| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Stiletto: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | ||
:Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | :Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the python thought the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question. | |||
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --[[User:Crazycrankle|Crazycrankle]] 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | :I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -[[User:Anonymous|Anonymous]] | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 14 August 2010
I don't know about that being a GP100, the cylinder appears to be unfluted. --funkychinaman 23:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
If you look closely there are flutes, the weapon was just in motion when I took the screencap. The main feature I used to identify was the ejector shroud which runs the full length of the barrel. -Anonymous
- Yes, but plenty of revolvers have full length ejector shrouds. It could just as easily be a SW 686 or a Python. Mind you, I'm just basing this on this one screenshot, I haven't actually seen the movie. --funkychinaman 15:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't have the ventilated rib of the python thought the 686 is possible. When I was looking at ejector shrouds I mostly compared it to models like the 19, 27/28, and 66. The model 60 had the same type of shroud but was too small to be the revolver in question.
Sure that's a Glock 19? Looks too long to me. --Crazycrankle 01:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure whether to go Glock 17 or 19 as the angle and lighting made it hard for me to tell. It could very well be a 17. -Anonymous