Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Last Boy Scout: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==S&W 66 or 629?== | ==S&W 66 or 629?== | ||
I'm not sure, but the bore of the 4" model 66 seems a little too large in the second vidcap. Maybe it's a 629? | I'm not sure, but the bore of the 4" model 66 seems a little too large in the second vidcap. Maybe it's a 629? | ||
: Focus tricks with the camera often make barrel bores look bigger. I've discovered this in many cases. So, it's a misleading thing to judge with. That said, it's still a 66, the rest of the gun does not appear big enough to be an N-frame. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:18, 28 October 2010
You forgot this gun!
Have you noted the crew guy on te right?
- That's hilarious. Don't know how I missed the snubby, but I'm not sure what it is. Model 36 maybe? - Gunmaster45
- Probably. - Charly Driver
This movie
This movie...this movie is the greatest movie. That's all that there is to say.--Oliveira 14:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
S&W 66 or 629?
I'm not sure, but the bore of the 4" model 66 seems a little too large in the second vidcap. Maybe it's a 629?
- Focus tricks with the camera often make barrel bores look bigger. I've discovered this in many cases. So, it's a misleading thing to judge with. That said, it's still a 66, the rest of the gun does not appear big enough to be an N-frame. StanTheMan 18:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)