| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Sa vz. 61 Skorpion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::Actually the correct form is '''vz.''' (all '''small''' letters). Source, official CZ site: [http://www.czub.cz/en/catalog/86-law-enforcement-military/], scroll down to see the Samopal and Skorpion. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:51, 25 May 2011 (CDT) | ::Actually the correct form is '''vz.''' (all '''small''' letters). Source, official CZ site: [http://www.czub.cz/en/catalog/86-law-enforcement-military/], scroll down to see the Samopal and Skorpion. [[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 10:51, 25 May 2011 (CDT) | ||
:::Well, vzor isn't a proper noun;vz. 61 is basically Mk. 61. In English you'd capitalise it if you were saying "Skorpion Mk. 61," so I think it's right to do that here too. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] 11:21, 25 May 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:21, 25 May 2011
Additional Variants
Article Name
What's with the SA? This is a Samopal Vzor 1961 submachine gun, commonly shortened to Vz.61, made by Česká Zbrojovka Uhersky Brod, usually known as CZ. Nothing in the name ought to be abbreviated as SA except concievably Samopal, and that not in English. Surely this article ought to be called "CZ Vz.61 Skorpion"
Submachine Gun vs. Machine Pistol
A machine pistol is a type of submachine gun. Why is this even an issue? BurtReynoldsMoustache 18:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Vz.61 or Vz 61?
Which is correct? - Mr. Wolf 10:12, 25 May 2011 (CDT)
- I think it's a Mr / Mr. thing, both are but the dot is more formal. Evil Tim 10:16, 25 May 2011 (CDT)
- Actually the correct form is vz. (all small letters). Source, official CZ site: [1], scroll down to see the Samopal and Skorpion. bozitojugg3rn4ut 10:51, 25 May 2011 (CDT)
- Well, vzor isn't a proper noun;vz. 61 is basically Mk. 61. In English you'd capitalise it if you were saying "Skorpion Mk. 61," so I think it's right to do that here too. Evil Tim 11:21, 25 May 2011 (CDT)