Error creating thumbnail: File missing Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Art of War: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
wasn't this movie made before Walther made the PPS? | wasn't this movie made before Walther made the PPS? | ||
:I believe you're correct. From what I've read, the PPS was first produced in 2007. Chris Hun7er 6:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | :I believe you're correct. From what I've read, the PPS was first produced in 2007. Chris Hun7er 6:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
That cant be a Walther P22 in the movie...the first production of that pistol wasnt out tell 2001 and this movie was released in 2000 [[Spades of Columbia]] | |||
==Confusing Ending== | ==Confusing Ending== | ||
I don't get the ending, why are some of the Chinese assassins are still active, like the guy with the Beretta 93R??? | I don't get the ending, why are some of the Chinese assassins are still active, like the guy with the Beretta 93R??? |
Revision as of 17:23, 14 May 2010
Need ID of this suppressed pistol possibly a Makarov or Beretta?
A female assassin is seen with a suppressed pistol when confronting Julia Fang (Marie Matiko) in the hospital.
- Could it be a Walther PPK .380? Chris_Hun7er 6:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
wasn't this movie made before Walther made the PPS?
- I believe you're correct. From what I've read, the PPS was first produced in 2007. Chris Hun7er 6:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
That cant be a Walther P22 in the movie...the first production of that pistol wasnt out tell 2001 and this movie was released in 2000 Spades of Columbia
Confusing Ending
I don't get the ending, why are some of the Chinese assassins are still active, like the guy with the Beretta 93R???