| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:At Bay: The Sequel to Offshore: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
This thing is on Amazon too... for $12. Why anyone would pay $12 for something like this I do not know, although reading the reviews, it seems that 12 year old stoners are the only people watching it.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 20:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC) | This thing is on Amazon too... for $12. Why anyone would pay $12 for something like this I do not know, although reading the reviews, it seems that 12 year old stoners are the only people watching it.-[[User:Ranger01|Ranger01]] 20:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Since when do we add junky, airsoft-using home movies? It looks like total junk and I'd rather watch ''Left Behind'' than this junk. I really don't think this site should bless junk that looks like a bad video game with a page. How had is it to make an IMDB page? The page has no information at all except for a plot synopsis (stupid) and a list of no-name "actors". Please, we have standards here! Delete this junk! | Since when do we add junky, airsoft-using home movies? It looks like total junk and I'd rather watch ''Left Behind'' than this junk. I really don't think this site should bless junk that looks like a bad video game with a page. How had is it to make an IMDB page? The page has no information at all except for a plot synopsis (stupid) and a list of no-name "actors". Please, we have standards here! Delete this junk!--[[User:Mandolin|Mandolin]] 14:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Okay, I'll bite... == | == Okay, I'll bite... == | ||
Revision as of 14:09, 29 September 2010
Is this a genuine film, or some self-published short? Because those are the crappiest-looking airsoft guns I've ever seen in a movie.--PistolJunkie 06:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Though it is a SELF PUBLISHED SHORT, it got listed on IMDB. IMDB lists many indie shorts, some of them not even completed. IMDB is weird that way. I know of a dozen so called 'films' which are listed, but were never completed. (which is different than completed, but unavailable due to being sold out or distribution issues). So having an IMDB listing qualifies this entry, though I suspect that the film's maker is the page maker. MoviePropMaster2008 15:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank God for IMFDB. It's pages like these that make it all worthwhile. User:Blokhed 28 Sept. 2010
- I'm sorry, but when you can see the freakin' nozzles on the P99s and the screws on that MP5K... thing, that's not good.--PistolJunkie 19:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
I don't think they are supposed to be real. It looks like it's a film about games. Look at the graphics on the caps, like it's a video game.
This thing is on Amazon too... for $12. Why anyone would pay $12 for something like this I do not know, although reading the reviews, it seems that 12 year old stoners are the only people watching it.-Ranger01 20:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Since when do we add junky, airsoft-using home movies? It looks like total junk and I'd rather watch Left Behind than this junk. I really don't think this site should bless junk that looks like a bad video game with a page. How had is it to make an IMDB page? The page has no information at all except for a plot synopsis (stupid) and a list of no-name "actors". Please, we have standards here! Delete this junk!--Mandolin 14:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I'll bite...
... and ask the obvious question: it says it's a sequel to Offshore. Is Offshore a game, another movie, a book? Wikipedia doesn't have anything, nor does IMDb. --funkychinaman 04:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- You might should ask the guy writing the page, as it seems that they mention it in the DVD commentary (dear god, they actually have a commentary track for this... thing.) Although you'll probably have to post on his user talk page; he seems oblivious to this talk page.--PistolJunkie 13:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Fake Toy Guns
Sorry, but I'm gonna start taking pics of obvious TOY guns because that's what all of these guns are. Obviously very cheap Spring powered airsoft weapons. If we're going to be accurate, we should identify these exactly as to what they are.....MoviePropMaster2008 04:29, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it e easier to just identify them as being toys rather than taking new pictures for this POS page? Anyways, the FAMAS is either a Tokyo Marui or a Jing Gong "FAMAS Super Version" modeled after the FAMAS G1, and the shotgun is an old Maruzen "CA870 CQB". Judging from the compensator and rail, the Glock looks like a Marui "G26AV" (the same one that was featured as a tie-in as the "Glock 33AV" in Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex).--PistolJunkie 05:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)