Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:M134 Minigun: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Handheld variant discussion:: new section) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
"Everything with rotating barrels" is not a sensible definition to use when addressing whether it's in video games or not. [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | "Everything with rotating barrels" is not a sensible definition to use when addressing whether it's in video games or not. [[User:Dongs|Dongs]] 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Handheld variant discussion: == | |||
Is it at all plausible? I realize the recoil would be astronomical, but wouldn't the weight of the gun itself dampen it a bit? And if it is plausible, would it at all be useful in a combat situation? [[User:That's One Angry Duck|That's One Angry Duck]] 04:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:57, 28 November 2010
Other variations
Discussion - Dillion-Aero/'Microgun'
The M134 Minigun is now manufactured By Dillon Aero as the MK44. Dillon Aero also upgrade GE M134's.
Although rumored, The Hand held Miniguns are NOT XM214 Microguns.
See the difference here:
I erased the GAU/19A because there's already a page. Drjuki 13:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Far too many false positives.
"Everything with rotating barrels" is not a sensible definition to use when addressing whether it's in video games or not. Dongs 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Handheld variant discussion:
Is it at all plausible? I realize the recoil would be astronomical, but wouldn't the weight of the gun itself dampen it a bit? And if it is plausible, would it at all be useful in a combat situation? That's One Angry Duck 04:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)