| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Spartan198 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Could shot feasibly be fired through barrels bent like they are in the film without the discharge injuring the shooter? ~~~~") |
Orca1 9904 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could shot feasibly be fired through barrels bent like they are in the film without the discharge injuring the shooter? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 19:45, 10 January 2014 (EST) | Could shot feasibly be fired through barrels bent like they are in the film without the discharge injuring the shooter? [[User:Spartan198|Spartan198]] ([[User talk:Spartan198|talk]]) 19:45, 10 January 2014 (EST) | ||
:I'm not sure about a weapon firing shot instead of slugs or cartridges, but I do know of one experimental version of the [[Sturmgewehr 44]] the Nazi's toyed with that had a barrel with a 90-degree bend, the idea being to allow soldiers to shoot around corners without having to expose themselves to enemy fire. Not sure how well it worked though. [[User:Orca1 9904|Orca1 9904]] ([[User talk:Orca1 9904|talk]]) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:54, 11 January 2014
Could shot feasibly be fired through barrels bent like they are in the film without the discharge injuring the shooter? Spartan198 (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2014 (EST)
- I'm not sure about a weapon firing shot instead of slugs or cartridges, but I do know of one experimental version of the Sturmgewehr 44 the Nazi's toyed with that had a barrel with a 90-degree bend, the idea being to allow soldiers to shoot around corners without having to expose themselves to enemy fire. Not sure how well it worked though. Orca1 9904 (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (EST)