| Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:Titanic (1997): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
- [[User:Kenny99|Kenny99]] 03:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | - [[User:Kenny99|Kenny99]] 03:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Why would they use a Winchester 1897, there were no shotguns in the film? | :Why would they use a Winchester 1897, there were no shotguns in the film? | ||
::Sorry about that. Also, I believe that the M1911 is in the film and it could be possible that Cal purchased an M1911 prototype at a high price and put a nickel finish on it | ::Sorry about that. Also, I believe that the M1911 is in the film to show off Cal's wealth and it could be possible that Cal purchased an M1911 prototype at a high price and put a nickel finish on it. - [[User:Kenny99|Kenny99]] 22:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 1 June 2010
NAA Revolver
Fluting looks too large for an NAA
M1911
- They ought to have picked a Colt 1903 instead of a M1911-S&Wshoooter
- Yeah, I never thought we would ever have to deal with a movie where the M1911 was an anachronism. -Gunman69 17:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
what gun they should have put in to be accurate
They should have the Colt Model 1903 Pocket Hammerless or the Smith & Wesson Model 10 in Titanic or the Winchester Model 1897 to be accurate. - Kenny99 03:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Why would they use a Winchester 1897, there were no shotguns in the film?
- Sorry about that. Also, I believe that the M1911 is in the film to show off Cal's wealth and it could be possible that Cal purchased an M1911 prototype at a high price and put a nickel finish on it. - Kenny99 22:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)