Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Children of Men: Difference between revisions
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Not really. If you pay attention to the movie, there is still a major government in place. It isn't like the British government is gone. They have an official military that seems well armed and well supplied and not a bunch of random group of people. It's just these specific places have intense civil unrest, which isn't a new thing for England. They've had this kind of shit before like in Belfast, Ireland. You noticed at the beginning of the movie, the main character was walking through a downtown area. Post apocalyptic implies the end of civilization and all we're left is Road Warrior kind of shit or zombies. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 03:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | :Not really. If you pay attention to the movie, there is still a major government in place. It isn't like the British government is gone. They have an official military that seems well armed and well supplied and not a bunch of random group of people. It's just these specific places have intense civil unrest, which isn't a new thing for England. They've had this kind of shit before like in Belfast, Ireland. You noticed at the beginning of the movie, the main character was walking through a downtown area. Post apocalyptic implies the end of civilization and all we're left is Road Warrior kind of shit or zombies. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 03:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Depends on your view of "Post-apocalyptic"... The movie makes it pretty clear that the rest of the world is falling apart, if not in downright anarchy. Though I'd agree this isn't fully "Post-apocalyptic" and more "Dystopian", it certainly has one foot in the apocalyptic genre. -The Canadian Gun Nut |
Revision as of 04:33, 17 June 2010
The PKM
I think the PKM is a L7A1.Oliveira 23:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
It is a PKM- note the front sight, the feed cover and the folded bipod- all of them correspond to the actual weapon and not the L7. As for why it is in British use, the weapon is only seen for roughly 2-3 seconds before the scene cuts, which isn't really long enough for most viewers to notice. Markit
Post Apocalyptic
Should this movie really be clumped into this category? 04:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
How is it not...they are pretty much living without law and its basically the end of mankind...unless this baby brings new hope of other babies. Spades of Columbia
- Not really. If you pay attention to the movie, there is still a major government in place. It isn't like the British government is gone. They have an official military that seems well armed and well supplied and not a bunch of random group of people. It's just these specific places have intense civil unrest, which isn't a new thing for England. They've had this kind of shit before like in Belfast, Ireland. You noticed at the beginning of the movie, the main character was walking through a downtown area. Post apocalyptic implies the end of civilization and all we're left is Road Warrior kind of shit or zombies. Excalibur01 03:08, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Depends on your view of "Post-apocalyptic"... The movie makes it pretty clear that the rest of the world is falling apart, if not in downright anarchy. Though I'd agree this isn't fully "Post-apocalyptic" and more "Dystopian", it certainly has one foot in the apocalyptic genre. -The Canadian Gun Nut