| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The November Man: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg|thumb|none|300px|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]] | [[File:EKOL_Spec_Silver.jpg|thumb|none|300px|EKOL Grizzly Special 99 (Nickel) - 9mm Blank Fire Only]] | ||
:Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT) | :Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), [[User:PeeWee055|PeeWee055]] ([[User talk:PeeWee055|talk]]) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --[[User:Ben41|Ben41]] ([[User talk:Ben41|talk]]) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
==Please help ID== | ==Please help ID== | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 13 August 2014
Beretta 84FS
Are you sure about the Beretta 84FS? Enlarging the one image makes me think more of some variant of the Beretta 92 pistol series, my guess would be the American made Beretta 92FS Inox (see below) due to the black controls - PeeWee055 (talk) 11:40, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
- Thanks for adding additional pictures, I see your point. However, we are probably dealing with an optical illusion here. As far as I can see, there’s a few things that are just more consistent with the 92FS design as opposed to the 84FS (below from left to right): (1) barrel extending from slide, (2) step-down on the slide, (3) safety switch on the slide and (4) disassembly lever. - PeeWee055 (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
It's probably this blank-firing pistol:
- Interesting point, seems we're getting somewhere. Still, my above 4 points (plus the front section of the slide between trigger guard and barrel) lead to the 92FS (or derivate). Anyway, let's just leave this and get on with our lifes :-), PeeWee055 (talk) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
- Well, upon some more research, it looking more like a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox (but not the new M9A1 version with the rail) or the blank-firing EKOL Beretta V92. I'm going to put it as a Beretta 92FS Compact Inox for now until I can find a good picture of EKOL V92. --Ben41 (talk) 06:13, 13 August 2014 (EDT)
Please help ID
I think it is CZ 75 SP-O1 SHADOW based on the sights, trigger, trigger guard, underbarrel rail, and the general shape of the gun.--One shot is all it takes. (talk) 17:15, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
- From the trigger guard, I think it's just a regular CZ 75 SP-01. --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:17, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
Are you sure, the rear sight looks far too large to be a regular SP-O1--One shot is all it takes. (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
- Nevermind, you're right. I was looking at the Phantom. --Funkychinaman (talk) 18:02, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
Ahh, easy mistake to make, when I posted the Shadow I didn't even notice the standard SP-O1--One shot is all it takes. (talk) 18:31, 8 August 2014 (EDT)
- It kind of looks like there's a barrel bushing. If it is, then that's a CZ SP-01 ACCU Shadow--ThePotShot (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2014 (EDT)