| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:From Paris With Love: Difference between revisions
Gunmaster45 (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:From Paris with Love to Talk:From Paris With Love) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 19:06, 6 July 2011
CHOPPED SIG
I'm not familiar with this model of sig, but it looks to me like they chopped up the frame to make the gun fit in energy drink cans, and then glossed over Travolta re-assembling the gun in such a way as to not explain how the hell the grip goes back on.
Am I wrong? Is this how this model of sig put together? Is this correct or movie nonsense?--James3 01:32, 8 May 2011 (CDT)
Pimp
Travolta look like a pimp.
M136 AT-4
Isn't Travolta holding the M136 AT-4 backwards in the photo? I might be wrong, so feel free to correct me.. :) --Warejaws 21:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
PSS?
I haven't seen the film. Whoever wrote about it in article, did you mean a Russian special pistol? Or Walther PPS maybe?
Looked like a Walther PP to me. Doesn't look at all like a Walther PPS, or the pistol above. --Crazycrankle 09:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok in response to your claim on the Beretta PX4 storm. I remember that Johnathan Rhyse Meyers clearly states that he had a 9mm in the trunk (referring to the PX4 storm )
Steyr M-A1...
The Steyr pictured is the original Steyr M9. The weapon used in the film is the M-A1 version in the picture below.
File:Http://www.dreadgazebo.com/gunporn/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/steyr-m40a1.JPG
Taurus PT handgun
I don't see the extension of the rear sight for adjustability, the giveaway of the PT99 model, so I'm switching it to the PT92. -- ZeoRanger5 00:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)