| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Muthers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The unidentified rifle appears to be an M1903. --~~~~") |
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Muthers, The to Talk:The Muthers: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The unidentified rifle appears to be an M1903. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:49, 10 September 2014 (EDT) | The unidentified rifle appears to be an M1903. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:49, 10 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
:I'm not sure but two Turko's revolvers seem to be different. On the second screenshot we can see a [[Single Action Army]] with a typical grip and shape of the frame while the revolver on the first screenshot resembles something like [[Colt New Service]] (it lacks an ejector rod but mayby it's simply lost). [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:12, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
:: Thx! And naval cannon?--[[User:Pandolfini|Pandolfini]] ([[User talk:Pandolfini|talk]]) 14:33, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::I tried to identify these cannons, using [http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/index_weapons.htm NavWeaps], possibly the best site about naval artillery. But without any result. There is a lot of similar guns but none that looks exactly the same. I can guess that it's a 57-mm or 76-mm gun, judging by the bore size. Are these gun firing on screen? [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 14:55, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::Sorry, I was wrong about Colt New Service. The screen revolver has a significantly smaller cylinder than the New Service. You need a real expert in revolvers, not my humble attempts. Sorry. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:04, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
::::I thought at first it was a 40mm saluting gun, but it has recoil dampeners. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 15:28, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::::I am not suggesting it is a 40mm saluting gun. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 16:57, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
* Is it possible it's one of these? They are former naval guns used up to WWII we have for saluting.[[User:Foofbun|Foofbun]] ([[User talk:Foofbun|talk]]) 17:42, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_3-pounder_Hotchkiss | |||
:I was looking at that as well. It looks a bit off though. Are we sure this is even a real gun. By the looks of the first cap, it may not even be rifled. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:54, 11 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:25, 11 July 2023
The unidentified rifle appears to be an M1903. --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2014 (EDT)
- I'm not sure but two Turko's revolvers seem to be different. On the second screenshot we can see a Single Action Army with a typical grip and shape of the frame while the revolver on the first screenshot resembles something like Colt New Service (it lacks an ejector rod but mayby it's simply lost). Greg-Z (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- Thx! And naval cannon?--Pandolfini (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- I tried to identify these cannons, using NavWeaps, possibly the best site about naval artillery. But without any result. There is a lot of similar guns but none that looks exactly the same. I can guess that it's a 57-mm or 76-mm gun, judging by the bore size. Are these gun firing on screen? Greg-Z (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- Sorry, I was wrong about Colt New Service. The screen revolver has a significantly smaller cylinder than the New Service. You need a real expert in revolvers, not my humble attempts. Sorry. Greg-Z (talk) 15:04, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- I thought at first it was a 40mm saluting gun, but it has recoil dampeners. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- I am not suggesting it is a 40mm saluting gun. --Funkychinaman (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- I thought at first it was a 40mm saluting gun, but it has recoil dampeners. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- Thx! And naval cannon?--Pandolfini (talk) 14:33, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
- Is it possible it's one of these? They are former naval guns used up to WWII we have for saluting.Foofbun (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2014 (EDT)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QF_3-pounder_Hotchkiss
- I was looking at that as well. It looks a bit off though. Are we sure this is even a real gun. By the looks of the first cap, it may not even be rifled. --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:54, 11 September 2014 (EDT)