Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:Colt Python: Difference between revisions

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:


If it were a copyright issue and we didn't have permission to use the former image that would be understandable, but otherwise I would question why this was done as the latter image seems very much inferior.
If it were a copyright issue and we didn't have permission to use the former image that would be understandable, but otherwise I would question why this was done as the latter image seems very much inferior.
:I found a good image, no more necessary to change. Perhaps it can be considered to do the opposite. --[[User:Charly Driver|Charly Driver]] 11:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:14, 16 November 2010

Other Variants

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Python with 4" Barrel and factory Black rubber combat grips - .357 Magnum
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Python Elite - .357 Magnum
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Python with 6" Barrel - .357 Magnum
File:8in Colt Stalker .357.jpg
Colt Stalker - .357 Magnum
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Python 380 - .357 magnum (Bruni blank-firing replica.)

I just moved this last pic from the main page, but, I think it says 'Made in Italy' on it. So I doubt it's a genuine Colt. StanTheMan 23:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Combat Python 3" in Royal Blue finish - .357 magnum

Snub nose

Why did we get rid of this image of a standard finish Python snub-nose:

File:Pythonsnubbie.jpg
Python "snubbie"

In favor of this one:

Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Colt Python Snub Nose, .357 w/ 2.5" barrel.

If it were a copyright issue and we didn't have permission to use the former image that would be understandable, but otherwise I would question why this was done as the latter image seems very much inferior.

I found a good image, no more necessary to change. Perhaps it can be considered to do the opposite. --Charly Driver 11:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)