| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Marsh: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) (→Derringer: new section) |
Commando552 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::I wouldn't say the scope helps much with the ID, as you can pretty easily add scope mounts onto any lever action rifle. Also, I think Marlin rifles tend to have a barrel that is noticeably longer than the magazine tube, which isn't the case here. My guess would be a Winchester 1894 based on the barrel band and sight position. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:28, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | :::I wouldn't say the scope helps much with the ID, as you can pretty easily add scope mounts onto any lever action rifle. Also, I think Marlin rifles tend to have a barrel that is noticeably longer than the magazine tube, which isn't the case here. My guess would be a Winchester 1894 based on the barrel band and sight position. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:28, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
::::Don't most Winchesters eject from the top though, which would precluding mounting a scope? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:32, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | ::::Don't most Winchesters eject from the top though, which would precluding mounting a scope? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:32, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
:::::There are a lot of scope mounts out there for Winchesters, mostly they do it by mounting it on the left side of the receiver. I used to have a scoped Winchester 94 (what they called the 1894 post 1964 I think) that had the scope mounted above the ejection port. There are two different version of the 94, the original top eject model that had to have a scout or offset scope (or a mount that redirected the ejecting case), and the later angle eject guns that could have the scope directly above the line of the barrel. Winchester is just my guess though, could be totally wrong. There really isn't much to go on. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:54, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | |||
== Derringer == | == Derringer == | ||
By process of elimination, I would probably just go with calling it a [[Remington 1866]]. It has a rib so it isn't an American Derringer or Bond Arms, the rib isn't vented so it isn't a Cobra, and it is bigger than a .22 so not a Chiappa. The images are not that clear, but I would also guess that it lacks a safety, which most modern versions made by other companies have. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:36, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | By process of elimination, I would probably just go with calling it a [[Remington 1866]]. It has a rib so it isn't an American Derringer or Bond Arms, the rib isn't vented so it isn't a Cobra, and it is bigger than a .22 so not a Chiappa. The images are not that clear, but I would also guess that it lacks a safety, which most modern versions made by other companies have. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 17:36, 4 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 4 June 2013
Revolver
Looks like a Ruger SP101. Greg-Z (talk) 15:48, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I thought that at first, but I think it may be a replica. Rugers have solid frames, this one has a sideplate. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- Maybe a version of this. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- Found it. --Funkychinaman (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- Maybe a version of this. --Funkychinaman (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
SMG
The "submachine gun" looks more like a hunting rifle (wihich it very likely is).... --Warejaws (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I don't know, but this weapon equipped the optical sight. I can't identify this gun on this screenshot.Pyramid Silent (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I'm guessing some sort of lever-action rifle. Since it's got a scope, maybe a Marlin? --Funkychinaman (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say the scope helps much with the ID, as you can pretty easily add scope mounts onto any lever action rifle. Also, I think Marlin rifles tend to have a barrel that is noticeably longer than the magazine tube, which isn't the case here. My guess would be a Winchester 1894 based on the barrel band and sight position. --commando552 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- Don't most Winchesters eject from the top though, which would precluding mounting a scope? --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- There are a lot of scope mounts out there for Winchesters, mostly they do it by mounting it on the left side of the receiver. I used to have a scoped Winchester 94 (what they called the 1894 post 1964 I think) that had the scope mounted above the ejection port. There are two different version of the 94, the original top eject model that had to have a scout or offset scope (or a mount that redirected the ejecting case), and the later angle eject guns that could have the scope directly above the line of the barrel. Winchester is just my guess though, could be totally wrong. There really isn't much to go on. --commando552 (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- Don't most Winchesters eject from the top though, which would precluding mounting a scope? --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I wouldn't say the scope helps much with the ID, as you can pretty easily add scope mounts onto any lever action rifle. Also, I think Marlin rifles tend to have a barrel that is noticeably longer than the magazine tube, which isn't the case here. My guess would be a Winchester 1894 based on the barrel band and sight position. --commando552 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
- I'm guessing some sort of lever-action rifle. Since it's got a scope, maybe a Marlin? --Funkychinaman (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2013 (EDT)
Derringer
By process of elimination, I would probably just go with calling it a Remington 1866. It has a rib so it isn't an American Derringer or Bond Arms, the rib isn't vented so it isn't a Cobra, and it is bigger than a .22 so not a Chiappa. The images are not that clear, but I would also guess that it lacks a safety, which most modern versions made by other companies have. --commando552 (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2013 (EDT)