Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

User talk:STEN

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Revision as of 11:03, 10 March 2015 by Funkychinaman (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reply

Sure. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:17, 4 March 2015 (EST)

  • First of all: what's your thoughts about this? --STEN (talk) 09:19, 4 March 2015 (EST)

Moved:

_______

Hmm, hmm... Atari Jaguar (not MS-DOS, sorry that I confuced you then) version of Wolfenstein 3D also have this weapon: this picture can show it. You said I did a Sysyphean work; you have right to say it. But then, I'm puzzled. Which old games are legiable? I read the rules again and didn't understand it. About this page... As I can see, GregZ is engaged in such things; maybe, we need his thoughts about this? --STEN (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2015 (EST)
And as I pointed out, a lot of people feel even that isn't enough. (Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk.) You can save yourself a lot of time arguing and just do a page for a modern game. You can always finish up that page for Stalin Subway. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2015 (EST)
Spenging time for arguing... I don't want to argue with you. Why should I do it? It's probably the last thing I could want. About the Atari... thanks for this worlds. I have emulated Jaguar version; it has the same quality with original (a good alternative of spedings thousand of dollars by buying original Atari Jaguar; you can read in Wiki how bad the most of the games for this console were, excluding Doom and Wolfenstein 3D). What should I do? Should I get shots of Beretta 92 in this game? Did I unterstand you correctly? --STEN (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2015 (EST)
I'm not doing this again, especially since you already deleted your talk page. That is a hard NO on Wolftenstein 3D. I'll be discussing the eligibility of this page elsewhere with the admins. --Funkychinaman (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2015 (EST)
"Hard no" - after "Buy yourself a capture card and a used Jaguar, and MAYBE we'll talk"... I don't know. Why I can't understand this? Can you explain me? --STEN (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2015 (EST)
I'm sorry you misunderstood. The answer is no. If you have a hard time with that, please see here. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2015 (EST)
I'm sorry I've got a headache because of exams and I can't check this now. I don't have a hard time with anything; thanks for spending your time by yourself for cheching this out, but I don't need in your care now. I think it'll be better to work with something different. Can you move this from the words "Atari Jaguar" onto my page talk? I think it wouldn't be offtopic for this game.--STEN (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2015 (EST)
Your formatting for Isle of the Dead is not correct. Please reduce the size of the photos for the cover art. You can take a look at a video game such as Resident Evil: Revelations for reference. If you don't choose to fix this page soon, it will be deleted. --Ben41 (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2015 (EST)
Ben, I'm not sure, which part of it? Do you mean the pictures for Mossberg or the cover itself? If it's the second case, which elements of this should be deleted? --STEN (talk) 04:13, 5 March 2015 (EST)
You need to write this code after __TOC__<br clear=all> right above where you start to list the guns. Your cover photos for the Mossberg 500 entry should no bigger than 400px. Any unidentified weapons should be on the discussion page. --Ben41 (talk) 04:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)
Fixed. --STEN (talk) 04:55, 5 March 2015 (EST)
I have made some final edits for your future reference. Also, weapons that do not actually appear in the game should not be made into entries. --Ben41 (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2015 (EST)

Stalin Subway

Hello, STEN. I want to talk about article Stalin Subway. You abandoned this article, so I can work on it in future. This screenshots are useful. In near future I shall add new information and screenshots. Pyramid Silent (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2015 (EDT)

  • Поскольку это наша беседа, я вижу более логичным говорить на родном для нас двоих языке (хотя, вероятно, вы и не знали об этом).

Кроме меня, над скриншотами работал кто-то другой. Как итог - визуальное оформление статьи незачёт полнейший. Лучше просто взять да сделать всё заново - так будет лучше.

Сама игра в сравнении с другими чисто русскими шутерами смотрится более-менее нормально (даже образцово). Но в сравнении с западными... Самую хорошую оценку этой игре поставила "Игромания" - 6.0 из 10. Это - твёрдая тройка. А второй - 3.0 (слабая двойка). Качество этого продукта оставляет желать лучшего по всем параметрам. Начиная от запредельно бредового сюжета без намёка на логику (авторы решительно не понимали реалий начала 1950х), вплоть до декораций. У русского языка есть для этого хорошее словосочетание - "развесистая клюква". Только почему-то сделанная русскими. Не экспертный товар, но и не для отечественного потребителя - не пойми для кого.

Да и стоит ли игра описания? Тот же Wolfenstein 3D для Atari Jaguar - в гораздо большей степени. --STEN (talk) 04:53, 10 March 2015 (EDT)

All edits must be in English. If you want to use Russian, please trade email addresses. Thanks. --Funkychinaman (talk) 07:03, 10 March 2015 (EDT)