Talk:Rambo III

Excellent work with the page, it came out great. Thanks for adding his knife and bow, I appreciate it. I also like the trivia section at the bottom. -GM

Do you like the few shots I added? -GM

thanks for the deleted scenes, I don't have them on my DVD. FYI, I don't like the M203 shot that you replaced my shot with. Though it shows him firing, it is blurrier than my shot and I posted the previous shot to get a clearer view of how the weapon was mated together. I'm reverting it back. Also thanks for the RGD-1 grenades, but I've already uploaded the files but haven't had time to do the section yet. Great shots of the Knife and bow! I did have some shots of from the grenade 'field' but yours had better color so I ended up not using mine.

I should have asked before I changed the M203 shot. Your right, yours was better. Sorry I stole your grenade section.

Moved discussion from movie page

-Actually Norinco made a copy of the M203 40mm grenade launcher to be used with AK type weapons. As does Romania. So this setup is believable -Spectre85

No it is ridiculous ... since the weapon is supposed to be RUSSIAN, not Chinese (since the weapon was taken off of a Spetnaz Sergeant) and the Russians never used M203 or clones of the M203 during this time period. Also I've never heard of a Norinco M203 so please furnish a link or something to prove this. This is very intriguing information.

-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AG-40 Here is a link for the Romanian AG-40 -Spectre85

It's still ridiculous because it's anachronistic. None of these M203 rip off clones were made in the 1980s when the film was shot and set. So the set up is ridiculous. MPM2008

Did'nt the Mujahideen use captured AK's with a M203 attached? Obviously supplied by the CIA with GL's ammo, and the rifle ammo they scrounged for. I do vaguely remember an abs model kit version with wooden stock AK & M203GL that was available in the mid 1980's.

- As far as the multiple shots from the M203, Rambo picks up at least two grenades from the sand after defeating Sgt. Kourov. With one already chambered in the launcher, he could have three or four shots. He is seen reloading it when he and Trautman are taking cover in the ditch.

I think the loading scene is the FIRST grenade. He never reloads after the battle starts, of course this could have been edited out or not shot. There is another scene mentioned in the film where Rambo picks up an enemy gun and the shot was removed by the editor and makes it look like Rambo magically as a new rifle. MPM2008

T-64

Based on the Western-style fume extractor I suspect the tank is an Israeli Ti-67 with a 105mm gun vice a true T-64, same as was used on The Beast.

Wrong. It's a T-62. Sure they may have added on some mods, but it's NOT a T64. The the Ti-67 from the Beast is a modified T-55, not a 62.

Also, the FN MAG isn't really missing the butt, that's the correct configuration when firing from a mount. The butt comes off and you just attach the rear plate.

Typo

This is a really high-traffic page on this site and the first sentence has the word "it's" instead of "its". Checking the spelling will really give this site a more professional and credible reputation.

I'll give you professional, but I don't see how a minor typo takes away any credibility. I've seen similar typos in federal and state documents before (ex., "payed" instead of "paid" in a document a family member received from Social Security), yet no one questions their credibility. Spartan198 20:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

You get typos like that in official docs because they are mostly written by fat-ass ladies of negro/latino nationality, that finished evening billing course and want to be called "professionals".

PS. no racism involved. Just a fact:)

"Fact" can be stated just as easily without words like "n****r". Spartan198 22:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

You're talking stereotypes, man.

WRONG User 178.92.168.157. The use of such racial slurs are NOT allowed on IMFDB. Only in the context of 'quoting' a film and even than we frown upon it unless it is censored somehow. You do it again. You'll get banned. Consider this your first & last warning. MoviePropMaster2008 23:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

No prob. I'll edit edit my post.

Not to take away from the importance of avoiding racism here, but how come the original typo wasn't changed instead of arguing about credibility and people who type official documents???