| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:WarGames: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: I agree. WHY TERRIERS?!?! Not only are they OLD and RARE, one would have to go out of their way to get them for a film that was shot in the mid 1980s. (IMHO). Also the M16 is an MGC replica, NOT an M16A1...... [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 15:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | :: I agree. WHY TERRIERS?!?! Not only are they OLD and RARE, one would have to go out of their way to get them for a film that was shot in the mid 1980s. (IMHO). Also the M16 is an MGC replica, NOT an M16A1...... [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 15:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::: I agree with both MPM and Jcordell. Though it's kinda hard to tell with the Smith, but I too would have to lean to it being a K-frame rather than an I-frame (Which I ''think'' is what the 32 is), if only out of practicality. I am glad to see a page for this film, it's one of my favorites. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:46, 26 October 2010
Possibly early S&W Model 10 snubbies
I believe that the very young Michael Madsen (wow!) and John Spencer might be using early model Smith & Wesson Model 10 with the half moon front sight instead of the front ramp. The Terrier is a smaller framed revolver and the ones they are holding appear to be the mid-size K frame Model 10's. --Jcordell 15:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. WHY TERRIERS?!?! Not only are they OLD and RARE, one would have to go out of their way to get them for a film that was shot in the mid 1980s. (IMHO). Also the M16 is an MGC replica, NOT an M16A1...... MoviePropMaster2008 15:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with both MPM and Jcordell. Though it's kinda hard to tell with the Smith, but I too would have to lean to it being a K-frame rather than an I-frame (Which I think is what the 32 is), if only out of practicality. I am glad to see a page for this film, it's one of my favorites. StanTheMan 18:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)