| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Covert Affairs: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I appreciate dramatic license as much as the next guy but the one overwhelming problem I have is the fact that the CIA's charter specifically forbids it from operating on U.S. soil. And while this show is somewhat entertaining the aplomb with which the Agency operates, armed, in the US is a little much. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | I appreciate dramatic license as much as the next guy but the one overwhelming problem I have is the fact that the CIA's charter specifically forbids it from operating on U.S. soil. And while this show is somewhat entertaining the aplomb with which the Agency operates, armed, in the US is a little much. --[[User:Charon68|Charon68]] 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Really? With all the BS this | Really? With all the BS this government pulls, would the CIA operating domestically really be that surprising? | ||
Revision as of 01:03, 15 September 2010
the unknown rifle is just an m4 with an elcan specter dr scope and other accessories.
Best Title Card Thing
OR
Either works, though I like the second one more. --Crazycrankle 04:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
No spoilers
Ominae, you have to read the rules regarding spoilers. Don't reveal too much about the story or plot. It is not necessary to identifying the gun. MoviePropMaster2008 19:25, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Realism
I appreciate dramatic license as much as the next guy but the one overwhelming problem I have is the fact that the CIA's charter specifically forbids it from operating on U.S. soil. And while this show is somewhat entertaining the aplomb with which the Agency operates, armed, in the US is a little much. --Charon68 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Really? With all the BS this government pulls, would the CIA operating domestically really be that surprising?