Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

User talk:Vjk50061: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "No one is disputing that Dillinger's gun was in .380, but it does not appear that we have any images of the Model 1903/1908 in .380. That particular gun is obviously a .32 (like ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
No one is disputing that Dillinger's gun was in .380, but it does not appear that we have any images of the Model 1903/1908 in .380. That particular gun is obviously a .32 (like I said, you can read it on the slide.) Please don't mislabel it. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 09:01, 16 March 2012 (CDT)
No one is disputing that Dillinger's gun was in .380, but it does not appear that we have any images of the Model 1903/1908 in .380. That particular gun is obviously a .32 (like I said, you can read it on the slide.) Please don't mislabel it. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 09:01, 16 March 2012 (CDT)
:Work with us here. I concern is documenting what is actually used the the productions. Not historical documentation. You can add that info on the discussion pages. If you continue to fight us in this matter you could be banned from the site and nobody likes t do that. thanks. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 10:24, 16 March 2012 (CDT)

Revision as of 15:24, 16 March 2012

No one is disputing that Dillinger's gun was in .380, but it does not appear that we have any images of the Model 1903/1908 in .380. That particular gun is obviously a .32 (like I said, you can read it on the slide.) Please don't mislabel it. --Funkychinaman 09:01, 16 March 2012 (CDT)

Work with us here. I concern is documenting what is actually used the the productions. Not historical documentation. You can add that info on the discussion pages. If you continue to fight us in this matter you could be banned from the site and nobody likes t do that. thanks. --Jcordell 10:24, 16 March 2012 (CDT)