| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Category talk:Field artillery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I recall an entire discussion in the forum regarding [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1398 indirect fire weapons.] Of note: "I'm basically of the same opinion. I think it...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I recall an entire discussion in the forum regarding [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1398 indirect fire weapons.] Of note: "I'm basically of the same opinion. I think it's fine to mention the indirect fire weapons on page, and point out interesting trivia about them specifically, but I don't think they warrant their own page - it's not really the purpose of the site, and it opens up an entirely new can of worms." That's straight from the Bunni's mouth. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 05:43, 25 November 2011 (CST) | I recall an entire discussion in the forum regarding [http://forum.imfdb.org/showthread.php?t=1398 indirect fire weapons.] Of note: "I'm basically of the same opinion. I think it's fine to mention the indirect fire weapons on page, and point out interesting trivia about them specifically, but I don't think they warrant their own page - it's not really the purpose of the site, and it opens up an entirely new can of worms." That's straight from the Bunni's mouth. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 05:43, 25 November 2011 (CST) | ||
:On the other hand we've had mortar pages forever, and mortars are field artillery. Plus the one that's actually listed here has appeared in three movies. I think this bears discussion, but I'm not going to instantly delete it without finding out what the other mods think. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 05:53, 25 November 2011 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:53, 25 November 2011
I recall an entire discussion in the forum regarding indirect fire weapons. Of note: "I'm basically of the same opinion. I think it's fine to mention the indirect fire weapons on page, and point out interesting trivia about them specifically, but I don't think they warrant their own page - it's not really the purpose of the site, and it opens up an entirely new can of worms." That's straight from the Bunni's mouth. --Funkychinaman 05:43, 25 November 2011 (CST)
- On the other hand we've had mortar pages forever, and mortars are field artillery. Plus the one that's actually listed here has appeared in three movies. I think this bears discussion, but I'm not going to instantly delete it without finding out what the other mods think. Evil Tim 05:53, 25 November 2011 (CST)