Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Stalingrad (1993): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Since we don't actually see the gun, how do we know it's actually there and it's not just a prop tube or something? Does it fire in the movie? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 07:38, 25 June 2012 (CDT) | Since we don't actually see the gun, how do we know it's actually there and it's not just a prop tube or something? Does it fire in the movie? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 07:38, 25 June 2012 (CDT) | ||
: Machine gun on screenshot can be tube. But some tanks fire their machine gun during the battle scene. Unfortunately at this moment i can't give you screenshot to prove it. [[User:Bednardos|Bednardos]] 15:53, 25 June 2012 (EET) | : Machine gun on screenshot can be tube. But some tanks fire their machine gun during the battle scene. Unfortunately at this moment i can't give you screenshot to prove it. [[User:Bednardos|Bednardos]] 15:53, 25 June 2012 (EET) | ||
:: Here is this tank, which fired a hull mounted DT machine gun | |||
[[Image:Stalingrad-DT2.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | |||
[[User:Bednardos|Bednardos]] 23:21, 25 June 2012 (EET) | |||
:It's usual problem with tank (and aircraft) weapons in war movies: we know what '''must be''' there but it is very hard to say if there is really used the proper weapon, or some other weapon, or even a movie prop. There are hundreds of screenshots with T-34s, Tigers, Shermans where only a bit of MG barrel can be seen. So we have to take on trust that the MGs are proper ones or write everywhere that it is supposed to be DT/MG34/M1919 etc. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] 07:59, 25 June 2012 (CDT) | :It's usual problem with tank (and aircraft) weapons in war movies: we know what '''must be''' there but it is very hard to say if there is really used the proper weapon, or some other weapon, or even a movie prop. There are hundreds of screenshots with T-34s, Tigers, Shermans where only a bit of MG barrel can be seen. So we have to take on trust that the MGs are proper ones or write everywhere that it is supposed to be DT/MG34/M1919 etc. [[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] 07:59, 25 June 2012 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:20, 25 June 2012
There is only one scene in this movie that pissed me of(concerning guns). During one of the fighting scenes you can see a K98 getting fired with closed but unlocked bolt. :-( Nevertheless this is a great movie, give it a watch. I think there should be subtitled version on youtube. Another recommandable movie that was made a few years before "Stalingrad" is the Finnish "Talvisota"(winter war), which is also pretty good. Greetings from upper Franconia.
Degtyaryov DT
Since we don't actually see the gun, how do we know it's actually there and it's not just a prop tube or something? Does it fire in the movie? --Funkychinaman 07:38, 25 June 2012 (CDT)
- Machine gun on screenshot can be tube. But some tanks fire their machine gun during the battle scene. Unfortunately at this moment i can't give you screenshot to prove it. Bednardos 15:53, 25 June 2012 (EET)
- Here is this tank, which fired a hull mounted DT machine gun
Bednardos 23:21, 25 June 2012 (EET)
- It's usual problem with tank (and aircraft) weapons in war movies: we know what must be there but it is very hard to say if there is really used the proper weapon, or some other weapon, or even a movie prop. There are hundreds of screenshots with T-34s, Tigers, Shermans where only a bit of MG barrel can be seen. So we have to take on trust that the MGs are proper ones or write everywhere that it is supposed to be DT/MG34/M1919 etc. Greg-Z 07:59, 25 June 2012 (CDT)