Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Mossberg 500 series shotgun: Difference between revisions
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) m ((Fixing the description on that pic bit, silly me)) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Image:Mossberg_590A1_SBS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mossberg 590A1 SBS - 12 gauge]] | [[Image:Mossberg_590A1_SBS.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mossberg 590A1 SBS - 12 gauge]] | ||
[[Image:Mossberg500CruiserwithForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mossberg 500 Cruiser with heat shield & foregrip - 12 gauge]] | [[Image:Mossberg500CruiserwithForegrip.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mossberg 500 Cruiser with heat shield & foregrip - 12 gauge]] | ||
[[Image:Moss500shorty.jpg|thumb|none|600px|Mossberg 500 shorty with pistol grip and MP5K foregrip (foregrip in the film ''[[Reign of Fire]]'' is "Tommy Gun" style) - 12 gauge.]] | |||
==Maverick 88== | ==Maverick 88== |
Revision as of 21:56, 15 November 2010
Additional Variants
Maverick 88
I was thinking, maybe this should be on the main page and not the discussion. It may look similar to the 500 or 590, but there are some big differences between the 88 and the 500/590. For, intance, the 88 has a traditional safety located between the pistol grip and trigger guard, instead of on the top. It also has a plain flat top on the receiver, with bo holes drilled in it for mounting a scope. Does anyone agree? --FirearmFanatic 13:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- - I guess so, because it's now on the main page. I guess perhaps this section could be deleted then? StanTheMan 23:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Crap
In trying to upload a picture of a Mossberg Cruiser with foregrip I accidentally cocked up what uploaded picture was which and unintentionally replaced a couple of pictures. I clicked upload before I noticed that filenames for those already existed. Is there any means of salvaging this? I'm really sorry. - Kooshmeister
- You just have to revert to the previous version of the image. I just did this. It's no big deal. -MT2008 14:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)