| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:M16 Gallery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Beretta ARX 160: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
From what I know, "Beretta ARX 160" is not a separate copy of the M16 design. When creating this weapon designers have focused on the model of "Beretta AR70/90". The M16 does not have anything in common structurally. The appearance of grip may be similar to the M16, nothing else. | From what I know, "Beretta ARX 160" is not a separate copy of the M16 design. When creating this weapon designers have focused on the model of "Beretta AR70/90". The M16 does not have anything in common structurally. The appearance of grip may be similar to the M16, nothing else. | ||
Beretta ARX 160 is a completely new production, there is nothing to do with the M16. | |||
--[[User:Mateogala|Mateogala]] 06:39, 25 March 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:39, 25 March 2012
Diemaco C7
Those are military weapons NOT available to the civilian population. In point of fact they are not even sold to movie armourers. They should be moved to the military variants section. --Charon68 01:45, 25 March 2012 (CDT)
Beretta ARX 160
From what I know, "Beretta ARX 160" is not a separate copy of the M16 design. When creating this weapon designers have focused on the model of "Beretta AR70/90". The M16 does not have anything in common structurally. The appearance of grip may be similar to the M16, nothing else. Beretta ARX 160 is a completely new production, there is nothing to do with the M16. --Mateogala 06:39, 25 March 2012 (CDT)