| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Mail Call: Difference between revisions
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Next page to be 'nuked' and more?== | ==Next page to be 'nuked' and more?== | ||
I've noticed a lot of Delete notices on pages such as Weaponology and Future Weapons as of late. Now I know there is a kind-of unspoken rule about 'documentary' pages not being allowed, but, I don't know, I'm wondering is this is getting a bit much.. At the very least, I'm worried that it's something that will inevitably concern several additional, and arguably very popular pages. One of which being this one - Since this is a sort of documentary show (As well as ''Lock 'n Load''), will it get slated for deletion as well? I have to say I'm finding that possibility a bit disconcerting; Of course I like this page, but it's also a bit disconcerting on a general level, especially given there's no specific mention or even allusion of non-allowance of documentary pages on the RS&P page. Though that is probably just an oversight, it still should be addressed on the rules page itself, since the template regards the page being against the rules | I've noticed a lot of Delete notices on pages such as Weaponology and Future Weapons as of late. Now I know there is a kind-of unspoken rule about 'documentary' pages not being allowed, but, I don't know, I'm wondering is this is getting a bit much.. At the very least, I'm worried that it's something that will inevitably concern several additional, and arguably very popular pages. One of which being this one - Since this is a sort of documentary show (As well as ''Lock 'n Load''), will it get slated for deletion as well? I have to say I'm finding that possibility a bit disconcerting; Of course I like this page, but it's also a bit disconcerting on a general level, especially given there's no specific mention or even allusion of non-allowance of documentary pages on the RS&P page. Though that is probably just an oversight, it still should be addressed on the rules page itself, since the template regards the page being against the rules when in fact, the pages are conforming to the RS&P as it's presently stated. That aside, what will this mean in the future for this page and others like it? [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
==...== | ==...== | ||
Revision as of 18:35, 9 October 2010
Makes me laugh every time XD
Next page to be 'nuked' and more?
I've noticed a lot of Delete notices on pages such as Weaponology and Future Weapons as of late. Now I know there is a kind-of unspoken rule about 'documentary' pages not being allowed, but, I don't know, I'm wondering is this is getting a bit much.. At the very least, I'm worried that it's something that will inevitably concern several additional, and arguably very popular pages. One of which being this one - Since this is a sort of documentary show (As well as Lock 'n Load), will it get slated for deletion as well? I have to say I'm finding that possibility a bit disconcerting; Of course I like this page, but it's also a bit disconcerting on a general level, especially given there's no specific mention or even allusion of non-allowance of documentary pages on the RS&P page. Though that is probably just an oversight, it still should be addressed on the rules page itself, since the template regards the page being against the rules when in fact, the pages are conforming to the RS&P as it's presently stated. That aside, what will this mean in the future for this page and others like it? StanTheMan 18:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
...
I'm not exactly a regular viewer, but I've watched this show enough to know that you'll be middle-aged by the time you finished documenting all of the weapons in it. -MT2008 04:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well I already have two seasons and SNAFU done. It will take maybe a month or two, but the other seasons can also be completed. Plus, once I'm done, it will be litterally impossible to make a page with more guns. - Gunmaster45
- This page is going to be ridiculously huge once every season is added. Should I divide the page into seasons, like have Seasons 1 & 2 on one page, 3 & 4 on the next, etc?
The King of IMFB
Mail Call is at 98 guns and counting. And I still have 6 more seasons to add eventually! The Unit cowers in fear. A new king rules the site. - Gunmaster45
- It's a history channel show about guns. What do you expect? I've seen most of the episodes but I didn't bother screen capping them because it's more like an info show about guns with R. Lee Ermey. You don't need to know what guns they use because the show is all about tell you Excalibur01 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Personally, I still don't understand why you guys are competing to have the longest gun pages on IMFDB. I just don't get why this excites people so much. -MT2008
- Cause we can. It's something to encourage the making of pages. A sense of pride that you made a page, cap all the guns and it looks good in your eyes. And I'm seeing some repeats in the page. We don't need to know in the second season they used the M1 Garand again. Excalibur01 17:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is the easiest organization. Plus, if we see it again, like how we see Gunny shoot it in different episodes, we see it much better, it helps document it better (Think of it like each season is a new page, I figured this was the easiest way to document such a huge show). And it doesn't tell you every single gun on the show. 70% of the guns I capped from this show I had to know from my own knowledge. I don't mean to offend you Ex, but after so much hard work (and very little sleep), I just want my bragging rights. - Gunmaster45
Being someone without history channel, I like to think I'm showing all the people like me the guns of the show. Once I get the rest of the Seasons on here, I'm going to love doing the Knob Creek episode. I reccomend you all watch the video on youtube, it is incredible. And since Gunny doesn't tell us every gun we see, it will aid the viewer greatly. - Gunmaster45
- Look, I don't really think repeating a gun is better orginazation, it's just repetition and counting a repeat on the overal of how many guns is kinda cheating. Yoy claim this page has 98 guns, but I've counted 5 of them repeat at least once, the M16A1 is up there 3 times. How hard is it to compact all the kinds of caps of the same gun under one section instead of 3? You are entitled to brag, and it's a very nice and big page you got here. I just think you over did it with the repeats. It's like if I started to cap repeats of guns from every season of The Unit and start a new section for that repeated gun, I'd be all day on my page doing that. Excalibur01 06:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
For anyone who is interested, the first 5 seasons of Mail Call are available on Hulu. 61 full episodes. --Gunkatas 06:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
GM45
I'd hate to say this, but you're quite an asshole. On here your talking down Marines because they have their fingers on the triggers. You have to remember, these are the guys who have pleged their lives towards the defending and sustainment of our lives. They are also training to fight in a war that has claimed thousands of lives, three of which were very close friends of mine. Again, i apologise, but please edit the rude remarks off the page. The Winchester
He's usually talking about actors, though, isn't he?
- Not on this page The Winchester
- I guarantee you I had no intention of offending anyone. I can remove the comment on the M203 section about the guy with his finger on the trigger, but I didn't mean to say it to insult him or any Marines, I guess I was just noting a recruit slip up (not a big deal, it can go). I don't think it merits me being considered an asshole, but I'll change it for the sake of the guys with theirs lives on the line every day. Let me know if there are any other assholish comments I should remove ;) - Gunmaster45
Few Points
-The section with the M1903 Mk.I Springfield, where US troops are seen using them, I very much doubt are Mk.Is. Without seeing the cutout for the Pederson device it's impossible to be 100% sure, but Mk.Is were never actually issued during WW1. It and the Pederson device were intended to be used in the planned offensives of spring 1919, by the time the war ended they hadn't made nearly enough to issue.
- The Colt New Service seen in a 101st Airborne Reenactor's shoulder holster is a Smith & Wesson Victory. You can tell by the grips, the size of the gun and the style of the holster. Kinda farby for a 101st reenactor, the Victorys were mostly issued to Navy and USMC troops in the Pacific.
-I very much doubt those are British troops with the M1914 Hotchkiss, while the British Army did use a Hotchkiss gun, it was the M1909 Portative model. I suspect they're mostly likely Americans, or possibly Belgians.
-The Hawkins Plains Rifle is not a modern weapon, it was introduced in the 1850s by the Hawkins brothers as the first commercial rifle intended for hunting western game. It was extremely popular at the time. It's become such a mainstay of modern hunters for the same reason it was popular back then - it's light, handy and has a big enough calibre for western game, and also because muzzle loader hunting became popular about the same time Jeremiah Johnson came out, where Robert Redford prominently used a Hawkins.
-Nyles
M1-C or M1-D
I noticed that if you look at the barrel of M1-c it doesn't have the widened barrel that M1-c has. this leads me to belive that it is a M1-D not an M1-c. Drjuki 14:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- The "widened barrel" is a clip-on flash supressor, it comes off and was used with both models.