Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Colt SCAMP: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has.  --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
:::::Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] ([[User talk:Mandolin|talk]]) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
::::::I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:57, 7 September 2015

I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --Funkychinaman (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)

Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--Mandolin (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but the source for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. Greg-Z (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --commando552 (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
Yeah, the BTA gun doesn't really look like the SCAMP.--Mandolin (talk) 14:46, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
I'll let the GTA players decide, but if it isn't, then it's gone. --Funkychinaman (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.buildlogs.org/index.php?title=Talk:Colt_SCAMP&oldid=957620"