Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Soldier Soldier (TV series): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) (New page: Just started a major revamp of this page as it was a bit lean. Will look a bit sorry for itself for a few days though. --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just started a major revamp of this page as it was a bit lean. Will look a bit sorry for itself for a few days though. --[[User:Commando552|Commando552]] 23:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | Just started a major revamp of this page as it was a bit lean. Will look a bit sorry for itself for a few days though. --[[User:Commando552|Commando552]] 23:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::You've done an excellent job so far, however there is a few minor error. The series has the Challenger 1, not Challenger 2 MBT - the CR1 doesn't have the L94a1 chaingun that the Warrior does (the Challenger 2 does however) The CR1 uses the L37A2 7.62mm coaxial machinegun - a variant of the L7 GPMG. Also, the L7/M240 GPMG is also used on the CR1 as the commander's external/AA defence machine gun (although the vehicle mounted variant is the L8A2 if memory serves me correctly) Other than that, the article looks pretty good to me [[User:Spanner|Spanner]] |
Revision as of 17:35, 29 October 2010
Just started a major revamp of this page as it was a bit lean. Will look a bit sorry for itself for a few days though. --Commando552 23:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- You've done an excellent job so far, however there is a few minor error. The series has the Challenger 1, not Challenger 2 MBT - the CR1 doesn't have the L94a1 chaingun that the Warrior does (the Challenger 2 does however) The CR1 uses the L37A2 7.62mm coaxial machinegun - a variant of the L7 GPMG. Also, the L7/M240 GPMG is also used on the CR1 as the commander's external/AA defence machine gun (although the vehicle mounted variant is the L8A2 if memory serves me correctly) Other than that, the article looks pretty good to me Spanner