| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:RPG-7: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Except a single LAW wouldn't do jack against a tank. It's effective mainly against APCs or unarmored vehicles. --[[User:JEESUS|JEESUS]] 13:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | :Except a single LAW wouldn't do jack against a tank. It's effective mainly against APCs or unarmored vehicles. --[[User:JEESUS|JEESUS]] 13:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::- LAW rockets seem to have done fine for 1950s/1960s-era tanks, since that was the time it was introduced. Though we have newer and more effective anti-armor launchers, the LAW still has it's viable uses and advantages today. But the point is you can't compare the performance of 40+ year old Anti-tank rocket systems against modern-day heavy armor, because the result is obvious, and a bit misleading. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 16:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:11, 6 October 2010
Diameter
How should the weapon's Diameter be measured? It has a 70mm diameter warhead, but a 40mm tube where the rocket is inserted. I always said it was a 70mm, but it is changed back to 40mm on this page constantly. - Gunmaster45
- I think it's the same as any other gun, the diameter of the tube / barrel is what matters, since that's what matters when you're working out what you can actually put into the gun. Vangelis 01:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Rocket Launchers in general
Are rocket launchers better if they are reloadable or unreloadable?
That depends a lot on what you want them to do. The RPG-7 is actually more of a crew-operated weapon as are most GMPGs and reloadable rocket launchers. If you need one soldier to be able to blow up a tank, you'd typically have him carry a single-shot disposable launcher like the LAW for Vietnam. Hughjefender.
- Except a single LAW wouldn't do jack against a tank. It's effective mainly against APCs or unarmored vehicles. --JEESUS 13:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- - LAW rockets seem to have done fine for 1950s/1960s-era tanks, since that was the time it was introduced. Though we have newer and more effective anti-armor launchers, the LAW still has it's viable uses and advantages today. But the point is you can't compare the performance of 40+ year old Anti-tank rocket systems against modern-day heavy armor, because the result is obvious, and a bit misleading. StanTheMan 16:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)