Talk:Aliens: Colonial Marines

• Valant 5/23/12 15:35 PST

I am a die hard fan of the Alien franchise, especially the second movie which holds to me as my favorite movie (cant count how many times I have seen it). I wanted to start a forum discussion relating to one of the only characters from the movie who has a slight chance of making it into the game: Private Hudson (Bill Paxton's character). *SPOILER ALERT FOR FILM* He was seen being dragged down into the depths of the ground, and proved himself a powerful soldier. I have a theory that he will appear in the movie if not as a main character than at least a cameo. Newt was able to survive on the planet for an extended period of time and the screen shots do show Hadley's Hope not completely destroyed. I hope this becomes a reality and wanted to get all of your feedback

I don't see how that would be possible, are you forgetting about the gigantic nuclear explosion that destroyed the whole colony? --commando552 18:47, 23 May 2012 (CDT)

• Valant 5/29/12 13:42 PST*

I thought the same thing to about the Nuclear Explosion, then again they show in the E3 2011 footage large portions of the colony left intact, that or in the Aliens Colonial Marines Technical Manual at the end of the book there are some transcripts from Weyland Yutani Representatives who state that the spaceship could have been left intact because of the blast radius did not reach it. Maybe he made it to the Derlict Space Jockey craft because of a rover or some Sci Fi BS. If did it would not be to upset.

I'm willing to bet that there will be an achievement for maybe finding his body or his gun since it shows up in the main page of this game. That'd be interesting, like 10 points and the achievement is called "Game over, Man! Game Over!" Just a thought. I however find it unlikely he survived that assault let alone surviving on that planet for 17 weeks. --Bad Boy (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2013 (EST)

According to one review, there is an achievement with that name, but it's for finishing the game. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2013 (EST)

Disappointing

This game...wow. Aside from calling mags clips even the magazine tube in shotguns clips, they also mistake a pump action for semi auto. That's what it saids. I couldn't stop laughing at the stupid when the shotgun called "Pump Shotgun" has listed fire mode as "Semi automatic" Excalibur01 (talk) 13:52, 12 February 2013 (EST)

If they're the only problems with the game, frankly I'll be a happy man.--Leigh Burne (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2013 (EST)

I wish that was the only problem with the game. That's just related to guns. The game is crap with bad graphics, cheesy story, stupid AI and clunky controls Excalibur01 (talk) 08:19, 13 February 2013 (EST)

Not to mention the limbs clipping through the walls and shitty dialogue/writing. Can't believe it took them 7 years to make this game. Duke Nukem Forever all over again... AVP2010 is much better in my opinion. bozitojugg3rn4ut (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2013 (EST)

Ehh, I wouldn't go that far. AVP 2010 was pretty damn lousy and at least in this one the NPCs aren't quite so enthusiastic about nagging you to death. Also you don't have a Predator trying to stab himself in the eyes with his wristblades. Evil Tim (talk) 09:44, 13 February 2013 (EST)

AVP had a problem because we focused at 3 different factions and 3 different types of story and gameplay. So they had to deal with multiple things. This game, they only had to focus on the Marines in the singleplayer...multiplayer aside, they had ONE faction to deal with. The Marines. Oh how they fucked it up. The graphics look like PS2 graphics. The enemy AI and your friendly AI clip through walls, don't follow you and seem very lifeless in conversation. Excalibur01 (talk) 12:04, 13 February 2013 (EST)

Having now played this myself... It's not that bad. The graphics are certainly above PS2 standard, saying that's just unfair. The lighting's well done. But it's by no means Killzone 2 in the graphics department. The nostalgic touches are great, but I guess they'll only influence people like me who love the film. The AI's pretty poor. But the absolute worst sin the game commits is by failing to make the Aliens scary. They're just cannon fodder. At least AvP's Marine campaign was freaky.--Leigh Burne (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2013 (EST)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck836MIeYwo here is a great review of the game. The guy mentions pretty much everything I have problems with. - bozitojugg3rn4ut (talk) 06:23, 14 February 2013 (EST)

Holy hell, that screen tearing. That doesn't happen on PC. Neither does the texture draw-in. I guess they mained on PC (which has a vsync option) and the other two platforms are ports which aren't optimised for a console's amount of graphics RAM (Xbox 360 has ten megs of graphics RAM and 512 megs general, decent gaming PC has 2+ gigs of graphics RAM and 10+ gigs general). Rage had the same problem with main development being on PC, and since that used megatextures it had texture draw-in for the entire game world.

On the plus side, the screen tearing can give Xbox owners some idea of what it's like to play bad PS3 ports. Evil Tim (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2013 (EST)

I gotta be honest, I haven't noticed any real graphical glitches yet (admittedly I'm only about halfway through the game), with the exception of one Alien who ran straight through a door that was actually closed.--Leigh Burne (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2013 (EST)