| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Olympus Has Fallen: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Not saying an ACOG on in MP5 is impractical but...there's something odd about it, mostly that the MP5 lacks range, accuracy and punch of a rifle and they would be using it indoors for the assault on the White House...wouldn't it have been practical for all the MP5s to be equipped with zero magnifying optics like Aimpoints, Eotechs...an ACOG on an MP5 to me is just...weird. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 21:28, 26 February 2013 (EST) | Not saying an ACOG on in MP5 is impractical but...there's something odd about it, mostly that the MP5 lacks range, accuracy and punch of a rifle and they would be using it indoors for the assault on the White House...wouldn't it have been practical for all the MP5s to be equipped with zero magnifying optics like Aimpoints, Eotechs...an ACOG on an MP5 to me is just...weird. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 21:28, 26 February 2013 (EST) | ||
:I feel the same way but I remember seeing some early model MP-5s with the 4x Hendsolt scope which was/is a lot bulkier than the ACOG if memory serves. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] ([[User talk:Charon68|talk]]) 21:39, 26 February 2013 (EST) | :I feel the same way but I remember seeing some early model MP-5s with the 4x Hendsolt scope which was/is a lot bulkier than the ACOG if memory serves. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] ([[User talk:Charon68|talk]]) 21:39, 26 February 2013 (EST) | ||
::True, then as the MP5 aged all the way to modern times, you rarely see it with a powered optic. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 22:01, 26 February 2013 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 03:01, 27 February 2013
Why would an AC-130 have guns as small as M134s? IIRC, the 25mm GAU-12 is what current AC-130s carry after being upgraded from 20mm M61s, so it should be noted that such an armament is inaccurate. Furthermore, why is an AC-130 attacking a Secret Service sniper? Somehow stolen by the NKs? The trailer did show it being shot down by an F-22.
This movie is gonna be awesome. Spartan198 (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2013 (EST)
I think the AC-130 was meant to be 2 things, shock and awe and to eliminate the Secret Service snipers on the roof top, which would clear the entry teams going through the front door. Of course even if it was depicted with the GAU 12 guns...It would be just as overkill with the cannon if they used it. I don't know what the roof of the White House is armored with...but I doubt it could withstand anything from an AC-130. Also the movie expected us to believe that the White House's AAA defenses didn't activate the moment it detected something like an AC-130 coming at it? Honestly, the invasion of the White House in 24 was more realistic and less over the top. Excalibur01 (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2013 (EST)
Not saying an ACOG on in MP5 is impractical but...there's something odd about it, mostly that the MP5 lacks range, accuracy and punch of a rifle and they would be using it indoors for the assault on the White House...wouldn't it have been practical for all the MP5s to be equipped with zero magnifying optics like Aimpoints, Eotechs...an ACOG on an MP5 to me is just...weird. Excalibur01 (talk) 21:28, 26 February 2013 (EST)
- I feel the same way but I remember seeing some early model MP-5s with the 4x Hendsolt scope which was/is a lot bulkier than the ACOG if memory serves. --Charon68 (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2013 (EST)
- True, then as the MP5 aged all the way to modern times, you rarely see it with a powered optic. Excalibur01 (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2013 (EST)