| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Call of Duty: Black Ops: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==Not being able to go past vietnam?== | ==Not being able to go past vietnam?== | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 9 June 2010
This game has a cold war look to it
Not being able to go past vietnam?
What is this crap I hear about treyarch LEGALLy not being able to go past vietnam in game? A comapny can do whatever the hell they want.
- I know, I was about to make this same post.-protoAuthor 20:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- From the article posted above (emphasis mine)
- "-Activision eventually convinced West and Zampella to stay with them by offering up a Memorandum of Understanding. In addition to extending their contracts through to October 2011, this legally-binding document gave West and Zampella some major financial bonuses as well as a couple other hefty promises. Chiefly, it gave the two "creative authority over the development of any games under the Modern Warfare brand (or any Call of Duty game set in the post-Vietnam era, the near future, or the distant future) including complete control over the Infinity Ward studio." In other words, Activision could not publish a Modern Warfare-branded game (or a Call of Duty game set any time later than Vietnam) without West and Zampella's full approval."
- West and Zampella were the two heads at IW who were fired in April. Now that they're no longer with the company, this might open the door for Treyarch's next CoD game to be Modern Warfare-esque, but there's a lot of litigation right now. The firing was way too late to affect BO, so they operated under the restrictions above. --funkychinaman 20:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Why did someone add possible weapons?
Someone added possible weapon prototypes like the G11 and the Pump 40mm? I am removing them tomarrow if no one says anything about why they should be left on. --FIVETWOSEVEN 02:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- This document (http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100601175649/callofduty/images/3/3d/Doc10.jpg) from the Black Ops viral site could be the reason --HashiriyaR32 03:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- There aren't possible anymore, it has been confirmed that they will be in the game, with other sites like Call of Duty wikia including them in their weapons list.
--SB2296 04:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, and the Call of Duty wiki is a beacon of truth... Spartan198 13:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The AUG and M202 have see in game trailer.Tanarmy
Still a little chance
Well, they are gonna include dedicated servers. So they apparently release modtools - So it seems like its gonna be possible change guns models, just like in CoD4. --88.208.103.46 09:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- no
M16 on magazine cover
It should be removed for now, seeing as there's currently no evidence to support its inclusion in the game. IMFDB chronicles weapons appearing in movies, television, and video games, not on magazine covers. Spartan198 14:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Game mags are a great source of weapons, thats where half the screenshots we see come from, game informer and the such.
- Screenshots are one thing, but there's no evidence that the image is actually from the game, it might just be an illustration the magazine drew up. I would heap the image of the guy sitting cross-legged with the two .45s in there as well. It wouldn't be the first time that weapons on cover art doesn't actually appear in the game itself. (Medal of Honor: European Assault comes to mind.) --funkychinaman 15:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Is it bothering you that much?
The game sure went into a lot of detail on the 1911 not to use it, and besides, what else would they have, they cant screw up history enough to throw in deegs and berettas.......oh wait, never mind, they can....
vietcong with a spas 12, damn at this rate my dream of marching into the reichstag waist firing an aa12 may come true