Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Intratec CAT Series of Pistols: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It is rather overstating the case to blame it all on the Clinton administration. Intratec went bankrupt in 1987 (during the Reagan administration) due to lawsuits from the anti-gun lobby, and from this point on the company starting cutting corners on quality control which gave their products a reputation for jamming and being generally unreliable. The California bill that banned some Intratec products by name was in 1989, so during the Bush Snr. administration. You can still blame the 1994 AWB on Clinton though. In my opinion the real thing that killed Intratec was that they tried to make the guns too cheap and ended up sacrificing too much in terms of quality control. For example, the CAT-9 is actually a pretty sound design, however there were significant problems with the consistency of the polymer frame leading to a large number of guns suffering from severe cracks and defects. You then also had some total marketing mis-steps which didn't help, like claiming that there new surface finish wouldn't take finger prints. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | :It is rather overstating the case to blame it all on the Clinton administration. Intratec went bankrupt in 1987 (during the Reagan administration) due to lawsuits from the anti-gun lobby, and from this point on the company starting cutting corners on quality control which gave their products a reputation for jamming and being generally unreliable. The California bill that banned some Intratec products by name was in 1989, so during the Bush Snr. administration. You can still blame the 1994 AWB on Clinton though. In my opinion the real thing that killed Intratec was that they tried to make the guns too cheap and ended up sacrificing too much in terms of quality control. For example, the CAT-9 is actually a pretty sound design, however there were significant problems with the consistency of the polymer frame leading to a large number of guns suffering from severe cracks and defects. You then also had some total marketing mis-steps which didn't help, like claiming that there new surface finish wouldn't take finger prints. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
::I'm sure it didn't help that the gun is incredibly ugly.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 19:57, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ::I'm sure it didn't help that the gun is incredibly ugly.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 19:57, 23 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::Intratec reminds me way too much of Cobray. They marketed their guns as cheap and usually were either based or ripped of other more higher quality guns. Both companies also had the densest marketing teams, who both thought marketing a gun based on it's infamy or it's capacity to sweep streets wouldn't get them flak in the mess that was the 1990's. Both had cheap and weird designs that probably cost $50 to make and both died in the late 80's. To quote Jackie Brown "They advertise this TEC-9 as the most popular gun in American Crime, like they're proud of that shit!" -- [[User:PaperCake|PaperCake]] 20:06, 23 April 2016 (EST) | |||
::::Ian from Forgotten Weapons has covered a few Cobray guns, I've never seen such ill-conceived and poorly though-out weapons. Who thought an open-bolt single-shot shotgun or 12-round .45-70 revolver was a good idea?--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 22:28, 23 April 2016 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:28, 24 April 2016
This handgun really went through such cruel publicity and exemplifies the ravenous and cruel attitude the system was under Clinton. It's funny because when I was a kid growing up, I never even heard of Bill Clinton or any of this kind of nonsense, yet I starting growing a passion for firearms and the typical cool stuff during the 90s. It really saddens me to find out how not-so hospitable or caring the 90s were for gun owners.-The Gunslinger 3 (talk) 06:01, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- It is rather overstating the case to blame it all on the Clinton administration. Intratec went bankrupt in 1987 (during the Reagan administration) due to lawsuits from the anti-gun lobby, and from this point on the company starting cutting corners on quality control which gave their products a reputation for jamming and being generally unreliable. The California bill that banned some Intratec products by name was in 1989, so during the Bush Snr. administration. You can still blame the 1994 AWB on Clinton though. In my opinion the real thing that killed Intratec was that they tried to make the guns too cheap and ended up sacrificing too much in terms of quality control. For example, the CAT-9 is actually a pretty sound design, however there were significant problems with the consistency of the polymer frame leading to a large number of guns suffering from severe cracks and defects. You then also had some total marketing mis-steps which didn't help, like claiming that there new surface finish wouldn't take finger prints. --commando552 (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- I'm sure it didn't help that the gun is incredibly ugly.--Mandolin (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2016 (EDT)
- Intratec reminds me way too much of Cobray. They marketed their guns as cheap and usually were either based or ripped of other more higher quality guns. Both companies also had the densest marketing teams, who both thought marketing a gun based on it's infamy or it's capacity to sweep streets wouldn't get them flak in the mess that was the 1990's. Both had cheap and weird designs that probably cost $50 to make and both died in the late 80's. To quote Jackie Brown "They advertise this TEC-9 as the most popular gun in American Crime, like they're proud of that shit!" -- PaperCake 20:06, 23 April 2016 (EST)
- I'm sure it didn't help that the gun is incredibly ugly.--Mandolin (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2016 (EDT)