| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:FN FNP: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Not really, they have different slides, sights, grip designs, magazine releases, rails and safety mechanisms (the top has a manual safety whereas the bottom is a de-cocker only without an ambi slide release). Looking into it, the bottom gun is the original FNP which was in 9mm and .40. They then came out with the FNP-45 which has all of the differences listed above and looks like the one on the main page (I think this was actually built for a potential military/LE contract or something but not sure). FNH USA have now come out with an updated versions of the FNP and they call them the FNX-9 and FNX-40 which have all of the FNP-45 improvements. There is also an FNX-45 which looks pretty much identical to the FNP-45 but has a few tweaks that makes it more tolerant of ammunition as the original was designed around NATO ammo specs. To add a bit of confusion, the Belgian company sell the FNX as an updated version of the FNP and sell it as such. I think these later guns should be referred to as the FNX so as to distinguish them from the FNP, but still list them on this page. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:11, 23 July 2012 (CDT) | ::Not really, they have different slides, sights, grip designs, magazine releases, rails and safety mechanisms (the top has a manual safety whereas the bottom is a de-cocker only without an ambi slide release). Looking into it, the bottom gun is the original FNP which was in 9mm and .40. They then came out with the FNP-45 which has all of the differences listed above and looks like the one on the main page (I think this was actually built for a potential military/LE contract or something but not sure). FNH USA have now come out with an updated versions of the FNP and they call them the FNX-9 and FNX-40 which have all of the FNP-45 improvements. There is also an FNX-45 which looks pretty much identical to the FNP-45 but has a few tweaks that makes it more tolerant of ammunition as the original was designed around NATO ammo specs. To add a bit of confusion, the Belgian company sell the FNX as an updated version of the FNP and sell it as such. I think these later guns should be referred to as the FNX so as to distinguish them from the FNP, but still list them on this page. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] 15:11, 23 July 2012 (CDT) | ||
== | == Change the title == | ||
It's full name is the FN FNP. Pleas change the title, becasue I have no idea how do. | It's full name is the FN FNP. Pleas change the title, becasue I have no idea how do. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
~added by m16m4. | ~added by m16m4. | ||
:You are incorrect. According to 2 different sources (The Gun Digest Book of Modern Gun Values & the FNH USA website) the name is "FNP". --[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]] 14:18, 23 July 2012 (CDT) | :You are incorrect. According to 2 different sources (The Gun Digest Book of Modern Gun Values & the FNH USA website) the name is "FNP". --[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]] 14:18, 23 July 2012 (CDT) | ||
::I don't doubt that, but almost all of the guns here, especially the non-military ones, are listed as <Company> <Model> like Kimber Warrior or Browning Hi-Power. "FNP" is just the model, is it not? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 15:54, 23 July 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:54, 23 July 2012
Link for specs. Click on any three and compare. --Funkychinaman 09:07, 20 April 2012 (CDT)
FNP-9 differences
Are the Belgian and US FNP-9s different guns? The two image below are from the Belgian and US sites respectively, and they are pretty different. --commando552 10:47, 17 May 2012 (CDT)
- Eh, I think they're just the same gun with a few differences. Jeddostotle7 14:40, 23 July 2012 (CDT)
- Not really, they have different slides, sights, grip designs, magazine releases, rails and safety mechanisms (the top has a manual safety whereas the bottom is a de-cocker only without an ambi slide release). Looking into it, the bottom gun is the original FNP which was in 9mm and .40. They then came out with the FNP-45 which has all of the differences listed above and looks like the one on the main page (I think this was actually built for a potential military/LE contract or something but not sure). FNH USA have now come out with an updated versions of the FNP and they call them the FNX-9 and FNX-40 which have all of the FNP-45 improvements. There is also an FNX-45 which looks pretty much identical to the FNP-45 but has a few tweaks that makes it more tolerant of ammunition as the original was designed around NATO ammo specs. To add a bit of confusion, the Belgian company sell the FNX as an updated version of the FNP and sell it as such. I think these later guns should be referred to as the FNX so as to distinguish them from the FNP, but still list them on this page. --commando552 15:11, 23 July 2012 (CDT)
Change the title
It's full name is the FN FNP. Pleas change the title, becasue I have no idea how do.
~added by m16m4.
- You are incorrect. According to 2 different sources (The Gun Digest Book of Modern Gun Values & the FNH USA website) the name is "FNP". --Zackmann08 14:18, 23 July 2012 (CDT)
- I don't doubt that, but almost all of the guns here, especially the non-military ones, are listed as <Company> <Model> like Kimber Warrior or Browning Hi-Power. "FNP" is just the model, is it not? --Funkychinaman 15:54, 23 July 2012 (CDT)