| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Left Behind: The Movie: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT) | The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
:I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT) | :I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.[[User:Mr.Ice|Mr.Ice]] ([[User talk:Mr.Ice|talk]]) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
:Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --[[User:MrMiracle|MrMiracle]] ([[User talk:MrMiracle|talk]]) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:43, 24 August 2013
The jet fighter is hardly a real MiG-29, and GSh-30 doesn't really appear in the movie. Greg-Z (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
- I admit I am not good at IDing planes but I just went off what the wikipedia page said. As for the GSh-30 there are plenty of pages which ID a vehicle and its weapons even if they are not used at all.Mr.Ice (talk) 15:19, 13 July 2013 (EDT)
- Well, it's clearly a simple CGI construct. But I can spot enough of the distinct physical features to identify it: high mounted canopy, angled body blending into wings, separated engine exhausts, no wingtip stores and no tailcone. If I saw a blurry aircraft on a flight at that distance with that silhouette, I'd call it a MiG-29. --MrMiracle (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2013 (EDT)