| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:2009: Lost Memories: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This was one of the more interesting movies out there about Japan and Korea [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 18:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | This was one of the more interesting movies out there about Japan and Korea [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 18:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
I recall a while back, I made this comment about how this was an interesting movie. After remembering my history, I wonder how the world really would be different if Imperial Japan not only survived WWII, but came out on top and really, I don't think any of us would like it. Of course, the movies doesn't tell us how good or bad the world is off with obviously a modern day Imperial Japan thriving instead of an American influenced one. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 21:25, 24 August 2012 (CDT) | |||
==Something urgent== | ==Something urgent== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
It seems the page's been changed to portray the Fureisenjin as "terrorists", based on the description, as freedom fighters. [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] 22:09, 20 July 2012 (CDT) | It seems the page's been changed to portray the Fureisenjin as "terrorists", based on the description, as freedom fighters. [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] 22:09, 20 July 2012 (CDT) | ||
: One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. In this case, it works both ways and after watching the movie with the intent to review it, I am against the "good guys" [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 00:02, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | |||
:: Ah. Should we leave it as is? [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | |||
::Honestly...It depends on who is working on the page. If I had did this page, my opinions is that yeah, they are terrorists. If someone is rutting for the freedom fighters, he would call them that. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 10:38, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | |||
Well, I wrote them as terrorists when I uploaded all the images because that's pretty much what they do. Guess it pissed off some people...lol (checked the history on the edit...) --[[User:Wildcards|Wildcards]] 19:03, 24 August 2012 (CDT) | |||
Maybe split the difference and go with "insurgents?" And I can't help but notice that whoever did this page didn't include the name of a single actor. Can someone do that? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 19:07, 24 August 2012 (CDT) | |||
:I didn't really know much Japanese and Korean stars, I'll get right on it.--[[User:Wildcards|Wildcards]] 19:09, 24 August 2012 (CDT) | |||
::Well, I was thinking matching up characters with names in IMDb. I'd do it myself, but I've never seen the movie, so I don't know who the characters are. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 19:20, 24 August 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:25, 25 August 2012
SPAS-12
Isn't the pump action on the SPAS-12 engaged for less powerful rounds, not more powerful? I was pretty certain that it exists to cycle the weapon when a less-than-lethal round or similar is used which lacks the necessary pressure to operate the weapon in semi-automatic mode. (I imagine this would also include the "non-functional" ammunition used for movie special effects, hence why SPAS-12s are forever being used in manual mode in film.) Atypicaloracle 13:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
It would make more sense showing the SWAT guy loading a more powerful round and needing to pump it to chamber the breaching shot. Excalibur01 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Just checked the wiki entry on SPAS-12, you were right about pump action only used for low pressure rounds. I got it backwards I guess... The entry has been corrected. Though it could be like Excalibur01 said, the agent was actually loading a breaching round in.--Wildcards 05:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Interesting movie
This was one of the more interesting movies out there about Japan and Korea Excalibur01 18:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I recall a while back, I made this comment about how this was an interesting movie. After remembering my history, I wonder how the world really would be different if Imperial Japan not only survived WWII, but came out on top and really, I don't think any of us would like it. Of course, the movies doesn't tell us how good or bad the world is off with obviously a modern day Imperial Japan thriving instead of an American influenced one. Excalibur01 21:25, 24 August 2012 (CDT)
Something urgent
It seems the page's been changed to portray the Fureisenjin as "terrorists", based on the description, as freedom fighters. Ominae 22:09, 20 July 2012 (CDT)
- One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. In this case, it works both ways and after watching the movie with the intent to review it, I am against the "good guys" Excalibur01 00:02, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
- Ah. Should we leave it as is? Ominae 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
- Honestly...It depends on who is working on the page. If I had did this page, my opinions is that yeah, they are terrorists. If someone is rutting for the freedom fighters, he would call them that. Excalibur01 10:38, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
Well, I wrote them as terrorists when I uploaded all the images because that's pretty much what they do. Guess it pissed off some people...lol (checked the history on the edit...) --Wildcards 19:03, 24 August 2012 (CDT)
Maybe split the difference and go with "insurgents?" And I can't help but notice that whoever did this page didn't include the name of a single actor. Can someone do that? --Funkychinaman 19:07, 24 August 2012 (CDT)
- I didn't really know much Japanese and Korean stars, I'll get right on it.--Wildcards 19:09, 24 August 2012 (CDT)
- Well, I was thinking matching up characters with names in IMDb. I'd do it myself, but I've never seen the movie, so I don't know who the characters are. --Funkychinaman 19:20, 24 August 2012 (CDT)