| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Colt SCAMP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | ::This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but [http://www.kitsune.addr.com/Firearms/Submachine-Guns/Colt_SCAMP.htm the source] for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | :::The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 7 September 2015
I have to question the production dates here. With the lack of military and civilian sales, how could it stay in production for that long? --Funkychinaman (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- Good question. Maybe just remove the production date? Because yeah, if it had been in production for that long, they would have showed up somewhere by now.--Mandolin (talk) 10:37, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but the source for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. Greg-Z (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- As far as I know the dated would be that it was conceptualised in 1969, prototype completed in 1971, shopped around in the mid '70s, seemingly abandoned by the end of the '70s. Therefore I think the correct way to date this would be (1971 - ????). However, more importantly, does this thing even remotely deserve a page though? It is only here because of the GTA5 ID which I do not think it looks even remotely like. The ID appears to be based solely on the fact that it is a full auto (actually burst, but whatever) pistol, rather than any physical features it actually has. --commando552 (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- The wikipedia dates are even more ludicrous, since it states production started in 1957. --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:32, 7 September 2015 (EDT)
- This production data is taken from Wikipedia, but the source for this Wiki article doesn't contain such info. I guess that it's an error, and we'll better remove this. Greg-Z (talk) 11:02, 7 September 2015 (EDT)