Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Lost: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
[[Image:Lost dart gun 2new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Ben41|]]
[[Image:Lost dart gun 2new.jpg|thumb|none|500px|Ben41|]]


:Your images are categorically ''not'' of better quality. The colors are over saturated and the people look like they are suffering from jaundice. This holds true for the pictures that you uploaded originally, as well (like Hurley at the motel), not just the ones that I uploaded and you tarnished. The colors in the pictures I posted are exactly like the original broadcast. You do know that they have professional video editors who refine these images to look exactly as they are supposed to look, right? Modifying them is a disgrace to the original product and a personal insult to me as I took much time to find exactly the right image before uploading it. I also find it disingenuous that you would use as an example the '''one''' image in which you ''arguably'' made clearer. Every single other one that you modified looks far worse than the original. This website is about exhibiting the firearms seen in films and that means showing them as the producers intended. Also, they leave the black bars in there because they add contrast. That is what the producers intended and that is why I leave them in.
:Your images are categorically ''not'' of better quality. The colors are over saturated and the people look like they are suffering from jaundice. This holds true for the pictures that you uploaded originally, as well (like Hurley at the motel), not just the ones that I uploaded and you tarnished. The colors in the pictures I posted are exactly like the original broadcast. You do know that they have professional video editors who refine these images to look exactly as they are supposed to look, right? Modifying them is a disgrace to the original product and a personal insult to me as I took much time to find exactly the right image before uploading it. I also find it disingenuous that you would use as an example the '''one''' image in which you ''arguably'' made clearer. Every single other one that you modified looks far worse than the original. This website is about exhibiting the firearms seen in films and that means showing them as the producers intended. Also, they leave the black bars in there because they add contrast. That is what the producers intended and that is why I leave them in.[[User:Axeman|Axeman]] 21:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)


==Remington 870==
==Remington 870==
Looks more like a Winchester 1300 --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 23:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Looks more like a Winchester 1300 --[[User:AdAstra2009|AdAstra2009]] 23:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:06, 30 December 2010

Browning Shotgun

Can anyone positively identify the weapon at the bottom of the page. It looks like a Browning design, but I am not certain. Axeman 06:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Walther PPK

The gun you guys said is a unknown isa as flashpaper version of a Walther PPK. User: Colt

SIG Pro

[IMG]http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h97/thesexygerman/1X21-ShannonGun.jpg[/IMG] (Shannon Rutherford) holds (John Locke) at gunpoint with the SIG Pro

Mosin-Nagant M91/30

That 91/30 looks more like an M91/38, actually.

I added some hi-res pics from Par Avion (Season 3, Episode 12). It is definitely the full-length rifle. Axeman 06:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Season 3, Episode 6: 'I Do'.

In this episode, about thirty minutes (minus commercials) in, Jack escapes from his cell, and finds an armory. He loads a pistol, and holds it on Ben. What kind of gun is this? I think it might be a Walter P38, but I would like a second opinion before I edit the page. Acora 03:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

It is a Walther P38. Axeman 04:06, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Who did this one?

Quite a few mistakes in here, 2 rifles are listed in the sub machine gun section. --Captain Snikt 03:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Axeman's Lost images

I recently replaced Axeman's images with what I thought were ones of better quality. The original images didn't have the black bars cropped with a little dark. I took the original images and cropped and brightened them I don't know which ones to leave up. Please let me know which ones are preferable. --Ben41 22:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Here's a comparison of the images (the ones currently on the page is on top and mine are on the bottom):


Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Your images are categorically not of better quality. The colors are over saturated and the people look like they are suffering from jaundice. This holds true for the pictures that you uploaded originally, as well (like Hurley at the motel), not just the ones that I uploaded and you tarnished. The colors in the pictures I posted are exactly like the original broadcast. You do know that they have professional video editors who refine these images to look exactly as they are supposed to look, right? Modifying them is a disgrace to the original product and a personal insult to me as I took much time to find exactly the right image before uploading it. I also find it disingenuous that you would use as an example the one image in which you arguably made clearer. Every single other one that you modified looks far worse than the original. This website is about exhibiting the firearms seen in films and that means showing them as the producers intended. Also, they leave the black bars in there because they add contrast. That is what the producers intended and that is why I leave them in.Axeman 21:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Remington 870

Looks more like a Winchester 1300 --AdAstra2009 23:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)