| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Total Recall (1990): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:- Indeed. I find this rather disconcerting. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:08, 19 September 2010
Holy @%?!
Is the Goncz comment on the Main Page legit? If so, are we gonna have to remove the gun's page, or.. well, lets just say should I be worried this might be one of those feared legal things that risk the integrity of the whole site? I know there was some controversial history over this weapon, as noted by the info on the gun's page. Anyway, what does all this mean? StanTheMan 17:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --Jcordell 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- - Indeed. I find this rather disconcerting. StanTheMan 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)