[User:WARthog|WARthog]] 03:12, 12 May 2011 (CDT) | ||
::Yeah, though the rims on the bullets would kinda stop them ever actually leaving the cylinder. I've changed the entry; I really think the serrated thingy is just there for looks, since I can't see how it would do anything other than make the gun more likely to snag on stuff when you draw it. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 02:32, 19 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
::: Maybe it's meant to be used to cut through barbed wire, like the serrations on Rambo's survival knife. - [[User: 2wingo]] | |||
==Damn this movie loves C-more sights== | ==Damn this movie loves C-more sights== | ||
| Line 62: | Line 73: | ||
Am I the only one who thinks that the custom S&W 629 is totally badass? | Am I the only one who thinks that the custom S&W 629 is totally badass? | ||
::Are you that 13 yr old profane kid, again? (just curious) mpm2008 | |||
== MP5 with M203? == | |||
Is there even any point to that on an smg? Is it just me, or does that sound tactically retarded? [[User:Lurker McNasty|Lurker McNasty]] 10:11, 16 October 2011 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:38, 5 November 2015
Extended Cut
There seems to be the full length version of the film with extended scenes on netflix as of right now if anyone cares to get that. This page kind of needs a revamp. --AdAstra2009 (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2015 (EST)
Interesting
Hmmm. IMFDB won't allow us to type in the actual CORRECT TITLE for this movie, which is "xXx". Because it won't allow a lower case letter to start a title. But the actual official title (per IMDB and the movie poster) is "xXx" (lower case x, Upper case X and then a lower case x). I hate it when software doesn't allow us the ability do to things 'out of the box'.... :( MoviePropMaster2008 02:52, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
- Wikipedia's article is at "XXx," but they seem to have a template (DISPLAYTITLE) which makes the correct name display. Let me have a look... Evil Tim 02:58, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
- Hm, seems complicated. I'd probably have to work out how a bunch of associated templates work to get it working over here. Still, I'll have a go next time I'm off work. Evil Tim 03:03, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
I think this might need Bunni's attention, actually. DISPLAYTITLE, according to the mediawiki documentation I've hunted down, shouldn't need a special template (and you can get rid of that page), it needs a server-side option called $wgAllowDisplayTitle to be set. If I'm reading Special:Version right we're also running slightly old version of Mediawiki software on the site. Evil Tim 03:39, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
FNC, not HK-33
The rifle that Vin Diesel uses during the raid on the fortress is not actually a HK-33, but a FNC that is equipped with a Beta-C mag and telescopic sight. More details can be found on the weapon in this link: Long Mountain Outfitter's page on XXX
05:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Screencaps
I just did some screencaps for xXx to fill the page out a little better. I'll add them to the site tommorow. -GM45
- What do you guys think of the improved xXx page?
Steyr TMP
- It's great now (you have such a good eye for shots of the guns). Only thing is, maybe a few more shots of Yelena with the MP9? -MT2008
Unfortunantly it's not a MP-9 but a Steyr TMP with the detachable stock that Steyr offered and an aftermarket scope mount installed. Not in the photos that the stock in the screencaps has no pivots and the barrel is nearly identical to the one shown in TMP photos. Rockwolf66
- It's a Brugger & Thorbet MP9. Why did you change you DUMB@$$!!!
- Hey, chill. He might actually be right. Personally, I can't really tell if the stock is fixed (in which case, the gun is probably a TMP with an aftermarket stock added) or an MP-9 with a folding stock. Unless you can give a more substantiated explanation for why the gun is an MP-9 (specific details you see identifying it as such), then you have no right to call Rockwolf a "dumbass". -MT2008 01:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry about it MT. Rockwolf66
- I for one think you are 100% right. The top doesn't have picattiny rails, and the C-more sight is mounted customly. The stock is likely an aftermarket add on, or another custom job. The dude who cursed you out doesn't even know how to write the gun's name or spell, so ignore him. Brugger and Thorbet? "Changr"? And he's missing an "it" after "changr". - Gunmaster45
- Thorbet is what they call Sorbet in San Francisco...... MPM2008
- I for one think you are 100% right. The top doesn't have picattiny rails, and the C-more sight is mounted customly. The stock is likely an aftermarket add on, or another custom job. The dude who cursed you out doesn't even know how to write the gun's name or spell, so ignore him. Brugger and Thorbet? "Changr"? And he's missing an "it" after "changr". - Gunmaster45
-
- It's a TMP modified to take a folding stock. They DID have folding stocks available for the TMP and also the others are right, a close look at the body of the weapon indicates it is a TMP. It lacks the changes made in the B&T gun design Just putting my 2 cents in MoviePropMaster2008
-
- Sorry, it was a typo.
- ...and I also apologize for my profane launge.
- I should of read the talk page first. Plus here's a little info about me: I'm 13 about to turn 14 and live in Indiana. So how can I create my own user acount?
I can't help but laugh my ass of to the statement above this one. He first apologizes for a typo then for his profane "launge" hahahahahahahaha
CZ-83
The CZ-83 is a .380 ACP or .32 ACP, not a 9x19mm.
Source. [1]
Modifications
The "serrated blade" under the barrel isn't actually a blade, if you look at the second screenshot, it's rounded. But if it's not a blade, what is it? And what's that strange ring on the end of the barrel?
- The blading is likely just in use like a barrel weight, to make the front end heavier, and the ring on the end is a muzzle break. - Gunmaster45
- the description on the page still says, the barrel weight is some kind of picatinny rail system....could this be rewritten, because it clearly isn't a rail to attach something.
- also on the picture showing the load of two regular bullets and four special bullets, it says that the purple ones would be blood splatter darts....this is incorrect. the red ones are blood splatter darts while the purple ones are explosive bullets. it is evident by the fact, that XXX uses one explosive dart to blow up the electro-box in the fortress.
- the fact that the special bullets look like buttons might be explained that the holes are vent-ports for some compressed gas that is used to propell the darts at less than lethal velocities (it looks quite similar to the gyrojet rounds used in the James Bond movie "you only live twice") WARthog 03:12, 12 May 2011 (CDT)
- Yeah, though the rims on the bullets would kinda stop them ever actually leaving the cylinder. I've changed the entry; I really think the serrated thingy is just there for looks, since I can't see how it would do anything other than make the gun more likely to snag on stuff when you draw it. Evil Tim 02:32, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
- Maybe it's meant to be used to cut through barbed wire, like the serrations on Rambo's survival knife. - User: 2wingo
- Yeah, though the rims on the bullets would kinda stop them ever actually leaving the cylinder. I've changed the entry; I really think the serrated thingy is just there for looks, since I can't see how it would do anything other than make the gun more likely to snag on stuff when you draw it. Evil Tim 02:32, 19 September 2011 (CDT)
Damn this movie loves C-more sights
Wonder i they were paid to advertise or just thought they looked cool?
- This movie only? C-More sights are very common in movies generally (far more common than they are in the real world). It probably has little to do with advertising; more because they're inexpensive and look very high-tech. Check out Air Force One, Soldier, Live Free or Die Hard, Terminator Salvation, etc. for starters. -MT2008 16:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Air pistol is not a crosman 2240, but a Webley & Scott Tempest or Hurricane
In the scene at the restaurant, Xander is shot with a dart from a Tempest or Hurricane, not from a 2240. The tempest is a spring powered air pistol, the 2240 is CO2 powered. You can see the difference between the rear sights and at the front. A Crosman 2240 has a round tube under the barrel, the tempest hasnt.
Am I the only one who thinks that the custom S&W 629 is totally badass?
- Are you that 13 yr old profane kid, again? (just curious) mpm2008
MP5 with M203?
Is there even any point to that on an smg? Is it just me, or does that sound tactically retarded? Lurker McNasty 10:11, 16 October 2011 (CDT)