| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Parker-Hale M-85: Difference between revisions
m (→Naming) |
(→Page naming: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I was wondering what would be the correct way of spelling 'Parker-Hale M85'. 'Parker-Hale' (rather than 'Parker Hale' as used on this page) seems to be correct, but I don't think 'M-85' is correct, 'M85' just looks more logical. A penny for your thoughts... [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 10:31, 20 November 2015 (EST) | I was wondering what would be the correct way of spelling 'Parker-Hale M85'. 'Parker-Hale' (rather than 'Parker Hale' as used on this page) seems to be correct, but I don't think 'M-85' is correct, 'M85' just looks more logical. A penny for your thoughts... [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 10:31, 20 November 2015 (EST) | ||
== Page naming == | |||
Shouldn't this page be given a more generic name like 'Parker-Hale rifles' or something? Being called 'M(-)85', it also has predecessor models with different characteristics than the 'M(-)85'model. Again, a penny for your thoughts... [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 10:36, 20 November 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 15:36, 20 November 2015
The text of the image of the 1200 is wrong. The rifle has scope and iron sights. They look perfectly in the picture. :)
Page name
Since this covers a series of rifles, maybe we should rename the page? --Funkychinaman (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2014 (EDT)
Naming
I was wondering what would be the correct way of spelling 'Parker-Hale M85'. 'Parker-Hale' (rather than 'Parker Hale' as used on this page) seems to be correct, but I don't think 'M-85' is correct, 'M85' just looks more logical. A penny for your thoughts... PeeWee055 (talk) 10:31, 20 November 2015 (EST)
Page naming
Shouldn't this page be given a more generic name like 'Parker-Hale rifles' or something? Being called 'M(-)85', it also has predecessor models with different characteristics than the 'M(-)85'model. Again, a penny for your thoughts... PeeWee055 (talk) 10:36, 20 November 2015 (EST)