Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:End of Days: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I'll be screencapping this shortly. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]
You are completely correct about his Glock, and I am surprised. But here's what threw me off: PropStore.com had a rubber stunt version of Jericho's Glock for sale about a year or two back, and that one was clearly a Glock 17L (no rail, no finger grooves, wrong slide shape). I'm guessing you're right that Glock might have had a promotional deal - check the credits and you may be able to find out.
You are completely correct about his Glock, and I am surprised. But here's what threw me off: PropStore.com had a rubber stunt version of Jericho's Glock for sale about a year or two back, and that one was clearly a Glock 17L (no rail, no finger grooves, wrong slide shape). I'm guessing you're right that Glock might have had a promotional deal - check the credits and you may be able to find out.


Also, PropStore now has the rubber stunt version of Jericho's MP5 for sale. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Also, PropStore now has the rubber stunt version of Jericho's MP5 for sale. -[[User:MT2008|MT2008]] 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks, the image will look better on the page then the airsoft prop. It doesn't have an SEF trigger group and many other feattures. The reason they had a Glock 17L as the rubber stunt prop was likely because the Glock 34 was so new, they had no rubber versions and probably found it easier to use wha they had instead of cast a new prop. Now that I know a rubber prop version was used, it makes me wish I hadn't removed some of the images I had. Might have to go back on that. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]
:Thanks, the image will look better on the page then the airsoft prop. It doesn't have an SEF trigger group and many other feattures. The reason they had a Glock 17L as the rubber stunt prop was likely because the Glock 34 was so new, they had no rubber versions and probably found it easier to use wha they had instead of cast a new prop. Now that I know a rubber prop version was used, it makes me wish I hadn't removed some of the images I had. Might have to go back on that. - [[User:Gunmaster45|Gunmaster45]]

Revision as of 05:24, 6 January 2009

You are completely correct about his Glock, and I am surprised. But here's what threw me off: PropStore.com had a rubber stunt version of Jericho's Glock for sale about a year or two back, and that one was clearly a Glock 17L (no rail, no finger grooves, wrong slide shape). I'm guessing you're right that Glock might have had a promotional deal - check the credits and you may be able to find out.

Also, PropStore now has the rubber stunt version of Jericho's MP5 for sale. -MT2008 04:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, the image will look better on the page then the airsoft prop. It doesn't have an SEF trigger group and many other feattures. The reason they had a Glock 17L as the rubber stunt prop was likely because the Glock 34 was so new, they had no rubber versions and probably found it easier to use wha they had instead of cast a new prop. Now that I know a rubber prop version was used, it makes me wish I hadn't removed some of the images I had. Might have to go back on that. - Gunmaster45