| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Crossfire Trail: Difference between revisions
Gunmaster45 (talk | contribs) |
(→Ski Cap: new section) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Welcome.--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 02:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC) | Welcome.--[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 02:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Ski Cap == | |||
Is the guy on the right wearing a ski cap? Didn't know they had those back then. | |||
[[Image:Cc3.jpg|thumb|none|400px]] | |||
Revision as of 02:34, 19 June 2011
See Joe Kidd to get a look at the Remington - Keene Repeating rifle. --Jcordell 02:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Language
It isn't necessary to be calling people a "prick" on the page. If you have strong feelings about something put it on the discussion page. I'm addressing this to the anonymous user 69.152.169.101. If you're going to do that at least log in as a member with a name and a page. I took the liberty of deleting your addition. --Jcordell 16:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
See I have a name. Go to my page. Feel free.
I feel no need to waste an entire page or make up some name for myself to point out that Mr. Gunmaster is exceedingly hostile to anyone who doesn't fit his particular brand of wiki-ing or shower him with praise. Furthermore, I think having a name and making a page for yourself only encourages this sort of glory-hound pursuit of recognition in my opinion. And as for keeping things on the discussion page, why did you leave our lord and savior Gunmaster's spanking of Mr. Colt Revolver Fan on the main page? To shame him so all who pass by will see that here Gunmaster's word is law? His behavior is childish, and leaving his little hissy fit of a reprimand on the main page of this article only condones further acts of childishness. Unless we're all well and fine with guilt tripping anyone who makes an honest mistake.
Well Gunmaster is a good kid but he's fifteen.Didn't you get carried away when you were fifteen? The original poster didn't seem to have any trouble so I left it. I just felt like the langauage wasn't necessary. Gloryhound? Well I guess if that's how you feel. It could be argued that being anonymous gives one the sense that they can do whatever and not have to answer or even explain one's behavior. There is alwasy two sides to each story. Look partner no flames here. Agree to diagree and lets have fun.--Jcordell 16:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'm 14 and i don't get carried away. But let's not talk about that.-Oliveira 16:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Well I'm 41 which probably makes me one of the oldest farts on this site. However I'm a lifelong gun and movie geek.--Jcordell 16:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
I see where you're comin' from, and appreciate your level-headed response. I reckon I still do get carried away about certain things.
Sure thing. That's what I do for a job as well.Have to be level while others are running around screaming and pulling their hair. Guess it came out last night. Take care.--Jcordell 16:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't trying to guilt trip him or publicly humiliate him, I was only kidding when I said I wouldn't need to see the movie anymore, I never care about plot spoilers. It's just not recommended to tell the whole movies plot in the summary. Was only trying to inform him of what is agreed on as all of the site's opinion of proper "wiki-ing", not just mine. Sorry for being a prick though. I was 16 when I wrote that, but I guess I'm still a wiley 17-year-old now. : P - Gunmaster45
Taken from the article
- The point of a plot summary is to SUMMARIZE the film, not tell the whole story. Now that I know how it ends, I guess I don't need to watch it... - Gunmaster45
Sorry for ruining the end of the movie for you, Gunmaster 45. I want to apologize to you and anyone else that this caused a problem. I know that that stinks. I'm fairly new to the site, so I don't really know how things run around here. Sorry! I haven't watched this movie in a long time, so I got confused on a lot of the guns when I tried to remember. But fortunately, I have just rewatched it and discovered that Gunmaster 45 has corrected me on almost everything! Sorry again about ruining the movie, it won't happen again by me. It's still a pretty good movie, and worth watching--User: Colt Revolver Fan.
- It's no big deal. Just remember for future references, the point of a summary is to just explain the basic START of the story, like how they summarize on IMDB, but not tell the entire plot. - Gunmaster45
Thanks for telling me!--User: Colt Revolver Fan
- There. I put the discussion on the discussion page. I also have a comment, I don't know why is it so bad to know what happens in a movie or video game. Most of the movies i watch i know what happens in them and they are still great movies.-Oliveira 16:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Well my 2 cents is that I read the summary and it didn't stop me from buying the DVD yesterday and watching it. I still enjoyed it a great deal. -harleyguy
Blooper
This was pointed out by an anonomyous user (70.254.164.229) on 07/01/09. I moved it from the main page to the discussion page. --Jcordell 16:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC) In the segment at the end ,when Covington shoots Dorn in the leg and the chest, one can clearly see that the Colt 1872 had NO bullets in the cylinder. Covington shoots him twice with an empty gun.
I'm a little confused on the use of the term "conversion" for the 1872 Open Top (I admit when I watched the DVD yesterday I thought it was an 1860 conversion). From what I've read, such as this link http://www.buffaloarms.com/browse.cfm/4,4850.htm the 1872 Open Top was built from the ground up as a metallic cartridge firing arm, rather than being a percussion gun converted to fire metallic cartridges.-harleyguy
Sharps-Borchardt 1878
Actually this is just a standard Sharps 1874 - the Sharps-Borchardt doesn't have an external hammer.
Good to know. I'm not real up on all the different configurations of the Sharps. Somebody else identified the Sharps and I didn't know enough to argue with them. --Jcordell 13:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Winchester 1876
I like the little change you made on the 76 Winchester Nyles. Getting the Mounties in there. Leave it to a Canadian. However you'll be happy to know that I made note of the fact that the Mounties (yes I know that isn't the proper title) used the 76 on the Winchester 1876 page. You should screencap Death Hunt. Old firearms and Canadians in the Yukon. Right up your alley. --Jcordell 13:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I mainly threw it in because that specific model was produced to order for the NWMP. I'd actually like to do Death Hunt, just an issue of finding a copy. For an American movie they definately got the little details about Canadian guns right.
Sorry First post wanted to introduce myself!
Hi Everyone! Just wanted to drop in to say hellogreetings! and also to introduce myself here! The Boards look quite interesting and i cant wait to become a member of the community!
Welcome.--Jcordell 02:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Ski Cap
Is the guy on the right wearing a ski cap? Didn't know they had those back then.
