| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Masquerade: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It's absolutely not Kimar, due it's still not produced at 1988, but, I can't say anything. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 14:39, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | :It's absolutely not Kimar, due it's still not produced at 1988, but, I can't say anything. [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 14:39, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
::it's very unlikely a PA-63 would be in an American film in 1988. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 14:55, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | ::it's very unlikely a PA-63 would be in an American film in 1988. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 14:55, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::But, how do you think, what is this pistol? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 15:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:13, 25 October 2015
The pistol is noway a FEG PA-63. It has different grip, a shorter barrel of different shape, different trigger guard. I agree that it's hardly a Kimar Lady K but not a PA-63. Why don't go the easiest way and identify is as Walther PPK? Greg-Z (talk) 14:26, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- It's absolutely not Kimar, due it's still not produced at 1988, but, I can't say anything. Pyramid Silent (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- it's very unlikely a PA-63 would be in an American film in 1988. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:55, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- But, how do you think, what is this pistol? Pyramid Silent (talk) 15:13, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
- it's very unlikely a PA-63 would be in an American film in 1988. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:55, 25 October 2015 (EDT)