| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Lethal Weapon 3: Difference between revisions
Stephenf1234 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Stephenf1234 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Unidentified revolver== | ==Unidentified revolver== | ||
Can anyone identify the revolver used by the armoured car thief. [[User:Stephenf1234|Stephenf1234]] 14:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | Can anyone identify the revolver used by the armoured car thief. [[User:Stephenf1234|Stephenf1234]] 14:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
[[Image:LW3_-_Revolver.png|thumb|none|600px|The thief shoots the real armoured car driver in the leg with his revlover.]] | |||
== Armor Piercing 9mm rounds == | == Armor Piercing 9mm rounds == | ||
Revision as of 14:52, 7 September 2010
The cover also shows him with the extended slide release. Is this another mistake? I think MPM might have got his tags mixed up again. - Gunmaster45
tags
MT2008 fixed my tags. After the first upload I haven't touched the Beretta descriptions. Instead yielding to those with better eyes than I have... So please talk to MT2008 MoviePropMaster2008 23:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Unidentified revolver
Can anyone identify the revolver used by the armoured car thief. Stephenf1234 14:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Armor Piercing 9mm rounds
Reading this article got me to thinking again about Armor Piercing 9mm rounds. I'm guessing they're talking about the 7N31 or 7N21 rounds developed in Russia. You can read about it here http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg61-e.htm. Are there any military forces that use this type of ammunition, or is it still in the trial phase, or nobody just uses it? Also, even though yes, it is a 9mm, would it work in any 9mm gun or is there any type of special modifications needed to use the round? Thoughts? --Gunkatas 20:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
MAC-10
During the section discussing the MAC-11/9 the author seems to imply that because the weapon is chambered for 9mm it cant be the MAC-10. I am not contesting the author's identification as he gives multiple distingishing features, however his statement "It is even stated that the weapon is a 9mm" does not aid this identification as the MAC-10 has varients chambered for 9mm as well.
Picture 3 in the 92FS section
In the picture where Mel Gibson is holding a Beretta and his badge, that is most certainly not his normal Beretta. It's definitely a Inox model. Acora 07:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- No way. The end of the gun in that screencap is clearly not stainless. The daylight hitting the rest of the gun makes it look a bit brighter on that particular picture, but it's still his regular Beretta, and not a stainless Inox - It has the proper blued-steel 'black' look in alternate angles during that same sequence. StanTheMan 17:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- If you say so. I haven't seen this movie in a while, so I really don't remember it in that much detail. But I see what you're talking about, so it's quite possible that I'm just mistaken. Thanks for clearing that up. Acora 02:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Smith & Wesson 629?
Travis's Model 29 is stainless, shouldn't it be a 629 then? I assumed thats what a 629 is. Same goes for the 586 and 686.
- The 629 and 686 are the stainless versions of the blue-steel 29 and 586 respectively, yes. However, that is not the case here. More lighting tricks I'm afraid. Seems to be common on this film (or at least, on the the screenshots for this page). Both revolvers Travis uses are blue-steel guns, and not stainless. On the pictures of the 29, the light gives it a shine that makes it appear stainless. But the gun is certainly a regular Model 29 - It's more obviously shown as a 'black' blue-steel gun throughout the rest of the film..
The 586, however, is even more obviously a blue steel gun - It's not as silver as Capt Murphy's (Kahan's) Model 60, as shown in this pic -
StanTheMan 13:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)